Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.

Summary Anatomy Item Literature (3673) Expression Attributions Wiki
XB-ANAT-490

Papers associated with tail (and foxg1)

Limit to papers also referencing gene:
Show all tail papers
???pagination.result.count???

???pagination.result.page??? 1

Sort Newest To Oldest Sort Oldest To Newest

The complete dorsal structure is formed from only the blastocoel roof of Xenopus blastula: insight into the gastrulation movement evolutionarily conserved among chordates., Sato Y., Dev Genes Evol. June 1, 2023; 233 (1): 1-12.                


The cytokine FAM3B/PANDER is an FGFR ligand that promotes posterior development in Xenopus., Zhang F., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. May 18, 2021; 118 (20):           


The Secreted Protein Disulfide Isomerase Ag1 Lost by Ancestors of Poorly Regenerating Vertebrates Is Required for Xenopus laevis Tail Regeneration., Ivanova AS., Front Cell Dev Biol. January 1, 2021; 9 738940.                  


Bioinformatics Screening of Genes Specific for Well-Regenerating Vertebrates Reveals c-answer, a Regulator of Brain Development and Regeneration., Korotkova DD., Cell Rep. October 22, 2019; 29 (4): 1027-1040.e6.                              


Noggin4 is a long-range inhibitor of Wnt8 signalling that regulates head development in Xenopus laevis., Eroshkin FM., Sci Rep. January 22, 2016; 6 23049.                                                            


Notum is required for neural and head induction via Wnt deacylation, oxidation, and inactivation., Zhang X., Dev Cell. March 23, 2015; 32 (6): 719-30.                                  


The serpin PN1 is a feedback regulator of FGF signaling in germ layer and primary axis formation., Acosta H., Development. March 15, 2015; 142 (6): 1146-58.                                    


Endogenous gradients of resting potential instructively pattern embryonic neural tissue via Notch signaling and regulation of proliferation., Pai VP., J Neurosci. March 11, 2015; 35 (10): 4366-85.                    


An essential role for LPA signalling in telencephalon development., Geach TJ., Development. February 1, 2014; 141 (4): 940-9.                            


The dual regulator Sufu integrates Hedgehog and Wnt signals in the early Xenopus embryo., Min TH., Dev Biol. October 1, 2011; 358 (1): 262-76.                            


In vitro organogenesis from undifferentiated cells in Xenopus., Asashima M., Dev Dyn. June 1, 2009; 238 (6): 1309-20.                      


Retinol dehydrogenase 10 is a feedback regulator of retinoic acid signalling during axis formation and patterning of the central nervous system., Strate I., Development. February 1, 2009; 136 (3): 461-72.                


The secreted serine protease xHtrA1 stimulates long-range FGF signaling in the early Xenopus embryo., Hou S., Dev Cell. August 1, 2007; 13 (2): 226-41.                      


Xenopus Xotx2 and Drosophila otd share similar activities in anterior patterning of the frog embryo., Lunardi A., Dev Genes Evol. September 1, 2006; 216 (9): 511-21.


Tes regulates neural crest migration and axial elongation in Xenopus., Dingwell KS., Dev Biol. May 1, 2006; 293 (1): 252-67.                          


The doublesex-related gene, XDmrt4, is required for neurogenesis in the olfactory system., Huang X., Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. August 9, 2005; 102 (32): 11349-54.                        


Xenopus aristaless-related homeobox (xARX) gene product functions as both a transcriptional activator and repressor in forebrain development., Seufert DW., Dev Dyn. February 1, 2005; 232 (2): 313-24.                  


Xantivin suppresses the activity of EGF-CFC genes to regulate nodal signaling., Tanegashima K., Int J Dev Biol. June 1, 2004; 48 (4): 275-83.          


Xolloid-related: a novel BMP1/Tolloid-related metalloprotease is expressed during early Xenopus development., Dale L., Mech Dev. December 1, 2002; 119 (2): 177-90.      

???pagination.result.page??? 1