Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.
XB-IMG-82900

Xenbase Image ID: 82900


Fig. 6. Effects of the unilateral injection of Mo-X-DG (8 ng) at stage 4 cells on the apoptosis and cell proliferation of the eye. (A�F) Eye sections of stage 32 embryos. Pe: pigmented epithelium. Detection of GFP, which was used as tracer, is shown in panels B, D, F. Panels A�D show BrdU immunodetection (red nuclei) in the control side (A, C) and Mo-injected side (Mo, B, D) of the embryo. Hoechst counterstaining labels all nuclei in panels C, D. Panels E and F show TUNEL detection of apoptotic nuclei (brown staining) in control (E) and Mo-X-DG-injected side (F), respectively. Sections of Mo-X-DG injected eyes always displayed a significantly higher number of TUNEL-positive cells than sections of uninjected, contralateral eyes. Eyes injected with control-Mo had the same number of TUNEL-positive cells than uninjected eyes (not shown). The numbers of BrdU-positive nuclei in control and Mo-X-DGinjected (Mo) retinas, expressed as percent over the total number of cells analyzed (control: n = 550, Mo: n = 514), are compared in panel G. The average number of TUNEL-positive cells per eye section (n = 120 sections) in control and Mo-X-DG-injected retinas is compared in panel H. Bars indicate SE in panel G and SEM in panel H. Differences between control and Mo are significant in panel G (t test: P = 0.008904109) and in panel H (t test: P = 8.997E�06).

Image published in: Lunardi A et al. (2006)

Copyright © 2006. Image reproduced with permission of the Publisher, Elsevier B. V.

Larger Image
Printer Friendly View

Return to previous page