Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.
Mol Biol Cell. August 1, 2009; 20 (15): 3491-502.

Molecular distinctions between Aurora A and B: a single residue change transforms Aurora A into correctly localized and functional Aurora B.

Hans F , Skoufias DA , Dimitrov S , Margolis RL .

Aurora A and Aurora B, paralogue mitotic kinases, share highly similar primary sequence. Both are important to mitotic progression, but their localizations and functions are distinct. We have combined shRNA suppression with overexpression of Aurora mutants to address the cause of the distinction between Aurora A and Aurora B. Aurora A residue glycine 198 (G198), mutated to asparagine to mimic the aligned asparagine 142 (N142) of Aurora B, causes Aurora A to bind the Aurora B binding partner INCENP but not the Aurora A binding partner TPX2. The mutant Aurora A rescues Aurora B mitotic function. We conclude that binding to INCENP is alone critical to the distinct function of Aurora B. Although G198 of Aurora A is required for TPX2 binding, N142G Aurora B retains INCENP binding and Aurora B function. Thus, although a single residue change transforms Aurora A, the reciprocal mutation of Aurora B does not create Aurora A function. An Aurora A-Delta120 N-terminal truncation construct reinforces Aurora A similarity to Aurora B, because it does not associate with centrosomes but instead associates with kinetochores.

PubMed ID: 19494039
PMC ID: PMC2719567
Article link: Mol Biol Cell.
Grant support: R01 GM-068107 NIGMS NIH HHS

Genes referenced: aurka aurkb incenp tpx2

External Resources:

Adams, 2000, Pubmed, Xenbase[+]

Xenbase: The Xenopus laevis and X. tropicalis resource.
Version: 4.9.0
Major funding for Xenbase is provided by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, grant P41 HD064556