Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
J Cell Biol
2002 Feb 04;1563:419-24. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200111002.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Condensin and cohesin display different arm conformations with characteristic hinge angles.
Anderson DE
,
Losada A
,
Erickson HP
,
Hirano T
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) proteins play central roles in higher-order chromosome dynamics from bacteria to humans. In eukaryotes, two different SMC protein complexes, condensin and cohesin, regulate chromosome condensation and sister chromatid cohesion, respectively. Each of the complexes consists of a heterodimeric pair of SMC subunits and two or three non-SMC subunits. Previous studies have shown that a bacterial SMC homodimer has a symmetrical structure in which two long coiled-coil arms are connected by a flexible hinge. A catalytic domain with DNA- and ATP-binding activities is located at the distal end of each arm. We report here the visualization of vertebrate condensin and cohesin by electron microscopy. Both complexes display the two-armed structure characteristic of SMC proteins, but their conformations are remarkably different. The hinge of condensin is closed and the coiled-coil arms are placed close together. In contrast, the hinge of cohesin is wide open and the coiled-coils are spread apart from each other. The non-SMC subunits of both condensin and cohesin form a globular complex bound to the catalytic domains of the SMC heterodimers. We propose that the "closed" conformation of condensin and the "open" conformation of cohesin are important structural properties that contribute to their specialized biochemical and physiological functions.
Figure 1. Electron micrographs of the human condensin complexes. (A) An example field of molecules. (B) The structure of holocomplexes can be classified into three major groups on the basis of the configuration of their coiled-coil arms: ‘folded-rod’ (first row) and ‘ends-split’ (second row)—a subset of which have a bend in the coils (third row)—and ‘coils-spread’ (fourth row). The last panel in the fourth row is an example of a rare ‘open-V’. (C) The two major forms of SMC heterodimers (hSMC2-hSMC4) are again folded-rod (first row) and ends-split (second row), some with bent coils (third row). Open-V configurations are rare (last panel, second row). The hinge domain is indicated by an arrow on the open-V molecules. B and C are the same magnification. Bars, 100 nm.
Figure 2. Electron micrographs of the human cohesin complexes. (A) An example field of molecules. (B) The structure of holocomplexes can be classified into two major groups on the basis of the configuration of their coiled-coil arms. In the first row the molecules are in a ‘coils-spread’ conformation, with their catalytic domains and the non-SMC proteins mostly superimposed. In the second and third rows the molecules are in an open-V conformation with the heads somewhat separated. The non-SMC complex appears either as a separate globule between the catalytic domains (second row), or bound to one of them (third row). A kink is often observed at a fixed position in one of the two coiled-coil arms (indicated by arrows). (C) SMC heterodimers (hSMC1-hSMC3) show mostly open-V configurations. Again, one of the coiled-coil arms often displays a kink (indicated by arrows). B and C are the same magnification. Bars, 100 nm.
Figure 3. Electron micrographs of the Xenopus condensin and cohesin complexes. (A) Holocomplexes of Xenopus condensin (first row) and heterodimers of XCAP-E/XSMC2 and XCAP-C/XSMC4 (second row). (B) Holocomplexes of Xenopus cohesin (first row) and heterodimers of XSMC1 and XSMC3 (second row). Arrows in B indicate the position of the kink in the coiled-coil arm. Bar, 100 nm.
Figure 4. Models. (A) Molecular architecture of condensin and cohesin. N and C indicate NH2-terminal and COOH-terminal nonhelical domains, respectively, of the SMC subunits. By analogy to BsSMC, we assume here that the coiled-coil arms of the eukaryotic SMC heterodimers are arranged into an antiparallel fashion. The relative positions of the non-SMC subunits (shown in yellow) are arbitrary. (B) Hypothetical models of the interactions of condensin (left) and cohesin (right) with DNA.
Anderson,
Structure of the Rad50 x Mre11 DNA repair complex from Saccharomyces cerevisiae by electron microscopy.
2001, Pubmed
Anderson,
Structure of the Rad50 x Mre11 DNA repair complex from Saccharomyces cerevisiae by electron microscopy.
2001,
Pubmed
Birkenbihl,
Cloning and characterization of rad21 an essential gene of Schizosaccharomyces pombe involved in DNA double-strand-break repair.
1992,
Pubmed
Cobbe,
Review: SMCs in the world of chromosome biology- from prokaryotes to higher eukaryotes.
2000,
Pubmed
Dej,
Separation anxiety at the centromere.
2000,
Pubmed
Fowler,
Trinodular structure of fibrinogen. Confirmation by both shadowing and negative stain electron microscopy.
1979,
Pubmed
Freeman,
The condensin complex governs chromosome condensation and mitotic transmission of rDNA.
2000,
Pubmed
Haber,
The many interfaces of Mre11.
1998,
Pubmed
Hirano,
SMC-mediated chromosome mechanics: a conserved scheme from bacteria to vertebrates?
1999,
Pubmed
Hirano,
Chromosome cohesion, condensation, and separation.
2000,
Pubmed
Hirano,
Bimodal activation of SMC ATPase by intra- and inter-molecular interactions.
2001,
Pubmed
Hirano,
Condensins, chromosome condensation protein complexes containing XCAP-C, XCAP-E and a Xenopus homolog of the Drosophila Barren protein.
1997,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Hopfner,
Structural biology of Rad50 ATPase: ATP-driven conformational control in DNA double-strand break repair and the ABC-ATPase superfamily.
2000,
Pubmed
Hopfner,
Structural biochemistry and interaction architecture of the DNA double-strand break repair Mre11 nuclease and Rad50-ATPase.
2001,
Pubmed
Kimura,
Phosphorylation and activation of 13S condensin by Cdc2 in vitro.
1998,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kimura,
13S condensin actively reconfigures DNA by introducing global positive writhe: implications for chromosome condensation.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kimura,
Dual roles of the 11S regulatory subcomplex in condensin functions.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kimura,
Chromosome condensation by a human condensin complex in Xenopus egg extracts.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kimura,
ATP-dependent positive supercoiling of DNA by 13S condensin: a biochemical implication for chromosome condensation.
1997,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Koshland,
Mitotic chromosome condensation.
1996,
Pubmed
Losada,
Identification and characterization of SA/Scc3p subunits in the Xenopus and human cohesin complexes.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Losada,
Intermolecular DNA interactions stimulated by the cohesin complex in vitro: implications for sister chromatid cohesion.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Losada,
Identification of Xenopus SMC protein complexes required for sister chromatid cohesion.
1998,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Löwe,
Crystal structure of the SMC head domain: an ABC ATPase with 900 residues antiparallel coiled-coil inserted.
2001,
Pubmed
Melby,
The symmetrical structure of structural maintenance of chromosomes (SMC) and MukB proteins: long, antiparallel coiled coils, folded at a flexible hinge.
1998,
Pubmed
Nasmyth,
Splitting the chromosome: cutting the ties that bind sister chromatids.
2000,
Pubmed
Schürmann,
Cell adhesion molecule L1 in folded (horseshoe) and extended conformations.
2001,
Pubmed
Sjögren,
Sister chromatid cohesion is required for postreplicative double-strand break repair in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
2001,
Pubmed
Sumara,
Characterization of vertebrate cohesin complexes and their regulation in prophase.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Sutani,
Fission yeast condensin complex: essential roles of non-SMC subunits for condensation and Cdc2 phosphorylation of Cut3/SMC4.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Tomonaga,
Characterization of fission yeast cohesin: essential anaphase proteolysis of Rad21 phosphorylated in the S phase.
2000,
Pubmed
Tóth,
Yeast cohesin complex requires a conserved protein, Eco1p(Ctf7), to establish cohesion between sister chromatids during DNA replication.
1999,
Pubmed
Uhlmann,
Sister-chromatid separation at anaphase onset is promoted by cleavage of the cohesin subunit Scc1.
1999,
Pubmed
