Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
BMC Genomics
2012 Jun 08;13:225. doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-225.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Probing the Xenopus laevis inner ear transcriptome for biological function.
Powers TR
,
Virk SM
,
Trujillo-Provencio C
,
Serrano EE
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
The senses of hearing and balance depend upon mechanoreception, a process that originates in the inner ear and shares features across species. Amphibians have been widely used for physiological studies of mechanotransduction by sensory hair cells. In contrast, much less is known of the genetic basis of auditory and vestibular function in this class of animals. Among amphibians, the genus Xenopus is a well-characterized genetic and developmental model that offers unique opportunities for inner ear research because of the amphibian capacity for tissue and organ regeneration. For these reasons, we implemented a functional genomics approach as a means to undertake a large-scale analysis of the Xenopus laevis inner ear transcriptome through microarray analysis. Microarray analysis uncovered genes within the X. laevis inner ear transcriptome associated with inner ear function and impairment in other organisms, thereby supporting the inclusion of Xenopus in cross-species genetic studies of the inner ear. The use of gene categories (inner eartissue; deafness; ion channels; ion transporters; transcription factors) facilitated the assignment of functional significance to probe set identifiers. We enhanced the biological relevance of our microarray data by using a variety of curation approaches to increase the annotation of the Affymetrix GeneChip(®) Xenopus laevis Genome array. In addition, annotation analysis revealed the prevalence of inner ear transcripts represented by probe set identifiers that lack functional characterization. We identified an abundance of targets for genetic analysis of auditory and vestibular function. The orthologues to human genes with known inner ear function and the highly expressed transcripts that lack annotation are particularly interesting candidates for future analyses. We used informatics approaches to impart biologically relevant information to the Xenopus inner ear transcriptome, thereby addressing the impediment imposed by insufficient gene annotation. These findings heighten the relevance of Xenopus as a model organism for genetic investigations of inner ear organogenesis, morphogenesis, and regeneration.
Figure 1. Normalization of X. laevis inner ear tissue (XIE) microarray data.A. Box plots of pre-normalized (A1) and GCRMA normalized (A2) Xl-PSID intensity data from three replicate XIE chips. B-D. MvA plots for pre-normalized (1) and GCRMA normalized (2) Xl-PSID intensity values representing the difference between chips XIE1-XIE2 (B), XIE1-XIE3 (C), and XIE2-XIE3 (D). Y axis (M, minus), differences in intensity for any given Xl-PSID from the two arrays. X axis (A, average), average intensity for a given Xl-PSID on the two arrays. Median and average IQR values for the Xl-PSID intensities are given on each plot.
Figure 2. RT-PCR analysis with Xenopus inner ear RNA.A. Electrophoresis gel of PCR products from RT-PCR reactions with template inner ear RNA. Lane 1: New England BioLabs 1 kb DNA ladder; Lane 2: No RT control with gata3 primers; Lane 3: No cDNA control with gata3 primers; Lane 4: gata3 amplified product; Lane 5: No cDNA control with clu primers; Lane 6: clu amplified product; Lane 7: No RT control with six1 primers; Lane 8: No cDNA control with six1 primers; Lane 9: six1 amplified product; Lane 10: No RT control with pfn2 primers; Lane 11: No cDNA control with pfn2 primers; Lane 12: pfn2 amplified product. B-C. Histograms of the average intensities of 105 Xl-PSID consensus sequences that formed affirmative pairwise alignments (BLASTN) with X. laevis (B, XE, n = 58) and X. tropicalis (C, TE, n = 58) inner ear cDNA library clones. Vertical line indicates an intensity value of four.
Figure 3. Venn diagram of the five inner ear gene categories. Venn diagram showing the number and overlap of HGNC or gene symbols within the five inner ear gene categories (see Additional file 2). The total number of symbols in each inner ear gene category are: 680 (IET); 222 (DF); 306 (IC); 367 (IT); and 527 (pTF). One gene symbol, NR3C1, was included in three gene lists (IET, 681; IT, 368; pTF, 528) and excluded from the diagram.
Figure 4. Histograms of Xl-PSID intensity values.A. Distribution of average Xl-PSID intensities for all experimental Xl-PSIDs (n =15, 491). Shaded areas are Xl-PSIDs with GCOS absent calls in all three replicates (n = 3, 314). B-F. Distribution of average intensities for Xl-PSIDs in the five gene categories: B, inner ear tissue (IET/Xl-PSIDs, n = 453); C, deafness (DF/Xl-PSIDs, n = 139); D, ion channel (IC/Xl-PSIDs, n = 74); E, ion transport (IT/Xl-PSIDs, n = 180); F, transcription factors (pTF/Xl-PSIDs, n = 795). Shaded areas are Xl-PSIDs with GCOS absent calls in all three replicates (B, IET/Xl-PSIDs, n = 92; C, DF/Xl-PSIDs, n = 33; D, IC/Xl-PSID, n = 22; E, IT/Xl-PSIDs, n = 52; F, pTF/Xl-PSIDs, n = 328). Vertical line separates the percentage of Xl-PSIDs intensities above and below four.
Figure 5. Decile analysis of inner ear gene category Xl-PSIDs. Bar graphs show the distribution Xl-PSIDs in each equal tally (A, number) or equal intensity (B, percentage) decile for IET/Xl-PSIDs (n = 361); DF/Xl-PSIDs (n = 106); IT/Xl-PSIDs (n = 128); pTF/Xl-PSIDs (n = 467). Note that IT/Xl-PSIDs includes both IC and IT genes.
Figure 6. BLAST analysis of gene category alignments Histograms showing the number of protein sequences for genes in three inner ear categories that aligned to Xl-PSID consensus sequences (Affy) or X. tropicalis 4.1 predicted proteins (Xt4.1 pp) using BLAST algorithms: A, IET/HGNC (n = 681); B, DF/HGNC (n = 222); C, IC/HGNC (n = 306). Pairwise alignments were sorted into similarity groups based on e-value (high = 0-10-100; mod = 10-99 to 10-50; weak = 10-49 to 10-15; low = E > 10-14, data not shown).
Agrawal,
Disorders of balance and vestibular function in US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2004.
2009, Pubmed
Agrawal,
Disorders of balance and vestibular function in US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2001-2004.
2009,
Pubmed
Alsaber,
Predicting candidate genes for human deafness disorders: a bioinformatics approach.
2006,
Pubmed
Altmann,
Microarray-based analysis of early development in Xenopus laevis.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Altschul,
Basic local alignment search tool.
1990,
Pubmed
Alvarado,
Downstream targets of GATA3 in the vestibular sensory organs of the inner ear.
2009,
Pubmed
Amaya,
Xenomics.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Anagnostopoulos,
A compendium of mouse knockouts with inner ear defects.
2002,
Pubmed
Baldessari,
Global gene expression profiling and cluster analysis in Xenopus laevis.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Bever,
Three-dimensional morphology of inner ear development in Xenopus laevis.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Birney,
Identification and analysis of functional elements in 1% of the human genome by the ENCODE pilot project.
2007,
Pubmed
Bowes,
Xenbase: gene expression and improved integration.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Brignull,
Feathers and fins: non-mammalian models for hair cell regeneration.
2009,
Pubmed
Chen,
An inner ear gene expression database.
2002,
Pubmed
Chesneau,
Transgenesis procedures in Xenopus.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Delprat,
FXYD6 is a novel regulator of Na,K-ATPase expressed in the inner ear.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Dennis,
DAVID: Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery.
2003,
Pubmed
Díaz,
Quantity, bundle types, and distribution of hair cells in the sacculus of Xenopus laevis during development.
1995,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Fettiplace,
Active hair bundle movements in auditory hair cells.
2006,
Pubmed
Forge,
The molecular architecture of the inner ear.
2002,
Pubmed
Friedman,
Mouse models to study inner ear development and hereditary hearing loss.
2007,
Pubmed
Gabashvili,
Ion channel gene expression in the inner ear.
2007,
Pubmed
Gohin,
Comparative transcriptomic analysis of follicle-enclosed oocyte maturational and developmental competence acquisition in two non-mammalian vertebrates.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Gong,
Design, validation and annotation of transcriptome-wide oligonucleotide probes for the oligochaete annelid Eisenia fetida.
2010,
Pubmed
Grow,
Global analysis of gene expression in Xenopus hindlimbs during stage-dependent complete and incomplete regeneration.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Harris,
Neomycin-induced hair cell death and rapid regeneration in the lateral line of zebrafish (Danio rerio).
2003,
Pubmed
Hawkins,
Gene expression differences in quiescent versus regenerating hair cells of avian sensory epithelia: implications for human hearing and balance disorders.
2003,
Pubmed
Hawkins,
Large scale gene expression profiles of regenerating inner ear sensory epithelia.
2007,
Pubmed
Heller,
Molecular screens for inner ear genes.
2002,
Pubmed
Hellsten,
The genome of the Western clawed frog Xenopus tropicalis.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Hildebrand,
Gene expression profiling analysis of the inner ear.
2007,
Pubmed
Holley,
Keynote review: The auditory system, hearing loss and potential targets for drug development.
2005,
Pubmed
Holton,
The transduction channel of hair cells from the bull-frog characterized by noise analysis.
1986,
Pubmed
Huang,
The DAVID Gene Functional Classification Tool: a novel biological module-centric algorithm to functionally analyze large gene lists.
2007,
Pubmed
Huang,
Systematic and integrative analysis of large gene lists using DAVID bioinformatics resources.
2009,
Pubmed
Hudspeth,
How the ear's works work.
1989,
Pubmed
Hurle,
Lineage-specific evolution of the vertebrate Otopetrin gene family revealed by comparative genomic analyses.
2011,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Irizarry,
Comparison of Affymetrix GeneChip expression measures.
2006,
Pubmed
Jacobs,
Ultrastructural correlates of mechanoelectrical transduction in hair cells of the bullfrog's internal ear.
1990,
Pubmed
Kent,
The human genome browser at UCSC.
2002,
Pubmed
Kil,
Origins of inner ear sensory organs revealed by fate map and time-lapse analyses.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Lin,
Identification of gene expression profiles in rat ears with cDNA microarrays.
2003,
Pubmed
López-Anaya,
Development of the Xenopus laevis VIIIth cranial nerve: increase in number and area of axons of the saccular and papillar branches.
1997,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Martin,
Negative hair-bundle stiffness betrays a mechanism for mechanical amplification by the hair cell.
2000,
Pubmed
Matsui,
Hair cell regeneration: an exciting phenomenon...but will restoring hearing and balance be possible?
2005,
Pubmed
McDermott,
Analysis and functional evaluation of the hair-cell transcriptome.
2007,
Pubmed
Morris,
Differential expression of genes within the cochlea as defined by a custom mouse inner ear microarray.
2005,
Pubmed
Morton,
Genetics, genomics and gene discovery in the auditory system.
2002,
Pubmed
Muñoz-Sanjuán,
Gene profiling during neural induction in Xenopus laevis: regulation of BMP signaling by post-transcriptional mechanisms and TAB3, a novel TAK1-binding protein.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Ohyama,
BMP signaling is necessary for patterning the sensory and nonsensory regions of the developing mammalian cochlea.
2010,
Pubmed
Petersen,
Non-syndromic, autosomal-recessive deafness.
2006,
Pubmed
Petit,
From deafness genes to hearing mechanisms: harmony and counterpoint.
2006,
Pubmed
Polimeni,
Plasma membrane Ca2+-ATPase isoforms in frog crista ampullaris: identification of PMCA1 and PMCA2 specific splice variants.
2007,
Pubmed
Powers,
Strategies for enhanced annotation of a microarray probe set.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Quick,
Inner ear formation during the early larval development of Xenopus laevis.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Quick,
Cell proliferation during the early compartmentalization of the Xenopus laevis inner ear.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Ramirez-Gordillo,
Optimization of gene delivery methods in Xenopus laevis kidney (A6) and Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell lines for heterologous expression of Xenopus inner ear genes.
2011,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Raviv,
Hearing loss: a common disorder caused by many rare alleles.
2010,
Pubmed
Resendes,
Gene discovery in the auditory system: characterization of additional cochlear-expressed sequences.
2002,
Pubmed
Riley,
Ringing in the new ear: resolution of cell interactions in otic development.
2003,
Pubmed
Roberts,
Hair cells: transduction, tuning, and transmission in the inner ear.
1988,
Pubmed
Sczyrba,
XenDB: full length cDNA prediction and cross species mapping in Xenopus laevis.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Segerdell,
An ontology for Xenopus anatomy and development.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Serrano,
Identification of genes expressed in the Xenopus inner ear.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Smotherman,
Hair cells, hearing and hopping: a field guide to hair cell physiology in the frog.
2000,
Pubmed
Staecker,
Development of gene therapy for inner ear disease: Using bilateral vestibular hypofunction as a vehicle for translational research.
2011,
Pubmed
Steel,
Deafness genes: expressions of surprise.
1999,
Pubmed
Thalmann,
Protein profile of human perilymph: in search of markers for the diagnosis of perilymph fistula and other inner ear disease.
1994,
Pubmed
Trujillo-Provencio,
RNA isolation from Xenopus inner ear sensory endorgans for transcriptional profiling and molecular cloning.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Tsai,
RESOURCERER: a database for annotating and linking microarray resources within and across species.
2001,
Pubmed
UniProt Consortium,
The Universal Protein Resource (UniProt).
2007,
Pubmed
Wangemann,
Supporting sensory transduction: cochlear fluid homeostasis and the endocochlear potential.
2006,
Pubmed
Wever,
Middle ear muscles of the frog.
1979,
Pubmed
Wu,
Preprocessing of oligonucleotide array data.
2004,
Pubmed
Wu,
A review of statistical methods for preprocessing oligonucleotide microarrays.
2009,
Pubmed
