Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
Biomech Model Mechanobiol
2012 Nov 01;118:1251-62. doi: 10.1007/s10237-012-0389-4.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
A potential role for differential contractility in early brain development and evolution.
Filas BA
,
Oltean A
,
Beebe DC
,
Okamoto RJ
,
Bayly PV
,
Taber LA
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Differences in brain structure between species have long fascinated evolutionary biologists. Understanding how these differences arise requires knowing how they are generated in the embryo. Growing evidence in the field of evolutionary developmental biology (evo-devo) suggests that morphological differences between species result largely from changes in the spatiotemporal regulation of gene expression during development. Corresponding changes in functional cellular behaviors (morphogenetic mechanisms) are only beginning to be explored, however. Here we show that spatiotemporal patterns of tissue contractility are sufficient to explain differences in morphology of the early embryonic brain between disparate species. We found that enhancing cytoskeletal contraction in the embryonic chick brain with calyculin A alters the distribution of contractile proteins on the apical side of the neuroepithelium and changes relatively round cross-sections of the tubular brain into shapes resembling triangles, diamonds, and narrow slits. These perturbed shapes, as well as overall brain morphology, are remarkably similar to those of corresponding sections normally found in species such as zebrafish and Xenopus laevis (frog). Tissue staining revealed relatively strong concentration of F-actin at vertices of hyper-contracted cross-sections, and a finite element model shows that local contraction in these regions can convert circular sections into the observed shapes. Another model suggests that these variations in contractility depend on the initial geometry of the brain tube, as localized contraction may be needed to open the initially closed lumen in normal zebrafish and Xenopus brains, whereas this contractile machinery is not necessary in chick brains, which are already open when first created. We conclude that interspecies differences in cytoskeletal contraction may play a larger role in generating differences in morphology, and at much earlier developmental stages, in the brain than previously appreciated. This study is a step toward uncovering the underlying morphomechanical mechanisms that regulate how neural phenotypic differences arise between species.
Barton,
Mosaic evolution of brain structure in mammals.
2000, Pubmed
Barton,
Mosaic evolution of brain structure in mammals.
2000,
Pubmed
Breuker,
Functional evo-devo.
2006,
Pubmed
Carroll,
Evo-devo and an expanding evolutionary synthesis: a genetic theory of morphological evolution.
2008,
Pubmed
Copp,
The genetic basis of mammalian neurulation.
2003,
Pubmed
Desmond,
Internal luminal pressure during early chick embryonic brain growth: descriptive and empirical observations.
2005,
Pubmed
Desmond,
Embryonic brain enlargement requires cerebrospinal fluid pressure.
1977,
Pubmed
Dye,
Two independent spiral structures control cell shape in Caulobacter.
2005,
Pubmed
Ettensohn,
Mechanisms of epithelial invagination.
1985,
Pubmed
Fabian,
Calyculin A, an enhancer of myosin, speeds up anaphase chromosome movement.
2007,
Pubmed
Filas,
Mechanical stress as a regulator of cytoskeletal contractility and nuclear shape in embryonic epithelia.
2011,
Pubmed
Gato,
Why the embryo still matters: CSF and the neuroepithelium as interdependent regulators of embryonic brain growth, morphogenesis and histiogenesis.
2009,
Pubmed
Gutzman,
Formation of the zebrafish midbrain-hindbrain boundary constriction requires laminin-dependent basal constriction.
2008,
Pubmed
Gutzman,
Epithelial relaxation mediated by the myosin phosphatase regulator Mypt1 is required for brain ventricle lumen expansion and hindbrain morphogenesis.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Hamburger,
A series of normal stages in the development of the chick embryo. 1951.
1992,
Pubmed
Harrington,
Comparative analysis of neurulation: first impressions do not count.
2009,
Pubmed
Hofman,
On the evolution and geometry of the brain in mammals.
1989,
Pubmed
Hofmann,
Early developmental patterning sets the stage for brain evolution.
2010,
Pubmed
Kinoshita,
Apical accumulation of Rho in the neural plate is important for neural plate cell shape change and neural tube formation.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Koshiba-Takeuchi,
Reptilian heart development and the molecular basis of cardiac chamber evolution.
2009,
Pubmed
Lee,
Studies on the mechanisms of neurulation in the chick: interrelationship of contractile proteins, microfilaments, and the shape of neuroepithelial cells.
1985,
Pubmed
Lowery,
Initial formation of zebrafish brain ventricles occurs independently of circulation and requires the nagie oko and snakehead/atp1a1a.1 gene products.
2005,
Pubmed
Lowery,
Strategies of vertebrate neurulation and a re-evaluation of teleost neural tube formation.
2004,
Pubmed
Lui,
Development and evolution of the human neocortex.
2011,
Pubmed
Martin,
Pulsed contractions of an actin-myosin network drive apical constriction.
2009,
Pubmed
Martin,
Pulsation and stabilization: contractile forces that underlie morphogenesis.
2010,
Pubmed
McGowan,
Species differences in early patterning of the avian brain.
2011,
Pubmed
Männer,
Correlation between the embryonic head flexures and cardiac development. An experimental study in chick embryos.
1993,
Pubmed
Nelson,
Emergent patterns of growth controlled by multicellular form and mechanics.
2005,
Pubmed
Nerurkar,
Morphogenetic adaptation of the looping embryonic heart to altered mechanical loads.
2006,
Pubmed
Northcutt,
Changing views of brain evolution.
2001,
Pubmed
Nyholm,
A novel genetic mechanism regulates dorsolateral hinge-point formation during zebrafish cranial neurulation.
2009,
Pubmed
Olson,
Gene regulatory networks in the evolution and development of the heart.
2006,
Pubmed
Pincus,
Comparison of quantitative methods for cell-shape analysis.
2007,
Pubmed
Raghavan,
Decoupling diffusional from dimensional control of signaling in 3D culture reveals a role for myosin in tubulogenesis.
2010,
Pubmed
Rodriguez,
Stress-dependent finite growth in soft elastic tissues.
1994,
Pubmed
Salazar-Ciudad,
A computational model of teeth and the developmental origins of morphological variation.
2010,
Pubmed
Salazar-Ciudad,
Mechanisms of pattern formation in development and evolution.
2003,
Pubmed
Schoenwolf,
Mechanisms of neurulation: traditional viewpoint and recent advances.
1990,
Pubmed
Solon,
Pulsed forces timed by a ratchet-like mechanism drive directed tissue movement during dorsal closure.
2009,
Pubmed
Sylvester,
Brain diversity evolves via differences in patterning.
2010,
Pubmed
Taber,
Theoretical study of Beloussov's hyper-restoration hypothesis for mechanical regulation of morphogenesis.
2008,
Pubmed
Voronov,
Cardiac looping in experimental conditions: effects of extraembryonic forces.
2002,
Pubmed
Wozniak,
Mechanotransduction in development: a growing role for contractility.
2009,
Pubmed
Xu,
Opening angles and material properties of the early embryonic chick brain.
2010,
Pubmed