XB-ART-52367Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A January 1, 2016; 113 (36): 10103-8.
Hedgehog-dependent E3-ligase Midline1 regulates ubiquitin-mediated proteasomal degradation of Pax6 during visual system development.
Pax6 is a key transcription factor involved in eye, brain, and pancreas development. Although pax6 is expressed in the whole prospective retinal field, subsequently its expression becomes restricted to the optic cup by reciprocal transcriptional repression of pax6 and pax2 However, it remains unclear how Pax6 protein is removed from the eyestalk territory on time. Here, we report that Mid1, a member of the RBCC/TRIM E3 ligase family, which was first identified in patients with the X-chromosome-linked Opitz BBB/G (OS) syndrome, interacts with Pax6. We found that the forming eyestalk is a major domain of mid1 expression, controlled by the morphogen Sonic hedgehog (Shh). Here, Mid1 regulates the ubiquitination and proteasomal degradation of Pax6 protein. Accordantly, when Mid1 levels are knocked down, Pax6 expression is expanded and eyes are enlarged. Our findings indicate that remaining or misaddressed Pax6 protein is cleared from the eyestalk region to properly set the border between the eyestalk territory and the retina via Mid1. Thus, we identified a posttranslational mechanism, regulated by Sonic hedgehog, which is important to suppress Pax6 activity and thus breaks pax6 autoregulation at defined steps during the formation of the visual system.
PubMed ID: 27555585
PMC ID: PMC5018744
Article link: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
Species referenced: Xenopus
Genes referenced: bmp4 ctrl mid1 myc nog nucb1 pax2 pax6 pou4f1 pou4f2 prox1 ptch1 rho shh vax1 vsx1
Morpholinos: mid1 MO2 mid1 MO3 pax2 MO1 pax6 MO2
Article Images: [+] show captions
|Fig. 1. Mid1 is expressed in cells of the forming optic stalk and induced on shh RNA injection. (A) mid1 mRNA expression was assessed by Wmish on Xenopus laevis embryos at different NF stages. (a–d) Lateral view, (a′) cranial view, and (b′–d′) lateral view. Twenty-micrometer gelatin/albumin sections at the level of the tadpole’s head (d1–d3), heart (c1), neural tube (c2), and pronephric anlage (c3). cg, cement gland; ec, endocardium; ed, eye disk; ev, eye vesicle; hd, hindbrain; he, heart; hf, heart field; kt, kidney tubules; mb, midbrain; mc, myocardium; op, olfactory placode; os, optic stalk; ov, otic vesicle; pnt, pronephric tubule; pos, presumptive os; sm, somites. (c4–c7) mid1 expression in eye stalk region in serial sections. (B) Injections were done into one cell of two-cell stage embryos. (a–d′) Synthetic shh-RNA (500 pg) was injected and Wmish against mid1, pax2, pax6, and ptc1 was performed as indicated. (e–f′) pax2-mo (2.5 pmol) was injected, and expression of mid1 and pax6 was monitored. Shown are transversal sections of the eye at the level of the lens. (g–g′) pax6-mo (2.5 pmol) was injected, and pax2 was monitored. Shown are lateral views of the head region and a transversal section of the head region at the level of the optic vesicles (g′). (h–h′) pax2 RNA (100 pg) was injected and expression of pax6 was analyzed.|
|Fig. S1. (A) a–f, Lateral view of the head region; g, ventral view of the head region; b′–g′, sections at the level of the forming eye stalk as indicated by the red dashed lines. Though pax2, vax1, and mid1 are clearly expressed within the forming eye stalk, their pattern of expression in this part is not identical and appears to follow a proximodistal axis with mid1 more distally, pax2 centrally, and vax1 proximally located. (B) a, dorsal view; a′, anterior view; a1, transversal section as indicated in a. The misexpression of shh upon the microinjection of synthetic 500 pg shh RNA induced the expression of ptc1 strongly at the open neural tube stage (NF stage 15) within the sensorial layer of the ectoderm (a1′) and this induction of ptc1 is maintained though less intense at tadpole stage (see also Fig. 1 B, d–d′). (C) a and b, anterior view. Misexpression of pax2 upon the microinjection of synthetic 100 pg pax2 RNA repressed the expression of pax6 already at the open neural tube stage (NF stage 15) and this suppression of pax6 is maintained at tadpole stage (see also Fig. 1 B, h–h′).|
|Fig. 2. Mid1 physically interacts with Pax6. (A) HeLa cells were transfected with pax6-flag alone or combined with myc-mid1 and analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Nuclei were stained with DAPI. Pictures are shown in false colors: green for Pax6, red for Mid1, blue for nuclei (Bottom). (B) HEK293 cells were transfected as in A. Cytosolic proteins were extracted with hypotonic buffer. Soluble nuclear proteins were extracted from the remaining fraction with high salt buffer. Blot shows Mid1 and Pax6 in the cytosolic (Cyt.) and nuclear (Nuc.) fractions, as well as the reprobes with anti–β-tubulin or anti-topoisomerase 1 antibody to control purity. (C) Interaction of Mid1 with Pax6 was assessed by coimmunoprecipitation performed in HEK293. (Left) Eluted myc-tagged proteins after immunoprecipitation (upper blot) and precipitated Pax6 (lower blot, reprobed with anti-Pax6 antibody). (Right) Blots for the input proteins. (D) Interaction of Mid1 and Pax6 was verified by GST using purified GST-Pax6 or purified GST as a control and lysates of HEK293 cells transfected with myc-mid1. (Left) Eluted myc-tagged proteins after GST pull down (upper blot) and precipitated Pax6 (lower blot, reprobed with anti-Pax6 antibody). (Right) Input protein of the lysate. (E) Pax6-flag was expressed alone or together with myc-Mid1 in HEK293 cells in the presence or absence of the proteasome inhibitor lactacystin (Lac), the E1 activating enzyme inhibitor Pyr41, or the caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK (Z-VAD) as indicated. For loading control, blots were reprobed with an anti-GAPDH antibody.|
|Fig. S2. Mid1 reduces endogenous Pax6 protein. (A) Mid1 physically interacted with Pax6. HEK293 cells were transfected with GFP-pax6 + myc-mid1 or myc-mid1 alone. The left panels show eluted Pax6 protein after immunoprecipitation with an anti-Myc antibody (upper blot) and precipitated myc-Mid1 (lower blot, reprobe with anti-Myc antibody). The right panels show blots with the respective lysates for the input proteins. (B) Xenopus animal cap explants expressed Pax6 upon neuralization by microinjection of 400 μg synthetic RNA of the BMP4 inhibitor noggin. Approximately 30 animal cap explants were separated in each lane. Coinjection of Xenopus mid1 RNA (1 ng) led to a reduction of Pax6 protein abundance. The reduction of Pax6 protein levels was considerably stronger, when Mid1 protein was forced to enter the nucleus by the fusion of a nuclear localization signal (mid1nls). The mouse lens epithelial cell line αTN4-1 expresses pax6 endogenously. Transfection of mid1 and of mid1nls led to a reduction of endogenous Pax6 protein. Corresponding Western blots were quantified with the help of ImageJ and normalized against GAPDH. (C) Pax6 levels increased upon proteasome inhibition. αTN4-1 cells were grown in DMEM medium (10% FCS) and were treated with DMSO (−) or with MG132 (5 μM) (+). Pax6 levels increased upon MG132 treatment (+), as well as polyubiquitinated proteins. Anti-GAPDH was used as a loading control. Densitometry was performed using ImageJ (right graph).|
|Fig. 3. Mid1 induces ubiquitination and reduces the abundance of Pax6 protein. (A) Blots show levels of Pax6, Mid1, and β-tubulin in HEK293 cells after cotransfection on pax6-flag expression plasmid and either EV or myc-mid1 at different time points (min) on cycloheximide block of protein synthesis. Diagram shows the quantified values of Pax6 protein relative to β-tubulin levels in Western blot. Amounts of Pax6 protein before the cycloheximide treatment are designated as 1 (100%). (B) In vivo ubiquitination of Pax6 was analyzed by transfection of HEK293 cells with plasmids coding for pax6-flag, myc-mid1, and his-ubiquitin as indicated and anti-his Western blot of proteins eluted after an anti-flag-IP (Left). Input of the proteins was verified by Western blot of the corresponding lysates with anti-Myc and anti-Pax6 antibodies, respectively (Right).|
|Fig. 4. Mid1 loss of function interferes with eye development. (A and B) 2.5 pmol of mid1-mo1 was injected into one cell at the two-cell stage and analyzed by Wmish at NF stage 38. (Upper) Lateral views of head region of noninjected (a; NIS) or injected side (a′; IS), dorsal view (a′). (B) Analysis of retinal stratification on mid1 suppression in transversal sections at the level of the lens using probes against pax6, brn3.0, vsx1, prox1, and rhodopsin. For better comparison, all images are oriented with the lens to the left. (C) Lateral view (a and b) of NF stage 38 embryos injected with mid1-mo2 into one cell at the two-cell stage and 10× enlarged view of the eye region of a′ and b′ (Lower). All mid1-mo2–injected embryos showed an increase in eye size (n = 212 mid1-mo2 and n = 126 ctrl-mo–injected embryos). The graph shows the mean values for 25 embryos (c; **P = 0.001). Analysis of cell proliferation of mid1-mo2–injected embryos. The number of phospho-histone H3 (pH3) positive cells were counted and compared. (d; ctrl-mo: six embryos, mean 14.4 pH3+ cells per section; mid1-mo2: eight embryos, mean 27.2 pH3+ cells per section; ***P = 0.0006). (D) Pax6 immunoreactivity in cryosections on mid1-mo1 injection. The number of Pax6-positive cells per sections within the retinal region was counted for both sides of two embryos, and the area of the total retina was estimated. The numbers of Pax6-positive cells from sections of three mid1-mo1–injected embryos were counted (c; *P = 0.03); the numbers of Pax6-positive cells relative to the area of the retina is shown in the right diagram (d). The value for the noninjected side was set to 1.|
|Fig. S3. (A) a1–a4 show a series of transversal sections at the level of the eye of the mid1 injected tadpole (NF stage 38) shown in Fig. 1 A, a. (B) Rescue of the mid1 knockdown eye phenotype. Lateral view of NF stage 38 embryos injected with mid1-mo2 (1.25 pmol) along with synthetic human mid1 RNA (1–2 ng) into one cell of a 2-cell stage embryo. The lower panel shows a 10× enlarged view of the respective eye region. Considering the eye to be an oblate spheroid, the mean radius was estimated by measuring the drawn distances and total volume was calculated. The graph shows the mean values for 20 embryos. The specificity of the pax2 and pax6 morpholino had been tested already by rescue experiments in refs. 53 and 54, respectively.|
|Fig. 5. Targeted overexpression of mid1 affects fate of retinal precursor cells, which can be reversed by pax6 coexpression. Cell fate analysis at stage 41 following overexpression of the indicated constructs by in vivo lipofection at the neurula stage. GFP was used as a tracer to visualize transfected cells. The error bars represent SEM. AM, amacrine cells; BI, bipolar cells; GC, ganglion cells; HOR, horizontal cells; MU, Müller cells; PR, photoreceptor cells.|
|Fig. S4. Human and Xenopus mid1/Mid1 affects fate of retinal precursor cells similarly. (A) Schematic of the retina showing the different cellular layers and retinal cell types. The picture on the right illustrates a clone of GFP-positive cells following lipofection. Cell types are identified according to their position in the layers and their morphology. (B) Human or Xenopus mid1 expression plasmids together with GFP or GFP plasmid alone were lipofected into the area of the eye prospective retinal field at NF stage 17. At NF stage 41, cryosections were done, and the fluorescent cells in the central retina were counted. The different cell types were identified according to their morphology. The diagram shows the percentages of the different cell types for GFP-lipofected embryos (green, n = 40), human Mid1 (light blue, n = 24), and Xenopus mid1 (dark blue, n = 17); error bars represent SEM. AM, amacrine cells; BI, bipolar cells; GC, ganglion cells; HOR, horizontal cells; MU, Müller cells; PR, photoreceptor cells.|
|prox1 (prospero homeobox 1 ) gene expression in the sectioned eye of X. laevis embryo, assayed via in-situ hybridization, NF stage 42.|
References [+] :
Aranda-Orgillés, The Opitz syndrome gene product MID1 assembles a microtubule-associated ribonucleoprotein complex. 2008, Pubmed