Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
J Cell Biol
2002 Jan 21;1562:389-399. doi: 10.1083/jcb.200108040.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Cadherin-mediated cell sorting not determined by binding or adhesion specificity.
Niessen CM
,
Gumbiner BM
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Cadherin adhesion molecules play important roles in the establishment of tissue boundaries. Cells expressing different cadherins sort out from each other in cell aggregation assays. To determine the contribution of cadherin binding and adhesion specificity to the sorting process, we examined the adhesion of cells to different purified cadherin proteins. Chinese hamster ovary cell lines expressing one of four different cadherins were allowed to bind to the purified cadherin extracellular domains of either human E-cadherin or Xenopus C-cadherin, and the specificity of adhesion was compared with cell-sorting assays. None of the different cadherin-expressing cells exhibited any adhesive specificity toward either of the two purified cadherin substrates, even though these cadherins differ considerably in their primary sequence. In addition, all cells exhibited similar strengthening of adhesion on both substrates. However, this lack of adhesive specificity did not determine whether different cadherin-expressing cells would sort from each other, and the tendency to sort was not predictable by the extent of sequence diversity in their extracellular domains. These results show that cadherins are far more promiscuous in their adhesive-binding capacity than had been expected and that the ability to sort out must be determined by mechanisms other than simple adhesive-binding specificity.
Figure 1. Purification and characterization of recombinant extracellular cadherin proteins. The extracellular domains of HE-cadherin and C-cadherin were both expressed in CHO cells as a COOH-terminal fusion proteins with the Fc part of human IgG. Recombinant proteins were purified from the media on a Protein A column. (A) Coomassie staining of HEEC1–5Fc and CEC1–5Fc run under reducing and nonreducing conditions. (B) Immunoblot analysis of the recombinant HEEC1–5Fc and CEC1–5Fc proteins using anti–human Fc, anti-HE cadherin, or anti–C-cadherin antibodies. (C) Bead aggregation assay: protein-A–coated beads coupled to HEEC1–5Fc or CEC1–5Fc were allowed to aggregate in the presence of Ca2+ or EDTA for the indicated time period.
Figure 2. C-cadherin– or HE-cadherin–expressing CHO cells bind equally well to either HEEC1–5Fc or CEC1–5Fc in an adhesion flow assay. (A) Adhesion flow assay using 100 μg of either HEEC1–5Fc or CEC1–5Fc as substrates. Note that the curves representing CHO cells on either substrate or any samples in the presence of EDTA are all collapsed on the X-axis. (B) Strengthening of adhesion. Cells were allowed to attach to HEEC1–5Fc (75 μg/ml) or CEC1–5Fc (50 μg/ml) substrates for either 10 or 40 min before they were subjected to increasing flow rates. (C) Different concentrations of HEEC1–5Fc substrate in the adhesion flow assay using both C-CHO and HE-CHO cells. (D) Different concentrations of CEC1–5Fc substrates in the adhesion flow assay using both C-CHO cells and HE-CHO cells.
Figure 3. Xenopus blastomeres adhere similarly well to both CEC1–5Fc and HEEC1–5Fc proteins. Blastomeres isolated from Xenopus animal cap tissue explants were allowed to adhere to different amounts of HEEC1–5Fc, CEC1–5Fc, or BSA. The results shown are the average of four independent experiments. Black bars, HEEC1–5Fc protein; white bars, CEC1–5Fc protein. Note that adherence of blastomeres to BSA alone is negligible, and therefore does not appear in the graph.
Figure 4. Characterization of CHO cells expressing different classical type I cadherins. (A) Immunofluorescence staining of different cadherin-expressing CHO cell lines, using antibodies to either the specific cadherin as indicated, β-catenin, or p120ctn. (B) Western blot analysis of expression levels of cadherins or β-catenin in the different cadherin CHO cell lines using equal micrograms of total protein. The same membrane was incubated with a β-catenin antibody and a pan-cadherin antibody (PEP-1). (C) Cell surface expression of different cadherins on CHO cells. Intact cells were biotinylated, lysed, and equal amounts of protein were immunoprecipitated with a β-catenin antiserum and immunoprecipitates were Western blotted, after which the biotinylated proteins were recognized by streptavidin-HRP.
Figure 5. XE-cadherin CHO cells and HN-cadherin CHO cells show no adhesive specificity. (A) Adhesion flow assay of XE-CHO cells attached to either CEC1–5Fc or HEEC1–5Fc substrates (100 μg/ml). (B) Adhesion flow assay of HN-CHO attached to either CEC1–5Fc or HEEC1–5 (100 μg/ml). (C) Different concentrations of HEEC1–5Fc substrate in the adhesion flow assay using both HN-CHO and HE-CHO cells. (D) Different concentrations of CEC1–5Fc substrates in the adhesion flow assay using both HN-CHO and HE-CHO cells.
Figure 6. Variable sorting specificities for different cadherin-expressing CHO cells. Cell aggregation assays using cells labeled with fluorescent dyes, either diI (red) or diO (green). Cells were allowed to aggregate for 3 h. For A–C, examples of fluorescence are shown in top panels, with quantification of sorting versus mixing shown in the graphs below. (A) diI-labeled C-CHO cells mix completely with diO-labeled C-CHO cells, and diI-labeled HE-CHO cells also mix completely with diO-labeled HE-CHO cells, showing that the fluorescent label does not cause cells to sort artifactually. Middle, C-CHO cells (red) also mix to a large extent with HE-CHO cells (green). (B) XE-CHO cells (red in all cases) mix with XE-CHO cells (green) or with C-CHO cells (green), but sort out from HE-CHO cells (green). (C) HN-CHO cells (red in all cases) mix with HN-CHO cells (green) or C-CHO cells (green), but sort out from HE-CHO cells (green). Total number of counted aggregates is set at 100%. Black bars, diI labeled aggregates (red); striped bars, diI- and diO-labeled mixed aggregates; white bars, diO-labeled aggregates (green).
Brieher,
Regulation of C-cadherin function during activin induced morphogenesis of Xenopus animal caps.
1994, Pubmed,
Xenbase
Brieher,
Regulation of C-cadherin function during activin induced morphogenesis of Xenopus animal caps.
1994,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Brieher,
Lateral dimerization is required for the homophilic binding activity of C-cadherin.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Bussemakers,
Molecular cloning and characterization of the human E-cadherin cDNA.
1993,
Pubmed
Chappuis-Flament,
Multiple cadherin extracellular repeats mediate homophilic binding and adhesion.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Choi,
Expression of cell adhesion molecule E-cadherin in Xenopus embryos begins at gastrulation and predominates in the ectoderm.
1989,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Christofori,
The role of the cell-adhesion molecule E-cadherin as a tumour-suppressor gene.
1999,
Pubmed
Detrick,
The effects of N-cadherin misexpression on morphogenesis in Xenopus embryos.
1990,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Friedlander,
Cell sorting-out is modulated by both the specificity and amount of different cell adhesion molecules (CAMs) expressed on cell surfaces.
1989,
Pubmed
Fujimori,
Ectopic expression of N-cadherin perturbs histogenesis in Xenopus embryos.
1990,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Ginsberg,
Inside-out integrin signalling.
1992,
Pubmed
Godt,
Drosophila oocyte localization is mediated by differential cadherin-based adhesion.
1998,
Pubmed
González-Reyes,
The Drosophila AP axis is polarised by the cadherin-mediated positioning of the oocyte.
1998,
Pubmed
Gottardi,
Biotinylation and assessment of membrane polarity: caveats and methodological concerns.
1995,
Pubmed
Gottardi,
E-cadherin suppresses cellular transformation by inhibiting beta-catenin signaling in an adhesion-independent manner.
2001,
Pubmed
Gumbiner,
Cell adhesion: the molecular basis of tissue architecture and morphogenesis.
1996,
Pubmed
Huber,
The cadherin cytoplasmic domain is unstructured in the absence of beta-catenin. A possible mechanism for regulating cadherin turnover.
2001,
Pubmed
Inuzuka,
R-cadherin: a novel Ca(2+)-dependent cell-cell adhesion molecule expressed in the retina.
1991,
Pubmed
Islam,
Expression of N-cadherin by human squamous carcinoma cells induces a scattered fibroblastic phenotype with disrupted cell-cell adhesion.
1996,
Pubmed
Kim,
N-Cadherin extracellular repeat 4 mediates epithelial to mesenchymal transition and increased motility.
2000,
Pubmed
Laemmli,
Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4.
1970,
Pubmed
Larue,
A role for cadherins in tissue formation.
1996,
Pubmed
Levi,
The distribution of E-cadherin during Xenopus laevis development.
1991,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Levine,
Selective disruption of E-cadherin function in early Xenopus embryos by a dominant negative mutant.
1994,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Linask,
N-cadherin-catenin interaction: necessary component of cardiac cell compartmentalization during early vertebrate heart development.
1997,
Pubmed
Luo,
Rescuing the N-cadherin knockout by cardiac-specific expression of N- or E-cadherin.
2001,
Pubmed
Matsunami,
Cell binding specificity of mouse R-cadherin and chromosomal mapping of the gene.
1993,
Pubmed
McCrea,
Induction of a secondary body axis in Xenopus by antibodies to beta-catenin.
1993,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Mellitzer,
Eph receptors and ephrins restrict cell intermingling and communication.
1999,
Pubmed
Mellitzer,
Control of cell behaviour by signalling through Eph receptors and ephrins.
2000,
Pubmed
Murphy-Erdosh,
The cadherin-binding specificities of B-cadherin and LCAM.
1995,
Pubmed
Nakagawa,
Neural crest cell-cell adhesion controlled by sequential and subpopulation-specific expression of novel cadherins.
1995,
Pubmed
Nakagawa,
Neural crest emigration from the neural tube depends on regulated cadherin expression.
1998,
Pubmed
Nose,
Expressed recombinant cadherins mediate cell sorting in model systems.
1988,
Pubmed
Nose,
Localization of specificity determining sites in cadherin cell adhesion molecules.
1990,
Pubmed
Ozawa,
Molecular organization of the uvomorulin-catenin complex.
1992,
Pubmed
Ozawa,
The membrane-proximal region of the E-cadherin cytoplasmic domain prevents dimerization and negatively regulates adhesion activity.
1998,
Pubmed
Radice,
Developmental defects in mouse embryos lacking N-cadherin.
1997,
Pubmed
Redies,
Cadherins in the central nervous system.
2000,
Pubmed
Rimm,
Alpha 1(E)-catenin is an actin-binding and -bundling protein mediating the attachment of F-actin to the membrane adhesion complex.
1995,
Pubmed
Shan,
Functional cis-heterodimers of N- and R-cadherins.
2000,
Pubmed
Shapiro,
Structural basis of cell-cell adhesion by cadherins.
1995,
Pubmed
Shimoyama,
Biochemical characterization and functional analysis of two type II classic cadherins, cadherin-6 and -14, and comparison with E-cadherin.
1999,
Pubmed
Shimoyama,
Identification of three human type-II classic cadherins and frequent heterophilic interactions between different subclasses of type-II classic cadherins.
2000,
Pubmed
Sivasankar,
Direct measurements of multiple adhesive alignments and unbinding trajectories between cadherin extracellular domains.
2001,
Pubmed
Sivasankar,
Direct molecular force measurements of multiple adhesive interactions between cadherin ectodomains.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Steinberg,
Experimental specification of cell sorting, tissue spreading, and specific spatial patterning by quantitative differences in cadherin expression.
1994,
Pubmed
Steinberg,
Does differential adhesion govern self-assembly processes in histogenesis? Equilibrium configurations and the emergence of a hierarchy among populations of embryonic cells.
1970,
Pubmed
Takeichi,
Morphogenetic roles of classic cadherins.
1995,
Pubmed
Takeichi,
The cadherin cell adhesion receptor family: roles in multicellular organization and neurogenesis.
1994,
Pubmed
Tamura,
Structure-function analysis of cell adhesion by neural (N-) cadherin.
1998,
Pubmed
Tepass,
Cadherins in embryonic and neural morphogenesis.
2000,
Pubmed
Towbin,
Electrophoretic transfer of proteins from polyacrylamide gels to nitrocellulose sheets: procedure and some applications.
1979,
Pubmed
Volk,
Formation of heterotypic adherens-type junctions between L-CAM-containing liver cells and A-CAM-containing lens cells.
1987,
Pubmed
Wacker,
Development and control of tissue separation at gastrulation in Xenopus.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Winning,
Disruption of cell adhesion in Xenopus embryos by Pagliaccio, an Eph-class receptor tyrosine kinase.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Xu,
In vivo cell sorting in complementary segmental domains mediated by Eph receptors and ephrins.
1999,
Pubmed
Yap,
Lateral clustering of the adhesive ectodomain: a fundamental determinant of cadherin function.
1997,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Yap,
Molecular and functional analysis of cadherin-based adherens junctions.
1997,
Pubmed
Yap,
The juxtamembrane region of the cadherin cytoplasmic tail supports lateral clustering, adhesive strengthening, and interaction with p120ctn.
1998,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Zhong,
Analysis of C-cadherin regulation during tissue morphogenesis with an activating antibody.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase