XB-ART-2874J Cell Biol. October 25, 2004; 167 (2): 339-49.
Distinct molecular forms of beta-catenin are targeted to adhesive or transcriptional complexes.
Beta-catenin plays essential roles in both cell-cell adhesion and Wnt signal transduction, but what precisely controls beta-catenin targeting to cadherin adhesive complexes, or T-cell factor (TCF)-transcriptional complexes is less well understood. We show that during Wnt signaling, a form of beta-catenin is generated that binds TCF but not the cadherin cytoplasmic domain. The Wnt-stimulated, TCF-selective form is monomeric and is regulated by the COOH terminus of beta-catenin, which selectively competes cadherin binding through an intramolecular fold-back mechanism. Phosphorylation of the cadherin reverses the TCF binding selectivity, suggesting another potential layer of regulation. In contrast, the main cadherin-binding form of beta-catenin is a beta-catenin-alpha-catenin dimer, indicating that there is a distinct molecular form of beta-catenin that can interact with both the cadherin and alpha-catenin. We propose that participation of beta-catenin in adhesion or Wnt signaling is dictated by the regulation of distinct molecular forms of beta-catenin with different binding properties, rather than simple competition between cadherins and TCFs for a single constitutive form. This model explains how cells can control whether beta-catenin is used independently in cell adhesion and nuclear signaling, or competitively so that the two processes are coordinated and interrelated.
PubMed ID: 15492040
PMC ID: PMC2172558
Article link: J Cell Biol.
Grant support: R37 GM374432 NIGMS NIH HHS , E.0865 Telethon, R37 GM374432 NIGMS NIH HHS
Genes referenced: cad cald1 cat.1 cdh1 csnk1a1 csnk2b ctnnbip1 myc s100a1 tbx2 wnt1 wnt3a
Article Images: [+] show captions
|Figure 1. Wnt signaling generates a form of β-catenin that binds preferentially to TCF-GST compared with cadherin-GST. (A) Detergent-free supernatants were prepared from C57MG and Rat1 cells stably expressing Wnt-1, and HEK293T cells incubated overnight ± Wnt3a-conditioned media (CM). Samples were affinity precipitated using equimolar amounts of cad-GST or TCF-GST fusion proteins. GST gives no binding and is not depicted. A fivefold excess of parental cell lysates was required to detect a signal in lanes 5 and 6. Cytosolic β-catenin from C57MG parentals binds cad-GST and TCF-GST proteins equivalently, like the Rat1 and HEK293 controls (not depicted). The blot was probed with a pAb to β-catenin. (B) Preferential binding of β-catenin to TCF-GST over cadherin-GST is not observed with purified, recombinant β-catenin. Recombinant, purified Xenopus β-catenin (Suh and Gumbiner, 2003) and β-catenin from a C57MG/Wnt cytosolic fraction were affinity precipitated with cad-GST and TCF-GST proteins, and blotted with an antibody to β-catenin.|
|Figure 2. The COOH terminus of β-catenin restricts binding to cadherin. COOH terminus of β-catenin competes cadherin, but not TCF binding. (A) Schematic shows where α-catenin, cadherin, and TCF interact with β-catenin (Huber et al., 1997; Graham et al., 2000; Pokutta and Weis, 2000; Huber and Weis, 2001). (B) The COOH terminus of β-catenin binds the arm repeat region of β-catenin in yeast-two hybrid (Cox et al., 1999) and recombinant protein assays (Piedra et al., 2001). (C) COOH-terminal region of β-catenin competes β-catenin binding to cad-GST, but not to TCF-GST fusion protein. Recombinant β-catenin (1.5 μg) purified from baculovirus (Suh and Gumbiner, 2003) was incubated with cadherin-GST (2 μg) or TCF-GST (2.4 μg) coupled agarose beads in the presence of increasing amounts of β-catenin COOH-terminal peptide (amino acids 695–781). Affinity precipitates were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting with an antibody to β-catenin. (D) Cadherin-GST preferentially depletes the fraction of β-catenin recognized by a COOH-terminal mAb (M5.2). A cytosolic fraction from Rat1/Wnt cells was affinity precipitated (×3) with cadherin-GST (lanes 1–3). The cad-GST nonbinding pool (lanes 4 and 5) was divided in two and immunoprecipitated with either an mAb that recognizes a COOH-terminal β-catenin epitope (βC-mAb (M5.2), lane 4) or an NH2-terminal β-catenin epitope (βN-mAb (1.1), lane 5). As a control, these antibodies were used to immunoprecipitate β-catenin from the total starting material (not previously depleted with cad-GST; lanes 6 and 7).|
|Figure 3. Differential binding activity of recombinant β-catenin as revealed by deletion analysis. (A) Schematic representation of β-catenin constructs. WT-myc-Xenopus β-catenin and GSK3β mutant (S/T>A residues 33, 37, 41, and 45) β-catenin were described previously by Guger and Gumbiner (2000). WT-human β-catenin-flag, ΔC695-flag and ΔN89-flag constructs were described in Kolligs et al. (1999). The myc-tagged, Xenopus β-catenin construct encoding only the arm repeat region of β-catenin was described previously (Funayama et al., 1995). (B) Recombinant β-catenin binding to cad-GST versus TCF-GST proteins. HEK293T cells were transfected with decreasing amounts of β-catenin plasmid and incubated in the presence (+) of Wnt3a conditioned media (CM). Cytosolic fractions were affinity precipitated and immunoblotted with anti-myc, -flag, or β-catenin antibodies. Input amounts of wild-type β-catenin, −ΔC695, and arm 12 constructs were the same in accordance with similar expression levels (not depicted).|
|Figure 4. Larger molecular size, α-catenin–containing fractions of β-catenin show preferential binding to cad-GST. (A) A cytosolic fraction from stage 12 Xenopus embryos was applied to a Sephacryl 300 gel filtration column, and fractions 28–39 were divided in two: one half of each sample was TCA-precipitated (top blot), whereas the other half was precipitated with cad-GST (middle blot). The top blot was reprobed with an antibody to α-catenin and is shown below. (B) Same as A except that starting material is an S100 fraction from Rat1/Wnt cells. Arrows refer to elution volumes of standard proteins with known molecular weight: (a) catalase (Mr = 232,000); (b) BSA (Mr = 66,000), purified mouse IgG (150 kD) eluted in fractions 31–33.|
|Figure 5. The α-catenin–free, monomeric form of β-catenin exhibits preferential binding to TCF compared with cadherin in Wnt cells. (A) Rat1 cells were labeled to steady-state with [35S]methionine/cysteine, and a cytosolic fraction was prepared from each condition (−Wnt, +Wnt, 10 mM LiCl, 12 h) and immunoprecipitated with the designated antibodies or affinity precipitated with GST proteins. Note that immunoprecipitation of endogenous E-cadherin (from the 100,000 g membrane pellet, lanes 5, 10, and 16) and TCF (lane 11) are also shown. Non-specific bands were not seen with a GST control (not depicted). Overnight incubation with LiCl (10 mM) allows the α-catenin–free pool of β-catenin to bind cad-GST, TCF-GST, and the endogenous E-cadherin (lanes 14–16), equivalently. (B). COOH-terminal epitopes of β-catenin are masked in the α-catenin–free fraction of β-catenin. Equivalent amounts of an S100 fraction from [35S]methionine/cysteine steady-state–labeled Rat1+Wnt cells were immunoprecipitated with the following antibodies: anti–β-catenin NH2-terminal mAb (1.1.1; lane 1), anti–β-catenin COOH-terminal mAb (M5.2; lane 2), anti–α-catenin mAb (lane 4), and a nonimmune control (lane 3). (Lanes 5–7) PDZ protein, mLin7, preferentially binds to β-catenin–α-catenin dimer: metabolically labeled Rat1+Wnt lysates were affinity precipitated with (lane 5) anti–β-catenin pAb, (lane 6) control GST, and (lane 7) mLin7-GST.|
|Figure 6. β-Catenin binding selectivity as a function of APC mutant status or GSK inhibition by LiCl. (A) A cytosolic fraction was prepared from colon carcinoma cell lines containing wild-type (HCT116) or mutant (HT29 and DLD1) forms of APC. (B) Selective binding activity of β-catenin in response to short-term, but not long-term treatment with LiCl. HEK293T cells were treated with 10 mM LiCl for 3, 6, and 15 h, after which cytosolic fractions were affinity precipitated as described above.|
|Figure 7. β-Catenin not phosphorylated at NH2-terminal GSK-3β sites binds to cadherin. (A) Cytosolic fraction from HEK293 cells ± Wnt3a was affinity precipitated with cad-GST and TCF-GST, and blotted with pAbs to β-catenin (top blot) or NH2-terminal unphosphorylated–β-catenin (amino acids 27–37, bottom blot). (B) NH2-terminal unphospho–β-catenin localizes to sites of cell–cell contact in Wnt-expressing cells. Rat1 fibroblasts ± Wnt were fixed and processed for immunofluorescence using standard protocols. Images were captured with the Axioplan 2 microscope and AxioVision2.0 software (Carl Zeiss MicroImaging, Inc.). Note that membrane staining of the unphospho-β-catenin (Cy3) is more readily detected under methanol, rather than PFA fixation conditions, perhaps accounting for the apparent differences observed between our study and Staal et al. (2002).|
|Figure 8. Cadherin phosphorylation reverses β-catenin binding selectivity during Wnt signaling. (A) Phosphorylation of cad-GST increases β-catenin binding to cadherin compared with TCF. A cytosolic fraction from L cells transfected with Wnt3a were incubated with equimolar amounts of cad-GST, TCF-GST, and CK2-P-cad-GST-glutathione–coupled beads for 1 h at 4°C (see Fig. S1 for characterization of GST fusion proteins). The resulting anti–β-catenin and anti-GST immunoblots are shown. (B) Fraction of β-catenin that binds cadherin is a subset of fraction of β-catenin that binds TCF. Cytosolic fraction of Wnt cells was sequentially affinity precipitated with cad-GST (lanes 1–3) or TCF-GST (lanes 6–8) proteins. After cad-GST depletion (lanes 1–3), half of the cad-GST non-binding fraction (NB/2) was precipitated with TCF-GST (lane 4); the other half was precipitated with TCA to show amount remaining (lane 5, far right). After TCF-GST depletion (lanes 6–8), half of the TCF-GST non-binding fraction (NB/2, lane 9) was precipitated with cad-GST, whereas the other half was precipitated with TCA to show amount remaining (lane 10, far right). Lanes 5 and 10 reveal a fraction of β-catenin that binds neither TCF nor cadherin. This fraction is likely due to β-catenin already complexed with partners such as ICAT (Gottardi and Gumbiner, 2004). (C) Phosphorylated cadherin-GST and TCF-GST bind the same pool of β-catenin in Wnt-activated cells. Cytosolic fraction was precipitated with cad-GST (top blot), TCF-GST (bottom left) or P-cadherin-GST (bottom right) fusion proteins. After cad-GST depletion (lanes 2–4 and 7–9), there is a fraction of β-catenin that binds TCF-GST (lane 5) and P-cadherin-GST (lane 10). Note that after TCF-GST depletion (lanes 13–15), there is no β-catenin remaining to bind P-cadherin-GST (lane 16). After P-cadherin-GST depletion (lanes 18–20), there is no β-catenin remaining to bind TCF-GST (lane 21). Reciprocal depletions suggest that P-cadherin-GST and TCF-GST bind the same form of β-catenin.|
|Figure 9. Multiple forms of β-catenin exist in cells. NH2-terminal phospho-β-catenin is well characterized and generated by the APC-Axin-GSK3β-CK1 complex (dashed line). Closed form of β-catenin is generated by Wnt signaling, perhaps through some of the same machinery (gray arrow). β-Catenin–α-catenin dimer is active for adhesion but not signaling. Open form binds both cadherin and TCF, and could explain how cadherin antagonizes β-catenin signaling in overexpression systems. The inactive form cannot participate in adhesion or signaling.|