Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.
XB-ART-49093
Neural Dev February 13, 2014; 9 12.

Genome-wide expression profile of the response to spinal cord injury in Xenopus laevis reveals extensive differences between regenerative and non-regenerative stages.

Lee-Liu D , Moreno M , Almonacid LI , Tapia VS , Muñoz R , von Marées J , Gaete M , Melo F , Larraín J .


Abstract
Xenopus laevis has regenerative and non-regenerative stages. As a tadpole, it is fully capable of functional recovery after a spinal cord injury, while its juvenile form (froglet) loses this capability during metamorphosis. We envision that comparative studies between regenerative and non-regenerative stages in Xenopus could aid in understanding why spinal cord regeneration fails in human beings. To identify the mechanisms that allow the tadpole to regenerate and inhibit regeneration in the froglet, we obtained a transcriptome-wide profile of the response to spinal cord injury in Xenopus regenerative and non-regenerative stages. We found extensive transcriptome changes in regenerative tadpoles at 1 day after injury, while this was only observed by 6 days after injury in non-regenerative froglets. In addition, when comparing both stages, we found that they deployed a very different repertoire of transcripts, with more than 80% of them regulated in only one stage, including previously unannotated transcripts. This was supported by gene ontology enrichment analysis and validated by RT-qPCR, which showed that transcripts involved in metabolism, response to stress, cell cycle, development, immune response and inflammation, neurogenesis, and axonal regeneration were regulated differentially between regenerative and non-regenerative stages. We identified differences in the timing of the transcriptional response and in the inventory of regulated transcripts and biological processes activated in response to spinal cord injury when comparing regenerative and non-regenerative stages. These genes and biological processes provide an entry point to understand why regeneration fails in mammals. Furthermore, our results introduce Xenopus laevis as a genetic model organism to study spinal cord regeneration.

PubMed ID: 24885550
PMC ID: PMC4046850
Article link: Neural Dev


Species referenced: Xenopus
Genes referenced: acta4 anxa1.1 aqp3 bhmt ccnb3 cdk2 cnfn.1 ctsk epha2 epha4 fos glul gnao1 hla-dqa1 hmox1 hoxc10 hoxc5 hoxc8 hsp70 hsp90b1 hspa5 ids kif11 kif4a kifc1 klf10 klf15 kpna2 lig1 mcm3 nradd nupr1 olfm4 plk1 reln rrm2b sds sema3fl sema4b socs3 stat3.2 stat6 stc1 timp-1 tlr5 tnf tuba4b tubb6 ucp2
Antibodies: Tuba4b Ab4


Article Images: [+] show captions
References [+] :
Altschul, Basic local alignment search tool. 1990, Pubmed