Click here to close Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly. We suggest using a current version of Chrome, FireFox, or Safari.
Search Criteria
Gene/CloneSpeciesStageAnatomy ItemExperimenter
ag1xenopus   

Too many results?Too few results?

Experiment details for ag1

A sticky problem: the Xenopus cement gland as a paradigm for anteroposterior patterning.

A sticky problem: the Xenopus cement gland as a paradigm for anteroposterior patterning.

Gene Clone Species Stages Anatomy
ag1.L laevis NF stage 12 ectoderm , dorsal
ag1.L laevis NF stage 14 cement gland primordium
ag1.L laevis NF stage 18 hatching gland , cement gland primordium , chordal neural plate border
ag1.L laevis NF stage 28 cement gland , hatching gland

Display additional annotations [+]
  Fig. 2. Developmental time course of three cement gland markers in Xenopus. In situ hybridization analysis using digoxygenin labeled antisense probes hybridized to a developmental series of whole Xenopus embryos. XCG (A-D) and XAG (E-H) (Sive et al., 1989) transcripts are first detected at late gastrula, in dispersed cells within the outer layer of the dorsal ectoderm, just anterior to the presumptive neural plate (A, E). XCG is detected in presumptive cement gland cells only, whereas XAG is detected in cement gland cells (arrowheads) and more weakly in the adjacent, posterior hatching gland cells (arrows). XA transcripts (CL) (Sive et al., 1989) are initially detected at late gastrula stage in the hatching gland primordium (I), and then at early neurula stage, in the cells of the posterior cement gland (J). Refer to Cement Gland Anatomy: Morphology and Molecules in the text for discussion of these data. In situ hybridization method adapted from Harland (1991).