Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
Multiple phosphorylation events control mitotic degradation of the muscle transcription factor Myf5.
Doucet C
,
Gutierrez GJ
,
Lindon C
,
Lorca T
,
Lledo G
,
Pinset C
,
Coux O
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
The two myogenic regulatory factors Myf5 and MyoD are basic helix-loop-helix muscle transcription factors undergoing differential cell cycle dependent proteolysis in proliferating myoblasts. This regulated degradation results in the striking expression of these two factors at distinct phases of the cell cycle, and suggests that their precise and alternated disappearance is an important feature of myoblasts, maybe connected to the maintenance of the proliferative status and/or commitment to the myogenic lineage of these cells. One way to understand the biological function(s) of the cyclic expression of these proteins is to specifically alter their degradation, and to analyze the effects of their stabilization on cells. To this aim, we undertook the biochemical analysis of the mechanisms governing Myf5 mitotic degradation, using heterologous systems. We show here that mitotic degradation of Myf5 is conserved in non-myogenic cells, and is thus strictly under the control of the cell cycle apparatus. Using Xenopus egg extracts as an in vitro system to dissect the main steps of Myf5 mitotic proteolysis, we show that (1) Myf5 stability is regulated by a complex interplay of phosphorylation/dephosphorylation, probably involving various kinases and phosphatases, (2) Myf5 is ubiquitylated in mitotic extracts, and this is a prerequisite to its degradation by the proteasome and (3) at least in the Xenopus system, the E3 responsible for its mitotic degradation is not the APC/C (the major E3 during mitosis). Altogether, our data strongly suggest that the mitotic degradation of Myf5 by the ubiquitin-proteasome system is precisely controlled by multiple phosphorylation of the protein, and that the APC/C is not involved in this process.
Figure 1. Myf5 mitotic degradation is conserved in non-muscle cells. HeLa-S3 cells expressing Myf5 under an inducible promotor (tetoff) were treated (lanes 2, 3, 4) or not (AS, lane 1) with nocodazole (200 ng/ml) for 16 h, as in [20]. In lanes 3 and 4, cells were treated with a proteasome inhibitor (MG132, 50 μM) for 2 h prior to lysis (as described in Methods). In lane 4, extract was incubated with Lambda phosphatase (New England Biolabs) for 30 min at 30°C. 25 μg of each extract were resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE and immunoblotted with anti-Myf5 antibodies. AS: asynchronous cells; * indicates a non specific band recognized by the antibodies that can be used as a loading control.
Figure 2. Myf5 is degraded in a cell-cycle dependent manner in Xenopus egg extracts, and its degradation is correlated with changes in its phosphorylation status. (A) Myf5 is phosphorylated and degraded in mitotic (CSF) extracts, but dephosphorylated and stable in interphase extracts. Degradation assays were performed as described in Methods; 2 μl samples were taken at the indicated times and resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE. (B) Degradation of Myf5 was quantified and normalized (start = 100%) : black squares represent the average degradation of Myf5 in interphase extracts (5 independent experiments), open circles the average degradation of Myf5 in CSF extracts (7 independent experiments), and black circles the average degradation of dephosphorylated (deP) Myf5 (see Methods section) in CSF extracts (4 independent experiments). Bars represent standard deviation. For each lane, a region corresponding to all non-phosphorylated and phosphorylated forms of Myf5 was quantified using the ImageQuant software (Molecular Dynamics). The apparent increase of Myf5 level in interphase extracts is probably due to the accumulation of all the initially phosphorylated forms of Myf5 (some of them being close to background) into the fastest migrating form of Myf5. (C) All the slower migrating forms of Myf5 are phosphorylated: lane 1: in vitro translated Myf5; lane 2: in vitro translated Myf5 after 1 h incubation with CSF extract in the presence of 1 μM microcystin LR (this treatment leads to hyperphosphorylation of Myf5 (Myf5PPP), see text and figure 3 for details); lanes 3â6: in vitro translated Myf5 (lanes 3 and 4), or Myf5PPP (lanes 5 and 6) were immunoprecipitated with anti-Myf5 antibodies and incubated in the absence or presence of Lambda phosphatase (λ PPase), as indicated. Samples were resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE and analyzed using a PhosphoImager. (D) A mitotic extract was first incubated with 200 μM MG132, or the same volume of pure DMSO as a control, for 10 min at 25°C; dephosphorylated (deP) Myf5 (see method) was then added to the treated extract. At each time point, 2 μl samples were resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE. (E) Relative amounts of Myf5 in the gel shown in D were quantified as above and reported on the graph.
Figure 3. Hyperphosphorylated Myf5 is stable. An equal volume of reticulocyte lysate containing in vitro translated Myf5 and of Xenopus mitotic egg extract (CSF) were incubated together for 60 min in the presence of 1 μM microcystin LR. At each time point, 0.5 μl samples were analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE (panel A). After this initial incubation, 2 μl of the reaction mixture containing hyperphosphorylated Myf5 (Myf5PPP) were further incubated in 18 μl of fresh mitotic extract, either in the presence of 1 μM microcystin (panel B) or without inhibitor addition (panel C), or without microcystin and in the presence of the proteasome inhibitor MG132 (200 μM, panel D). At each time point, 2 μl samples were analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE.
Figure 4. Several signaling pathways are likely to control Myf5 mitotic degradation (A) 1 μl of untreated (upper panel) or dephosphorylated (deP, lower panel) Myf5 was incubated with buffer (lane 2), recombinant CDK1/cyclin B (New England Biolabs, 40U, lane 3), recombinant Erk2 (New England Biolabs, 200U, lane 4) or both kinases (lane 5) for 30 min at 30°C. The reaction mix was resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE. "Start" is a non-incubated control. (B) Myf5 degradation is sensitive to very low concentrations of calcium: a mitotic extract was prepared using XB without CaCl2 but supplemented with 6 mM EGTA (see Methods), then incubated with 0.1 mM CaCl2 and 6 mM EGTA, or an equivalent volume of water as a control, for 10 min at 25°C. 2 μl of Myf5 were incubated for 1 hour with 18 μl of treated extract. 2 μl samples were resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE at the beginning and the end of the reaction. Myf5 degradation rate was quantified as previously described; the graph represents mean values of 3 experiments. Bars represent standard deviations.
Figure 5. Polyubiquitylation of Myf5 is required for its degradation. (A) Myf5 is polyubiquitylated in mitotic extracts: Myf5 was incubated in a mitotic extract in the presence of ubiquitin (1 mg/ml), MG132 (200 μM) and ubiquitin aldehyde (5 μM). At the times indicated, 2 μl samples were analyzed by 10% SDS-PAGE to visualize the formation of high-MW adducts ((Ub)n-Myf5, poly-ubiquitylated Myf5 molecules). (B) Lysine-less (K0) ubiquitin inhibits Myf5 polyubiquitylation: Myf5 ubiquitylation was performed in a mitotic extract in the presence of MG132 (200 μM), ubiquitin aldehyde (1 μM), ubiquitin (Ub) and lysine-less-ubiquitin (UbK0) at the indicated concentrations, for 30 min at 25°C. (C) Lysine-less ubiquitin stabilizes Myf5: Degradation assays were performed in 20 μl reaction mixtures containing 16 μl of mitotic extract, 2 μl of radiolabeled in vitro translated Myf5 and a mixture of wild type and K0 ubiquitin as indicated. The reaction was performed at 25°C for 40 min, 2 μl samples were resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE. "START" corresponds to a 2 μl sample taken at time 0 from the reaction containing 1 mg/ml Ub. Radioactivity was quantified as previously described (see legend of figure 2) and percentages of degradation were calculated for each Ub/UbK0 ratio from the difference between the times 0 (not shown) and 40 minutes.
Figure 6. The E3 responsible for Myf5 ubiquitylation is not the APC/C. (A) In vitro translated Xkid (upper panel) or Myf5 (lower panel) were incubated in 15 μl Xenopus interphase egg extract in which Cdh1 has been translated [39]. After the times indicated, 2.5 μl were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and fluorography. (B) 1 ml of mitotic extract was activated with 1 μM microcystin LR (in order to fully activate APC/C), then fractionated on a DEAE column (see Methods). Bound proteins were eluted in two steps with buffer A containing 0.25 M and 0.5 M NaCl, respectively. Each fraction (lanes 2 & 3) was compared to a control reaction containing buffer (lane 1) for its ability to mediate ubiquitylation of either cyclin B (upper panel) or Myf5 (lower panel). Lanes 4â7: the 0.25 M NaCl eluate that mediates both cyclin B and Myf5 ubiquitylation was then subjected to immunoprecipitations using either anti-Cdc27 or control antibodies. For each immunoprecipitation, both the material bound to the beads or the supernatant were analyzed for ubiquitylation activity using cyclin B (upper panel) or Myf5 (lower panel) as a substrate. (Ub)n-cycB and (Ub)n-Myf5 indicate poly-ubiquitylated forms of cyclin B and Myf5, respectively.
Figure 7. Myf5 ubiquitylation is controlled by phosphorylation. (A) Scheme of Myf5 E3 purification : for details see Methods section. (B) 2 ml of mitotic extract were fractionated as described in A; the fractions obtained from the UnoQ column were screened for their ability to ubiquitylate radiolabeled Myf5 in the presence of a ubiquitylation mix containing GST-Ub (see Methods). The reactions were resolved by 10% SDS-PAGE. (Ub)n-Myf5 indicates poly-ubiquitylated forms of Myf5. (C) The fraction containing the E3 was concentrated about 10-fold using a Centricon 10 K (Millipore). Untreated Myf5 (lanes 1 to 3) or dephosphorylated (deP) Myf5 (lanes 4 to 6) was incubated with the ubiquitylation mix alone (lanes 2, 5) or together with 6 μl of concentrated fraction containing the E3 (lanes 3, 6) for 30 minutes at 25°C. Non incubated Myf5 was loaded in lanes 1 and 4 (START) as control. Similar amounts of radioactive Myf5 and dephosphorylated Myf5 were used.
Figure 8. A model for Myf5 mitotic degradation pathway. Myf5 is subjected to multiple phosphorylations in Xenopus mitotic egg extracts, that tightly control its stability: phosphorylation of the protein leads to its ubiquitylation by an E3 distinct from APC/C, and its subsequent degradation by the proteasome. However, a hyperphosphorylated form of Myf5 remains stable (see text for details).
Abu Hatoum,
Degradation of myogenic transcription factor MyoD by the ubiquitin pathway in vivo and in vitro: regulation by specific DNA binding.
1998, Pubmed
Abu Hatoum,
Degradation of myogenic transcription factor MyoD by the ubiquitin pathway in vivo and in vitro: regulation by specific DNA binding.
1998,
Pubmed
Auradé,
Myf5, MyoD, myogenin and MRF4 myogenic derivatives of the embryonic mesenchymal cell line C3H10T1/2 exhibit the same adult muscle phenotype.
1994,
Pubmed
Black,
Transcriptional control of muscle development by myocyte enhancer factor-2 (MEF2) proteins.
1998,
Pubmed
Brassac,
The polo-like kinase Plx1 prevents premature inactivation of the APC(Fizzy)-dependent pathway in the early Xenopus cell cycle.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Buckingham,
Skeletal muscle formation in vertebrates.
2001,
Pubmed
Castro,
APC/Fizzy-Related targets Aurora-A kinase for proteolysis.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Castro,
Cyclin B/cdc2 induces c-Mos stability by direct phosphorylation in Xenopus oocytes.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Castro,
Xkid is degraded in a D-box, KEN-box, and A-box-independent pathway.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Davis,
Expression of a single transfected cDNA converts fibroblasts to myoblasts.
1987,
Pubmed
De Azevedo,
Inhibition of cyclin-dependent kinases by purine analogues: crystal structure of human cdk2 complexed with roscovitine.
1997,
Pubmed
Deshaies,
SCF and Cullin/Ring H2-based ubiquitin ligases.
1999,
Pubmed
Deshaies,
Multisite phosphorylation and the countdown to S phase.
2001,
Pubmed
Duncia,
MEK inhibitors: the chemistry and biological activity of U0126, its analogs, and cyclization products.
1998,
Pubmed
Favata,
Identification of a novel inhibitor of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase.
1998,
Pubmed
Geley,
Anaphase-promoting complex/cyclosome-dependent proteolysis of human cyclin A starts at the beginning of mitosis and is not subject to the spindle assembly checkpoint.
2001,
Pubmed
Glotzer,
Cyclin is degraded by the ubiquitin pathway.
1991,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Halevy,
Correlation of terminal cell cycle arrest of skeletal muscle with induction of p21 by MyoD.
1995,
Pubmed
Hershko,
Basic Medical Research Award. The ubiquitin system.
2000,
Pubmed
Hershko,
The ubiquitin system.
1998,
Pubmed
Hoessel,
Indirubin, the active constituent of a Chinese antileukaemia medicine, inhibits cyclin-dependent kinases.
1999,
Pubmed
Holloway,
Anaphase is initiated by proteolysis rather than by the inactivation of maturation-promoting factor.
1993,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Izumi,
Phosphorylation and activation of the Xenopus Cdc25 phosphatase in the absence of Cdc2 and Cdk2 kinase activity.
1995,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kassar-Duchossoy,
Mrf4 determines skeletal muscle identity in Myf5:Myod double-mutant mice.
2004,
Pubmed
King,
A 20S complex containing CDC27 and CDC16 catalyzes the mitosis-specific conjugation of ubiquitin to cyclin B.
1995,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
King,
Mutagenic analysis of the destruction signal of mitotic cyclins and structural characterization of ubiquitinated intermediates.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Kiss,
The bisindolylmaleimide GF 109203X, a selective inhibitor of protein kinase C, does not inhibit the potentiating effect of phorbol ester on ethanol-induced phospholipase C-mediated hydrolysis of phosphatidylethanolamine.
1995,
Pubmed
Kitzmann,
The muscle regulatory factors MyoD and myf-5 undergo distinct cell cycle-specific expression in muscle cells.
1998,
Pubmed
Kitzmann,
Crosstalk between cell cycle regulators and the myogenic factor MyoD in skeletal myoblasts.
2001,
Pubmed
Kitzmann,
cdk1- and cdk2-mediated phosphorylation of MyoD Ser200 in growing C2 myoblasts: role in modulating MyoD half-life and myogenic activity.
1999,
Pubmed
Kramer,
Mitotic regulation of the APC activator proteins CDC20 and CDH1.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Krönke,
Cyclosporin A inhibits T-cell growth factor gene expression at the level of mRNA transcription.
1984,
Pubmed
Leclerc,
Indirubins inhibit glycogen synthase kinase-3 beta and CDK5/p25, two protein kinases involved in abnormal tau phosphorylation in Alzheimer's disease. A property common to most cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitors?
2001,
Pubmed
Lindon,
Cell cycle-regulated expression of the muscle determination factor Myf5 in proliferating myoblasts.
1998,
Pubmed
Lindon,
Constitutive instability of muscle regulatory factor Myf5 is distinct from its mitosis-specific disappearance, which requires a D-box-like motif overlapping the basic domain.
2000,
Pubmed
Lindon,
Cell density-dependent induction of endogenous myogenin (myf4) gene expression by Myf5.
2001,
Pubmed
Lingbeck,
E12 and E47 modulate cellular localization and proteasome-mediated degradation of MyoD and Id1.
2005,
Pubmed
Lorca,
Ca2+ is involved through type II calmodulin-dependent protein kinase in cyclin degradation and exit from metaphase.
1994,
Pubmed
Lorca,
Fizzy is required for activation of the APC/cyclosome in Xenopus egg extracts.
1998,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Manger,
Differential effect of cyclosporin A on activation signaling in human T cell lines.
1986,
Pubmed
Margottin-Goguet,
Prophase destruction of Emi1 by the SCF(betaTrCP/Slimb) ubiquitin ligase activates the anaphase promoting complex to allow progression beyond prometaphase.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Meijer,
Biochemical and cellular effects of roscovitine, a potent and selective inhibitor of the cyclin-dependent kinases cdc2, cdk2 and cdk5.
1997,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Meijer,
Roscovitine and other purines as kinase inhibitors. From starfish oocytes to clinical trials.
2003,
Pubmed
Meksuriyen,
Biosynthesis of staurosporine, 1. 1H- and 13C-NMR assignments.
1988,
Pubmed
Montarras,
Developmental patterns in the expression of Myf5, MyoD, myogenin, and MRF4 during myogenesis.
1991,
Pubmed
Murray,
Cyclin synthesis drives the early embryonic cell cycle.
1989,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Nash,
Multisite phosphorylation of a CDK inhibitor sets a threshold for the onset of DNA replication.
2001,
Pubmed
Nurse,
Universal control mechanism regulating onset of M-phase.
1990,
Pubmed
Ott,
Early expression of the myogenic regulatory gene, myf-5, in precursor cells of skeletal muscle in the mouse embryo.
1991,
Pubmed
Puri,
Regulation of muscle regulatory factors by DNA-binding, interacting proteins, and post-transcriptional modifications.
2000,
Pubmed
Reed,
Ratchets and clocks: the cell cycle, ubiquitylation and protein turnover.
2003,
Pubmed
Rudnicki,
MyoD or Myf-5 is required for the formation of skeletal muscle.
1993,
Pubmed
Schmidt,
Xenopus polo-like kinase Plx1 regulates XErp1, a novel inhibitor of APC/C activity.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Semsarian,
Skeletal muscle hypertrophy is mediated by a Ca2+-dependent calcineurin signalling pathway.
1999,
Pubmed
Shteinberg,
Phosphorylation of the cyclosome is required for its stimulation by Fizzy/cdc20.
1999,
Pubmed
Skapek,
Inhibition of myogenic differentiation in proliferating myoblasts by cyclin D1-dependent kinase.
1995,
Pubmed
Solomon,
Cyclin activation of p34cdc2.
1990,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Song,
Phosphorylation of nuclear MyoD is required for its rapid degradation.
1998,
Pubmed
Sudakin,
The cyclosome, a large complex containing cyclin-selective ubiquitin ligase activity, targets cyclins for destruction at the end of mitosis.
1995,
Pubmed
Tintignac,
Cyclin E-cdk2 phosphorylation promotes late G1-phase degradation of MyoD in muscle cells.
2000,
Pubmed
Tintignac,
Mutant MyoD lacking Cdc2 phosphorylation sites delays M-phase entry.
2004,
Pubmed
Toullec,
The bisindolylmaleimide GF 109203X is a potent and selective inhibitor of protein kinase C.
1991,
Pubmed
Tunquist,
Under arrest: cytostatic factor (CSF)-mediated metaphase arrest in vertebrate eggs.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Vodermaier,
APC/C and SCF: controlling each other and the cell cycle.
2004,
Pubmed
Yagi,
Induction by staurosporine of hepatocyte growth factor production in human skin fibroblasts independent of protein kinase inhibition.
2003,
Pubmed
Yoshida,
Cell heterogeneity upon myogenic differentiation: down-regulation of MyoD and Myf-5 generates 'reserve cells'.
1998,
Pubmed
Zhang,
Direct inhibition of G(1) cdk kinase activity by MyoD promotes myoblast cell cycle withdrawal and terminal differentiation.
1999,
Pubmed