Dutertre S , Ulens C , Büttner R , Fish A , van Elk R , Kendel Y , Hopping G , Alewood PF , Schroeder C , Nicke A , Smit AB , Sixma TK , Lewis RJ .

	Figure 1. Isolation and characterization of α-conotoxin TxIA. (A) Ls-AChBP screening for α-conotoxins in venoms of 30 species of Australian cone snails. (B) LC-MS profile of the crude venom of C. textile. TxIA was isolated as a minor component shown in the extracted ions for this peptide. Inset shows a shell of C. textile. (C) Saturation binding experiments revealed a competitive interaction of TxIA with Ls-AChBP. When an ∼IC50 concentration of TxIA was added, the Kd of 125I-Bgt shifted from 3.5 to 40 nM, whereas the Bmax remained unaffected. (D) Displacement of 125I-Bgt from Ls-AChBP by α-conotoxins TxIA, PnIA and analogs (plot with all fixed to 100% in curve fit). Data in (A), (C) and (D) represent the mean±s.e.m. of duplicate data obtained in three separate experiments.
	Figure 2. Antagonist activity of α-conotoxin TxIA and analogs at oocyte-expressed rat α3β2 (A) and α7 (B) nAChRs. Oocytes were clamped at −70 mV and 100 μM ACh (α3β2) or nicotine (α7) were applied for 2 s in 4 min intervals. Toxins were applied for 3 min. Data are represented as the mean±s.e.m. of at least four oocytes.
	Figure 3. (A) Crystal structure of Ac-AChBP in complex with TxIA(A10L). The model is shown along the five-fold symmetry axis. α-Conotoxins are shown in red. (B) Superposition of the subunit interface from Ac-AChBP in complex with TxIA(A10L) and PnIA(A10L D14K). The principal face of the binding site is shown in shades of yellow, the complementary face in shades of blue. The superposition illustrates the different orientation of the conotoxin backbone in the binding pocket. PnIA(A10L D14K) is shown in blue, TxIA(A10L) in red. (C) Comparison of the different backbone orientations observed in co-crystal structures of Ac-AChBP with different α-conotoxins. TxIA(A10L), shown in red, is tilted by a 20° rotation around Pro7 with respect to PnIA(A10L D14K), shown in blue. The backbone orientation of α-conotoxin ImI, shown in magenta, is very similar to PnIA(A10L D14K) even though it is much shorter and forms a different network of interactions. Lines represent disulfide bridges. Detailed view of the molecular interactions that results in the different backbone orientations of (D) TxIA, (E) PhIA(A10L D14K) and (F) ImI within the binding site. The principal face of the binding site is shown in yellow, the complementary face in blue. The conotoxins are colored according to the color scheme in (C). Dashed lines represent hydrogen bonds or electrostatic interactions.
	Figure 4. Surface representation of the three α-conotoxins that have been co-crystallized with Ac-AChBP. The surface of the α-conotoxin facing the principal binding site is shown in (A), the complementary binding site in (B). Ac-AChBP is shown in a transparent view for clarity. The principal subunit (+) of Ac-AChBP is shown in yellow, the complementary subunit (−) in blue.
	Figure 5. Functional contribution of the electrostatic interaction between Arg5-TxIA and an Asp residue of the principal binding subunit of Ac-AChBP and different nAChR subtypes. (A) Ki estimates from binding assays on wild-type Ac-AChBP, D195A and D195N mutants demonstrating the loss of affinity for Arg5-containing conotoxins. (B) Surface plasmon resonance experiments on wild-type Ac-AChBP (red traces) and D195A mutant (blue traces) for TxIA analogs and PnIA(A10L D14K). (C) Effect of the Asp-mutations on the potency of TxIA and analogs to inhibit α7 and α3β2 nAChR current. (D, E) Homology models for the interaction of TxIA(A10L) with α3β2 and α7 nAChRs. The α3β2 model also shows the Arg–Asp interaction observed in the co-crystal structure.

Bourne, Crystal structure of a Cbtx-AChBP complex reveals essential interactions between snake alpha-neurotoxins and nicotinic receptors. 2005, Pubmed

Bourne, Crystal structure of a Cbtx-AChBP complex reveals essential interactions between snake alpha-neurotoxins and nicotinic receptors. 2005, Pubmed
Celie, Crystal structure of nicotinic acetylcholine receptor homolog AChBP in complex with an alpha-conotoxin PnIA variant. 2005, Pubmed , Xenbase
Celie, Crystal structure of acetylcholine-binding protein from Bulinus truncatus reveals the conserved structural scaffold and sites of variation in nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. 2005, Pubmed
Celie, Nicotine and carbamylcholine binding to nicotinic acetylcholine receptors as studied in AChBP crystal structures. 2004, Pubmed
Clark, The synthesis, structural characterization, and receptor specificity of the alpha-conotoxin Vc1.1. 2006, Pubmed , Xenbase
Cohen, Towards complete validated models in the next generation of ARP/wARP. 2004, Pubmed
Collaborative Computational Project, Number 4, The CCP4 suite: programs for protein crystallography. 1994, Pubmed
Davis, MOLPROBITY: structure validation and all-atom contact analysis for nucleic acids and their complexes. 2004, Pubmed
Dutertre, Beta2 subunit contribution to 4/7 alpha-conotoxin binding to the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. 2005, Pubmed , Xenbase
Emsley, Coot: model-building tools for molecular graphics. 2004, Pubmed
Everhart, Determinants of potency on alpha-conotoxin MII, a peptide antagonist of neuronal nicotinic receptors. 2004, Pubmed , Xenbase
Hansen, Structural and ligand recognition characteristics of an acetylcholine-binding protein from Aplysia californica. 2004, Pubmed
Hansen, Structures of Aplysia AChBP complexes with nicotinic agonists and antagonists reveal distinctive binding interfaces and conformations. 2005, Pubmed
Hogg, Single amino acid substitutions in alpha-conotoxin PnIA shift selectivity for subtypes of the mammalian neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. 1999, Pubmed
Hooft, Errors in protein structures. 1996, Pubmed
Lewis, Therapeutic potential of venom peptides. 2003, Pubmed
Lewis, Ion channel toxins and therapeutics: from cone snail venoms to ciguatera. 2000, Pubmed
Loughnan, Physico-chemical characterization and synthesis of neuronally active alpha-conotoxins. 2004, Pubmed
Luo, Single-residue alteration in alpha-conotoxin PnIA switches its nAChR subtype selectivity. 1999, Pubmed , Xenbase
McCoy, Likelihood-enhanced fast translation functions. 2005, Pubmed
McIntosh, Conus peptides targeted to specific nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subtypes. 1999, Pubmed
Murshudov, Refinement of macromolecular structures by the maximum-likelihood method. 1997, Pubmed
Olivera, Diversity of Conus neuropeptides. 1990, Pubmed
Quiram, Pairwise interactions between neuronal alpha7 acetylcholine receptors and alpha-conotoxin ImI. 1999, Pubmed
Rapier, Nicotinic modulation of [3H]dopamine release from striatal synaptosomes: pharmacological characterisation. 1990, Pubmed
Satkunanathan, Alpha-conotoxin Vc1.1 alleviates neuropathic pain and accelerates functional recovery of injured neurones. 2005, Pubmed
Schnölzer, In situ neutralization in Boc-chemistry solid phase peptide synthesis. Rapid, high yield assembly of difficult sequences. 1992, Pubmed
Smit, A glia-derived acetylcholine-binding protein that modulates synaptic transmission. 2001, Pubmed
Talley, Alpha-conotoxin OmIA is a potent ligand for the acetylcholine-binding protein as well as alpha3beta2 and alpha7 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. 2006, Pubmed , Xenbase
Ulens, Structural determinants of selective alpha-conotoxin binding to a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor homolog AChBP. 2006, Pubmed
Vincler, Molecular mechanism for analgesia involving specific antagonism of alpha9alpha10 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. 2006, Pubmed
Winn, Use of TLS parameters to model anisotropic displacements in macromolecular refinement. 2001, Pubmed