Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.

Summary Expression Phenotypes Gene Literature (18) GO Terms (7) Nucleotides (253) Proteins (34) Interactants (706) Wiki
XB-GENEPAGE-5788094

Gene Symbol: vamp2

Gene Name: vesicle associated membrane protein 2

Anatomy terms
anterior neural tube brain central nervous system cranial nerve eye fat body head intestine lens limb neural plate neural tube neuroectoderm optic tectum posterior neural tube retina retinal inner plexiform layer ... [+]
Anatomy stages
NF stage 10 to NF stage 66
RNA-Seq and EST Transcriptome profiles tropicalis laevis.L laevis.S
Gurdon EST 1012070790 1012784072 1012771219
Unigene EST Profile Str.9959 Xl.234 Xl.233
RNA-Seq stage profile Data from Owens et al. 2016 Data from Session et al. 2016 Data from Session et al. 2016
GEO data vamp2.L vamp2.S
Microarray Data Data from Yanai et al. 2011 Data from Yanai et al. 2011 Data from Yanai et al. 2011
Stage and Tissue Profiles
                    Source: Owens et al. 2016 (tropicalis)
                    Source: Session et al. 2016 (laevis)
          Source: Session et al. 2016 (laevis)
Experimental Regulation (via RNA-seq)


                                                            Source: Ding et al. 2017 (laevis)
Summary ImagesSort by:
Expression Image
NF stage 25
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 40
Good quality Poor quality
    
Community Submitted ImagesSort by:
Expression Image
NF stage 40
Good quality Poor quality
     
Literature ImagesSort by:
Expression Image
NF stage 25
Liu, et al. 2005
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 25
Liu, et al. 2005
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 13 to NF stage 26
Knecht, et al. 1995
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 13 to NF stage 35 and 36
Lallier, et al. 2000
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 40
Marshak, et al. 2012
Good quality Poor quality
1 more [+]