Wu Y , Devotta A , José-Edwards DS , Kugler JE , Negrón-Piñeiro LJ , Braslavskaya K , Addy J , Saint-Jeannet JP , Di Gregorio A .

T32 HD007520 NICHD NIH HHS , T32 GM008539 NIGMS NIH HHS , P30 CA016087 NCI NIH HHS , R03 HD098395 NICHD NIH HHS , P30 DE020754 NIDCR NIH HHS

	Figure 1. Xbp1 notochord expression is dependent upon Ci-Bra. (A) Whole-mount in situ hybridization (WMISH) of a wild-type Ciona robusta embryo at the mid-tailbud II stage (Hotta et al., 2007) with a fluorescent antisense RNA probe specific for Cr-Xbp1. Hybridization signal (green) is visible in both epidermis and notochord cells. (A’) Higher-magnification view of the area boxed in light orange in (A). The notochord is delineated on both sides by dashed red lines. Nuclei are stained by DAPI (blue; see Materials and methods). Scale bar: 50 µm. (B) WMISH of a wild-type C. robusta embryo (dorsal view), carried out with a digoxigenin-labeled antisense RNA probe specific for Cr-Xbp1. Staining is visible in epidermis (green arrowheads), anterior sensory vesicle (blue arrowhead), and notochord (delineated by dashed red lines). Both RNA probes were synthesized from EST 26p13. (C) WMISH of a Ci-Bra-/- mutant C. robusta embryo (lateral view) with the same probe described in (B). Staining is unaffected in the epidermis (green arrowheads) and sensory vesicle (blue arrowhead), but is lost from the disrupted notochord territory (delineated by dashed white lines).
	Figure 2. Functional analysis of Ciona Xbp1. Microphotographs of late-tailbud II (A–C), mid-tailbud I (E, F), and late-tailbud I (G–I’) C. robusta transgenic embryos, electroporated at the 1-cell stage with 50 µg of each of the plasmids indicated in the bottom-left corner of each panel. (A, E, G) Control embryos electroporated with the notochord marker plasmid Bra>GFP, which does not interfere with development (Corbo et al., 1997). (B) Embryo electroporated with Bra>Xbp1DBD::GFP, showing a short tail due to an arrest in notochord development. (C) Embryo co-electroporated with Bra>GFP and a construct able to express Xbp1 shRNA in the notochord (see Materials and methods), incubated in parallel with the embryos in (A) and (B), showing a nearly complete tail elongation but defective notochord formation. Insets in (A–C) show higher-magnification views of the regions of the notochord boxed by yellow rectangles; all insets display approximately 10 notochord cells, even though in (A) mosaic incorporation of the marker plasmid allows clear visualization of only 6 of the 10 selected notochord cells. (D) Graph displaying the percentage of embryos showing defective notochord development in Bra>GFP control embryos (abbreviated as GFP) and in transgenic embryos carrying Bra>Xbp1DBD::GFP (abbreviated as Xbp1DBD), Bra>Xbp1DBD::VP16::GFP (abbreviated as Xbp1DBD::VP16), or a Cr-Xbp1 shRNA construct (abbreviated as shRNA). The total number (n) of fully developed transgenic embryos that were scored per each transgene is reported underneath their respective bars. (E, F) Effects of the ectopic/overexpression of Xbp1 in CNS, notochord, and endoderm driven by the Foxa.a promoter region. Embryos were stained with DAPI. Avg., average. (H, I) Representative embryos carrying the Bra>Xbp1DBD::VP16::GFP transgene, stained with rhodamine-phalloidin (red). (H) Embryo displaying incorporation (incorp.) of the fluorescent transgene in 50% of the notochord cells. (I) Representative embryo showing transgene incorporation in the entire notochord lineage (100% incorp.) (G’, H’, I’) Higher-magnification views of the notochord territory of the embryos in (G), (H), and (I), respectively. In (H’), white arrowheads indicate the 20 notochord cells (out of 40 total) that have not incorporated the transgene and display a normal morphology.
	Figure 3. Expression patterns of putative Cr-Xbp1 notochord targets. (A–X) Whole-mount in situ hybridization (WMISH) of Ciona embryos ranging from early gastrula to late tailbud for the genes reported on top of each panel, with digoxigenin-labeled antisense RNA probes synthesized from either the ESTs reported in the lower-right corner of each panel or from gene-specific PCR-amplified products. Gene models are indicated in the bottom-left corners. Insets show either embryos at different developmental stages (D, P, V, W, X) or optical cross sections of the tails of embryos hybridized with the same probes as those in the main panels (G, M, S, T, U). Inset in (N) shows a higher magnification of the trunk region of the same embryo, to display staining in the anterior-most notochord cells. Gene ontologies are reported on top of the panel(s) that they refer to (Supplementary file 1). Stained territories are denoted by arrowheads, color-coded as follows: red, notochord; blue, CNS; green, epidermis; yellow, endoderm; purple, mesenchyme; orange, muscle; aqua, bipolar tail neuron(s). (Y) Pie graph summarizing the gene ontologies of 53 of the 71 potential Cr-Xbp1-downstream genes expressed in the Ciona notochord. (Z) Schematic representation of the Bra-Xbp1 subcircuit identified by this study and of the processes that it influences in Ciona. Filled arrowheads indicate activation of target gene expression, light yellow arrowheads indicate either positive or negative regulation of the genes belonging to each group; slanting parallel lines symbolize that the interactions could be either direct or indirect.
	Figure 4. Effects of Cr-Xbp1 transgenes on the expression of Ci-Bra and fibrillin. Mid-tailbud I C. robusta embryos electroporated with the transgenes reported in green font and hybridized in situ with fluorescent antisense RNA probes (red font). (A, B) Bra>GFP transgenic embryo, photographed in the green (A) and red (B) channels. (C) Higher-magnification view of the notochord of the embryo in (A, B), obtained after merging the green and red images and the blue channel (DAPI). The Bra>GFP plasmid (green) has been incorporated in 20 of the definitive 40 notochord cells (50% incorporation) (A). Ci-Bra transcripts (red) are detected in all 40 notochord cells (B, C). (D, E) Bra>Xbp1DBD::GFP transgenic embryo displaying mosaic incorporation, photographed in the green (D) and red (E) channels. White arrowheads indicate a cluster of non-transgenic notochord cells that express Ci-Bra (red). (F) Higher-magnification view of the notochord of the embryo in (D, E), obtained after merging the green and red images. Expression of Ci-Bra is unperturbed in non-transgenic cells (red) and downregulated in transgenic notochord cells (green). (G, H) Control wild-type (G) and transgenic Bra>Xbp1DBD::VP16::GFP (H) mid-tailbud I embryos, hybridized in situ with a TRITC-labeled antisense RNA probe for fibrillin (gene model: KH.C3.225; EST: 02k18) and counterstained with DAPI. The embryo in (H) shows 50% incorporation of the transgene, incomplete notochord intercalation, and downregulation of fibrillin in the transgenic notochord cells.
	Figure 5. Cross-regulation between Brachyury and Xbp1 in the dorsal mesoderm and developing notochord of Xenopus. (A–F’) Xenopus laevis embryos at the late gastrula stage (NF stage 12), control (A, C), and morphants (B, B’, D, D’, E, E’, F, F’). Injection of the Xbra translation-blocking MO (XbraMO; Shi et al., 2011) caused a reduction of Xbp1 expression in nearly all embryos analyzed (G). Xbra splice-blocking MO (XbraMOS) resulted in a similar phenotype, although at a lower frequency, affecting ~70% of the morphant embryos (G). Both Xbp1 translation-blocking MO (Xbp1MO; Yuan et al., 2008; Tanegashima et al., 2009) and splice-blocking MO (XbpMOS) caused a similar reduction of Xbra expression in approximately 65% of the morphant embryos (H). Embryos are shown as dorsal/vegetal views, anterior to top. The number of embryos analyzed (n) is indicated underneath each bar.
	Figure 6. Xbra and Xbp1 morpholino-mediated knockdowns result in axis truncation. Xbra (XbraMO) and Xbp1 (Xbp1MO) knockdowns cause comparable anterior-posterior axis elongation defects and posterior truncations. (A–C’) Xenopus embryos at NF stage 35/36. (A) Control embryo. (B, C) Morphant embryos injected with Xbp1MO (B) and XbraMO (C), displaying a mild notochord phenotype. (B’, C’) Morphant embryos injected with Xbp1MO (B’) and XbraMO (C’), displaying a severe notochord phenotype. Embryos are shown in lateral views, anterior to the right, dorsal on top. (D) Quantification of the notochord defects in Xbp1MO and XbraMO embryos. The number of embryos analyzed (n) is indicated underneath each bar.
	Figure 2—figure supplement 1 Additional images of Xbp1DBD and Xbp1DBD::VP16 transgenic embryos. Confocal microphotographs of Ciona embryos electroporated with the transgenes indicated in each panel. Anterior is to the left. (A–B’) Transgenic embryos displaying 100% incorporation of the transgene, stained with rhodamine-phalloidin; merged images from red and green channels (A, B) and higher-magnification views of the notochord cells in the green channel (A’, B’). (C, D) Representative transgenic embryos displaying 50% transgene incorporation, stained with rhodamine-phalloidin.
	Figure 3—figure supplement 1 Additional expression patterns of putative Cr-Xbp1 notochord targets. (A-J) Whole-mount in situ hybridization (WMISH) of late gastrula to late-tailbud Ciona robusta embryos for the genes reported on top of each panel, carried out with digoxigenin-labeled antisense RNA probes synthesized from either the ESTs reported in the lower-right corner of each panel or from gene-specific PCR-amplified regions. Gene models are indicated in the bottom-left corners. Insets show expression at different developmental stages. Gene ontologies are reported on top of the panel(s) that they refer to. Stained territories are denoted by arrowheads, color-coded as in Figure 3; light pink arrowheads indicate weak notochord
	Figure 3—figure supplement 2 Ciona-/ascidian-specific notochord genes regulated by Xbp1. (A–O) Whole-mount in situ hybridization (WMISH) of Ciona robusta embryos ranging from early gastrula (inset in B) to mid-tailbud II (top inset in N) for the genes reported on top of each panel, carried out with antisense RNA probes synthesized from either the ESTs reported in the lower-right corner of each panel or from PCR-amplified gene-specific regions. (P) These genes currently appear to be either Ciona-specific (gray slice) or present only in Ciona and other ascidian species (i.e., ascidian-specific; light pink and coral red sections). A fraction of the ascidian-specific genes encode for proteins that contain recognizable domains (coral red section), while the remaining genes do not contain recognizable domains. Insets show different stages (A’, B, C, D, I, L, M, N) and/or optical cross sections of the tail (inset in E and bottom insets in M, N). Top inset in (M) shows a different plan of focus of the late-tailbud II embryo shown in partial cross section in the bottom inset. Arrowheads are color-coded as in Figure 3; the white arrowhead in the top inset in (N) indicates lack of notochord staining.
	Figure 3—figure supplement 3 Putative Xbp1 targets expressed in tissues other than the notochord. Whole-mount in situ hybridization (WMISH) of Ciona robusta embryos ranging from 76 cell (inset in D) to mid-tailbud II (H) for the genes reported on top of each panel, carried out with antisense RNA probes synthesized from either the ESTs reported in the lower-right corner of each panel or from PCR-amplified gene-specific regions. Expression is detected in trunk endoderm (A, C), CNS (B), and in regions of the mesenchyme of variable extent (C–H). Arrowheads are color-coded as in Figure 3.
	Still from Figure 4—video 1 X-projection of confocal images of the embryo in Figure 4C.
	Still from Figure 4—video 2 X-projection of confocal images of the embryo in Figure 4F
	Figure 5—figure supplement 1 Evaluation of the effects of splice-blocking morpholino oligonucleotides on Xbra and Xbp1 transcripts. (A, B) Schematic representation of the Xbra (A) and Xbp1 (B) gene structure. Exons (abbreviated as E) are depicted as colored boxes. For each gene, the target site of the splice-blocking MOs (XbraMOS and Xbp1MOS) is indicated (red arrowheads). The RT-PCR primers used to assess the efficacy of the MOs span the entire coding region of each gene. (C) In XbraMOS-injected embryos, a shorter transcript (red arrow) is detected by gel electrophoresis due to the exclusion of exon 6 (E6). (D) In Xbp1MOS-injected embryos, a shorter transcript is produced (red arrow) due to the exclusion of exon 3 (E3). These aberrant transcripts are not detected in uninjected embryos (Uninj). Left lanes in (C, D) contain a standard molecular weight marker for double-stranded DNA (1 Kb Plus DNA Ladder, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA).
	Figure 6—figure supplement 1 Notochord formation in Xbra and Xbp1 morphant embryos monitored through the expression of Shh. Xenopus embryos at NF stage 35/36. (A) Control embryo. (B–C’) Morphant embryos injected with Xbp1MO (B, B’) and XbraMO (C, C’), displaying either mild (B, C) or severe (B’, C’) notochord phenotypes. Shh expression (black arrows) is uninterrupted along the entire length of the notochord in control embryos (A), and discontinuous in morphant embryos (B–C’). Embryos are shown in lateral views, anterior to the right and dorsal on top.

Acosta-Alvear, XBP1 controls diverse cell type- and condition-specific transcriptional regulatory networks. 2007, Pubmed

Acosta-Alvear, XBP1 controls diverse cell type- and condition-specific transcriptional regulatory networks. 2007, Pubmed
Ang, HNF-3 beta is essential for node and notochord formation in mouse development. 1994, Pubmed
Baek, Involvement of endoplasmic reticulum stress in myofibroblastic differentiation of lung fibroblasts. 2012, Pubmed
Bagnat, Development of a straight vertebrate body axis. 2020, Pubmed
Bagwell, Notochord vacuoles absorb compressive bone growth during zebrafish spine formation. 2020, Pubmed
Bell, GEISHA, a whole-mount in situ hybridization gene expression screen in chicken embryos. 2004, Pubmed
Bennett, Calmodulin-like protein increases filopodia-dependent cell motility via up-regulation of myosin-10. 2007, Pubmed
Bowes, Xenbase: gene expression and improved integration. 2010, Pubmed , Xenbase
Brozovic, ANISEED 2015: a digital framework for the comparative developmental biology of ascidians. 2016, Pubmed
Brozovic, ANISEED 2017: extending the integrated ascidian database to the exploration and evolutionary comparison of genome-scale datasets. 2018, Pubmed
Butz, Differential target gene activation by TBX2 and TBX2VP16: evidence for activation domain-dependent modulation of gene target specificity. 2004, Pubmed
Calfon, IRE1 couples endoplasmic reticulum load to secretory capacity by processing the XBP-1 mRNA. 2002, Pubmed
Cao, XBP1 forms a regulatory loop with BMP-4 and suppresses mesodermal and neural differentiation in Xenopus embryos. 2006, Pubmed , Xenbase
Chiba, Brachyury null mutant-induced defects in juvenile ascidian endodermal organs. 2009, Pubmed
Christiaen, Pitx genes in Tunicates provide new molecular insight into the evolutionary origin of pituitary. 2002, Pubmed
Christiaen, A modular cis-regulatory system controls isoform-specific pitx expression in ascidian stomodaeum. 2005, Pubmed
Christiaen, The transcription/migration interface in heart precursors of Ciona intestinalis. 2008, Pubmed
Clauss, In situ hybridization studies suggest a role for the basic region-leucine zipper protein hXBP-1 in exocrine gland and skeletal development during mouse embryogenesis. 1993, Pubmed
Conlon, Inhibition of Xbra transcription activation causes defects in mesodermal patterning and reveals autoregulation of Xbra in dorsal mesoderm. 1996, Pubmed , Xenbase
Corbo, Characterization of a notochord-specific enhancer from the Brachyury promoter region of the ascidian, Ciona intestinalis. 1997, Pubmed
Dallas, Fibronectin regulates latent transforming growth factor-beta (TGF beta) by controlling matrix assembly of latent TGF beta-binding protein-1. 2005, Pubmed
Darnell, GEISHA: an in situ hybridization gene expression resource for the chicken embryo. 2007, Pubmed
Davidson, Integrin alpha5beta1 and fibronectin regulate polarized cell protrusions required for Xenopus convergence and extension. 2006, Pubmed , Xenbase
Deng, Anion translocation through an Slc26 transporter mediates lumen expansion during tubulogenesis. 2013, Pubmed
Denker, Ciona intestinalis notochord as a new model to investigate the cellular and molecular mechanisms of tubulogenesis. 2012, Pubmed
Di Gregorio, The regulation of forkhead/HNF-3beta expression in the Ciona embryo. 2001, Pubmed
Di Gregorio, Analyzing gene regulation in ascidian embryos: new tools for new perspectives. 2002, Pubmed
Di Gregorio, The notochord gene regulatory network in chordate evolution: Conservation and divergence from Ciona to vertebrates. 2020, Pubmed
Dong, Tube formation by complex cellular processes in Ciona intestinalis notochord. 2009, Pubmed
Dunn, The evolutionarily conserved leprecan gene: its regulation by Brachyury and its role in the developing Ciona notochord. 2009, Pubmed
Fry, Cell cycle regulation by the NEK family of protein kinases. 2012, Pubmed
Fujiwara, Gene expression profiles in Ciona intestinalis cleavage-stage embryos. 2002, Pubmed
Gilchrist, A pipeline for the systematic identification of non-redundant full-ORF cDNAs for polymorphic and evolutionary divergent genomes: Application to the ascidian Ciona intestinalis. 2015, Pubmed
Godwin, The role of fibrillin and microfibril binding proteins in elastin and elastic fibre assembly. 2019, Pubmed
Grumati, Ubiquitin signaling and autophagy. 2018, Pubmed
Halper, Basic components of connective tissues and extracellular matrix: elastin, fibrillin, fibulins, fibrinogen, fibronectin, laminin, tenascins and thrombospondins. 2014, Pubmed
Hamada, Novel genes involved in Ciona intestinalis embryogenesis: characterization of gene knockdown embryos. 2007, Pubmed
Han, Physiological/pathological ramifications of transcription factors in the unfolded protein response. 2017, Pubmed
Harder, Multiple inputs into a posterior-specific regulatory network in the Ciona notochord. 2019, Pubmed
Harland, In situ hybridization: an improved whole-mount method for Xenopus embryos. 1991, Pubmed , Xenbase
Hollien, Evolution of the unfolded protein response. 2013, Pubmed
Hotta, Temporal expression patterns of 39 Brachyury-downstream genes associated with notochord formation in the Ciona intestinalis embryo. 1999, Pubmed
Hotta, Characterization of Brachyury-downstream notochord genes in the Ciona intestinalis embryo. 2000, Pubmed
Hotta, A web-based interactive developmental table for the ascidian Ciona intestinalis, including 3D real-image embryo reconstructions: I. From fertilized egg to hatching larva. 2007, Pubmed
Hudson, Patterning across the ascidian neural plate by lateral Nodal signalling sources. 2005, Pubmed
Hudson, Divergent mechanisms specify chordate motoneurons: evidence from ascidians. 2011, Pubmed
Imai, Gene expression profiles of transcription factors and signaling molecules in the ascidian embryo: towards a comprehensive understanding of gene networks. 2004, Pubmed
Imai, Regulatory blueprint for a chordate embryo. 2006, Pubmed
Inanobe, An Epithelial Ca2+-Sensor Protein is an Alternative to Calmodulin to Compose Functional KCNQ1 Channels. 2015, Pubmed , Xenbase
Ishibashi, Microarray analysis of embryonic retinoic acid target genes in the ascidian Ciona intestinalis. 2003, Pubmed
Ishikawa, UPR transducer BBF2H7 allows export of type II collagen in a cargo- and developmental stage-specific manner. 2017, Pubmed
Iwakoshi, Plasma cell differentiation and the unfolded protein response intersect at the transcription factor XBP-1. 2003, Pubmed
Jiang, Ascidian notochord morphogenesis. 2007, Pubmed
Jiang, Activation of autophagy via Ca(2+)-dependent AMPK/mTOR pathway in rat notochordal cells is a cellular adaptation under hyperosmotic stress. 2015, Pubmed
José-Edwards, The identification of transcription factors expressed in the notochord of Ciona intestinalis adds new potential players to the brachyury gene regulatory network. 2011, Pubmed
José-Edwards, Tbx2/3 is an essential mediator within the Brachyury gene network during Ciona notochord development. 2013, Pubmed
José-Edwards, Brachyury, Foxa2 and the cis-Regulatory Origins of the Notochord. 2015, Pubmed
Kania, Calcium homeostasis and ER stress in control of autophagy in cancer cells. 2015, Pubmed
Katikala, Functional Brachyury binding sites establish a temporal read-out of gene expression in the Ciona notochord. 2013, Pubmed
Katoh, The clavesin family, neuron-specific lipid- and clathrin-binding Sec14 proteins regulating lysosomal morphology. 2009, Pubmed
Kier, The diversity of hydrostatic skeletons. 2012, Pubmed
Kim, Regulation of Neurogenesis by FGF Signaling and Neurogenin in the Invertebrate Chordate Ciona. 2020, Pubmed
Kubo, Genomic cis-regulatory networks in the early Ciona intestinalis embryo. 2010, Pubmed
Kugler, Evolutionary conservation of vertebrate notochord genes in the ascidian Ciona intestinalis. 2008, Pubmed
Kugler, Positioning a multifunctional basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor within the Ciona notochord gene regulatory network. 2019, Pubmed
Kusakabe, Gene expression profiles in tadpole larvae of Ciona intestinalis. 2002, Pubmed
Lee, XBP-1 regulates a subset of endoplasmic reticulum resident chaperone genes in the unfolded protein response. 2003, Pubmed
Lee, XBP-1 is required for biogenesis of cellular secretory machinery of exocrine glands. 2005, Pubmed
Liang, The zygotic expression of zebrafish trebf during embryogenesis is restricted to the embryonic shield and its derivatives. 2001, Pubmed
Mai, Xbp1, a stress-induced transcriptional repressor of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Swi4/Mbp1 family. 1997, Pubmed
Mitra, The unfolded protein response in metazoan development. 2019, Pubmed
Mittnenzweig, A single-embryo, single-cell time-resolved model for mouse gastrulation. 2021, Pubmed
Miwata, Systematic analysis of embryonic expression profiles of zinc finger genes in Ciona intestinalis. 2006, Pubmed
Nishiyama, RNA interference by expressing short hairpin RNA in the Ciona intestinalis embryo. 2008, Pubmed
Noiret, Expression analysis of the polypyrimidine tract binding protein (PTBP1) and its paralogs PTBP2 and PTBP3 during Xenopus tropicalis embryogenesis. 2012, Pubmed , Xenbase
Oda-Ishii, Lineage-independent mosaic expression and regulation of the Ciona multidom gene in the ancestral notochord. 2007, Pubmed
Ogasawara, Gene expression profiles in young adult Ciona intestinalis. 2002, Pubmed
Ogasawara, Identification of thirty-four transcripts expressed specifically in hemocytes of Ciona intestinalis and their expression profiles throughout the life cycle. 2006, Pubmed
Parsons, Zebrafish mutants identify an essential role for laminins in notochord formation. 2002, Pubmed
Passamaneck, Direct activation of a notochord cis-regulatory module by Brachyury and FoxA in the ascidian Ciona intestinalis. 2009, Pubmed
Pennati, Morphological Differences between Larvae of the Ciona intestinalis Species Complex: Hints for a Valid Taxonomic Definition of Distinct Species. 2015, Pubmed
Pizzagalli, A guide to plasma membrane solute carrier proteins. 2021, Pubmed
Razy-Krajka, An FGF-driven feed-forward circuit patterns the cardiopharyngeal mesoderm in space and time. 2018, Pubmed
Reeves, Functional and evolutionary insights from the Ciona notochord transcriptome. 2017, Pubmed
Reeves, Brachyury controls Ciona notochord fate as part of a feed-forward network. 2021, Pubmed
Reimold, An essential role in liver development for transcription factor XBP-1. 2000, Pubmed
Reimold, Plasma cell differentiation requires the transcription factor XBP-1. 2001, Pubmed
Robertson, Regulation of the Bioavailability of TGF-β and TGF-β-Related Proteins. 2016, Pubmed
Sadowski, GAL4-VP16 is an unusually potent transcriptional activator. 1988, Pubmed
Saint-Jeannet, Whole-Mount In Situ Hybridization of Xenopus Embryos. 2017, Pubmed , Xenbase
Sasaki, Novel endostyle-specific genes in the ascidian Ciona intestinalis. 2003, Pubmed
Satoh, Ascidian embryos as a model system to analyze expression and function of developmental genes. 2001, Pubmed
Satoh, How was the notochord born? 2012, Pubmed
Satou, Gene expression profiles in Ciona intestinalis tailbud embryos. 2001, Pubmed
Senft, UPR, autophagy, and mitochondria crosstalk underlies the ER stress response. 2015, Pubmed
Shaffer, XBP1, downstream of Blimp-1, expands the secretory apparatus and other organelles, and increases protein synthesis in plasma cell differentiation. 2004, Pubmed
Shi, Snail2 controls mesodermal BMP/Wnt induction of neural crest. 2011, Pubmed , Xenbase
Shi, Olfactomedin 2, a novel regulator for transforming growth factor-β-induced smooth muscle differentiation of human embryonic stem cell-derived mesenchymal cells. 2014, Pubmed
Shimozono, Differential regional expression of genes in the developing brain of Ciona intestinalis embryos. 2010, Pubmed
Singh, Death Associated Protein Kinase 1 (DAPK1): A Regulator of Apoptosis and Autophagy. 2016, Pubmed
Singla, Endosomal PI(3)P regulation by the COMMD/CCDC22/CCDC93 (CCC) complex controls membrane protein recycling. 2019, Pubmed
Slack, An interaction between dorsal and ventral regions of the marginal zone in early amphibian embryos. 1980, Pubmed , Xenbase
Smith, Expression of a Xenopus homolog of Brachyury (T) is an immediate-early response to mesoderm induction. 1991, Pubmed , Xenbase
Souid, The xbp-1 gene is essential for development in Drosophila. 2007, Pubmed
Stemple, Structure and function of the notochord: an essential organ for chordate development. 2005, Pubmed
Stolfi, Genetic and genomic toolbox of the chordate Ciona intestinalis. 2012, Pubmed
Stolow, Xenopus sonic hedgehog as a potential morphogen during embryogenesis and thyroid hormone-dependent metamorphosis. 1995, Pubmed , Xenbase
Stott, Rescue of the tail defect of Brachyury mice. 1993, Pubmed
Takahashi, Brachyury downstream notochord differentiation in the ascidian embryo. 1999, Pubmed
Tamplin, Integrated microarray and ChIP analysis identifies multiple Foxa2 dependent target genes in the notochord. 2011, Pubmed
Tanegashima, Coordinated activation of the secretory pathway during notochord formation in the Xenopus embryo. 2009, Pubmed , Xenbase
Tetsukawa, Identification of chondroitin/dermatan sulfotransferases in the protochordate, Ciona intestinalis. 2010, Pubmed
Wagner, FGF signaling establishes the anterior border of the Ciona neural tube. 2012, Pubmed
Walter, The unfolded protein response: from stress pathway to homeostatic regulation. 2011, Pubmed
Wang, Histone HIST1H1C/H1.2 regulates autophagy in the development of diabetic retinopathy. 2017, Pubmed
Xu, Specific structure and unique function define the hemicentin. 2013, Pubmed
Yamada, Ciona intestinalis Noto4 contains a phosphotyrosine interaction domain and is involved in the midline intercalation of notochord cells. 2011, Pubmed
Yamada, Interaction of notochord-derived fibrinogen-like protein with Notch regulates the patterning of the central nervous system of Ciona intestinalis embryos. 2009, Pubmed
Yang, X-box-binding protein 1 is required for pancreatic development in Xenopus laevis. 2020, Pubmed , Xenbase
Yao, Organelle-specific autophagy in inflammatory diseases: a potential therapeutic target underlying the quality control of multiple organelles. 2021, Pubmed
Yap, Evaluating endoplasmic reticulum stress and unfolded protein response through the lens of ecology and evolution. 2021, Pubmed
Yoshida, XBP1 mRNA is induced by ATF6 and spliced by IRE1 in response to ER stress to produce a highly active transcription factor. 2001, Pubmed
Yoshida, Left-right asymmetric expression of Pitx is regulated by the asymmetric Nodal signaling through an intronic enhancer in Ciona intestinalis. 2008, Pubmed
Yuan, IRE1beta is required for mesoderm formation in Xenopus embryos. 2008, Pubmed , Xenbase
Zhao, Xenopus X-box binding protein 1, a leucine zipper transcription factor, is involved in the BMP signaling pathway. 2003, Pubmed , Xenbase
Zilberberg, Specificity of latent TGF-β binding protein (LTBP) incorporation into matrix: role of fibrillins and fibronectin. 2012, Pubmed