Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
Environ Sci Eur
2016 Jan 01;281:10. doi: 10.1186/s12302-016-0080-y.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Adaption of a dermal in vitro method to investigate the uptake of chemicals across amphibian skin.
Kaufmann K
,
Dohmen P
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
BACKGROUND: Literature data indicate that terrestrial life stages of amphibians may be more sensitive to xenobiotics than birds or mammals. It is hypothesized that dermal exposure could potentially be a significant route of exposure for amphibians, as there is evidence that their skin is more permeable than the skin of other vertebrate species. Thus, higher amounts of xenobiotics might enter systemic circulation by dermal uptake resulting in adverse effects. Heretofore, no guidelines exist to investigate dermal toxicity of chemicals to amphibians. In order to minimize vertebrate testing, this work was targeted to develop an in vitro test system as a possible model to assess the dermal uptake of chemicals across amphibian skin.
RESULTS: The dermal absorption in vitro method (OECD guideline 428), an established toxicological (mammal) test procedure, was adapted to amphibian skin, in a first approach using the laboratory model organism Xenopus laevis and reference compounds (caffeine and testosterone). Skin permeability to both reference substances was significantly higher compared to published mammalian data. Caffeine permeated faster across the skin than testosterone, with ventralskin tending to be more permeable than dorsal skin. As usage of frozen mammalian skin is accepted, frozen skin of X. laevis was tested in parallel. To the freshly excised skin, however, freezing led to increased skin permeability, in particular to caffeine, indicating a loss of skin integrity due to freezing (without additional preservation measures).
CONCLUSIONS: This work has demonstrated that the chosen method can be applied successfully to amphibian skin, providing the basis for further investigations. In future, well-established in vitro test systems and a broad dataset for many chemicals may help assess potential amphibian risk from xenobiotics without the need for extensive vertebrate testing.
Fig. 1. Absorption-time profiles of caffeine and testosterone permeation across the skin of Xenopus laevis. Mean cumulative absorbed dose ± standard deviation, found in the receptor fluids plotted against time and differentiated by skin storage and body side; mean values are based on 3–5 skin samples (as specified in brackets behind indication of skin storage and side in the diagram legends), stemming from one animal [except for testosterone data of freshly excised skin due to separation of testosterone results into 4- and 8-h exposure studies; see (Additional file 2) for 4-h testosterone data and detailed information on the individual cumulative absorbed doses]; due to incorrect sampling, testosterone data after 2 h for freshly excised skin and 3 h for frozen stored skin were excluded from this diagram
Fig. 2. Comparative overview of permeability coefficients of caffeine and testosterone applied to the skin of Xenopus laevis. Permeability coefficients are arranged as boxplots, separated into the different groups fresh and frozen stored skin samples from dorsal (=d) and ventral (=v) body sides; each boxplot is based on 4–7 skin samples (as specified in brackets behind indication of skin side beneath the boxplots), stemming from two animals (for testosterone frozen stored skin samples stemmed from four frogs); dashed
gray line: conferring to Marzulli et al. [26], substances may be classified into five classes for estimation of their permeation rates according to the obtained permeability coefficients (<6 × 10−6-, 6 × 10−6 to 6 × 10−5, 6 × 10−5 to 6 × 10−4, 6 × 10−4 to 6 × 10−3, and >6 × 10−3-cm/h meaning very slow, slow, moderate, fast, and very fast, respectively); ns not significant; asterisks indicate level of significance and different letters indicate significant difference calculated as described in “Methods” section. An Additional file shows individual maximum permeability coefficients in detail (see Additional file 1)
Fig. 3. Comparative overview of impedances of the skin of Xenopus laevis prior to dermal absorption experiments. Measured skin impedance data illustrated as boxplots separated into freshly excised and frozen stored skin with dorsal (=d) and ventral (=v) body sides; each boxplot is based on 9–12 skin samples (as specified in brackets behind indication of skin side beneath the boxplots), stemming from four (freshly excised skin) to six (frozen stored skin) animals each; asterisks indicate the level of significance and different letters indicate significant difference calculated as described in “Methods” section. An Additional file shows individual measured impedances in detail (see Additional file 3)
BLANK,
Further observations on factors which influence the water content of the stratum corneum.
1953, Pubmed
BLANK,
Further observations on factors which influence the water content of the stratum corneum.
1953,
Pubmed
Belden,
Acute toxicity of fungicide formulations to amphibians at environmentally relevant concentrations.
2010,
Pubmed
Brühl,
Amphibians at risk? Susceptibility of terrestrial amphibian life stages to pesticides.
2011,
Pubmed
Christensen,
Adaptations in the water economy of some anuran amphibia.
1974,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Farquhar,
Cell junctions in amphibian skin.
1965,
Pubmed
Gentz,
Medicine and surgery of amphibians.
2007,
Pubmed
Guth,
Suitability of skin integrity tests for dermal absorption studies in vitro.
2015,
Pubmed
Harrison,
Effects of freezing on human skin permeability.
1984,
Pubmed
Holbrook,
Regional differences in the thickness (cell layers) of the human stratum corneum: an ultrastructural analysis.
1974,
Pubmed
Karadzovska,
Experimental factors affecting in vitro absorption of six model compounds across porcine skin.
2012,
Pubmed
Karadzovska,
Predicting skin permeability from complex vehicles.
2013,
Pubmed
Li,
Transepithelial electrical measurements with the Ussing chamber.
2004,
Pubmed
Lillywhite,
Water relations of tetrapod integument.
2006,
Pubmed
Llewelyn,
Percutaneous absorption of chemicals: developing an understanding for the treatment of disease in frogs.
2016,
Pubmed
Major,
Survey of Current Techniques in the Care and Maintenance of the African Clawed Frog (Xenopus laevis).
1998,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Mann,
Amphibians and agricultural chemicals: review of the risks in a complex environment.
2009,
Pubmed
Martinez-Palomo,
Localization of permeability barriers in the frog skin epithelium.
1971,
Pubmed
Moss,
Quantitative structure-permeability relationships (QSPRs) for percutaneous absorption.
2002,
Pubmed
Otberg,
The role of hair follicles in the percutaneous absorption of caffeine.
2008,
Pubmed
Potts,
The influence of stratum corneum morphology on water permeability.
1991,
Pubmed
Quaranta,
Why amphibians are more sensitive than mammals to xenobiotics.
2009,
Pubmed
Schultz,
Housing and husbandry of Xenopus for oocyte production.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Shah,
Comparative penetration of insecticides in target and non-target species.
1983,
Pubmed
Smith,
Contaminant exposure in terrestrial vertebrates.
2007,
Pubmed
Tur,
Percutaneous penetration of methyl nicotinate at three anatomic sites: evidence for an appendageal contribution to transport?
1991,
Pubmed
Van Meter,
Estimating terrestrial amphibian pesticide body burden through dermal exposure.
2014,
Pubmed
Wack,
Transdermal delivery of corticosterone in terrestrial amphibians.
2010,
Pubmed
Watkins,
Linear a-c electrical properties of frog skin and current-induced voltage responses.
1972,
Pubmed
Weltje,
Comparative acute and chronic sensitivity of fish and amphibians: a critical review of data.
2013,
Pubmed
Willens,
Percutaneous malathion absorption by anuran skin in flow-through diffusion cells.
2006,
Pubmed
van de Sandt,
In vitro predictions of skin absorption of caffeine, testosterone, and benzoic acid: a multi-centre comparison study.
2004,
Pubmed