Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.

Summary Expression Phenotypes Gene Literature (18) GO Terms (5) Nucleotides (72) Proteins (30) Interactants (354) Wiki
XB-GENEPAGE-488101

Gene Symbol: pecam1

Gene Name: platelet and endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1

Anatomy terms
anterior cardinal vein aortic arch arterial endothelium blood vessel dorsal aorta endothelial cell head head vasculature heart intersomitic artery intersomitic region intersomitic vein intersomitic vessel limb ... [+]
RNA-Seq and EST Transcriptome profiles tropicalis laevis.L laevis.S
Gurdon EST 1012796035
Unigene EST Profile Xl.2357
RNA-Seq stage profile Data from Owens et al. 2016 Data from Session et al. 2016 Data from Session et al. 2016
GEO data pecam1.L pecam1.S
Microarray Data Data from Yanai et al. 2011 Data from Yanai et al. 2011 Data from Yanai et al. 2011
Stage and Tissue Profiles
                    Source: Owens et al. 2016 (tropicalis)
                    Source: Session et al. 2016 (laevis)
          Source: Session et al. 2016 (laevis)
Experimental Regulation (via RNA-seq)


                                                            Source: Ding et al. 2017 (laevis)
Summary ImagesSort by:
Expression Image
NF stage 26
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 32
Good quality Poor quality
    
Community Submitted ImagesSort by:
Expression Image
NF stage 12
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 12
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 13
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 13
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 14
Good quality Poor quality
15 more [+]
      
Literature ImagesSort by:
Expression Image
NF stage 26
Ciau-Uitz, et al. 2013
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 37 and 38
Kirmizitas, et al. 2017
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 40
Kälin, et al. 2007
Good quality Poor quality