Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
J Nucleic Acids
2010 Dec 06;2010:143890. doi: 10.4061/2010/143890.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Divalent metal- and high mobility group N protein-dependent nucleosome stability and conformation.
Ong MS
,
Vasudevan D
,
Davey CA
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
High mobility group N proteins (HMGNs) bind specifically to the nucleosome core and act as chromatin unfolding and activating factors. Using an all-Xenopus system, we found that HMGN1 and HMGN2 binding to nucleosomes results in distinct ion-dependent conformation and stability. HMGN2 association with nucleosome core particle or nucleosomal array in the presence of divalent metal triggers a reversible transition to a species with much reduced electrophoretic mobility, consistent with a less compact state of the nucleosome. Residues outside of the nucleosome binding domain are required for the activity, which is also displayed by an HMGN1 truncation product lacking part of the regulatory domain. In addition, thermal denaturation assays show that the presence of 1 mM Mg(2+)> or Ca(2+) gives a reduction in nucleosome core terminus stability, which is further substantially diminished by the binding of HMGN2 or truncated HMGN1. Our findings emphasize the importance of divalent metals in nucleosome dynamics and suggest that the differential biological activities of HMGNs in chromatin activation may involve different conformational alterations and modulation of nucleosome core stability.
Figure 1. HMGN binding to the nucleosome core is ion dependent and capable of eliciting a transition. Gel labels indicate HMGN identity (N1t, HMGN1t; N1, HMGN1; N2, HMGN2; n, NCP alone; a, nucleosome array alone), and numbers designate HMGN : nucleosome molar stoichiometry. (a) EMSAs of HMGN binding to two distinct NCP constructs, NCP-601 (left) and NCP147 (right), under three different buffer conditions: low ionic strength (top), near physiological ionic strength (middle), and near physiological ionic strength with 1 mM Mg2+ (bottom). Under noncooperative binding conditions (top), 1 : 1 as well as 2 : 1 HMGN : nucleosome species are observed at low stoichiometry [12]. At higher ionic strength (middle), 2 : 1 species (S1) are the only specific complexes that occur. In the presence of divalent metal, a distinct, slow-migrating species (S2) is also observed for HMGN1t and HMGN2 binding. (b) EMSA showing migration rate for S1 and S2 of NCP-601 (HMGN : nucleosome = 4 : 1) relative to NCP and a 4-nucleosome array. (c) SDS-polyacrylamide gel analysis of HMGN purification products (see Methods). Samples from HMGN1 (left) and HMGN2 (right) overexpression are shown for crude extract (cr) and after gel filtration (gf) and ion-exchange chromatography (N1, N1t, and N2). (d) Xenopus HMGN primary structures. Functional domains are the NBD (blue) and RD (red). Nuclear localization elements are shown in green.
Figure 2. HMGN association with nucleosomal array is capable of inducing the S2 transition. Gel labels indicate HMGN identity, (N1t, HMGN1t; N1, HMGN1; N2, HMGN2; a, 12-array alone) and numbers designate HMGN : nucleosome molar stoichiometry. (a) HMGN binding to 12-array at low (top) and near physiological ionic strength (bottom). ((b), (c)) HMGN binding to 12-array at near physiological ionic strength with 1 mM Mg2+.
Figure 3. S2 formation is divalent metal dependent and requires HMGN elements outside of the NBD. EMSA gel labels indicate HMGN identity (N1t, HMGN1t; N1, HMGN1; N2, HMGN2; a, 12-array alone; n, NCP alone), and numbers designate HMGN : nucleosome molar stoichiometry. (a) HMGN binding to 12-array at near physiological ionic strength with 1 mM Ca2+. (b) Binding of HMGN proteins and NBD peptides to NCP-601 at near physiological ionic strength with 1 mM Mg2+. (c) Binding of HMGN NBD peptides to 12-array at low ionic strength (top), near physiological ionic strength (middle), and near physiological ionic strength with 1 mM Mg2+ (bottom).
Figure 4. Thermal denaturation assays reveal influence of divalent metal and HMGNs on nucleosome stability. ((a)–(h)) Sample buffer was near physiological ionic strength without divalent metal ((a)–(d); 1XTB, default) or with 1 mM Mg2+ or Ca2+ ((a)–(c), (e)–(h); +Mg, +Ca). Assays were conducted on naked NCP DNA fragments alone (a), NCP ((b), (c)), NCP-601 with 3 : 1 HMGN : NCP stoichiometry in the absence of divalent metal (d), NCP-601 with 1 : 1 (e), 2 : 1 (f), or 3 : 1 (g) HMGN : NCP stoichiometry and NCP147 with 2 : 1 HMGN : NCP stoichiometry (h). ((d)–(h)) “NCP” corresponds to an HMGN-free control sample.
Figure 5. Off-centered NCP undergoes a transition in the presence of divalent metal and associates with HMGNs to form an S2-like state. (a) Crystal structure-based [19] models for off-centered and centered NCP. DNA strands are colored orange and cyan and histone proteins are grey. Off-centered NCP is missing an interaction between one DNA terminus and the N-terminal tail of H3 (MIA). (b) EMSAs of HMGN binding to centered (C; right) versus off-centered (O; left) NCP146b. Gel labels indicate HMGN identity (N1t, HMGN1t; N1, HMGN1; N2, HMGN2; n, NCP alone), and numbers designate HMGN:nucleosome molar stoichiometry. Off-centered samples (left 7 lanes) also contain a fraction of faster migrating centered NCP. Gels were run under three different buffer conditions: low ionic strength (top), near physiological ionic strength (middle), and near physiological ionic strength with 1 mM Mg2+ (bottom). HMGN : nucleosome molar stoichiometry (*) for centered samples (right 3 lanes) is 1 : 1 (top, middle) or 3 : 1 (bottom). Assignments of 1 : 1 and 2 : 1 HMGN : off-centered NCP species are inferred by comparison with those for centered NCP (see text for details). The additional band observed at low HMGN stoichiometry with Mg2+ (arrow) may coincide with a minor fraction of off-centered NCP in a compact state associated with one molecule of HMGN.
Anderson,
Sequence and position-dependence of the equilibrium accessibility of nucleosomal DNA target sites.
2000, Pubmed
Anderson,
Sequence and position-dependence of the equilibrium accessibility of nucleosomal DNA target sites.
2000,
Pubmed
Bryan,
Physical properties of inner histone-DNA complexes.
1978,
Pubmed
Bustin,
Chromatin unfolding and activation by HMGN(*) chromosomal proteins.
2001,
Pubmed
Cherukuri,
Cell cycle-dependent binding of HMGN proteins to chromatin.
2008,
Pubmed
Crippa,
Deposition of chromosomal protein HMG-17 during replication affects the nucleosomal ladder and transcriptional potential of nascent chromatin.
1993,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Crippa,
Nucleosome core binding region of chromosomal protein HMG-17 acts as an independent functional domain.
1992,
Pubmed
Davey,
Solvent mediated interactions in the structure of the nucleosome core particle at 1.9 a resolution.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Ding,
Alleviation of histone H1-mediated transcriptional repression and chromatin compaction by the acidic activation region in chromosomal protein HMG-14.
1997,
Pubmed
Dorigo,
Chromatin fiber folding: requirement for the histone H4 N-terminal tail.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Duguid,
Raman spectroscopy of DNA-metal complexes. II. The thermal denaturation of DNA in the presence of Sr2+, Ba2+, Mg2+, Ca2+, Mn2+, Co2+, Ni2+, and Cd2+.
1995,
Pubmed
Ferreira,
Histone tails and the H3 alphaN helix regulate nucleosome mobility and stability.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Henikoff,
Nucleosome destabilization in the epigenetic regulation of gene expression.
2008,
Pubmed
Hill,
Effects of HMGN1 on chromatin structure and SWI/SNF-mediated chromatin remodeling.
2005,
Pubmed
Jiang,
Nucleosome positioning and gene regulation: advances through genomics.
2009,
Pubmed
Li,
Rapid spontaneous accessibility of nucleosomal DNA.
2005,
Pubmed
Lim,
Preparation and functional analysis of HMGN proteins.
2004,
Pubmed
Lim,
Metastable macromolecular complexes containing high mobility group nucleosome-binding chromosomal proteins in HeLa nuclei.
2002,
Pubmed
Lowary,
New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning.
1998,
Pubmed
Lucey,
Differential expression of the HMGN family of chromatin proteins during ocular development.
2008,
Pubmed
Luger,
Preparation of nucleosome core particle from recombinant histones.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Ong,
DNA stretching and extreme kinking in the nucleosome core.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Paton,
Nonhistone nuclear high mobility group proteins 14 and 17 stabilize nucleosome core particles.
1983,
Pubmed
Polach,
Mechanism of protein access to specific DNA sequences in chromatin: a dynamic equilibrium model for gene regulation.
1995,
Pubmed
Postnikov,
Clusters of nucleosomes containing chromosomal protein HMG-17 in chromatin.
1997,
Pubmed
Postnikov,
Regulation of chromatin structure and function by HMGN proteins.
2010,
Pubmed
Postnikov,
Homodimers of chromosomal proteins HMG-14 and HMG-17 in nucleosome cores.
1995,
Pubmed
Richmond,
The structure of DNA in the nucleosome core.
2003,
Pubmed
Schalch,
X-ray structure of a tetranucleosome and its implications for the chromatin fibre.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Simpson,
Structure of the chromatosome, a chromatin particle containing 160 base pairs of DNA and all the histones.
1978,
Pubmed
Strick,
Cation-chromatin binding as shown by ion microscopy is essential for the structural integrity of chromosomes.
2001,
Pubmed
Subramanian,
The nucleosome-binding protein HMGN2 modulates global genome repair.
2009,
Pubmed
Thoma,
Repair of UV lesions in nucleosomes--intrinsic properties and remodeling.
2005,
Pubmed
Trieschmann,
Modular structure of chromosomal proteins HMG-14 and HMG-17: definition of a transcriptional enhancement domain distinct from the nucleosomal binding domain.
1995,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Trieschmann,
Incorporation of chromosomal proteins HMG-14/HMG-17 into nascent nucleosomes induces an extended chromatin conformation and enhances the utilization of active transcription complexes.
1995,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Ueda,
Distinct domains in high mobility group N variants modulate specific chromatin modifications.
2006,
Pubmed
Ueda,
Delineation of the protein module that anchors HMGN proteins to nucleosomes in the chromatin of living cells.
2008,
Pubmed
Weischet,
Thermal denaturation of nucleosomal core particles.
1978,
Pubmed
West,
HMGN3a and HMGN3b, two protein isoforms with a tissue-specific expression pattern, expand the cellular repertoire of nucleosome-binding proteins.
2001,
Pubmed
Wu,
Platinum drug adduct formation in the nucleosome core alters nucleosome mobility but not positioning.
2008,
Pubmed
Wu,
Using soft X-rays for a detailed picture of divalent metal binding in the nucleosome.
2010,
Pubmed