Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
PLoS Comput Biol
2011 Jun 01;76:e1002049. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002049.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Brownian dynamics simulation of nucleocytoplasmic transport: a coarse-grained model for the functional state of the nuclear pore complex.
Moussavi-Baygi R
,
Jamali Y
,
Karimi R
,
Mofrad MR
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
The nuclear pore complex (NPC) regulates molecular traffic across the nuclear envelope (NE). Selective transport happens on the order of milliseconds and the length scale of tens of nanometers; however, the transport mechanism remains elusive. Central to the transport process is the hydrophobic interactions between karyopherins (kaps) and Phe-Gly (FG) repeat domains. Taking into account the polymeric nature of FG-repeats grafted on the elastic structure of the NPC, and the kap-FG hydrophobic affinity, we have established a coarse-grained model of the NPC structure that mimics nucleocytoplasmic transport. To establish a foundation for future works, the methodology and biophysical rationale behind the model is explained in details. The model predicts that the first-passage time of a 15 nm cargo-complex is about 2.6±0.13 ms with an inverse Gaussian distribution for statistically adequate number of independent Brownian dynamics simulations. Moreover, the cargo-complex is primarily attached to the channel wall where it interacts with the FG-layer as it passes through the central channel. The kap-FG hydrophobic interaction is highly dynamic and fast, which ensures an efficient translocation through the NPC. Further, almost all eight hydrophobic binding spots on kap-β are occupied simultaneously during transport. Finally, as opposed to intact NPCs, cytoplasmic filaments-deficient NPCs show a high degree of permeability to inert cargos, implying the defining role of cytoplasmic filaments in the selectivity barrier.
Figure 1. A schematic representation of the NPC structure with the cargo-complex indicated as a kap-β-bound blue sphere inside the central channel.For more excellent descriptive figures of the NPC along with different biochemical agents see the recent comprehensive review by Jamali et al., 2011 [18].
Figure 2. Dimensions of different subunits of the Xenopus oocyte NPC that were used in our model.Dimensions taken from Akey 1989 and Stoffler et al. 2003 [37], [38].
Figure 3. Our discretized model of the NPC structure includes three different groups of nups.a) Poms are responsible for anchoring the structure to the NE. They are modeled as a set of linear springs fixed at one end to the NE and at the other end to the central channel. b) The main scaffold includes cytoplasmic filaments, central channel, and nuclear basket, and is modeled by linear and angular springs. While the linear springs account for the elastic extension in the NPC backbone, angular springs explain the bending rigidity. c) FG-repeat domains are modeled as discrete wormlike chains (WLC) with the persistence length measured by AFM force-extension [39].
Figure 4. The energy and force-law of different springs between consecutive beads in the structural component of the NPC.a) Extensional elastic potential energy between two consecutive beads in the pom or main scaffold regions, representing the elastic extension. b) Angular potential energy between two consecutive springs representing bending rigidity of the main scaffold and the FG-repeat domains. Y-axis on the left shows values of the angular potential energy for the main scaffold, while the right y-axis shows those values for FG-repeat domains. c) The force-law of the wormlike chain (WLC). Discrete WLC models the FG-repeat domains.
Figure 5. The nonbonded potential energies employed in the model.a) Hydrophobic potential energy is applied between FG-beads localized to the central channel (dashed line). The same potential, a bit stronger, is applied between kap and FG-beads (solid line). b) Pairwise repulsive potential.
Figure 6. The structural components of the NPC and their equivalences in our model.a) The NPC structure is composed of three different groups of nups, namely poms (yellow), structural proteins (green), and FG-nups (red). b) In our model, we consider all these components with the appropriate set of bead-spring elements representing their in-vivo functions.
Figure 7. The cargo-complex interacting with FG-repeat domains via hydrophobic patches on the convex surface of the kap-β[46], [73].Kap-β has a boat-like shape [8] and the localization of the binding spots on its surface has led to the idea of a “coherent FG-binding stripe” instead of discrete binding spots [46]. In our model, we take into account this fact by considering a ‘hydrophobic arc with limited capacity’ on the cargo surface. This arc possesses eight hydrophobic binding spots, and thus, is able to simultaneously interact with up to eighth FG-motifs. The magnification on the right shows a closer depiction of the cargo-complex with the crystal structure of the kap-β (blue) interacting with FG-repeats (red) on its convex surface (1F59, pdb bank). Also, the average path of a 15 nm cargo-complex during translocation is shown in purple. The path is averaged over 150 independent simulations. As it can be seen, the cargo-complex is primarily attached to the FG-layer during its translocation.
Figure 8. The mean transport time of a 15 nm diameter cargo complex is ms (SEM) that is averaged over 150 independent runs.As it can be seen, the transport time is scattered over a wide range from 0.5 ms to 8 ms. The transport time can be viewed as the first passage time [80] if an absorbing wall is imagined in the nuclear compartment where the cargo is released. The histograms show the distribution of the first passage time that obeys the inverse Gaussian. Red dashed lines show the best fitted inverse Gaussian distribution with the scale parameter and the mean value 2.6 ms. Solid black line shows the cumulative distribution function (cdf) obtained from simulation results and blue dash lines represent cdf of the inverse Gaussian that is in a good agreement with simulation results.
Figure 9. The histograms on left show the radial probability distribution of the cargo-complex versus the channel radius (the bin size is 1 nm).The cargo diameter is indicated inside the plot area. Each diagram is averaged over 50 independent simulations. Histograms are fit with Gaussian distributions (red dash line). The peak ± SD is recorded on top of histograms for each cargo size. Color bars on the right side show the radial probability distribution inside the central channel geometry. The more reddish, the higher the probability density. As it can be seen both in histograms and color bars, the large cargo is more likely to attach to the wall and less likely to disperse in the channel as opposed to the smaller cargo. This is partly due to its larger surface area and smaller diffusion coefficient, which make it less mobile compared the smaller cargo.
Figure 10. The y-component of a cargo-complex trajectory during ∼2.5 ms transport through the pore.The NPC structure is sketched on the right to illustrate the corresponding location of the cargo-complex within the NPC. It can be seen that the cargo-complex jumps back and forth tens of times before it released in the nuclear basket. The majority of its time is spent in the central channel.
Akey,
Interactions and structure of the nuclear pore complex revealed by cryo-electron microscopy.
1989, Pubmed,
Xenbase
Akey,
Interactions and structure of the nuclear pore complex revealed by cryo-electron microscopy.
1989,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Bangs,
Predictive biosimulation and virtual patients in pharmaceutical R and D.
2005,
Pubmed
Bayliss,
Structural basis for the interaction between FxFG nucleoporin repeats and importin-beta in nuclear trafficking.
2000,
Pubmed
Bayliss,
The molecular mechanism of transport of macromolecules through nuclear pore complexes.
2000,
Pubmed
Bayliss,
GLFG and FxFG nucleoporins bind to overlapping sites on importin-beta.
2002,
Pubmed
Beck,
Snapshots of nuclear pore complexes in action captured by cryo-electron tomography.
2007,
Pubmed
Bednenko,
Importin beta contains a COOH-terminal nucleoporin binding region important for nuclear transport.
2003,
Pubmed
Ben-Efraim,
Gradient of increasing affinity of importin beta for nucleoporins along the pathway of nuclear import.
2001,
Pubmed
Bickel,
The nuclear pore complex mystery and anomalous diffusion in reversible gels.
2002,
Pubmed
Buehler,
Deformation and failure of protein materials in physiologically extreme conditions and disease.
2009,
Pubmed
Cifra,
Persistence lengths and structure factors of wormlike polymers under confinement.
2008,
Pubmed
Colwell,
Charge as a selection criterion for translocation through the nuclear pore complex.
2010,
Pubmed
Cronshaw,
Proteomic analysis of the mammalian nuclear pore complex.
2002,
Pubmed
Cronshaw,
The nuclear pore complex: disease associations and functional correlations.
2004,
Pubmed
D'Angelo,
Structure, dynamics and function of nuclear pore complexes.
2008,
Pubmed
Dange,
Autonomy and robustness of translocation through the nuclear pore complex: a single-molecule study.
2008,
Pubmed
Denning,
Disorder in the nuclear pore complex: the FG repeat regions of nucleoporins are natively unfolded.
2003,
Pubmed
Devos,
Simple fold composition and modular architecture of the nuclear pore complex.
2006,
Pubmed
Dölker,
Hydrophilic linkers and polar contacts affect aggregation of FG repeat peptides.
2010,
Pubmed
Fahrenkrog,
Molecular architecture of the yeast nuclear pore complex: localization of Nsp1p subcomplexes.
1998,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Fahrenkrog,
The nuclear pore complex: nucleocytoplasmic transport and beyond.
2003,
Pubmed
Fischer,
Average protein density is a molecular-weight-dependent function.
2004,
Pubmed
Frey,
FG-rich repeats of nuclear pore proteins form a three-dimensional meshwork with hydrogel-like properties.
2006,
Pubmed
Frey,
A saturated FG-repeat hydrogel can reproduce the permeability properties of nuclear pore complexes.
2007,
Pubmed
Guilak,
Viscoelastic properties of the cell nucleus.
2000,
Pubmed
Gustin,
Effects of poliovirus infection on nucleo-cytoplasmic trafficking and nuclear pore complex composition.
2001,
Pubmed
Görlich,
Characterization of Ran-driven cargo transport and the RanGTPase system by kinetic measurements and computer simulation.
2003,
Pubmed
Herrmann,
Near-field optical study of protein transport kinetics at a single nuclear pore.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Isgro,
Binding dynamics of isolated nucleoporin repeat regions to importin-beta.
2005,
Pubmed
Jamali,
Nuclear pore complex: biochemistry and biophysics of nucleocytoplasmic transport in health and disease.
2011,
Pubmed
Jovanovic-Talisman,
Artificial nanopores that mimic the transport selectivity of the nuclear pore complex.
2009,
Pubmed
Kasper,
CREB binding protein interacts with nucleoporin-specific FG repeats that activate transcription and mediate NUP98-HOXA9 oncogenicity.
1999,
Pubmed
Krishnan,
Intramolecular cohesion of coils mediated by phenylalanine--glycine motifs in the natively unfolded domain of a nucleoporin.
2008,
Pubmed
Kubitscheck,
Nuclear transport of single molecules: dwell times at the nuclear pore complex.
2005,
Pubmed
Kustanovich,
Metastable network model of protein transport through nuclear pores.
2004,
Pubmed
Lim,
Flexible phenylalanine-glycine nucleoporins as entropic barriers to nucleocytoplasmic transport.
2006,
Pubmed
Lim,
Nanomechanical basis of selective gating by the nuclear pore complex.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Lim,
Towards reconciling structure and function in the nuclear pore complex.
2008,
Pubmed
Liu,
Structural basis for the high-affinity binding of nucleoporin Nup1p to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae importin-beta homologue, Kap95p.
2005,
Pubmed
Lowe,
Selectivity mechanism of the nuclear pore complex characterized by single cargo tracking.
2010,
Pubmed
Ma,
Three-dimensional distribution of transient interactions in the nuclear pore complex obtained from single-molecule snapshots.
2010,
Pubmed
Macara,
Transport into and out of the nucleus.
2001,
Pubmed
Maddox,
A Monte Carlo study of peptide insertion into lipid bilayers: equilibrium conformations and insertion mechanisms.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Miao,
Transport-related structures and processes of the nuclear pore complex studied through molecular dynamics.
2009,
Pubmed
Mohr,
Characterisation of the passive permeability barrier of nuclear pore complexes.
2009,
Pubmed
Mooren,
Nuclear side conformational changes in the nuclear pore complex following calcium release from the nuclear membrane.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Moussavi-Baygi,
Biophysical coarse-grained modeling provides insights into transport through the nuclear pore complex.
2011,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Naim,
Cargo surface hydrophobicity is sufficient to overcome the nuclear pore complex selectivity barrier.
2009,
Pubmed
Panté,
Molecular dissection of the nuclear pore complex.
1996,
Pubmed
Panté,
Nuclear pore complex is able to transport macromolecules with diameters of about 39 nm.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Patel,
Natively unfolded nucleoporins gate protein diffusion across the nuclear pore complex.
2007,
Pubmed
Pei,
Brownian dynamics simulation of the diffusion of rods and wormlike chains in a gel modeled as a cubic lattice: application to DNA.
2009,
Pubmed
Peters,
Translocation through the nuclear pore complex: selectivity and speed by reduction-of-dimensionality.
2005,
Pubmed
Peters,
Translocation through the nuclear pore: Kaps pave the way.
2009,
Pubmed
Ribbeck,
Kinetic analysis of translocation through nuclear pore complexes.
2001,
Pubmed
Ribbeck,
The permeability barrier of nuclear pore complexes appears to operate via hydrophobic exclusion.
2002,
Pubmed
Rout,
Virtual gating and nuclear transport: the hole picture.
2003,
Pubmed
Satterly,
Influenza virus targets the mRNA export machinery and the nuclear pore complex.
2007,
Pubmed
Shulga,
Yeast nucleoporins involved in passive nuclear envelope permeability.
2000,
Pubmed
Smith,
Direct mechanical measurements of the elasticity of single DNA molecules by using magnetic beads.
1992,
Pubmed
Stoffler,
Cryo-electron tomography provides novel insights into nuclear pore architecture: implications for nucleocytoplasmic transport.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Strawn,
Minimal nuclear pore complexes define FG repeat domains essential for transport.
2004,
Pubmed
Timney,
Simple kinetic relationships and nonspecific competition govern nuclear import rates in vivo.
2006,
Pubmed
Vaziri,
Mechanics and deformation of the nucleus in micropipette aspiration experiment.
2007,
Pubmed
Walther,
The cytoplasmic filaments of the nuclear pore complex are dispensable for selective nuclear protein import.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Whittaker,
Viral entry into the nucleus.
2000,
Pubmed
Wolf,
On the octagonal structure of the nuclear pore complex: insights from coarse-grained models.
2008,
Pubmed
Yamada,
A bimodal distribution of two distinct categories of intrinsically disordered structures with separate functions in FG nucleoporins.
2010,
Pubmed
Yang,
Nuclear import time and transport efficiency depend on importin beta concentration.
2006,
Pubmed
Yang,
Imaging of single-molecule translocation through nuclear pore complexes.
2004,
Pubmed
Yokokawa,
Mechanical properties of plasma membrane and nuclear envelope measured by scanning probe microscope.
2008,
Pubmed