XB-ART-42756
Mol Biol Cell
2011 Mar 15;226:880-91. doi: 10.1091/mbc.E10-07-0595.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Nuclear import of an intact preassembled proteasome particle.
Savulescu AF
,
Shorer H
,
Kleifeld O
,
Cohen I
,
Gruber R
,
Glickman MH
,
Harel A
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
The 26S proteasome is a conserved 2.5 MDa protein degradation machine that localizes to different cellular compartments, including the nucleus. Little is known about the specific targeting mechanisms of proteasomes in eukaryotic cells. We used a cell-free nuclear reconstitution system to test for nuclear targeting and import of distinct proteasome species. Three types of stable, proteolytically active proteasomes particles were purified from Xenopus egg cytosol. Two of these, the 26S holoenzyme and the 20S core particle, were targeted to the nuclear periphery but did not reach the nucleoplasm. This targeting depends on the presence of mature nuclear pore complexes (NPCs) in the nuclear envelope. A third, novel form, designated here as 20S+, was actively imported through NPCs. The 20S+ proteasome particle resembles recently described structural intermediates from other systems. Nuclear import of this particle requires functional NPCs, but it is not directly regulated by the Ran GTPase cycle. The mere presence of the associated "+" factors is sufficient to reconstitute nuclear targeting and confer onto isolated 20S core particles the ability to be imported. Stable 20S+ particles found in unfertilized eggs may provide a means for quick mobilization of existing proteasome particles into newly formed nuclear compartments during early development.
???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 21289101
???displayArticle.pmcLink??? PMC3057711
???displayArticle.link??? Mol Biol Cell
Species referenced: Xenopus laevis
Genes referenced: actl6a dnai1 hsp90aa1 ran ranbp2 rpn2
???attribute.lit??? ???displayArticles.show???
![]() |
FIGURE 1:. Nuclear targeting of proteasomes. (A) In vitro reconstituted nuclei were separated from the surrounding cytosol by centrifugation through a sucrose cushion, as described in Materials and Methods. Total reaction, cytosolic, and nuclear fractions were immunoblotted with specific markers. Note that actin is exclusively cytosolic, while a fraction of the histone and nucleoporin markers are recruited to nuclei within the time of incubation. The α7 and Rpn2 proteasome subunits are also significantly recruited to the nuclear fraction. (B) Reconstituted nuclei were fixed and processed for indirect immunofluorescence. DNA was stained with Hoechst 33258 (left column). Anti-Nup358 exhibits the typical punctuate rim staining of NPC components. Both α7 and Rpn2 antibodies exhibit punctuate staining throughout the nucleus. Scale bar, 10 μm. |
![]() |
FIGURE 2:. Proteasome targeting requires mature nuclear envelopes and NPCs. (A) Schematic representation of major steps and known chemical inhibitors of the nuclear assembly pathway (reviewed by Harel and Forbes, 2004). The addition of GTPγS at t = 0 of nuclear reconstitution results in unfused membrane vesicles docked on the surface of chromatin. BAPTA inhibits a subsequent step, resulting in aborted assembly intermediates with sealed double nuclear membranes, but no NPCs (poreless nuclei). If nuclear assembly is allowed to proceed normally and recombinant Impβ 45â462 is later added, mature NPCs are formed, but nuclear transport is blocked (plugged pores). (B) Separation of nuclear and cytosolic fractions was carried out as in Figure 1A and compared between normal nuclei (left three columns) and BAPTA-inhibited intermediates (right three columns). Proteasome markers were missing in BAPTA-inhibited nuclear intermediates. (C) Normal (functional) nuclei and BAPTA-inhibited intermediates were immunostained with anti-α7 as in Figure 1B. Scale bar, 10 μm. (D) Separated nuclear and cytosolic fractions were compared between normal assembly and GTPγS-inhibited reactions. The α7 proteasomal marker is absent from the aborted assembly intermediates. |
![]() |
FIGURE 3:. Biochemical purification of three distinct species of proteasome particles. (A) Migration of endogenous proteasomes (extract) and purified particles (designated 26S, 20S+, and 20S) in native gels. Active particles were visualized by the Suc-LLVY-AMC peptide, which becomes fluorescent upon proteolytic cleavage in the internal cavity of the proteasome core particle. The slower migrating top two bands correspond to single- and double-capped 26S forms known from yeast extracts and other systems. The 20S+ particle shows higher peptidase activity than an equivalent sample of the 20S CP. (B) Silver staining (top) and immunoblot analysis (bottom) of samples of the three purified particle preparations, following denaturing SDSâPAGE. The blot was probed with antibodies directed against α7 (a 20S CP subunit), Rpn2 and Rpt1 (19S subunits), and Hsp90, which is only detected in the 20S+ particle. (C) Identical samples of the three purified particle preparations (26S, 20S+, and 20S) were loaded for the in-gel peptidase activity assay shown in (A) and in three native gels used for immunoblotting. Equal loading based on anti-α7 reactivity in a denaturing immunoblot is shown in the bottom strip of (A). The native blots were probed against α7, Rpn2, and Hsp90, all of which were detected in the single band of the 20S+ particle. (D) Immunoprecipitation out of Xenopus egg cytosol was performed with affinity-purified antibodies generated against the central PC-repeat domain of xRpn2, or control rabbit IgG. Rpn2 and α7 were coimmunoprecipitated, but Rpt1 was missing, indicating the presence of an endogenous particle in the extract containing the 20S CP together with an exposed Rpn2 subunit. |
![]() |
FIGURE 4:. Nuclear targeting and import of fluorescently labeled proteasomes. Purified 26S, 20S+, and 20S particles were fluorescently labeled and added into nuclear reconstitution reactions after the assembly of functional nuclei had been completed. Samples were fixed and analyzed by confocal microscopy. For each of the three particles a representative nucleus is shown, starting with a surface (top) view section on the left, and followed by three consecutive 1-μm-thick confocal sections through the middle of the nucleus. The labeled 26S and 20S particles accumulate at the nuclear envelope, while the 20S+ particle reaches the nucleoplasm. |
![]() |
FIGURE 5:. Nuclear targeting of the 20S+ particle requires functional NPCs. (A) Labeled 20S+ particles were added into normal reconstitution reactions (functional nuclei), or reactions in which NPC assembly was inhibited by BAPTA (poreless nuclei). Samples were fixed and analyzed by epifluorescence microscopy; 20S+ staining was not observed in BAPTA-inhibited intermediates. (B) Normal reconstituted reactions were split in two and 8 μM Impβ 45â462 was added to plug the channel of preassembled NPCs in one sample. Labeled 20S+ particles were then added to both samples. Consecutive confocal sections through the middle of representative nuclei are shown. The 20S+ accumulated inside normal nuclei, but only stained the nuclear envelope when pores were plugged. (C) Nuclear and cytosolic fractions were separated and immunoblotted with the α7 proteasomal marker, as in Figure 2. Normal nuclei were compared with BAPTA-inhibited nuclei [corresponding to poreless intermediates in (A)], and Impβ 45â462 was added after assembly [plugged pores in (B)]. The α7 subunit is not detected in the nuclear fraction of BAPTA-inhibited intermediates and a smaller portion of α7 cofractionates with plugged-pore nuclei as compared with normal nuclei. |
![]() |
FIGURE 6:. 20S+ import is not blocked by RanGTP. (A) Reconstituted nuclei were preincubated with buffer (control) or 10 μM RanQ69L-GTP for 15 min, before the addition of fluorescently labeled 20S+ particles and TRITC-NLS-BSA import substrate. Both 20S+ and the NLS cargo accumulated in control nuclei (top row; confocal midsection). The import of the NLS cargo was blocked in the presence of RanQ69L-GTP, while 20S+ particles still accumulated inside the nucleus. (B) Nuclear and cytosolic fractions were separated and immunoblotted with anti-α7 as in Figure 5C, comparing normal nuclei with the addition of 2 mM GTPγS after 1 h of assembly. Both reactions were fractionated after 20 min of incubation. The inhibition of GTPase functions after nuclear assembly did not affect the nuclear/cytoplasmic ratio of the α7 proteasomal marker. |
![]() |
FIGURE 7:. Reconstitution of an import-compatible form of the proteasome. (A) The purified + fraction was fluorescently labeled and tested in an import assay with reconstituted nuclei, as in Figure 6. The labeled + fraction accumulated inside nuclei (right). The addition of RanQ69L-GTP blocked the import of TRITC-NLS-BSA cargo, but did not affect the nuclear accumulation of the + fraction. (B) Preincubation of labeled proteasome particles with cytosol prior to their addition into nuclear reconstitution reactions did not affect their targeting properties. The 20S+ particles were efficiently imported (top row), while 20S particles remained perinuclear (middle row) in the majority of nuclei. By contrast, when labeled 20S particles were preincubated with the unlabeled + fraction, about half of the nuclei exhibited substantial intranuclear accumulation together with nuclear rim staining (bottom row). The histogram on the right compiles the results of three separate experiments, in which individual nuclei were scored as showing either nuclear rim or rim + intranuclear staining. Labeled 20S particles were preincubated with cytosol (control) or with cytosol supplemented with the concentrated + fraction (reconstitution). Error bars represent the SE. Scale bars, 10 μm. |
![]() |
FIGURE 8:. Different 19S subunits show distinct nuclear targeting properties. (A) Normal (functional) nuclei and BAPTA-inhibited (poreless) nuclei were immunostained with anti-α7 and anti-Rpt5 and analyzed by confocal microscopy. Differential interference contrast (DIC) images and confocal midsections are shown for all nuclei. The 20S CP subunit α7 was missing from poreless nuclei, but anti-Rpt5 strongly stained these nuclear assembly intermediates. (B) Nuclear and cytosolic fractions were separated and compared between normal and BAPTA-inhibited nuclei, as in Figure 2B. Immunoblotting of the separate fractions confirmed that Rpt5 was present in the nuclear fraction in both normal and poreless nuclei, while α7 and Rpn2 only associated with normal nuclei. |
References [+] :
Adori,
Subcellular distribution of components of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in non-diseased human and rat brain.
2006, Pubmed
Adori, Subcellular distribution of components of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in non-diseased human and rat brain. 2006, Pubmed
Andersen, Thioredoxin Txnl1/TRP32 is a redox-active cofactor of the 26 S proteasome. 2009, Pubmed
Arcangeletti, Visualization of prosomes (MCP-proteasomes), intermediate filament and actin networks by "instantaneous fixation" preserving the cytoskeleton. 1997, Pubmed
Bajorek, Proteasome disassembly and downregulation is correlated with viability during stationary phase. 2003, Pubmed
Cabrera, Proteasome nuclear import mediated by Arc3 can influence efficient DNA damage repair and mitosis in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. 2010, Pubmed
Effantin, Electron microscopic evidence in support of alpha-solenoid models of proteasomal subunits Rpn1 and Rpn2. 2009, Pubmed
Fagotto, Nuclear localization signal-independent and importin/karyopherin-independent nuclear import of beta-catenin. 1998, Pubmed , Xenbase
Fahrenkrog, The nuclear pore complex: a jack of all trades? 2004, Pubmed
Finlay, Reconstitution of biochemically altered nuclear pores: transport can be eliminated and restored. 1990, Pubmed , Xenbase
Finley, Recognition and processing of ubiquitin-protein conjugates by the proteasome. 2009, Pubmed
Forbes, Spontaneous formation of nucleus-like structures around bacteriophage DNA microinjected into Xenopus eggs. 1983, Pubmed , Xenbase
Fried, Nucleocytoplasmic transport: taking an inventory. 2003, Pubmed
Funakoshi, Multiple assembly chaperones govern biogenesis of the proteasome regulatory particle base. 2009, Pubmed
Girão, Subcellular redistribution of components of the ubiquitin-proteasome pathway during lens differentiation and maturation. 2005, Pubmed
Glickman, The ubiquitin-proteasome proteolytic pathway: destruction for the sake of construction. 2002, Pubmed
Glickman, Purification and characterization of proteasomes from Saccharomyces cerevisiae. 2001, Pubmed
Glickman, The regulatory particle of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae proteasome. 1998, Pubmed
Glickman, Getting in and out of the proteasome. 2000, Pubmed
Godon, The H2O2 stimulon in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. 1998, Pubmed
Gordon, The intracellular localization of the proteasome. 2002, Pubmed
Görlich, Identification of different roles for RanGDP and RanGTP in nuclear protein import. 1996, Pubmed , Xenbase
Harel, Removal of a single pore subcomplex results in vertebrate nuclei devoid of nuclear pores. 2003, Pubmed , Xenbase
Harel, Importin beta negatively regulates nuclear membrane fusion and nuclear pore complex assembly. 2003, Pubmed , Xenbase
Harel, Importin beta: conducting a much larger cellular symphony. 2004, Pubmed
Henderson, The ins and outs of APC and beta-catenin nuclear transport. 2002, Pubmed
Hendil, The 20S proteasome as an assembly platform for the 19S regulatory complex. 2009, Pubmed
Hendriksen, RanBP3 enhances nuclear export of active (beta)-catenin independently of CRM1. 2005, Pubmed , Xenbase
Hetzer, Border control at the nucleus: biogenesis and organization of the nuclear membrane and pore complexes. 2009, Pubmed
Hirano, Cell cycle control of higher-order chromatin assembly around naked DNA in vitro. 1991, Pubmed , Xenbase
Huber, The importin-beta binding domain of snurportin1 is responsible for the Ran- and energy-independent nuclear import of spliceosomal U snRNPs in vitro. 2002, Pubmed
Isono, The assembly pathway of the 19S regulatory particle of the yeast 26S proteasome. 2007, Pubmed
Jäggi, Modulation of nuclear pore topology by transport modifiers. 2003, Pubmed , Xenbase
Kajava, What curves alpha-solenoids? Evidence for an alpha-helical toroid structure of Rpn1 and Rpn2 proteins of the 26 S proteasome. 2002, Pubmed
Kaneko, Assembly pathway of the Mammalian proteasome base subcomplex is mediated by multiple specific chaperones. 2009, Pubmed
King, A 20S complex containing CDC27 and CDC16 catalyzes the mitosis-specific conjugation of ubiquitin to cyclin B. 1995, Pubmed , Xenbase
Klebe, Interaction of the nuclear GTP-binding protein Ran with its regulatory proteins RCC1 and RanGAP1. 1995, Pubmed , Xenbase
Kusmierczyk, Some assembly required: dedicated chaperones in eukaryotic proteasome biogenesis. 2008, Pubmed
Kutay, Dominant-negative mutants of importin-beta block multiple pathways of import and export through the nuclear pore complex. 1997, Pubmed , Xenbase
Lehmann, 20 S proteasomes are imported as precursor complexes into the nucleus of yeast. 2002, Pubmed
Liu, ATP binding and ATP hydrolysis play distinct roles in the function of 26S proteasome. 2006, Pubmed
Lohka, Formation in vitro of sperm pronuclei and mitotic chromosomes induced by amphibian ooplasmic components. 1983, Pubmed , Xenbase
Lyman, Influence of cargo size on Ran and energy requirements for nuclear protein import. 2002, Pubmed
Macaulay, Assembly of the nuclear pore: biochemically distinct steps revealed with NEM, GTP gamma S, and BAPTA. 1996, Pubmed , Xenbase
Mattsson, Proteins associated with the promyelocytic leukemia gene product (PML)-containing nuclear body move to the nucleolus upon inhibition of proteasome-dependent protein degradation. 2001, Pubmed
Mayr, The import pathway of human and Thermoplasma 20S proteasomes into HeLa cell nuclei is different from that of classical NLS-bearing proteins. 1999, Pubmed
Mitrousis, Molecular basis for the recognition of snurportin 1 by importin beta. 2008, Pubmed
Murata, Molecular mechanisms of proteasome assembly. 2009, Pubmed
Murray, Real time observation of anaphase in vitro. 1996, Pubmed , Xenbase
Murray, Cyclin synthesis drives the early embryonic cell cycle. 1989, Pubmed , Xenbase
Newport, A major developmental transition in early Xenopus embryos: I. characterization and timing of cellular changes at the midblastula stage. 1982, Pubmed , Xenbase
Olink-Coux, Cytolocation of prosome antigens on intermediate filament subnetworks of cytokeratin, vimentin and desmin type. 1994, Pubmed
Palmer, Subpopulations of proteasomes in rat liver nuclei, microsomes and cytosol. 1996, Pubmed
Panté, Nuclear pore complex is able to transport macromolecules with diameters of about 39 nm. 2002, Pubmed , Xenbase
Park, Hexameric assembly of the proteasomal ATPases is templated through their C termini. 2009, Pubmed
Pemberton, Mechanisms of receptor-mediated nuclear import and nuclear export. 2005, Pubmed
Peters, Distinct 19 S and 20 S subcomplexes of the 26 S proteasome and their distribution in the nucleus and the cytoplasm. 1994, Pubmed , Xenbase
Peters, Ultrastructure of the approximately 26S complex containing the approximately 20S cylinder particle (multicatalytic proteinase/proteasome). 1991, Pubmed , Xenbase
Peters, Structural features of the 26 S proteasome complex. 1993, Pubmed , Xenbase
Pickart, Proteasomes and their kin: proteases in the machine age. 2004, Pubmed
Rechsteiner, The multicatalytic and 26 S proteases. 1993, Pubmed
Reits, Dynamics of proteasome distribution in living cells. 1997, Pubmed
Ribbeck, The permeability barrier of nuclear pore complexes appears to operate via hydrophobic exclusion. 2002, Pubmed
Roelofs, Chaperone-mediated pathway of proteasome regulatory particle assembly. 2009, Pubmed
Rosenzweig, The central unit within the 19S regulatory particle of the proteasome. 2008, Pubmed
Rotem, Importin beta regulates the seeding of chromatin with initiation sites for nuclear pore assembly. 2009, Pubmed , Xenbase
Ryabova, Distribution of prosome proteins and their relationship with the cytoskeleton in oogenesis of Xenopus laevis. 1994, Pubmed , Xenbase
Shah, Major binding sites for the nuclear import receptor are the internal nucleoporin Nup153 and the adjacent nuclear filament protein Tpr. 1998, Pubmed , Xenbase
Stewart, Molecular mechanism of the nuclear protein import cycle. 2007, Pubmed
Ström, Importin-beta-like nuclear transport receptors. 2001, Pubmed
Tonoki, Genetic evidence linking age-dependent attenuation of the 26S proteasome with the aging process. 2009, Pubmed
Tsvetkov, The nanny model for IDPs. 2009, Pubmed
von Mikecz, The nuclear ubiquitin-proteasome system: visualization of proteasomes, protein aggregates, and proteolysis in the cell nucleus. 2008, Pubmed , Xenbase
Walther, The cytoplasmic filaments of the nuclear pore complex are dispensable for selective nuclear protein import. 2002, Pubmed , Xenbase
Wang, Import of human and Thermoplasma 20S proteasomes into nuclei of HeLa cells requires functional NLS sequences. 1997, Pubmed
Weis, Regulating access to the genome: nucleocytoplasmic transport throughout the cell cycle. 2003, Pubmed
Wendler, The bipartite nuclear localization sequence of Rpn2 is required for nuclear import of proteasomal base complexes via karyopherin alphabeta and proteasome functions. 2004, Pubmed
Wilkinson, Localization of the 26S proteasome during mitosis and meiosis in fission yeast. 1998, Pubmed
Wójcik, Proteasome activator subunit PA28 alpha and related Ki antigen (PA28 gamma) are absent from the nuclear fraction purified by sucrose gradient centrifugation. 1999, Pubmed
Wójcik, Intracellular localization of proteasomes. 2003, Pubmed
Yokoya, beta-catenin can be transported into the nucleus in a Ran-unassisted manner. 1999, Pubmed
Zmijewski, S-glutathionylation of the Rpn2 regulatory subunit inhibits 26 S proteasomal function. 2009, Pubmed