Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
Biomolecules
2019 Aug 02;98:. doi: 10.3390/biom9080336.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Multiple Modulation of Acid-Sensing Ion Channel 1a by the Alkaloid Daurisoline.
Osmakov DI
,
Koshelev SG
,
Lyukmanova EN
,
Shulepko MA
,
Andreev YA
,
Illes P
,
Kozlov SA
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs) are proton-gated sodium-selective channels that are expressed in the peripheral and central nervous systems. ASIC1a is one of the most intensively studied isoforms due to its importance and wide representation in organisms, but it is still largely unexplored as a target for therapy. In this study, we demonstrated response of the ASIC1a to acidification in the presence of the daurisoline (DAU) ligand. DAU alone did not activate the channel, but in combination with protons, it produced the second peak component of the ASIC1a current. This second peak differs from the sustained component (which is induced by RF-amide peptides), as the second (DAU-induced) peak is completely desensitized, with the same kinetics as the main peak. The co-application of DAU and mambalgin-2 indicated that their binding sites do not overlap. Additionally, we found an asymmetry in the pH activation curve of the channel, which was well-described by a mathematical model based on the multiplied probabilities of protons binding with a pool of high-cooperative sites and a single proton binding with a non-cooperative site. In this model, DAU targeted the pool of high-cooperative sites and, when applied with protons, acted as an inhibitor of ASIC1a activation. Moreover, DAU's occupation of the same binding site most probably reverses the channel from steady-state desensitization in the pH 6.9-7.3 range. DAU features disclose new opportunities in studies of ASIC structure and function.
Figure 1. Effect of daurisoline (DAU) application on a rat ASIC1a channel and its structure. (a) Potentiating effect of DAU (30 μM) on ASIC1a channel activation by fast external solution acidification from pH 7.8 to 5.5. The whole-cell currents shown were obtained from the same oocyte. (b) Chemical formula of DAU.
Figure 2. Concentration-dependent activation of the DAU-induced second component of the ASIC1a current. (a) Representative whole-cell traces for currents evoked by a fast pH 5.5 stimulus in the control (black) and in the channels that were pre-incubated for 15 s with DAU at various concentrations (red). (b) The dose–response curve fitted to the logistic equation for the second component of the ASIC1a current. I/Imax is the amplitude of the second component of the current at a conditioning pH of 7.8, normalized to the maximum amplitude (Imax) calculated for each oocyte by individual fitting. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6).
Figure 3. Comparison of the effects that DAU and the RF-amide peptide have on ASIC1a current. (a) Representative traces of pH 5.5-evoked currents of ASIC1a alone (black trace) and of ASIC1a with a 15 s pre-incubation of 300 μM DAU (red trace) or 100 μM FRRF-NH2 peptide (blue trace). (b) Effects of 300 μM DAU and 100 μM FRRF-NH2 peptide on the time of exponential decay (τdec) for the main peak (both control and with the peptide) and for the second (DAU) component of the current (DAU). Time τdec was calculated as the interval between the maximum of the current amplitude and the point having 1/e times reduced amplitude to this maximum. The significance of data was proved by statistical analysis of variance followed by a Tukey’s test ANOVA. Results are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5–12); ns—non significantly difference; * P < 0.05.
Figure 4. DAU-induced inhibition of steady-state desensitization (SSD) of rat ASIC1a. (a) Whole-cell currents obtained from the channels held at the conditioning pHs of 7.8 and 7.0 in response to a pH-5.5 stimulus, with (red) or without (black) a pre-incubation for 15 s with DAU at various concentrations. (b) The dose–response curve fitted to the logistic equation for peak ASIC1a amplitudes at various concentrations of pre-incubated DAU. I/Imax is the main peak’s amplitude at a conditioning pH of 7.0, normalized to the maximum amplitude (Imax), which we calculated for each oocyte via individual fitting. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6). (c) pH dependence of the channel’s SSD without (black curve) and with (red curve) pre-incubation of 1 mM DAU. ASIC1a held at various conditioning pHs was activated by same pH 5.5 stimulus. The peak current amplitudes are plotted as a function of pH and fitted to the logistic equation. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5); * P < 0.05.
Figure 5. DAU-induced development of the second peak at conditioning pHs of 7.8 and 7.0. Dose–response curves for the second peak by DAU pre-incubation at the holding pHs of 7.8 and 7.0 were plotted for same pH 5.5 activating stimulus. I/Imax is the second peak’s amplitude at a conditioning pH of 7.8 or 7.0, normalized to the maximum amplitude (Imax), which we calculated for each oocyte via individual fitting. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 6).
Figure 6. The peculiarity of rat ASIC1a activation by protons. (a) pH dependence of activation of ASIC1a channels expressed in X. laevis oocytes fitted to the logistic equation F1 (dotted line) and to equation F2 (black solid line). Redline reflects pH dependence of activation of model 3–10 corresponding to activation of the channel at the binding of 10 protons with coefficients of cooperativity of p = r = 0.8 and q = s = 0.65, respectively, fitted to equation F2. (b) pH dependence of activation of the channels expressed in CHO cells fitted to the logistic equation F1 (dashed line) and to equation F2 (black solid line). The data were re-plotted from Figure 1k in [38]. Redline reflects pH dependence of activation of model 3–10 corresponding to activation of the channel at the binding of 10 protons with coefficients of cooperativity of p = r = 0.79 and q = s = 0.6, respectively, fitted to equation F2. (c) Calculated parameters of pH50 for non-discriminated sites, pH501 for “high-cooperative” sites and pH502 for “non-cooperative” site are shown as a result of experimental data mathematical processing. (d) pH dependence of ASIC1a activation by protons (black line) and by the combination of protons and 1 mM DAU (red line). ASIC1a held at pH 7.8 was activated by various acidic pH stimuli. I/Imax is the amplitude of the peak current evoked by acidic pH stimuli and normalized to the maximum amplitude (Imax), which we calculated for each cell via individual fitting. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 7); * P < 0.05.
Figure 7. Comparison of the effects that DAU and Mamb-2 have on ASIC1a. (a) Representative traces of pH 5.5-evoked currents of ASIC1a alone (black trace) and of ASIC1a with a 15 s pre-incubation of 300 μM DAU (red trace), 1 μM mambalgine-2 peptide (Mamb-2) (blue trace), or a mixture of 300 μM DAU and 1 μM Mamb-2 (magenta trace). (b) Integrated currents measured for ASIC1a (alone and in the presence of each of the following: 300 μM DAU, 1 μM Mamb-2, and a mixture of 300 μM DAU and 1 μMMamb-2) generated by dropping the pH from 7.8 to 5.5. Data are presented as mean ± SEM; n = 5. *P < 0.05, significantly different from the integrated current at pH 7.8; Kruskal–Wallis ANOVA. (c) Dose–response ASIC1a inhibitory curves for Mamb-2 alone (black line) and for Mamb-2 in concurrence with 300 μM DAU (red line). Data were fitted by the logistic equation. The calculated permanent current for Mamb-2 was 5.3 ± 2.3%, and the maximal integrated current increased to 26.7 ± 7.8% in the presence of DAU. Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 5); * P < 0.05.
Scheme 1. Model 3–10 with ten consecutive H+ binding steps.
Figure 8. Dual effect of pre-incubated DAU on ASIC1a channel. (a) Average control current (n = 7; black trace) and current obtained by subtracting the average control current from the average current induced by 300 µM DAU (n = 7; red trace). The black arrows indicate the boundary of the three conditional zones of the DAU action: Area 1 (inhibitory), area 2 (neutral), and area 3 (potentiating). For area 1, we calculated the integral control current S1 (grey) and the integral inhibited current S2 (green). A is the maximal amplitude of the control current; A1 and A2 are the amplitudes of the control current at time tstart (the start of second peak’s development) and tmax (the second peak’s maximum), respectively. (b) Calculated parameters of the DAU effect, presented as mean ± SEM (n = 7). The inhibition of the channel activation as a ratio of area S2 to area S1 is expressed as a delay in the of channel’s opening kinetics without a change in the peak amplitude (A). We estimated the percentage by which the main current is desensitized at tstart and tmax using the ratio of the difference between amplitudes (A minus A1 and A2, respectively) to amplitude A.
Alijevic,
Subtype-specific modulation of acid-sensing ion channel (ASIC) function by 2-guanidine-4-methylquinazoline.
2012, Pubmed,
Xenbase
Alijevic,
Subtype-specific modulation of acid-sensing ion channel (ASIC) function by 2-guanidine-4-methylquinazoline.
2012,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Andreev,
Analgesic Activity of Acid-Sensing Ion Channel 3 (ASIС3) Inhibitors: Sea Anemones Peptides Ugr9-1 and APETx2 versus Low Molecular Weight Compounds.
2018,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Askwith,
Neuropeptide FF and FMRFamide potentiate acid-evoked currents from sensory neurons and proton-gated DEG/ENaC channels.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Babini,
Alternative splicing and interaction with di- and polyvalent cations control the dynamic range of acid-sensing ion channel 1 (ASIC1).
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Baconguis,
Structural plasticity and dynamic selectivity of acid-sensing ion channel-spider toxin complexes.
2012,
Pubmed
Baconguis,
X-ray structure of acid-sensing ion channel 1-snake toxin complex reveals open state of a Na(+)-selective channel.
2014,
Pubmed
Baron,
Pharmacology of acid-sensing ion channels - Physiological and therapeutical perspectives.
2015,
Pubmed
Bartoi,
Acid-sensing ion channel (ASIC) 1a/2a heteromers have a flexible 2:1/1:2 stoichiometry.
2014,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Benveniste,
A kinetic analysis of the modulation of N-methyl-D-aspartic acid receptors by glycine in mouse cultured hippocampal neurones.
1990,
Pubmed
Besson,
Pharmacological modulation of Acid-Sensing Ion Channels 1a and 3 by amiloride and 2-guanidine-4-methylquinazoline (GMQ).
2017,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Bohlen,
A heteromeric Texas coral snake toxin targets acid-sensing ion channels to produce pain.
2011,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Chen,
The tarantula toxin psalmotoxin 1 inhibits acid-sensing ion channel (ASIC) 1a by increasing its apparent H+ affinity.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Deval,
Acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs): pharmacology and implication in pain.
2010,
Pubmed
Deval,
Acid-Sensing Ion Channels and nociception in the peripheral and central nervous systems.
2015,
Pubmed
Diochot,
Black mamba venom peptides target acid-sensing ion channels to abolish pain.
2012,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Dubinnyi,
Lignan from thyme possesses inhibitory effect on ASIC3 channel current.
2012,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Frey,
Conformational changes in the lower palm domain of ASIC1a contribute to desensitization and RFamide modulation.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Friese,
Acid-sensing ion channel-1 contributes to axonal degeneration in autoimmune inflammation of the central nervous system.
2007,
Pubmed
Gründer,
Biophysical properties of acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs).
2015,
Pubmed
Jasti,
Structure of acid-sensing ion channel 1 at 1.9 A resolution and low pH.
2007,
Pubmed
Liu,
[Protective effects of (-)-S.R-daurisoline on neuronal injury in rat primary cortical cultures].
1998,
Pubmed
Liu,
Effect of daurisoline on HERG channel electrophysiological function and protein expression.
2012,
Pubmed
Liu,
Daurisoline suppressed early afterdepolarizations and inhibited L-type calcium current.
2010,
Pubmed
Mazzuca,
A tarantula peptide against pain via ASIC1a channels and opioid mechanisms.
2007,
Pubmed
Osmakov,
Sea anemone peptide with uncommon β-hairpin structure inhibits acid-sensing ion channel 3 (ASIC3) and reveals analgesic activity.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Osmakov,
Proton-independent activation of acid-sensing ion channel 3 by an alkaloid, lindoldhamine, from Laurus nobilis.
2018,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Osmakov,
Endogenous Isoquinoline Alkaloids Agonists of Acid-Sensing Ion Channel Type 3.
2017,
Pubmed
Pignataro,
Prolonged activation of ASIC1a and the time window for neuroprotection in cerebral ischaemia.
2007,
Pubmed
Salinas,
Binding site and inhibitory mechanism of the mambalgin-2 pain-relieving peptide on acid-sensing ion channel 1a.
2014,
Pubmed
Schuhmacher,
Expression of acid-sensing ion channels and selection of reference genes in mouse and naked mole rat.
2016,
Pubmed
Sherwood,
Dynorphin opioid peptides enhance acid-sensing ion channel 1a activity and acidosis-induced neuronal death.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Sherwood,
Endogenous arginine-phenylalanine-amide-related peptides alter steady-state desensitization of ASIC1a.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Stephan,
The ASIC3/P2X3 cognate receptor is a pain-relevant and ligand-gated cationic channel.
2018,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Sun,
Cryo-EM structure of the ASIC1a-mambalgin-1 complex reveals that the peptide toxin mambalgin-1 inhibits acid-sensing ion channels through an unusual allosteric effect.
2018,
Pubmed
Vick,
ASICs and neuropeptides.
2015,
Pubmed
Vullo,
Conformational dynamics and role of the acidic pocket in ASIC pH-dependent gating.
2017,
Pubmed
Walder,
ASIC1 and ASIC3 play different roles in the development of Hyperalgesia after inflammatory muscle injury.
2010,
Pubmed
Waldmann,
A proton-gated cation channel involved in acid-sensing.
1997,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Wemmie,
Acid-sensing ion channels in pain and disease.
2013,
Pubmed
Wu,
Natural autophagy blockers, dauricine (DAC) and daurisoline (DAS), sensitize cancer cells to camptothecin-induced toxicity.
2017,
Pubmed
Xiong,
Neuroprotection in ischemia: blocking calcium-permeable acid-sensing ion channels.
2004,
Pubmed
Yin,
Loss of Acid sensing ion channel-1a and bicarbonate administration attenuate the severity of traumatic brain injury.
2013,
Pubmed
Yu,
A nonproton ligand sensor in the acid-sensing ion channel.
2010,
Pubmed
Zhang,
[Protective effects of phenolic alkaloids from Menispermum dauricum on inflammatory injury following focal cerebral ischemia-reperfusion in rats].
2004,
Pubmed