Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.

Summary Expression Gene Literature (214) GO Terms (14) Nucleotides (67) Proteins (34) Interactants (407) Wiki
XB-GENEPAGE-484542

Gene Symbol: grem1

Gene Name: gremlin 1, DAN family BMP antagonist

Anatomy terms
anterior autopod blastema branchial arch branchial crest cranial neural crest distal mesenchyme epithelium eye fin head hindlimb bud hyoid arch hyoid crest intersomitic epithelium intersomitic region limb bud ... [+]
Anatomy stages
NF stage 25 to NF stage 55
RNA-Seq and EST Transcriptome profiles tropicalis laevis.L laevis.S
Gurdon EST 1012095824 1012797212
Unigene EST Profile Str.31102 Xl.318
RNA-Seq stage profile Data from Owens et al. 2016 Data from Session et al. 2016 Data from Session et al. 2016
GEO data grem1.L grem1.S
Microarray Data Data from Yanai et al. 2011 Data from Yanai et al. 2011 Data from Yanai et al. 2011
Stage and Tissue Profiles
                    Source: Owens et al. 2016 (tropicalis)
                    Source: Session et al. 2016 (laevis)
          Source: Session et al. 2016 (laevis)
Experimental Regulation (via RNA-seq)


                                                            Source: Ding et al. 2017 (laevis)
Summary ImagesSort by:
Expression Image
NF stage 32
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 35 and 36 to NF stage 40
Good quality Poor quality
    
Community Submitted ImagesSort by:
Expression Image
NF stage 35 and 36 to NF stage 40
Good quality Poor quality
     
Literature ImagesSort by:
Expression Image
NF stage 32
Ori, et al. 2006
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 32
Pearl, et al. 2008
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 33 and 34
Cho, et al. 2011
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 35 and 36
Lee, et al. 2010
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 31 to NF stage 35 and 36
Cho, et al. 2011
Good quality Poor quality
6 more [+]