Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.

Summary Expression Phenotypes Gene Literature (2) GO Terms (10) Nucleotides (289) Proteins (46) Interactants (145) Wiki
XB-GENEPAGE-971107

Gene Symbol: ube2c

Gene Name: ubiquitin conjugating enzyme E2 C

Anatomy terms
Keller explant bone tissue brain central nervous system ectoderm egg endomesoderm eye forebrain head intermediate mesoderm midbrain neural plate neuroectoderm otic vesicle pharyngeal region testis upper blastopore lip ... [+]
Anatomy stages
unfertilized egg stage to NF stage 35 and 36
RNA-Seq and EST Transcriptome profiles tropicalis laevis.L laevis.S
Gurdon EST 1012070562 1012767472
Unigene EST Profile Str.65269 Xl.4422 Xl.27784
RNA-Seq stage profile Data from Owens et al. 2016 Data from Session et al. 2016 Data from Session et al. 2016
GEO data ube2c.L ube2c.S
Microarray Data Data from Yanai et al. 2011 Data from Yanai et al. 2011 Data from Yanai et al. 2011
Stage and Tissue Profiles
                    Source: Owens et al. 2016 (tropicalis)
                    Source: Session et al. 2016 (laevis)
          Source: Session et al. 2016 (laevis)
Experimental Regulation (via RNA-seq)


                                                            Source: Ding et al. 2017 (laevis)
Summary ImagesSort by:
Expression Image
NF stage 15 to NF stage 20
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 26 to NF stage 32
Good quality Poor quality
    
Community Submitted ImagesSort by:
Expression Image
NF stage 15 to NF stage 20
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 29 and 30
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 29 and 30
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 29 and 30
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 26 to NF stage 32
Good quality Poor quality
 
      
Literature ImagesSort by:
Expression Image
NF stage 15 to NF stage 32
Zhang, et al. 2017
Good quality Poor quality