Due to necessary maintenance, Xenbase will be unavailable from December 24-29, 2014. We apologize for the inconvenience.

Click on this message to dismiss it.
Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.
J Pharmacol Exp Ther. May 1, 2001; 297 (2): 646-56.

Analysis of mecamylamine stereoisomers on human nicotinic receptor subtypes.

Papke RL , Sanberg PR , Shytle RD .

Because mecamylamine, a nicotinic receptor antagonist, is used so often in nicotine research and because mecamylamine may have important therapeutic properties clinically, it is important to fully explore and understand its pharmacology. In the present study, the efficacy and potency of mecamylamine and its stereoisomers were evaluated as inhibitors of human alpha 3 beta 4, alpha 3 beta 2, alpha 7, and alpha 4 beta 2 nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), as well as mouse adult type muscle nAChRs and rat N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors expressed in Xenopus oocytes. The selectivity of mecamylamine for neuronal nAChR was manifested primarily in terms of slow recovery rates from mecamylamine-induced inhibition. Neuronal receptors showed a prolonged inhibition after exposure to low micromolar concentrations of mecamylamine. Muscle-type receptors showed a transient inhibition by similar concentrations of mecamylamine, and NMDA receptors were only transiently inhibited by higher micromolar concentrations. Mecamylamine inhibition of neuronal nAChR was noncompetitive and voltage dependent. Although there was little difference between S-(+)-mecamylamine and R-(-)-mecamylamine in terms of 50% inhibition concentration values for a given receptor subtype, there appeared to be significant differences in the off-rates for the mecamylamine isomers from the receptors. Specifically, S-(+)-mecamylamine appeared to dissociate more slowly from alpha 4 beta 2 and alpha 3 beta 4 receptors than did R-(-)-mecamylamine. In addition, it was found that muscle-type receptors appeared to be somewhat more sensitive to R-(-)-mecamylamine than to S-(+)-mecamylamine. Together, these findings suggest that in chronic (i.e., therapeutic) application, S-(+)-mecamylamine might be preferable to R-(-)-mecamylamine in terms of equilibrium inactivation of neuronal receptors with decreased side effects associated with muscle-type receptors.

PubMed ID: 11303054
Article link: J Pharmacol Exp Ther.

Genes referenced:
Antibodies referenced:
Morpholinos referenced:

My Xenbase: [ Log-in / Register ]
version: [3.3]

Major funding for Xenbase is provided by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, grant P41 HD064556