Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.

Summary Expression Phenotypes Gene Literature (24) GO Terms (1) Nucleotides (55) Proteins (18) Interactants (316) Wiki
XB-GENEPAGE-484662

Gene Symbol: prrx1

Gene Name: paired related homeobox 1

Anatomy terms
blastema bone tissue branchial arch connective tissue cranial neural crest ectoderm eye fibroblast forebrain forelimb forelimb bud head head mesenchyme head region hindlimb hindlimb bud hyoid arch ... [+]
Anatomy stages
NF stage 10 to NF stage 66
RNA-Seq and EST Transcriptome profiles tropicalis laevis.L laevis.S
RNA-Seq stage profile Data from Owens et al. 2016 Data from Session et al. 2016 Data from Session et al. 2016
GEO data prrx1.L prrx1.S
Microarray Data Data from Yanai et al. 2011 Data from Yanai et al. 2011 Data from Yanai et al. 2011
Stage and Tissue Profiles
                    Source: Owens et al. 2016 (tropicalis)
                    Source: Session et al. 2016 (laevis)
          Source: Session et al. 2016 (laevis)
Experimental Regulation (via RNA-seq)


                                                            Source: Ding et al. 2017 (laevis)
Summary ImagesSort by:
Expression Image
NF stage 29 and 30
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 33 and 34
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 45
Good quality Poor quality
   
Community Submitted ImagesSort by:
Expression Image
NF stage 25
Good quality Poor quality
     
Literature ImagesSort by:
Expression Image
NF stage 29 and 30
Takahashi, et al. 1998
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 29 and 30
El-Hodiri, et al. 2018
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 29 and 30 to NF stage 33 and 34
El-Hodiri, et al. 2018
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 33 and 34
El-Hodiri, et al. 2018
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 25 to NF stage 35 and 36
Takahashi, et al. 1998
Good quality Poor quality
6 more [+]