Rahman TN et al. (2020), Stentian structural plasticity in the developin...

XB-ART-56961

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2020 May 19;11720:10636-10638. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2001107117.

Show Gene links Show Anatomy links

Stentian structural plasticity in the developing visual system.

Rahman TN , Munz M , Kutsarova E , Bilash OM , Ruthazer ES .

???displayArticle.abstract???
In a small fraction of Xenopus tadpoles, a single retinal ganglion cell (RGC) axon misprojects to the ipsilateral optic tectum. Presenting flashes of light to the ipsilateral eye causes that ipsilateral axon to fire, whereas stimulating the contralateral eye excites all other RGC inputs to the tectum. We performed time-lapse imaging of individual ipsilaterally projecting axons while stimulating either the ipsilateral or contralateral eye. Stimulating either eye alone reduced axon elaboration by increasing branch loss. New branch additions in the ipsi axon were exclusively increased by contralateral eye stimulation, which was enhanced by expressing tetanus neurotoxin (TeNT) in the ipsilateral axon, to prevent Hebbian stabilization. Together, our results reveal the existence of a non-cell-autonomous "Stentian" signal, engaged by activation of neighboring RGCs, that promotes exploratory axon branching in response to noncorrelated firing.

???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 32366647
???displayArticle.pmcLink??? PMC7245132
???displayArticle.link??? Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A
???displayArticle.grants??? [+]

???attribute.lit??? ???displayArticles.show???

Fig. 1. Ipsi RGC axons respond differentially to simulation of the ipsi and contra eyes. (A) EGFP-electroporated eye (green) projecting to BODIPY-labeled tectum (red). (B) Ipsi RGC axon from rectangle in A. (C) Experimental protocol: ipsi axon imaged every 10 min over 1-h baseline in darkness and 2-h visual stimulation of the ipsi or contra eye via optical fiber. (D and E) Ipsi RGC axon arbors undergoing (D) contra eye stimulation or (E) ipsi eye stimulation in the tectum. Reconstructed arbors show cumulative changes during 1 h in darkness and the last hour of stimulation, indicating added or elongated (magenta), lost or retracted (green), and transient (both added or elongated and lost or retracted within 1 h, blue) branch tips. (F) Total branch tip number (TBTN) normalized to initial number. (G) Total branch length (TBL) normalized to initial length. (H) Branch density (branch number/total length) normalized to initial density. (I) Net change in TBTN every 10 min binned by hour. (J) Mean number of branch additions every 10 min normalized to mean additions in darkness. (K−M) Data binned as in J for (K) elongation (mean length added every 10 min of growing branches, normalized to elongation in darkness), (L) losses, and (M) retraction. All graphs present ipsi axons from contra-eye-stimulated (n = 10, dark green) and ipsi-eye-stimulated (n = 7, light green) animals. Mixed-design two-way ANOVA, Bonferroni’s post hoc test to compare hours is indicated above bar graphs, and interaction of time vs. eye stimulated is indicated to the right of time plots (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001).

Fig. 2. TeNT expression in ipsi RGC axon enhances dynamic branch additions in response to contra, but not ipsi, eye stimulation. (A and B) TeNT-expressing ipsi RGC axon arbors undergoing (A) contra eye stimulation or (B) ipsi eye stimulation. Reconstructed arbors show cumulative changes during 1 h in darkness and the last hour of stimulation. (C and D) Mean branch additions every 10 min, (C) normalized to mean additions in darkness and (D) binned by hour. (E–J) Corresponding graphs for (E and F) branch elongation, (G and H) losses, and (I and J) retraction. All graphs present TeNT-expressing ipsi axons from contra-eye-stimulated (n = 7, dark blue) and ipsi-eye-stimulated animals (n = 9, light blue). Mixed-design two-way ANOVA to compare hours is indicated above bar graphs, and interaction of time vs. eye stimulated is indicated to the right of time plots (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01).

References [+] :

Assali, Activity dependent mechanisms of visual map formation--from retinal waves to molecular regulators. 2014, Pubmed