Watson JR , Fox HM , Nietlispach D , Gallop JL , Owen D , Mott HR .

092096 Wellcome Trust , 281971 European Research Council

	FIGURE 1. The TOCA1 HR1-Cdc42 interaction is low affinity. A, curves derived from direct binding assays in which the indicated concentrations of Cdc42Δ7Q61L·[3H]GTP were incubated with 30 nm GST-PAK or HR1-His6 in SPAs. The SPA signal was corrected by subtraction of control data with no GST-PAK or HR1-His6. The data were fitted to a binding isotherm to give an apparent Kd and are expressed as a percentage of the maximum signal; B and C, competition SPA experiments were carried out with the indicated concentrations of ACK GBD (B) or HR1 domain (C) titrated into 30 nm GST-ACK and either 30 nm Cdc42Δ7Q61L·[3H]GTP or full-length Cdc42Q61L·[3H]GTP. The Kd values derived for the ACK GBD with Cdc42Δ7 and full-length Cdc42 were 0.032 ± 0.01 and 0.011 ± 0.01 μm, respectively. The Kd values derived for the TOCA1 HR1 with Cdc42Δ7 and full-length Cdc42 were 6.05 ± 1.96 and 5.39 ± 1.69 μm, respectively.
	FIGURE 2. The Cdc42-HR1 interaction is of low affinity in the context of full-length protein and in TOCA1 paralogues. A, diagram illustrating the TOCA1 constructs assayed for Cdc42 binding. Domain boundaries are derived from secondary structure predictions; B, binding curves derived from direct binding assays, in which the indicated concentrations of Cdc42Δ7Q61L·[3H]GTP were incubated with 30 nm GST-ACK or His-tagged TOCA1 constructs, as indicated, in SPAs. The SPA signal was corrected by subtraction of control data with no fusion protein. The data were fitted to a binding isotherm to give an apparent Kd and are expressed as a percentage of the maximum signal. C–E, representative examples of competition SPA experiments carried out with the indicated concentrations of the TOCA1 HR1-SH3 construct titrated into 30 nm GST-ACK and 30 nm Cdc42Δ7Q61L·[3H]GTP (C) or HR1CIP4 (D) or HR1FBP17 (E) titrated into 30 nm GST-ACK and 30 nm Cdc42FLQ61L·[3H]GTP.
	FIGURE 3. The structure of the TOCA1 HR1 domain. A, the backbone trace of the 35 lowest energy structures of the HR1 domain overlaid with the structure closest to the mean is shown alongside a schematic representation of the structure closest to the mean. Flexible regions at the N and C termini (residues 330–333 and 421–426) are omitted for clarity. B, a sequence alignment of the HR1 domains from TOCA1, CIP4, and PRK1. The secondary structure was deduced using Stride (64), based on the Ramachandran angles, and is indicated as follows: gray, turn; yellow, α-helix; blue, 310 helix; white, coil. C, a close-up of the N-terminal region of TOCA1 HR1, indicating some of the NOEs defining its position with respect to the two α-helices. Dotted lines, NOE restraints. D, a close-up of the interhelix loop region showing some of the contacts between the loop and helix 1. NOEs are indicated with dotted lines. All structural figures were generated using PyMOL.
	FIGURE 4. Mapping the binding surface of Cdc42 onto the TOCA1 HR1 domain. A, the 15N HSQC of 200 μm TOCA1 HR1 domain is shown in the free form (black) and in the presence of a 4-fold molar excess of Cdc42Δ7Q61L·GMPPNP (red). Expansions of two regions are shown with peak assignments, showing backbone amides in fast or intermediate exchange. B, CSPs were calculated as described under “Experimental Procedures” and are shown for backbone and side chain NH groups. The mean CSP is marked with a red line. Residues that disappeared in the presence of Cdc42 were assigned a CSP of 0.2 but were excluded when calculating the mean CSP and are indicated with open bars. Those that were not traceable due to spectral overlap were assigned a CSP of zero and are marked with an asterisk below the bar. Residues with affected side chain CSPs derived from 13C HSQCs are marked with green asterisks above the bars. Secondary structure elements are shown below the graph. C, a schematic representation of the HR1 domain. Residues with significantly affected backbone or side chain chemical shifts when Cdc42 bound and that are buried are colored dark blue, whereas those that are solvent-accessible are colored yellow. Residues with significantly affected backbone and side chain groups that are solvent-accessible are colored red. A close-up of the binding region is shown, with affected side chain heavy atoms shown as sticks. D, the G protein-binding region is marked in red onto structures of the HR1 domains as indicated.
	FIGURE 5. Mapping the binding surface of the HR1 domain onto Cdc42. A, the 15N HSQC of Cdc42Δ7Q61L·GMPPNP is shown in its free form (black) and in the presence of excess TOCA1 HR1 domain (1:2.2, red). Expansions of two regions are shown, with most peaks in fast or intermediate exchange. B, CSPs are shown for backbone NH groups. The red line indicates the mean CSP, plus one S.D. Residues that disappeared in the presence of Cdc42 were assigned a CSP of 0.1 and are indicated with open bars. Those that were not traceable due to overlap are marked with an asterisk. Residues with disappeared peaks in 13C HSQC experiments are marked on the chart with green asterisks. Secondary structure elements are indicated below the graph. C, the residues with significantly affected backbone and side chain groups are highlighted on an NMR structure of free Cdc42Δ7Q61L·GMPPNP; those that are buried are colored dark blue, whereas those that are solvent-accessible are colored red. Residues with either side chain or backbone groups affected are colored blue if buried and yellow if solvent-accessible. Residues without information from shift mapping are colored gray. The flexible switch regions are circled.
	FIGURE 6. Model of Cdc42·HR1 complex. A, a representative model of the Cdc42·HR1 complex from the cluster closest to the lowest energy model produced using HADDOCK (67). Residues of Cdc42 that are affected in the presence of the HR1 domain but are not in close proximity to it are colored in red and labeled. B, structure of Rac1 in complex with the HR1b domain of PRK1 (46) (PDB code 2RMK). C, sequence alignment of RhoA, Cdc42 and Rac1. Contact residues of RhoA and Rac1 to PRK1 HR1a and HR1b, respectively, are colored cyan. Residues of Cdc42 that disappear or show chemical shift changes in the presence of TOCA1 are colored cyan if also identified as contacts in RhoA and Rac1 and yellow if they are not. Residues equivalent to Rac1 and RhoA contact sites but that are invisible in free Cdc42 are gray. D, regions of interest of the Cdc42·HR1 domain model. The four lowest energy structures in the chosen HADDOCK cluster are shown overlaid, with the residues of interest shown as sticks and labeled. Cdc42 is shown in cyan, and TOCA1 is shown in purple.
	FIGURE 7. The N-WASP GBD displaces the TOCA1 HR1 domain. A, the model of the Cdc42·TOCA1 HR1 domain complex overlaid with the Cdc42-WASP structure. Cdc42 is shown in green, and TOCA1 is shown in purple. The core CRIB region of WASP is shown in red, whereas its basic region is shown in orange and the C-terminal region required for maximal affinity is shown in cyan. A semitransparent surface representation of Cdc42 and WASP is shown overlaid with the schematic. B, competition SPA experiments carried out with indicated concentrations of the N-WASP GBD construct titrated into 30 nm GST-ACK or GST-WASP GBD and 30 nm Cdc42Δ7Q61L·[3H]GTP. C, Selected regions of the 15N HSQC of 145 μm Cdc42Δ7Q61L·GMPPNP with the indicated ratios of the TOCA1 HR1 domain, the N-WASP GBD, or both, showing that the TOCA HR1 domain does not displace the N-WASP GBD. D, selected regions of the 15N HSQC of 600 μm TOCA1 HR1 domain in complex with Cdc42 in the absence and presence of the N-WASP GBD, showing displacement of Cdc42 from the HR1 domain by N-WASP.
	FIGURE 8. Actin polymerization downstream of Cdc42·N-WASP·TOCA1 is inhibited by excess N-WASP GBD but not by the TOCA1 HR1 domain. Fluorescence curves show actin polymerization in the presence of increasing concentrations of N-WASP GBD or TOCA1 HR1 domain as indicated. Maximal rates of actin polymerization derived from the linear region of the curves are represented in bar charts below. Error bars, S.E.
	FIGURE 9. A simplified model of the early stages of Cdc42·N-WASP·TOCA1-dependent actin polymerization. Step 1, TOCA1 is recruited to the membrane via its F-BAR domain and/or Cdc42 interactions. F-BAR oligomerization is expected to occur following membrane binding, but a single monomer is shown for clarity. Step 2, N-WASP exists in an inactive, folded conformation. The TOCA1 SH3 domain interacts with N-WASP, causing an activatory allosteric effect. The HR1TOCA1-Cdc42 and SH3TOCA1-N-WASP interactions position Cdc42 and N-WASP for binding. Step 3, electrostatic interactions between Cdc42 and the basic region upstream of the CRIB initiate Cdc42·N-WASP binding. Step 4, the core CRIB binds with high affinity while the region C-terminal to the CRIB displaces the TOCA1 HR1 domain and increases the affinity of the N-WASP-Cdc42 interaction further. The VCA domain is released for downstream interactions, and actin polymerization proceeds. WH1, WASP homology 1 domain; PP, proline-rich region; VCA, verprolin homology, cofilin homology, acidic region.

Abdul-Manan, Structure of Cdc42 in complex with the GTPase-binding domain of the 'Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome' protein. 1999, Pubmed

Abdul-Manan, Structure of Cdc42 in complex with the GTPase-binding domain of the 'Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome' protein. 1999, Pubmed
Acuner Ozbabacan, Transient protein-protein interactions. 2011, Pubmed
Aspenström, A Cdc42 target protein with homology to the non-kinase domain of FER has a potential role in regulating the actin cytoskeleton. 1997, Pubmed
Bai, A TOCA/CDC-42/PAR/WAVE functional module required for retrograde endocytic recycling. 2015, Pubmed
Bailey, The structure of binder of Arl2 (BART) reveals a novel G protein binding domain: implications for function. 2009, Pubmed
Bourne, The GTPase superfamily: conserved structure and molecular mechanism. 1991, Pubmed
Bu, Cdc42 interaction with N-WASP and Toca-1 regulates membrane tubulation, vesicle formation and vesicle motility: implications for endocytosis. 2010, Pubmed
Bu, The Toca-1-N-WASP complex links filopodial formation to endocytosis. 2009, Pubmed
Buck, A two-state allosteric model for autoinhibition rationalizes WASP signal integration and targeting. 2004, Pubmed
Burbelo, A conserved binding motif defines numerous candidate target proteins for both Cdc42 and Rac GTPases. 1995, Pubmed
Chander, Transducer of Cdc42-dependent actin assembly promotes breast cancer invasion and metastasis. 2013, Pubmed
Cherfils, Regulation of small GTPases by GEFs, GAPs, and GDIs. 2013, Pubmed
Elliot-Smith, Specificity determinants on Cdc42 for binding its effector protein ACK. 2005, Pubmed
Elliot-Smith, Double mutant cycle thermodynamic analysis of the hydrophobic Cdc42-ACK protein-protein interaction. 2007, Pubmed
Fenwick, The RalB-RLIP76 complex reveals a novel mode of ral-effector interaction. 2010, Pubmed
Fricke, Drosophila Cip4/Toca-1 integrates membrane trafficking and actin dynamics through WASP and SCAR/WAVE. 2009, Pubmed
Gallop, Phosphoinositides and membrane curvature switch the mode of actin polymerization via selective recruitment of toca-1 and Snx9. 2013, Pubmed , Xenbase
Giuliani, Requirements for F-BAR proteins TOCA-1 and TOCA-2 in actin dynamics and membrane trafficking during Caenorhabditis elegans oocyte growth and embryonic epidermal morphogenesis. 2009, Pubmed
Hall, Rho GTPases and the actin cytoskeleton. 1998, Pubmed
Heinig, STRIDE: a web server for secondary structure assignment from known atomic coordinates of proteins. 2004, Pubmed
Hemsath, An electrostatic steering mechanism of Cdc42 recognition by Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome proteins. 2005, Pubmed
Henne, Structure and analysis of FCHo2 F-BAR domain: a dimerizing and membrane recruitment module that effects membrane curvature. 2007, Pubmed
Ho, Toca-1 mediates Cdc42-dependent actin nucleation by activating the N-WASP-WIP complex. 2004, Pubmed , Xenbase
Hu, Transducer of Cdc42-dependent actin assembly promotes epidermal growth factor-induced cell motility and invasiveness. 2011, Pubmed
Hutchinson, Mutational analysis reveals a single binding interface between RhoA and its effector, PRK1. 2011, Pubmed
Hutchinson, Differential binding of RhoA, RhoB, and RhoC to protein kinase C-related kinase (PRK) isoforms PRK1, PRK2, and PRK3: PRKs have the highest affinity for RhoB. 2013, Pubmed
Höning, Phosphatidylinositol-(4,5)-bisphosphate regulates sorting signal recognition by the clathrin-associated adaptor complex AP2. 2005, Pubmed
Itoh, Dynamin and the actin cytoskeleton cooperatively regulate plasma membrane invagination by BAR and F-BAR proteins. 2005, Pubmed
Kakimoto, Regulation of neuronal morphology by Toca-1, an F-BAR/EFC protein that induces plasma membrane invagination. 2006, Pubmed
Kim, Autoinhibition and activation mechanisms of the Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein. 2000, Pubmed
Kobashigawa, The NMR structure of the TC10- and Cdc42-interacting domain of CIP4. 2009, Pubmed
Kozma, The Ras-related protein Cdc42Hs and bradykinin promote formation of peripheral actin microspikes and filopodia in Swiss 3T3 fibroblasts. 1995, Pubmed
Kühn, Formins as effector proteins of Rho GTPases. 2014, Pubmed
Lebensohn, Activation of the WAVE complex by coincident signals controls actin assembly. 2009, Pubmed
Lee, Self-assembly of filopodia-like structures on supported lipid bilayers. 2010, Pubmed , Xenbase
Leung, The nucleotide switch in Cdc42 modulates coupling between the GTPase-binding and allosteric equilibria of Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein. 2005, Pubmed
Ma, The Arp2/3 complex mediates actin polymerization induced by the small GTP-binding protein Cdc42. 1998, Pubmed , Xenbase
Ma, Corequirement of specific phosphoinositides and small GTP-binding protein Cdc42 in inducing actin assembly in Xenopus egg extracts. 1998, Pubmed , Xenbase
Machesky, Signaling to actin dynamics. 1999, Pubmed
Machesky, Rho: a connection between membrane receptor signalling and the cytoskeleton. 1996, Pubmed
Maesaki, The structural basis of Rho effector recognition revealed by the crystal structure of human RhoA complexed with the effector domain of PKN/PRK1. 1999, Pubmed
Miki, Direct binding of the verprolin-homology domain in N-WASP to actin is essential for cytoskeletal reorganization. 1998, Pubmed
Miki, WAVE, a novel WASP-family protein involved in actin reorganization induced by Rac. 1998, Pubmed
Miyamoto, Nuclear actin polymerization is required for transcriptional reprogramming of Oct4 by oocytes. 2011, Pubmed , Xenbase
Modha, The Rac1 polybasic region is required for interaction with its effector PRK1. 2008, Pubmed
Mott, Structure of the small G protein Cdc42 bound to the GTPase-binding domain of ACK. 1999, Pubmed
Mott, Structures of Ras superfamily effector complexes: What have we learnt in two decades? 2015, Pubmed
Nakamura, Structural basis for membrane binding specificity of the Bin/Amphiphysin/Rvs (BAR) domain of Arfaptin-2 determined by Arl1 GTPase. 2012, Pubmed
Nobes, Rho, rac, and cdc42 GTPases regulate the assembly of multimolecular focal complexes associated with actin stress fibers, lamellipodia, and filopodia. 1995, Pubmed
Owen, Molecular dissection of the interaction between the small G proteins Rac1 and RhoA and protein kinase C-related kinase 1 (PRK1). 2003, Pubmed
Owen, The IQGAP1-Rac1 and IQGAP1-Cdc42 interactions: interfaces differ between the complexes. 2008, Pubmed
Owen, Residues in Cdc42 that specify binding to individual CRIB effector proteins. 2000, Pubmed
Padrick, Physical mechanisms of signal integration by WASP family proteins. 2010, Pubmed
Perkins, Transient protein-protein interactions: structural, functional, and network properties. 2010, Pubmed
Praefcke, Evolving nature of the AP2 alpha-appendage hub during clathrin-coated vesicle endocytosis. 2004, Pubmed
Ridley, The small GTP-binding protein rho regulates the assembly of focal adhesions and actin stress fibers in response to growth factors. 1992, Pubmed
Ridley, The small GTP-binding protein rac regulates growth factor-induced membrane ruffling. 1992, Pubmed
Ridley, Rho: theme and variations. 1996, Pubmed
Rieping, ARIA2: automated NOE assignment and data integration in NMR structure calculation. 2007, Pubmed
Rohatgi, Mechanism of N-WASP activation by CDC42 and phosphatidylinositol 4, 5-bisphosphate. 2000, Pubmed , Xenbase
Rohatgi, The interaction between N-WASP and the Arp2/3 complex links Cdc42-dependent signals to actin assembly. 1999, Pubmed , Xenbase
Rudolph, The Cdc42/Rac interactive binding region motif of the Wiskott Aldrich syndrome protein (WASP) is necessary but not sufficient for tight binding to Cdc42 and structure formation. 1998, Pubmed
Schanda, SOFAST-HMQC experiments for recording two-dimensional heteronuclear correlation spectra of proteins within a few seconds. 2005, Pubmed
Schmid, Integrating molecular and network biology to decode endocytosis. 2007, Pubmed
Shen, Protein backbone and sidechain torsion angles predicted from NMR chemical shifts using artificial neural networks. 2013, Pubmed
Symons, Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome protein, a novel effector for the GTPase CDC42Hs, is implicated in actin polymerization. 1996, Pubmed
Takano, EFC/F-BAR proteins and the N-WASP-WIP complex induce membrane curvature-dependent actin polymerization. 2008, Pubmed
Thompson, Delineation of the Cdc42/Rac-binding domain of p21-activated kinase. 1998, Pubmed
Tsujita, Coordination between the actin cytoskeleton and membrane deformation by a novel membrane tubulation domain of PCH proteins is involved in endocytosis. 2006, Pubmed
Van Itallie, A complex of ZO-1 and the BAR-domain protein TOCA-1 regulates actin assembly at the tight junction. 2015, Pubmed
Vetter, The guanine nucleotide-binding switch in three dimensions. 2001, Pubmed
Vranken, The CCPN data model for NMR spectroscopy: development of a software pipeline. 2005, Pubmed
Walrant, Triggering actin polymerization in Xenopus egg extracts from phosphoinositide-containing lipid bilayers. 2015, Pubmed , Xenbase
Wang, Single-molecule dynamics reveals cooperative binding-folding in protein recognition. 2006, Pubmed
Watanabe, Protein kinase N (PKN) and PKN-related protein rhophilin as targets of small GTPase Rho. 1996, Pubmed
Watson, (1)H, (13)C and (15)N resonance assignments of the Cdc42-binding domain of TOCA1. 2016, Pubmed , Xenbase
Wu, Calcium oscillations-coupled conversion of actin travelling waves to standing oscillations. 2013, Pubmed
de Vries, The HADDOCK web server for data-driven biomolecular docking. 2010, Pubmed
ten Klooster, Targeting and activation of Rac1 are mediated by the exchange factor beta-Pix. 2006, Pubmed