Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
Sci Rep
2021 Feb 25;111:4570. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82630-5.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Superior predatory ability and abundance predicts potential ecological impact towards early-stage anurans by invasive 'Killer Shrimp' (Dikerogammarus villosus).
Warren DA
,
Bradbeer SJ
,
Dunn AM
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Invasive alien species negatively impact upon biodiversity and generate significant economic costs worldwide. Globally, amphibians have suffered considerable losses, with a key driver being predation by large invasive invertebrate and vertebrate predators. However, there is no research regarding the potential ecological impact of small invertebrate invaders. The invasive freshwater amphipod Dikerogammarus villosus can act as a top predator capable of displacing native amphipods and preying heavily upon a range of native species. Listed as one of Europe's top 100 worst invaders, D. villosus has significantly restructured freshwater communities across western Europe and is expected to invade North America in the near future. Here we explore the ecological impact of invasive D. villosus upon UK native and invasive amphibians (Rana temporaria and Xenopus laevis respectively) using the "Relative Impact Potential" (RIP) metric. By combining estimations of per capita effects (i.e. functional response; FR) and relative field abundances, we apply the RIP metric to quantify the potential ecological impact of invasive D. villosus upon embryonic and larval amphibian prey, compared to the native amphipod Gammarus pulex. Both native and invasive amphipods consumed early-stage amphibians and exhibited potentially destabilising Type II FRs. However, larger body size in invasive D. villosus translated into a superior FR through significantly lower handling times and subsequently higher maximum feeding rates-up to seven times greater than native G. pulex. Higher invader abundance also drove elevated RIP scores for invasive D. villosus, with potential impact scores predicted up to 15.4 times greater than native G. pulex. Overall, D. villosus is predicted to have a greater predatory impact upon amphibian populations than G. pulex, due primarily to its larger body size and superior field abundance, potentially reducing amphibian recruitment within invaded regions.
Figure 1. Type II functional response curves for intermediate D. villosus (filled squares and solid black line) and large D. villosus (filled triangle and dotted black line) towards non-native X. laevis embryos (n = 5 replicates per prey density). Shaded Regions are bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals (yellow: intermediate D. villosus, blue: large D. villosus).
Figure 2. Rogers random-predator (Type II) functional response curves for large G. pulex (filled circles with dot-dash black line), intermediate D. villosus (filled squares and solid black line) and large D. villosus (filled triangle and dotted black line) towards native R. temporaria larvae (n = up to 11 replicates per prey density). Shaded Regions display bootstrapped 95% confidence intervals (red: large G. pulex, yellow: intermediate D. villosus, blue: large D. villosus).
Figure 3. RIP biplots comparing intermediate D. villosus (filled square), large D. villosus (filled triangle) and large G. pulex (open circle) when feeding upon native R. temporaria larvae as prey. Biplots generated using mean ± standard errors (SE) estimates for FRs (i.e. maximum feeding rates) and field abundances (ind/m2) recorded in each amphipod size treatment. Mean (± SE) FR parameters are generated from bootstrapped estimates (n = 30 bootstraps).
Alford,
Ecology: Bleak future for amphibians.
2011, Pubmed
Alford,
Ecology: Bleak future for amphibians.
2011,
Pubmed
Alroy,
Current extinction rates of reptiles and amphibians.
2015,
Pubmed
Barrios-O'Neill,
Fortune favours the bold: a higher predator reduces the impact of a native but not an invasive intermediate predator.
2014,
Pubmed
Bellard,
Global patterns in threats to vertebrates by biological invasions.
2016,
Pubmed
Bollache,
Comparison of the functional responses of invasive and native amphipods.
2008,
Pubmed
Currie,
A behaviorally related developmental switch in nitrergic modulation of locomotor rhythmogenesis in larval Xenopus tadpoles.
2016,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Dick,
Invading predatory crustacean Dikerogammarus villosus eliminates both native and exotic species.
2000,
Pubmed
Dick,
Parasitism may enhance rather than reduce the predatory impact of an invader.
2010,
Pubmed
Dudgeon,
Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservation challenges.
2006,
Pubmed
Fisher,
Chytrid fungi and global amphibian declines.
2020,
Pubmed
Gallardo,
Priority setting for invasive species management by the water industry.
2020,
Pubmed
Glazier,
A unifying explanation for diverse metabolic scaling in animals and plants.
2010,
Pubmed
González-Del-Pliego,
Phylogenetic and Trait-Based Prediction of Extinction Risk for Data-Deficient Amphibians.
2019,
Pubmed
Hayes,
The cause of global amphibian declines: a developmental endocrinologist's perspective.
2010,
Pubmed
Hothorn,
Simultaneous inference in general parametric models.
2008,
Pubmed
Maazouzi,
Ecophysiological responses to temperature of the "killer shrimp" Dikerogammarus villosus: is the invader really stronger than the native Gammarus pulex?
2011,
Pubmed
Nunes,
A global meta-analysis of the ecological impacts of alien species on native amphibians.
2019,
Pubmed
Oertli,
Leaf litter processing and energy flow through macroinvertebrates in a woodland pond (Switzerland).
1993,
Pubmed
Rall,
Universal temperature and body-mass scaling of feeding rates.
2012,
Pubmed
Sentis,
On the use of functional responses to quantify emergent multiple predator effects.
2018,
Pubmed
Taylor,
Size matters: predation of fish eggs and larvae by native and invasive amphipods.
2017,
Pubmed
Tinsley,
Extinction of an introduced warm-climate alien species, Xenopus laevis, by extreme weather events.
2015,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Vucic-Pestic,
Allometric functional response model: body masses constrain interaction strengths.
2010,
Pubmed
