Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.

Summary Expression Phenotypes Gene Literature (8) GO Terms (17) Nucleotides (81) Proteins (33) Interactants (269) Wiki
XB-GENEPAGE-486137

Gene Symbol: hes2

Gene Name: hes family bHLH transcription factor 2

Anatomy terms
Keller explant animal cap anterior placodal area brain chordal neural plate border ciliary marginal zone egg eye eye primordium forebrain hindbrain lateral line system lens neural fold neural plate border ... [+]
Anatomy stages
unfertilized egg stage to NF stage 41
RNA-Seq and EST Transcriptome profiles tropicalis laevis.L laevis.S
RNA-Seq stage profile Data from Owens et al. 2016 Data from Session et al. 2016 Data from Session et al. 2016
GEO data hes2.L hes2.S
Microarray Data Data from Yanai et al. 2011 Data from Yanai et al. 2011 Data from Yanai et al. 2011
Stage and Tissue Profiles
                    Source: Owens et al. 2016 (tropicalis)
                    Source: Session et al. 2016 (laevis)
          Source: Session et al. 2016 (laevis)
Experimental Regulation (via RNA-seq)


                                                            Source: Ding et al. 2017 (laevis)
Summary ImagesSort by:
Expression Image
NF stage 18
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 37 and 38
Good quality Poor quality
    
Community Submitted ImagesSort by:
Expression Image
NF stage 18
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 37 and 38
Good quality Poor quality
    
Literature ImagesSort by:
Expression Image
NF stage 14
Riddiford, et al. 2016
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 14 to NF stage 15
Sölter, et al. 2006
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 18
Riddiford, et al. 2016
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 17 to NF stage 28
Riddiford, et al. 2016
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 11 to NF stage 41
Sölter, et al. 2006
Good quality Poor quality