XB-ART-45461Dev Cell. April 17, 2012; 22 (4): 775-87.
Spindle position in symmetric cell divisions during epiboly is controlled by opposing and dynamic apicobasal forces.
Orientation of cell division is a vital aspect of tissue morphogenesis and growth. Asymmetric divisions generate cell fate diversity and epithelial stratification, whereas symmetric divisions contribute to tissue growth, spreading, and elongation. Here, we describe a mechanism for positioning the spindle in symmetric cell divisions of an embryonic epithelium. We show that during the early stages of epiboly, spindles in the epithelium display dynamic behavior within the plane of the epithelium but are kept firmly within this plane to give a symmetric division. This dynamic stability relies on balancing counteracting forces: an apically directed force exerted by F-actin/myosin-2 via active cortical flow and a basally directed force mediated by microtubules and myosin-10. When both forces are disrupted, spindle orientation deviates from the epithelial plane, and epithelial surface is reduced. We propose that this dynamic mechanism maintains symmetric divisions while allowing the quick adjustment of division plane to facilitate even tissue spreading.
PubMed ID: 22406140
PMC ID: PMC3332010
Article link: Dev Cell.
Grant support: Wellcome Trust , 090868 Wellcome Trust , Wellcome Trust
Genes referenced: actl6a ctrl gnl3 hist2h2be myh4 myh6 myo10 myo10.2 noct nr2e1 rho rho.2 tjp1
Antibodies referenced: Ctnnb1 Ab5 Phosphorylated myosin light chain Ab2 Tuba4b Ab2
Morpholinos referenced: myh10 MO1 myo10.2 MO5
Article Images: [+] show captions
|Figure 1. Mitotic Spindle Position in a Developing Epithelium(A) Stills taken from a single focal plane movie of mitotic spindles in the outer epithelial layer of a Xenopus laevis embryo. Embryos were injected with GFP-α-tubulin (green) to label spindles and Cherry-histone2B (Cherry-H2B) to highlight chromosomes. Spindles are aligned parallel to the plane of the epithelium but are also held in a specific position along the apicobasal axis of the cell; spindles in neighboring cells assemble in the same focal plane and remain here throughout mitosis (arrows).(B) Zoom-in of movie in (A) shows that spindles undergo rapid rotational movement in the x/y plane, while remaining held in parallel orientation and apicobasal position.(C) 3D reconstruction of Cherry-H2B fluorescence from a z stack confocal movie (Movie S2), which can be used to track the apicobasal position of nuclei as mitosis proceeds (side view; apical at top, basal at bottom). Virtually no movements in the apicobasal axis are seen.(D) A side-view image of a mitotic spindle in the outer epithelium of a fixed embryo (apical at top, basal at bottom) demonstrates the apicobasal position of spindles in these cells.(E) Mean values for cell length, width, and distance of spindle from apical surface are shown (±SEM, n = 91 spindles in 18 embryos).Scale bars represent 20 μm in (A) and (B) and 10 μm in (D). See also Movies S1 and S2.|
|Figure 2. Spindle Position Does Not Correspond to Cell-Cell Junction Location(A) Immunofluorescence for ZO-1 (green), a component of tight junctions, shows that spindle position does not correlate with the location of tight junctions.(B) β-Catenin (green), a component of adherens junctions, is localized all around the basolateral cell surfaces.(C) Transmission electron micrographs (zoomed-in areas highlighted in red, yellow, and blue boxes) show that tight junctions (TJ) and the zona adherens (ZA) are located apically and stretch no more than 2.5 μm down from the apical cell membrane (red box), whereas regions of high density, which may be cell-cell contacts (yellow and blue boxes; arrows), are found at random positions around the basolateral membranes.Scale bars represent 10 μm in (A) and (B) and are as displayed in (C).|
|Figure 3. Treatment with Low-Dose Noc Specifically Disrupts Astral Microtubules and Causes Spindles to Reposition Apically(A) Spindles in control (Ctrl) versus Noc-treated embryos; treatment with Noc eradicates astral microtubules that are seen in Ctrl spindles and causes spindles to move to the apical cell surface.(B) Stills taken from Movie S3, showing spindles in Ctrl and Noc-treated embryos. The Noc-treated spindle moves toward the apical cell surface, whereas the Ctrl spindle remains in a constant position along the apicobasal axis even as anaphase proceeds.Scale bars represent 10 μm. See also Figure S1 and Movies S3 and S4.|
|Figure 5. Myo10 Helps Position the Spindle but Functions Antagonistically to F-Actin(A) Side-view immunofluorescent images of spindles in control morpholino (Ctrl MO) and Myo10 MO-injected embryos.(B) 3D reconstructions of single cells from epithelium of Ctrl MO and Myo10 MO embryos.(C) Quantification of spindle position in Ctrl MO, Myo10 MO (both coinjected with GFP as a control), and Myo10 MO rescued with full-length GFP-tagged Myo10 (GFP-HIQT), tailless Myo10 (GFP-HIQCC), or headless Myo10 (GFP-IQT). Spindles are repositioned closer to the apical cell surface in Myo10 MO embryos compared to Ctrl MO, a phenotype rescued by coinjection with full-length or headless Myo10, but not tailless Myo10. To test for significance, unpaired Student's t tests were performed (n = 5 independent experiments for Ctrl MO + GFP and Myo10 MO + GFP, from a total of 27 and 32 embryos, respectively; n = 3 independent experiments, from a total of 18 embryos each for Myo10 MO + GFP-HIQT, + GFP-HIQCC, and + GFP-IQT; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01, ∗∗∗p < 0.01).(D) Quantification of spindle position in Ctrl MO, Myo10 MO (both treated with 0.1% DMSO as a control), and Myo10 embryos treated with Noc or LatB. Treatment with low-dose Noc does not affect Myo10 MO spindle position, but LatB treatment of Myo10 MO embryos causes spindles, on average, to move basally and results in a wider spread of spindle position. To test for significance, unpaired Student's t tests were performed (n = 3 independent experiments, from a total of 20, 16, 18, and 11 embryos for Ctrl MO, Myo10 MO, Myo10 MO + Noc, and Myo10 MO + LatB, respectively; ∗p < 0.05, ∗∗p < 0.01).(E) High-resolution side-view confocal images (stacks of 13 z slices for each condition) of spindle microtubules in Ctrl MO, Myo10 MO, and Myo10 MO rescued with GFP-HIQT. In Ctrl MO cells, spindle microtubules have an apical asymmetry, with more astral microtubules on the apical side (arrows). Spindles in Myo10 MO cells lose this asymmetry, and long basal astral microtubules are seen (arrows). The GFP-HIQT rescue restores the apical asymmetry.(F) Filament tracing of the microtubule signal (white trace of red staining) provides an unbiased approach to view the asymmetry of the microtubule network. For each image, the trace represents only microtubules present in the central mitotic cell: any traces originating in neighboring cells were deleted. In particular, a dense network of microtubules is seen on the apical side of Ctrl MO spindles, which is lost in the Myo10 MO and restored in the GFP-HIQT rescue (square bracket).ns, not significant. Scale bars represent 10 μm. See also Figure S3.|
|Figure 7. Microtubules and F-Actin Show Partial Redundancy in Spindle Orientation(A) Quantification of spindle angle in Ctrl, Noc, LatB, and Noc + LatB-treated embryos. Spindle angle was measured relative to the x/y plane, such that a spindle angle of 0° denotes a spindle that is oriented parallel to the epithelium and will undergo a symmetric division, and 90° denotes a spindle that is oriented perpendicular and will undergo an asymmetric division. Treatment with either Noc or LatB alone causes a slight reduction in parallel spindles, but a much larger reduction is seen in double-treated, Noc + LatB, embryos. Error bars represent SEM (n = 3 independent experiments, from a total of 17, 16, 19, and 20 embryos for Ctrl, Noc, LatB, and Noc + LatB, respectively).(B) Stills from Movie S7, following two spindles (arrows) in a Noc + LatB-treated embryo. Both spindles undergo random rotations out of the plane of the epithelium.(C) Cell perimeters in Ctrl and Noc + LatB embryos traced through one cell division. Each Ctrl division results in two daughter cells of similar apical surface area; divisions in Noc + LatB produce daughter cells of differing apical cell surface. In some cases (arrows) cells with a smaller apical surface are lost from the epithelial layer.See also Figure S5 and Movie S7.|
|Figure S1, related to Figure 3: (A) Confocal images from embryos incubated in a concentration gradient of nocodazole (Noc) from 10nM to 1μM. Spindles reposition more apically as Noc concentration increases and microtubules are lost. In 500nM and 1μM Noc, spindle microtubules are lost and condensed chromosomes are found pressed against the apical cell surface. Scale bars represent 10μm. (B) Quantification of spindle position in Noc concentration gradient (error bars represent standard error of the mean, n = 3 independent experiments from a total of 13-18 embryos for each treatment). (C) Quantification of spindle position in a time series experiment, where embryos were incubated in 100nM Noc for varying time periods, from 0 to 60 mins. The average spindle position remained apical in longer incubations, indicating that spindles assembled after the addition of Noc, as well as existing spindles, take up the apical position (error bars represent standard error of the mean, n = 3 independent experiments from a total of 10-18 embryos for each treatment).|
|Figure S2, related to Figure 4: (A) Interphase nuclei position was quantified in Control, Noc, LatB and Noc + LatB treatments. Position was measured relative to cell length. No significant difference in interphase nuclei position was see in any of the treatments. (B) Metaphase spindle length was measured in Control, Noc, LatB and Noc + LatB treatments. Spindle length was measured relative to cell width. Spindles in embryos treated with Noc were found to be significantly shorter when compared to controls. To test for significance, unpaired Student t-tests were performed (n=3 independent experiments from a total of 18, 18, 16, 17, embryos for Ctrl, Noc, LatB and Noc + LatB respectively; *p<0.05, ***p<0.001).|
|Figure S3, related to Figure 5: (A) Quantification of interphase nuclei position in Control MO and Myo10 MO injected embryos. Nuclei position was measured relative to cell length. No significant difference in nuclei position was seen (an unpaired Student t-test was performed; n=3 independent experiments from a total of 21 embryos for Ctrl MO and Myo10 MO). (B) To determine Myo10 localisation, embryos were injected with GFP or GFP-HIQT (full length Myo10 tagged with GFP) and stained using an anti-GFP antibody (green). GFP-HIQT localises to the spindle and shows strong accumulation at the cell cortex. (C) Quantification of spindle position following over-expression of Myo10 constructs. In a control background, expression of GFP-HIQT causes spindles to reposition slightly basally, as does expression of GFP-IQT. Whereas, expression of GFP-HIQCC causes spindles to reposition slightly apically when compared to controls. To test for significance, unpaired Student t-tests were performed (n=3 independent experiments, from a total of 20, 19, 18, and 16 embryos each for Ctrl MO + GFP, + GFP-HIQT + GFP-HIQCC and + GFP-IQT, respectively; *p<0.05, **p<0.01). (D) Quantification of metaphase spindle length in Ctrl and Myo10 MO injected embryos, measured relative to cell width. Spindles in Myo10 morphants are significantly longer than controls (an unpaired Student t-test was performed; n=3 independent experiments from a total of 21 embryos for Ctrl MO and Myo10 MO, ***p<0.001).|
|Figure S4, related to Figure 6: (A) Quantification of interphase nuclei position in Control MO and MHC-B MO injected embryos. Nuclei position was measured relative to cell length. No significant difference in nuclei position was seen. (B) Quantification of metaphase spindle length in Ctrl and MHC-B MO injected embryos, measured relative to cell width. No significant difference in spindle length was seen. (C) Microtubule organisation following knockdown of myosin-2. Z-stack (left; -tubulin in red, DAPI staining in blue) and microtubule trace (right; trace in white; chromosomes reconstructed in blue) images of Control and MHC-B MO cells. Knockdown of myosin-2 leads to an expansion of the dense microtubule network apical of the spindle. To test for statistical significance in (A) and (B), unpaired Student t-tests were performed (n=3 independent experiments from a total of 21 and 25 embryos for Ctrl MO and MHC-B MO, respectively).|
|Figure S5, related to Figure 7: A working model for spindle positioning during symmetric divisions. Our results indicate that spindle position during symmetric division is determined by a balance between a basally-directed force (left) and an apically-directed force (right). Microtubule organisation shows an apical bias with astral microtubules contributing to a dense microtubule network apical of the spindle. This forms an apical barrier, preventing the spindle from moving apically and pushing the spindle basally. Active myosin-2 is concentrated in the apical portion of the cell, resulting in a gradient of actomyosin contraction from apical to basal (graded blue triangle). Apical contraction may help pull the spindle apically but will also generate an apical-ward movement of cortical F-actin. The spindle is connected to flowing cortical F-actin via astral microtubules and actin cables, potentially carrying the spindle apically.|