XB-ART-49477Mech Dev November 1, 2014; 134 80-95.
The need of MMP-2 on the sperm surface for Xenopus fertilization: its role in a fast electrical block to polyspermy.
Monospermic fertilization in the frog, Xenopus laevis, is ensured by a fast-rising, positive fertilization potential to prevent polyspermy on the fertilized egg, followed by a slow block with the formation of a fertilization envelope over the egg surface. In this paper, we found that not only the enzymatic activity of sperm matrix metalloproteinase-2 (MMP-2) was necessary for a sperm to bind and/or pass through the extracellular coat of vitelline envelope, but also the hemopexin (HPX) domain of MMP-2 on the sperm surface was involved in binding and membrane fusion between the sperm and eggs. A peptide with a partial amino acid sequence of the HPX domain caused egg activation accompanied by an increase in [Ca(2+)]i in a voltage-dependent manner, similar to that in fertilization. The membrane microdomain (MD) of unfertilized eggs bound the HPX peptide, and this was inhibited by ganglioside GM1 distributed in the MD. The treatment of sperm with GM1 or anti-MMP-2 HPX antibody allows the sperm to fertilize an egg clamped at 0 mV, which untreated sperm cannot achieve. We propose a model accounting for the mechanism of voltage-dependent fertilization based on an interaction between the positively charged HPX domain in the sperm membrane and negatively-charged GM1 in the egg plasma membrane.
PubMed ID: 25296387
Article link: Mech Dev
Genes referenced: mmp2 cat.2 dnai1 fn1 hpx kit mmp7 sgp spr upk3a
Antibodies: Mmp2 Ab1 Mmp2 Ab2 Sperm Ab1
Article Images: [+] show captions
|Fig. 1. Gelatin zymography and Western blot of the extract obtained from mature sperm after SDS-PAGE with 10% gels. (A) Gelatin zymography of the sperm extract showing major 68 kDa and 55 kDa lytic bands and a minor 60 kDa band (lane 1), but no lytic band in the presence of 1 mM o-phenanthroline during gel-incubation (lane 2). (B) Western blot of the sperm extract by anti-MMP-2 catalytic antibody (lane 1), showing a major band of 68 kDa band and minor 55, 60 and 53 kDa bands. Western blots of the sperm extract by anti-MMP-2 HPX antibody, showing 53-28 kDa bands lower than 68-55 kDa bands (lane 2). Western blot of the sperm membrane fraction (lane 3) and the sperm cytoplasmic fraction (lane 4) by anti-MMP-2 HPX antibody, showing 68-55 kDa bands and several minor bands with the HPX domain (53-28 kDa) in the membrane fraction, but a major 55 kDa band and minor 42 and 39 kDa bands in the cytoplasmic fraction. (C) Immunoprecipitation of the sperm extract by anti-MMP-2 HPX antibody, showing precipitation of MMP-2 (68-53 kDa) (lane 1) and coprecipitation of a 106-76 kDa fraction of SGP (lane 3), but no precipitation by pre-immune antibody (lanes 2 and 4). Asterisks, input antibodies. (D) A domain structure of MMP-2, showing the signal peptide (Pre), the prodomain (Pro), the catalytic domain (Cat), the fibronectin-like collagen-binding domain (FN), the zinc-binding site (Zn2+), and the hemopexin domain (HPX).|
|Fig. 2. Colocalization of MMP-2 and SGP on the sperm surface. Sperm were treated with anti-MMP-2 HPX antibody and anti-SGP antibody followed by the secondary antibodies, showing the distribution of MMP-2 (green) in the head region including in acrosomal region (AC) and the middle and posterior portions of head (MH and PH). A small amount of MMP-2 was localized in the anterior portion of head (AH) and the tail region (T). SGP was distributed over the entire sperm surface (red). MMP-2 was colocalized with SGP on the sperm surface (merge with DIC image). Since the images (A–C) were taken from the same sperm with 1 µm-thick optical slices, only some areas of the sperm surface were shown in each image. The sperm were treated with Ca2+ ionophore A23187 (10 µM, 15 min) to induce acrosome reaction, and then treated with the antibodies, showing the localization of MMP-2 around the acrosomal region at the tip of the head (Fig. 2D). DIC, Differential interference contrast microscopy. Bars, 5 µm.|
|Fig. 3. The rate of fertilization of jellied eggs in the presence of inhibitors for broad MMPs: o-phenanthrolin (A) and GM6001 (B), and an inhibitor more specific for MMP-2: MMP-2 inhibitor II (Ki: 2.4, 45 and 379 µM for MMP-2, MMP-1 and MMP-7, respectively) (C), showing that the enzymatic activity of MMP-2 is necessary for fertilization of jellied eggs. Fertilization of jellied egg was inhibited when the sperm were treated the inhibitor specific for MMP-2 inhibitor II (D), indicating the involvement of MMP-2 in the sperm for fertilization. The fertilization in denuded eggs was not affected by MMP-2 inhibitor II (E) either in the presence at insemination or in the pretreatment of sperm before insemination (pre-treatment), but the treatment of sperm with anti-MMP-2 HPX antibody inhibited fertilization in both jellied eggs (F, closed bars) and denuded eggs (F, open bars), indicating that the MMP-2 HPX domain is necessary for the membrane interaction between the sperm and eggs at fertilization.|
|Fig. 4. (A) and (B) A typical increase in [Ca2+]i induced by the fertilizing sperm in a dejellied egg, showing the propagation of a Ca2+ wave from the sperm entrance site toward the opposite site. The increase in [Ca2+]i was initiated 5 min after insemination and continued about 5 min. The second increase in fluorescence intensity (*) is an artifact by the appearance of white surface of vegetal hemisphere during cortical contraction after passing the Ca2+ wave. Numbers on the top right of figures (C and D) show time (min) after insemination. Bar, 0.5 mm. (C) and (D) A typical increase in [Ca2+]i induced by the treatment of the HPX peptide (473–485; GMSQIRGETFFFK, 2 mM, 20 µL) in a dejellied egg, showing the increase in [Ca2+]i which was initiated 4 min after treatment and spread over the egg surface for 3 min. The resumption meiosis in metaphase II-arrested unfertilized eggs (D-a) was confirmed by the formation of an egg pronucleus (D-b). The second peak in fluorescence intensity (*) is an artifact by the appearance of white surface of vegetal hemisphere during cortical contraction after passing the Ca2+ wave. Numbers on the top right show time (min) after treatment. Bar, 0.5 mm (A) and 10 µm (D). (E) The activation of dejellied eggs by the treatment with the HPX peptides, showing higher activities by GMSQIRGETFFFK (473–485) (a) and by RGETFFK (478–485) (c), but lower activity by GMSQIAGETFFFK (R475A) (b). In each column, 40–50 eggs were examined (mean ± SEM, n = 4). (F) The activation of denuded eggs by the treatment with agarose-beads conjugated by GMSQIRGETFFFK (473–485), indicating signal transduction for egg activation on the egg plasma membrane. In each column, 37–45 eggs were examined (mean ± SEM, n = 3).|
|Fig. 5. (A) Interactions of the microdomain (MD) of egg membrane with the HPX peptide (473–485; GMSQIRGETFFFK), showing binding of the MD to the HPX peptide captured on a sensor chip for SPR system (Biacore). Binding of the MD was inhibited in the presence of GM1, but not of asialo GM or GM3. RU, resonance unit (1 pg/mm2). (B) The presence of uroplakin III (UPIII) in the MD bound to the HPX peptide was confirmed by further binding of anti-UPIII antibody on the chip. (C–H) Detection of GM1 on the sperm surface with FITC-conjugated cholera toxin B subunit (FITC-CTB), showing a very small amount of GM1 on the GM1-untreated sperm (C) in comparison with the sperm without treatment of FITC-CTB (D), but a large amount of GM1 bound the sperm after treatment of the sperm with GM1 (100 µg/mL, 15 min) (E and F). The binding of GM1 on the sperm was inhibited by the pre-treatment of sperm with anti-MMP-2 HPX antibody (1:10-dilution, 20 min) (G and H). The set of E and F or G and H is showing different optical slices in the same sperm, respectively. Left panels, the fluorescence images of FITC-CTB; Right panels, the merge of fluorescence images with differential interference images (DIC). Ac, acrosomal region; H, head; T, tail. Bar, 5 µm.|
|Fig. 6. Voltage-dependency of egg activation by the fertilizing sperm and the HPX peptide (A and B). Dejellied eggs were voltage-clamped at –20 mV (A) or +10 mV (B), respectively, and then treated with the HPX peptide (GMSQIRGETFFFK, 2 mM, 20 µL), showing egg activation in the egg at –20 mV accompanied with a large inward current (activation current) about 4 min after treatment (A), but no change in the holding current in the egg at +10 mV (B). (C) Voltage-dependent egg activation by the sperm (open squares) or by the treatment with the HPX peptide (GMSQIRGETFFFK, 2 mM, 20 µL) (closed circles). No egg underwent activation during voltages at higher than 0 mV by the sperm or +10 mV by the HPX peptide, respectively. Percentage of egg activation is plotted as a function of the clamp potential. Each point represents results from 10 to 20 eggs.|
|Fig. 7. Changes of voltage-dependency in fertilization by the treatment of sperm with gangliosides or anti-MMP-2 HPX antibody. (A–D) Jellied eggs were voltage-clamped at +10 mV and then inseminated. At 10 min after insemination, the clamp voltage was negatively shifted in incremental steps (10 mV-step, for 5 min). Fertilization current (egg activation) was elicited at –20 mV by untreated sperm (A), but at 0 mV by the sperm which had been treated with GM1 (100 µg/mL, 15 min) (B), or by the sperm which had been treated with anti-MMP-2 HPX antibody (1:100-dilution, 15 min) (C). Untreated sperm caused activation in about half of the eggs at –10 mV or –20 mV (untreated), but 10% and 80% of the eggs were activated by GM1-treated sperm at 0 mV and –10 mV, respectively (GM1). The treatment of sperm with asialo GM1 or GM3 (100 µg/mL, 15 min) did not affect the voltage dependency (asialo GM1, GM3). The sperm which had been treated with anti-MMP-2 HPX antibody (1:100-dilution, 15 min) caused activation in 20% and 60% of the eggs at 0 mV and −10 mV, respectively (anti-MMP-2 HPX). No egg was activated at 0 mV by the sperm treated by preimmune antibody (preimmune). Each column represents results from 10 to 30 eggs.|
|Fig. 8. A schematic model of voltage-dependent fertilization (egg activation) based on an interaction between the MMP-2 HPX domain on the sperm membrane and GM1 in the MD of egg membrane. Since the membrane potential of unfertilized eggs is negative (about –20 mV), positively charged MMP-2 HPX domain can bind to interact with negatively charged GM1 in the MD of egg plasma membrane. Short forms of MMP-2 with the HPX domain might be also involved in this interaction. The bound sperm transmits a signal for the increase in [Ca2+]i to activate the egg, probably through partial digestion of uroplakin III (UPIII) by a sperm tryptic protease, followed by the activation of Src kinase (Src) and phospholipase Cγ (PLC). IP3 produced by PLCγ releases Ca2+ ions from the ER to open Ca2+-sensitive Cl–-channels on the egg membrane, which elicits a positive fertilization potential higher than 0 mV. The positive membrane potential might inhibit the interaction between the MMP-2 HPX domain in the extra sperm and GM1 to prevent polyspermy.|
|Fig. S1. (A) Amino acid sequence and domain structure of Xenopus laevis testis MMP-2, showing a signal peptide (Pre), a prodomain (Pro), a typical catalytic domain (Cat) with zinc binding region (underline), a fibronectin-like collagen-binging domain (FN), and a hemopexin domain (HPX). Asterisk, glutamic acid (E) in Xenopus laevis tadpole tail MMP-2 (GenBank, AY037943). Arrows, the position of primers for RT-PCR. Dotted line, HPX peptide. (B) RT-PCR analysis for confirmation of the expression of MMP-2 in Xenopus laevis testis. RT reaction was performed with GeneRacer kit (Invitrogen), and poly (A) RNA extract was used as a negative control (RT−). The reaction products were subjected to PCR (95 °C for 30 sec, 56 °C for 1 min, 72 °C for 2 min) for 30 cycles; the forward and reverse PCR primers specific for MMP-2 were 5′-CTGCACTGATTCTGGTCGCTC-3′ and 5′-TCAACACGATCAACATCAGGA-3′, respectively.|