Proks P , de Wet H , Ashcroft FM .

084655 Wellcome Trust , WT084655 Wellcome Trust

	Figure 1. Data segments used for noise analysis of macroscopic Kir6.2-G334D/SUR1 currents. Representative example of activation of Kir6.2-G334D/SUR1 channels by 10 mM MgATP. Nucleotide application is indicated by the bar. The parallel vertical lines denote 1-s data segments during which the current reaches a quasi–steady-state level. The dotted horizontal line indicates the zero current level. PO and N in the absence of nucleotides (open triangles in Fig. 4, B–D) were calculated from segment 1, and in the presence of 10 mM MgATP (open circles in Fig. 4, B–D) from segment 2.
	Figure 2. Rundown of Kir6.2/SUR1 and Kir6.2-G334D/SUR1 channels in macropatches. (A) Macroscopic Kir6.2/SUR1 currents at −60 mV recorded from a giant patch. Patch excision and the start of the perfusion with nucleotide-free intracellular solution are indicated by the arrows. The dotted line represents the zero current level. (B) Macroscopic Kir6.2-G334D/SUR1 currents recorded at −60 mV. Patch excision and the start of the perfusion with nucleotide-free solution are indicated by the arrows. The dotted line represents the zero current level. (C) Mean macroscopic KATP current at −60 mV during the first 60 s of rundown, expressed as a fraction of the maximum value reached after excision, is plotted as a function of the time after patch excision for Kir6.2/SUR1 (open circles; n = 10) and Kir6.2-G334D/SUR1 channels (filled circles; n = 10). The lines are the best fit of a double-exponential function to the mean data (solid line, Kir6.2/SUR1; dotted line, Kir6.2-G334D/SUR1).
	Figure 3. Kinetics of Kir6.2/SUR1 and Kir6.2-G334D/SUR1 channels. (A) Single Kir6.2/SUR1 currents recorded at −60 mV in nucleotide-free solution. c, the closed current level. (B) Distributions of Kir6.2/SUR1 open times (left), closed times (middle), and burst times (right) in nucleotide-free solution. The PO(0) of the channel illustrated was 0.36. The distributions were fit with the following parameters. Open times: τO = 3.39 ms (τO,COR = 2.46 ms); closed times: τC1 = 0.44 ms, aC1 = 0.949; τC2 = 9.6 ms, aC2 = 0.022; τC3 = 53 ms, aC3 = 0.020; τC4 = 363 ms, aC4 = 0.009; burst times: τB1 = 93 ms, aB1 = 0.526, τB2 = 31 ms, aB2 = 0.328, τB3 = 1.7 ms, aB3 = 0.145. The mean burst duration (τB) was 59.3 ms. (C) Single Kir6.2-G334D/SUR1 currents recorded at −60 mV in nucleotide-free solution. c, the closed current level. (D) Distributions of Kir6.2-G334D/SUR1 open times (left), closed times (middle), and burst times (right) in nucleotide-free solution. The PO(0) of the channel illustrated was 0.27. The distributions were fit with the following parameters. Open times: τO = 3.32 ms (τO,COR = 2.32 ms); closed times: τC1 = 0.39 ms, aC1 = 0.940; τC2 = 16.9 ms, aC2 = 0.030; τC3 = 139 ms, aC3 = 0.023; τC4 = 415 ms, aC4 = 0.007; burst times: τB1 = 61 ms, a1 = 0.651; τB2 = 20 ms, a2 = 0.187; τB3 = 1.0 ms, a3 = 0.162. The mean burst duration (τB) was 43.6 ms.
	Figure 4. Rundown and reactivation of Kir6.2-G334D/SUR1 channels by MgATP and MgADP. (A) Representative record showing repetitive activation of Kir6.2-G334D/SUR1 current by 10 mM MgATP. Nucleotide application is indicated by the bars. Patch excision and the start of the perfusion with nucleotide-free solution are indicated by the arrows. The dotted line indicates the zero current level. (B–D) Estimates of NrPO (B), PO (C), and the fraction of functional channels (N) (D) calculated from noise analysis of current records obtained during repetitive application of 10 mM MgATP (open circles) or 1 mM MgADP (open squares), or in control solution before the application of nucleotide (open triangles). Data are mean ± SEM from 10 patches. The lines are drawn by eye.
	Figure 5. Nucleotide activation of Kir6.2-G334D/SUR1 channels. (A) Kir6.2-G334D/SUR1 current magnitude (IADP) in the presence of 3 µM MgADP (filled squares) or 30 µM MgADP (filled circles), expressed as a fraction of that in the presence of a maximal stimulatory ADP concentration (1 mM; IMAX). This is plotted against the current magnitude in the presence of 1 mM MgADP (IMAX), expressed as a fraction of the current immediately after excision (IEX). The dotted lines represent the best linear fit to the data at 3 µM (lower) or 30 µM (upper) MgADP. (B) Repetitive activation of Kir6.2-G334D/SUR1 channels by different concentrations of MgADP. Nucleotide application is indicated by the bars, and the numbers above the bars give the nucleotide concentration in millimolars. The dotted line indicates the zero current level. (C) Concentration–response relationships for activation of Kir6.2-G334D/SUR1 channels by MgATP (filled circles; n = 8) or MgADP (open circles; n = 8). The lines are the best fit of Eq. 1 to the mean data with EC50 = 7.7 µM and h = 1.30 (MgADP) and EC50 = 112 µM and h = 1.25 (MgATP).
	Figure 6. Effect of other Mg-nucleotides. (A) Mean increase in Kir6.2-G334D/SUR1 current in the presence of different nucleotides (refer to Materials and methods). White bar, 1 mM MgATP (n = 13); pale gray bar, 1 mM MgATPγS (n = 6); dark gray bar, 1 mM MgADP (n = 7); black bar, 1 mM MgAMP-PNP (n = 6); crosshatched bar, 1 mM MgAMP-PNP plus 1 mM MgATP (n = 6). ***, P < 0.001 (against MgATP). (B) Mean time constants (τ) of current activation (τON-1 and τON-2) and deactivation (τOFF) by MgATP (white bars, n = 13), MgATPγS (pale gray bars, n = 6), and MgADP (dark gray bars, n = 7). *, P < 0.5; ***, P < 0.001 (against MgATP). (C) Time course of current activation and deactivation by 1 mM MgADP (top) and 1 mM MgATP (bottom). Nucleotide application is indicated by the bar, and the dotted line represents the zero current level. The white lines are the best fit of one (MgADP) or two (MgATP) exponential components for activation (A1*e−t/τ1+A2*e−t/τ2) and one for deactivation (A*e−t/τ). For MgADP: AON-1 = 680 pA, τON-1 = 330 ms; AOFF = 680 pA, τOFF = 1,320 ms. For MgATP: AON-1 = 490 pA, τON-1 = 730 ms; AON-2 = 180 pA, τON-2 = 4,060 ms; AOFF = 670 pA; τOFF = 1,835 ms.
	Figure 7. NBD-independent nucleotide activation. Representative examples of the effect of 1 mM MgATP on Kir6.2-G334D/SUR-KAKA channels (A) or Kir6.2-G334DΔC channels (B). Patch excision and the start of the perfusion with nucleotide-free solution are indicated by the arrows and MgATP application by the bars. The dotted line indicates the zero current level.
	Figure 8. Effect of 10 mM MgATP on Kir6.2-G334D/SUR1 kinetics. (A and C) Single Kir6.2-G334D/SUR1 currents recorded at −60 mV from the same patch first in nucleotide-free solution (A), and then in the presence of 10 mM MgATP (C). c, the closed current level. (B and D) Distributions of open times (left), closed times (middle), and burst durations (right) in 0 mM MgATP (B; PO = 0.26) and in 10 mM MgATP (D; PO = 0.82). The distributions were fit with the following parameters. For 0 mM MgATP (B): open times: τO = 2.34 ms (τO,COR = 1.57 ms); closed times: τC1 = 0.33 ms, aC1 = 0.901; τC2 = 5.5 ms, aC2 = 0.043; τC3 = 39 ms, aC3 = 0.049; τC4 = 192 ms, aC4 = 0.007; burst times: τB1 = 33 ms, aB1 = 0.53; τB2 = 9.3 ms, aB2 = 0.34; τB3 = 0.63 ms, aB3 = 0.13. The mean burst duration (τB) was 20.8 ms. For 10 mM MgATP (D): open times: τO = 2.73 ms (τO,COR = 1.75 ms); closed times: τC1 = 0.33 ms, aC1 = 0.994; τC2 = 2.5 ms, aC2 = 0.004; τC3 = 14 ms, aC3 = 0.003; burst times: τB ≡ τB1 = 282 ms.
	Figure 9. Effect of 1 mM MgADP on Kir6.2-G334D/SUR1 kinetics. (A and C) Single Kir6.2-G334D/SUR1 currents recorded at −60 mV from the same patch first in nucleotide-free solution (A), and then in 1 mM MgADP (C). (B and D) Distributions of open times (left), closed times (middle), and burst durations (right) in 0 mM MgADP (B; PO = 0.39) and 1 mM MgADP (D; PO = 0.82). The distributions were fit with the following parameters. For 0 mM MgADP (B): open times: τO = 2.31 ms (τO,COR = 1.51 ms); closed times: τC1 = 0.33 ms, aC1 = 0.942; τC2 = 7.3 ms, aC2 = 0.021; τC3 = 36 ms, aC3 = 0.034; τC4 = 230 ms, aC4 = 0.003; burst times: τB1 = 41 ms, aB1 = 0.770; τB2 = 5.6 ms, aB2 = 0.115; τB3 = 0.46 ms, aB3 = 0.115. The mean burst duration (τ) was 32.3 ms. For 1 mM MgADP (D): open times: τO = 2.61 ms (τO,COR = 1.77 ms); closed times: τC1 = 0.38 ms, aC1 = 0.990; τC2 = 3.8 ms, aC2 = 0.001; τC3 = 14 ms, aC3 = 0.009; burst times: τB ≡ τB1 = 263 ms.
	Figure 10. Comparison of the activatory and inhibitory effects of Mg-nucleotides. (A) Concentration–response relationships for activation and inhibition of macroscopic KATP currents by ADP. Inhibition was measured for Kir6.2/SUR1 currents in the absence of Mg2+ (open circles; n = 6). Activation was measured for Kir6.2-G334D/SUR1 currents in the presence of Mg2+ (filled squares; n = 8; data from Fig. 5 C). Filled circles (n = 15) indicate data obtained for Kir6.2/SUR1 currents in the presence of Mg2+, where activation and inhibition are simultaneously present. The solid lines are the best fit of Eqs. 1–3 to the mean data. For Kir6.2-G334D/SUR1 channels, data were fit with Eq. 1, EC50 = 7.7 µM and h = 1.30. For Kir6.2/SUR1 channels, data in Mg-free solution were fit with Eq. 2, IC50 = 62 µM and h = 0.81, and data in Mg-containing solution were fit with Eq. 3 using fixed activation parameters (EC50 = 8 µM and h2 = 1.3) and a = 2; IC50 = 280 µM and h1 = 1.4 for inhibition. The dotted line is best fit of the data for Kir6.2/SUR1 in Mg-containing solution assuming no interaction between the activatory and inhibitory sites (IC50 was fixed at 62 µM and EC50 at 8 µM) and a = 2.5, h1 = 1.3, and h2 = 1.3. (B) Concentration–response relationships for activation and inhibition of macroscopic KATP currents by ATP. Inhibition was measured for Kir6.2/SUR1 currents in the absence of Mg2+ (open circles; n = 6). Activation was measured for Kir6.2-G334D/SUR1 currents in the presence of Mg2+ (filled squares; n = 8; data from Fig. 5 C). Filled circles (n = 8) indicate data obtained for Kir6.2/SUR1 currents in the presence of Mg2+, where activation and inhibition are simultaneously present. For Kir6.2-G334D/SUR1 channels, the line through the mean data were fit with Eq. 1, EC50 = 112 µM and h = 1.25. For Kir6.2/SUR1 channels in the absence of Mg2+, the line through the mean data are the best fit of Eq. 2, with IC50 = 7.1 µM and h = 1.1. For Kir6.2/SUR1 channels, data in Mg-containing solution were fit with Eq. 2, with IC50 = 14 µM and h = 1.0. (C) Concentration–inhibition relationships for Kir6.2/SUR1-KAKA currents in the absence (open circles; n = 8) and presence of Mg2+ (gray circles; n = 8). The lines through the mean data are the best fit of Eq. 2, with IC50 = 4.8 µM and h = 1.2 for Mg2+-free solution, and IC50 = 8.3 µM and h = 1.2 for Mg2+ solution. (D) Concentration–response inhibition relationships for Kir6.2/SUR1 currents in the absence (open circles; n = 8) or presence of Mg2+ (filled circles; n = 8). The physiological range of [ATP]i is shown by the bar. The lines are drawn by eye.

Abraham, Coupling of cell energetics with membrane metabolic sensing. Integrative signaling through creatine kinase phosphotransfer disrupted by M-CK gene knock-out. 2002, Pubmed

Abraham, Coupling of cell energetics with membrane metabolic sensing. Integrative signaling through creatine kinase phosphotransfer disrupted by M-CK gene knock-out. 2002, Pubmed
Aittoniemi, Review. SUR1: a unique ATP-binding cassette protein that functions as an ion channel regulator. 2009, Pubmed
Alekseev, Ligand-insensitive state of cardiac ATP-sensitive K+ channels. Basis for channel opening. 1998, Pubmed
Antcliff, Functional analysis of a structural model of the ATP-binding site of the KATP channel Kir6.2 subunit. 2005, Pubmed
Ashcroft, The Walter B. Cannon Physiology in Perspective Lecture, 2007. ATP-sensitive K+ channels and disease: from molecule to malady. 2007, Pubmed
Baukrowitz, PIP2 and PIP as determinants for ATP inhibition of KATP channels. 1998, Pubmed , Xenbase
Bienengraeber, ABCC9 mutations identified in human dilated cardiomyopathy disrupt catalytic KATP channel gating. 2004, Pubmed
Bokvist, Separate processes mediate nucleotide-induced inhibition and stimulation of the ATP-regulated K(+)-channels in mouse pancreatic beta-cells. 1991, Pubmed
Béguin, PKA-mediated phosphorylation of the human K(ATP) channel: separate roles of Kir6.2 and SUR1 subunit phosphorylation. 1999, Pubmed , Xenbase
Clement, Association and stoichiometry of K(ATP) channel subunits. 1997, Pubmed
Dabrowski, Pyridine nucleotide regulation of the KATP channel Kir6.2/SUR1 expressed in Xenopus oocytes. 2003, Pubmed , Xenbase
Davies, The effect of intracellular pH on ATP-dependent potassium channels of frog skeletal muscle. 1992, Pubmed
Drain, KATP channel inhibition by ATP requires distinct functional domains of the cytoplasmic C terminus of the pore-forming subunit. 1998, Pubmed , Xenbase
Enkvetchakul, ATP interaction with the open state of the K(ATP) channel. 2001, Pubmed
Fan, Anionic phospholipids activate ATP-sensitive potassium channels. 1997, Pubmed
Findlay, ATP maintains ATP-inhibited K+ channels in an operational state. 1986, Pubmed
Furukawa, Stilbene disulfonates block ATP-sensitive K+ channels in guinea pig ventricular myocytes. 1993, Pubmed
Gillis, Effects of sulfonamides on a metabolite-regulated ATPi-sensitive K+ channel in rat pancreatic B-cells. 1989, Pubmed
Gribble, MgATP activates the beta cell KATP channel by interaction with its SUR1 subunit. 1998, Pubmed , Xenbase
Gribble, Properties of cloned ATP-sensitive K+ currents expressed in Xenopus oocytes. 1997, Pubmed , Xenbase
Gribble, The essential role of the Walker A motifs of SUR1 in K-ATP channel activation by Mg-ADP and diazoxide. 1997, Pubmed , Xenbase
Hopkins, Two sites for adenine-nucleotide regulation of ATP-sensitive potassium channels in mouse pancreatic beta-cells and HIT cells. 1992, Pubmed
John, Regulation of cloned ATP-sensitive K channels by adenine nucleotides and sulfonylureas: interactions between SUR1 and positively charged domains on Kir6.2. 2001, Pubmed
Li, Open state destabilization by ATP occupancy is mechanism speeding burst exit underlying KATP channel inhibition by ATP. 2002, Pubmed , Xenbase
Lin, Regulation of ATP-sensitive potassium channel function by protein kinase A-mediated phosphorylation in transfected HEK293 cells. 2000, Pubmed
Magleby, Burst kinetics of single calcium-activated potassium channels in cultured rat muscle. 1983, Pubmed
Markworth, ATP4- mediates closure of pancreatic beta-cell ATP-sensitive potassium channels by interaction with 1 of 4 identical sites. 2000, Pubmed
Masia, An ATP-binding mutation (G334D) in KCNJ11 is associated with a sulfonylurea-insensitive form of developmental delay, epilepsy, and neonatal diabetes. 2007, Pubmed
Matsuo, Different binding properties and affinities for ATP and ADP among sulfonylurea receptor subtypes, SUR1, SUR2A, and SUR2B. 2000, Pubmed
Mikhailov, 3-D structural and functional characterization of the purified KATP channel complex Kir6.2-SUR1. 2005, Pubmed
Miki, Roles of KATP channels as metabolic sensors in acute metabolic changes. 2005, Pubmed
Nichols, Adenosine diphosphate as an intracellular regulator of insulin secretion. 1996, Pubmed
Proks, Mutations within the P-loop of Kir6.2 modulate the intraburst kinetics of the ATP-sensitive potassium channel. 2001, Pubmed , Xenbase
Proks, Modification of K-ATP channels in pancreatic beta-cells by trypsin. 1993, Pubmed
Proks, A gating mutation at the internal mouth of the Kir6.2 pore is associated with DEND syndrome. 2005, Pubmed , Xenbase
Proks, Functional effects of KCNJ11 mutations causing neonatal diabetes: enhanced activation by MgATP. 2005, Pubmed , Xenbase
Proks, Mechanism of action of a sulphonylurea receptor SUR1 mutation (F132L) that causes DEND syndrome. 2007, Pubmed , Xenbase
Proks, Modeling K(ATP) channel gating and its regulation. 2009, Pubmed
Qin, Kinetics of ATP-sensitive K+ channel revealed with oil-gate concentration jump method. 1989, Pubmed
Ribalet, ATP mediates both activation and inhibition of K(ATP) channel activity via cAMP-dependent protein kinase in insulin-secreting cell lines. 1989, Pubmed
Rosado, A role for the actin cytoskeleton in the initiation and maintenance of store-mediated calcium entry in human platelets. 2000, Pubmed
Schwanstecher, Interaction of tolbutamide and cytosolic nucleotides in controlling the ATP-sensitive K+ channel in mouse beta-cells. 1994, Pubmed
Shyng, Membrane phospholipid control of nucleotide sensitivity of KATP channels. 1998, Pubmed
Shyng, Regulation of KATP channel activity by diazoxide and MgADP. Distinct functions of the two nucleotide binding folds of the sulfonylurea receptor. 1997, Pubmed
Silberberg, Preventing errors when estimating single channel properties from the analysis of current fluctuations. 1993, Pubmed
Tarasov, A Kir6.2 mutation causing neonatal diabetes impairs electrical activity and insulin secretion from INS-1 beta-cells. 2006, Pubmed
Trapp, Molecular analysis of ATP-sensitive K channel gating and implications for channel inhibition by ATP. 1998, Pubmed , Xenbase
Tucker, Truncation of Kir6.2 produces ATP-sensitive K+ channels in the absence of the sulphonylurea receptor. 1997, Pubmed , Xenbase
Ueda, MgADP antagonism to Mg2+-independent ATP binding of the sulfonylurea receptor SUR1. 1997, Pubmed
Xie, Wortmannin, an inhibitor of phosphatidylinositol kinases, blocks the MgATP-dependent recovery of Kir6.2/SUR2A channels. 1999, Pubmed
Zingman, Signaling in channel/enzyme multimers: ATPase transitions in SUR module gate ATP-sensitive K+ conductance. 2001, Pubmed
de Wet, Studies of the ATPase activity of the ABC protein SUR1. 2007, Pubmed