XB-ART-19769J Cell Biol May 1, 1995; 129 (4): 1093-101.
Distribution of alpha-dystroglycan during embryonic nerve-muscle synaptogenesis.
The distribution of alpha-dystroglycan (alpha DG) relative to acetylcholine receptors (AChRs) and neural agrin was examined by immunofluorescent staining with mAb IIH6 in cultures of nerve and muscle cells derived from Xenopus embryos. In Western blots probed with mAb IIH6, alpha DG was evident in membrane extracts of Xenopus muscle but not brain. alpha DG immunofluorescence was present at virtually all synaptic clusters of AChRs and neural agrin. Even microclusters of AChRs and agrin at synapses no older than 1-2 h (the earliest examined) had alpha DG associated with them. alpha DG was also colocalized at the submicrometer level with AChRs at nonsynaptic clusters that have little or no agrin. The number of large (> 4 microns) nonsynaptic clusters of alpha DG, like the number of large nonsynaptic clusters of AChRs, was much lower on innervated than on noninnervated cells. When mAb IIH6 was included in the culture medium, the large nonsynaptic clusters appeared fragmented and less compact, but the accumulation of agrin and AChRs along nerve-muscle contacts was not prevented. It is concluded that during nerve-muscle synaptogenesis, alpha DG undergoes the same nerve-induced changes in distribution as AChRs. We propose a diffusion trap model in which the alpha DG-transmembrane complex participates in the anchoring and recruitment of AChRs and alpha DG during the formation of synaptic as well as nonsynaptic AChR clusters.
PubMed ID: 7744958
PMC ID: PMC2120479
Article link: J Cell Biol
Genes referenced: dag1 ighx
Antibodies: Agrn Ab1 Dag1 Ab1
Article Images: [+] show captions
|Figure 1. Western blot analysis of rabbit and frog a- and BDG. Nitrocellulose transfers of solubilized rabbit (R) or Xenopus (F) muscle heavy microsomes that had been separated by SDSPAGE under reducing conditions were incubated together with mAb HH6 (11116) or rabbit antisera to I3(3 (FP-B and FP-D). mAb HH6 recognizes a glycosylated region of c~DG (Ervasti and Campbell, 1993). The polyclonal antisera are to fusion proteins of c¢- and/3DG (Ibraghimov- Beskrovnaya et al., 1992). Anti-FP-B recognizes a region overlapping the cleavage point between ct- and/ffDG, and anti-FP-D is specific for c~DG. All three reagents recognize a band at 156 kD in rabbit muscle, but only mAb HH6 binds to Xenopus c~DG. In addition, in rabbit muscle anti-FP-B recognizes a doublet at 43 kD corresponding to /3DG (Ibraghimov-Beskrovnaya et al., 1992), which is somewhat larger in Xenopus muscle (51-54 kD). Molecular mass markers (in kilodaltons) are shown to the left.|
|Figure 2. ~xDG immunofluorescence at synaptic and nonsynaptic clusters of AChRs. (At) AChR fluorescence along a neurite-muscle contact. (Ae) Corresponding ~xDG immunofluorescence, located at the synaptic clusters of AChRs. (B~) Large clusters of AChRs on noninnervated muscle cells. (B2) Corresponding aDG immunofluorescence, located at the same sites as the nonsynaptic AChR clusters. (Q) AChR fluorescence, (C2) otDG immunofluorescence, prominent near the end of a muscle cell where AChR fluorescence is sparse. The arrow in Ct and C2 points to the same microcluster. Bar, 10 #m.|
|Figure 3. Precision of colocalization and specificity of otDG immunofluorescence. (A~) Intricate pattern of AChR distribution within a large nonsynaptic AChR cluster. (Az) aDG immunofluorescence has an almost identical pattern. The arrowhead (also in A~) points to microclusters of colocalized AChRs and t~DG. Arrows point to portions of the immunofluorescence that extend beyond the limits of the AChR cluster. (B~) Another large nonsynaptic cluster of AChRs. (Be) Corresponding nonspecific immunofluorescence obtained by substituting a control IgM (TEPC 183) for mAb IIH6. Bar, 5 #m.|
|Figure 4. Comparison of agrin and otDG immunofluorescence. (AI) Phase-contrast micrograph of a neurite (N) and muscle cells (M). (A2) Agrin immunofluorescence at sites of neurite-muscle contact (arrows) and along the path of neurite-substrate contact (arrowhead). (A3) c~DG immunofluorescence is colocalized with, but more extensive than, the agrin along the neurite-muscle contact (arrows). It is also seen on the edge of another muscle cell (arrowhead) where there was no neurite or agrin, o~DG immunofluorescence is not associated with the agrin that was deposited along the path of neurite-substrate contact. This was also the case when the neurites were eliminated before immunofluorescent staining, as shown in BI (phase-contrast), B2 (agrin), and B3 (aDG). Bar, 10 #m.|
|Pigure 6. Incidence of czDG immunofluorescence at young synaptic clusters of AChRs (open columns) and agrin (stippled columns). The data for AChR clusters are from three 7-8-h cocultures. Within those cultures, some of the identified contacts were known to be <120 min (see Fig. 5). The data for agrin clusters are from two 8-h cocultures; some of the contacts within these cultures were <70 rain. The numbers above the columns indicate how many clusters were counted, n, AChR clusters; @, agrin clusters.|
|Figure 8. Effect of mAb HH6 and other IgM mAbs on nonsynaptic AChR clusters. On the left are the AChR clusters. On the right is shown the corresponding immunofluorescence for the mAb that was included in the culture medium: 1:40 mAb II1-16 (A and B), 1:40 mAb HNK-1 (C), 1:40 mAb HepSS-1 (D), and 1:10 mAb HepSS-1 (E). Bar, 10/~m.|
References [+] :
Anderson, Effects of innervation on the distribution of acetylcholine receptors on cultured muscle cells. 1977, Pubmed, Xenbase