Xenbase is undergoing scheduled maintenance Wednesday, June 14 and Thursday, June 15, 2023. Xenbase will be unavailable on those days.

 Click on this message to dismiss it.
Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.

Summary Expression Phenotypes Gene Literature (24) GO Terms (2) Nucleotides (79) Proteins (31) Interactants (507) Wiki
XB-GENEPAGE-490505

Gene Symbol: nes

Gene Name: nestin

Anatomy terms
brain central nervous system ciliary marginal zone eye head head region heart hindbrain neural plate neuroectoderm retina retinal ganglion cell retinal ganglion cell layer retinal inner nuclear layer ... [+]
Anatomy stages
NF stage 10.5 to NF stage 62
RNA-Seq and EST Transcriptome profiles tropicalis laevis.L laevis.S
RNA-Seq stage profile Data from Owens et al. 2016 Data from Session et al. 2016 Data from Session et al. 2016
GEO data nes.L nes.S
Microarray Data Data from Yanai et al. 2011 Data from Yanai et al. 2011 Data from Yanai et al. 2011
Stage and Tissue Profiles
                    Source: Owens et al. 2016 (tropicalis)
                    Source: Session et al. 2016 (laevis)
          Source: Session et al. 2016 (laevis)
Experimental Regulation (via RNA-seq)


                                                            Source: Ding et al. 2017 (laevis)
Summary ImagesSort by:
Expression Image
NF stage 15 to NF stage 20
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 26 to NF stage 32
Good quality Poor quality
    
Community Submitted ImagesSort by:
Expression Image
NF stage 15 to NF stage 20
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 26 to NF stage 32
Good quality Poor quality
    
Literature ImagesSort by:
Expression Image
NF stage 15 to NF stage 32
Zhang, et al. 2017
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 33 and 34
Gutkovich, et al. 2010
Good quality Poor quality
Expression Image
NF stage 50
Martinez-De Luna, et al. 2017
Good quality Poor quality