Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Fate maps, constructed from lineage tracing all of the cells of an embryo, reveal which tissues descend from each cell of the embryo. Although fate maps are very useful for identifying the precursors of an organ and for elucidating the developmental path by which the descendant cells populate that organ in the normal embryo, they do not illustrate the full developmental potential of a precursor cell or identify the mechanisms by which its fate is determined. To test for cell fate commitment, one compares a cell's normal repertoire of descendants in the intact embryo (the fate map) with those expressed after an experimental manipulation. Is the cell's fate fixed (committed) regardless of the surrounding cellular environment, or is it influenced by external factors provided by its neighbors? Using the comprehensive fate maps of the Xenopus embryo, we describe how to identify, isolate and culture single cleavage stage precursors, called blastomeres. This approach allows one to assess whether these early cells are committed to the fate they acquire in their normal environment in the intact embryo, require interactions with their neighboring cells, or can be influenced to express alternate fates if exposed to other types of signals.
Dale,
Regional specification within the mesoderm of early embryos of Xenopus laevis.
1987, Pubmed,
Xenbase
Dale,
Regional specification within the mesoderm of early embryos of Xenopus laevis.
1987,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Gallagher,
Autonomous differentiation of dorsal axial structures from an animal cap cleavage stage blastomere in Xenopus.
1991,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Godsave,
Single cell analysis of mesoderm formation in the Xenopus embryo.
1991,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Hainski,
Xenopus maternal RNAs from a dorsal animal blastomere induce a secondary axis in host embryos.
1992,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Hainski,
Activin-like signal activates dorsal-specific maternal RNA between 8- and 16-cell stages of Xenopus.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Klein,
The first cleavage furrow demarcates the dorsal-ventral axis in Xenopus embryos.
1987,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Moody,
Fates of the blastomeres of the 16-cell stage Xenopus embryo.
1987,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Moody,
Fates of the blastomeres of the 32-cell-stage Xenopus embryo.
1987,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Moody,
Segregation of fate during cleavage of frog (Xenopus laevis) blastomeres.
1990,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Moore,
Animal-vegetal asymmetries influence the earliest steps in retina fate commitment in Xenopus.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Pandur,
Multiple maternal influences on dorsal-ventral fate of Xenopus animal blastomeres.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Peng,
Xenopus laevis: Practical uses in cell and molecular biology. Solutions and protocols.
1991,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Sullivan,
foxD5a, a Xenopus winged helix gene, maintains an immature neural ectoderm via transcriptional repression that is dependent on the C-terminal domain.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Vincent,
Subcortical rotation in Xenopus eggs: an early step in embryonic axis specification.
1987,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Yan,
foxD5 plays a critical upstream role in regulating neural ectodermal fate and the onset of neural differentiation.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Yan,
The competence of Xenopus blastomeres to produce neural and retinal progeny is repressed by two endo-mesoderm promoting pathways.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
