Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.
Search Criteria
Gene/CloneSpeciesStageAnatomy ItemExperimenter
fgf9xenopus notochord [+] 

Too many results?Too few results?

Experiment details for fgf9

Lin G and Slack JM (2008) Assay

Requirement for Wnt and FGF signaling in Xenopus tadpole tail regeneration.

Gene Clone Species Stages Anatomy
fgf9.S laevis NF stage 48 to NF stage 50 notochord

Display additional annotations [+]
  Fig. 1. Gene expression profiles during Xenopus tadpole tail regeneration. (A–X) In situ hybridization detection of fgf8 (A–D), fgf9 (E–H), fgf10 (I–L), fgf20 (M–P), wnt3a (Q–T) and wnt5a (U–X) in control tadpoles (A, E, I, M, Q, U; stage 42–43 tadpoles) and in tail regenerates 1–3 days post amputation (1 dpa: B, F, J, N, R, V; 2 dpa: C, G, K, O, S, W; 3 dpa: D, H, L, P, T, X; stage 48+ tadpoles). Arrowheads indicate amputation levels. Scale bars: 200 μm. dpa: day post amputation. (Y) RT-PCR detection of FGF, BMP and Wnt signalling components in tadpole tail immediately after amputation (D0) and 1–4 days post amputation (D1–D4). 1 mm of stump tissue was used to prepare RNA. ODC (ornithine decarboxylase) is used as loading control. (Z) Relative expression levels of genes detected by RT-PCR, based on the density of the PCR bands in (Y). The band density on D0 is the reference standard (1 arbitrary unit) in each gene group. Note that an increased in situ signal may correspond to a limited overall change in the larger tissue region used for RNA analysis.