XB-IMG-3253
Xenbase Image ID: 3253
|
Figure 6. XSmad2 and XSmad4 did not rescue the phenotype induced by XSUMO-1-MO. A-D: XSUMO-1-MO inhibited ectopic axis formation induced by XSmad2. Injection of XSmad2 into the ventral marginal zone caused ectopic axis formation while control MO did not affect the secondary axis formation induced by XSmad2 (A and B, arrow). XSUMO-1-MO inhibited axis formation induced by XSmad2 (C). Wild-type embryos (D). E: Axis duplication frequency by injection of XSmad2 and by coinjection of XSmad2 and control MO or XSUMO-1-MO. Over 20 ng XSUMO-1-MO strongly inhibited ectopic axis formation induced by 1,000 pg XSmad2. F: Frequency of axis elongation error by XSUMO-1-MO and by coinjection with XSUMO-1-MO, XSmad2, and XSmad4. XSUMO-1-MO was coinjected with increasing amounts of XSmad2 mRNA (0, 250, 500, and 1,000 pg) or XSmad2 and XSmad4 mRNA (500 pg each). C.MO, control MO. Severe defects are shown in black, medium defects in gray, and mild defects in white. G-L: XSmad2 did not rescue inhibition of Xbra expression by XSUMO-1-MO. Embryos were coinjected with indicated RNA or MO and lacZ (lineage tracer) into the dorsal marginal zone at the 8-cell stage. Then, expression of Xbra was investigated by WISH. 500 or 1,000 pg XSmad2 mRNA and 40 ng XSUMO-1-MO were injected (H-J, respectively). XSUMO-1-MO (40 ng) was coinjected with 500 or 1,000 pg XSmad2 mRNA (K and L, respectively). No-inj., Injected nothing (G). Red and blue indicate the injected area and Xbra-expressing area, respectively. Image published in: Yukita A et al. (2007) Copyright © 2007. Image reproduced with permission of the Publisher, John Wiley & Sons.
Image source: Published Larger Image Printer Friendly View |