Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.

Summary Expression Phenotypes Gene Literature (13) GO Terms (9) Nucleotides (135) Proteins (30) Interactants (72) Wiki
XB-GENEPAGE-6492079

Gene Symbol: shroom1

Gene Name: shroom family member 1

Anatomy terms
animal hemisphere animal pole anterior neural fold brain cement gland cement gland primordium ectoderm egg germinal vesicle intestine mesoderm neuroectoderm notochord oocyte optic vesicle otic vesicle ... [+]
RNA-Seq and EST Transcriptome profiles tropicalis laevis.L laevis.S
Gurdon EST
Unigene EST Profile Str.57376 Xl.5622
RNA-Seq stage profile Data from Owens et al. 2016 Data from Session et al. 2016 Data from Session et al. 2016
GEO data shroom1.L shroom1.S
Microarray Data Data from Yanai et al. 2011 Data from Yanai et al. 2011 Data from Yanai et al. 2011
Stage and Tissue Profiles
                    Source: Owens et al. 2016 (tropicalis)
                    Source: Session et al. 2016 (laevis)
          Source: Session et al. 2016 (laevis)
Experimental Regulation (via RNA-seq)


                                                            Source: Ding et al. 2017 (laevis)
Summary ImagesSort by:
Expression Image
unfertilized egg stage
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 1
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 2 (2-cell)
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 6.5
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 25
Good quality Poor quality
1 more [+]
      
Literature ImagesSort by:
Expression Image
unfertilized egg stage
Lee, et al. 2009
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 1
Lee, et al. 2009
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 2 (2-cell)
Lee, et al. 2009
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
unfertilized egg stage to NF stage 6.5
Lee, et al. 2009
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 6.5
Lee, et al. 2009
Good quality Poor quality
5 more [+]