Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
???displayArticle.abstract???
In Xenopus egg extracts, spindles assembled around sperm nuclei contain a centrosome at each pole, while those assembled around chromatin beads do not. Poles can also form in the absence of chromatin, after addition of a microtubule stabilizing agent to extracts. Using this system, we have asked (a) how are spindle poles formed, and (b) how does the nucleation and organization of microtubules by centrosomes influence spindle assembly? We have found that poles are morphologically similar regardless of their origin. In all cases, microtubule organization into poles requires minus end-directed translocation of microtubules by cytoplasmic dynein, which tethers centrosomes to spindle poles. However, in the absence of pole formation, microtubules are still sorted into an antiparallel array around mitotic chromatin. Therefore, other activities in addition to dynein must contribute to the polarized orientation of microtubules in spindles. When centrosomes are present, they provide dominant sites for pole formation. Thus, in Xenopus egg extracts, centrosomes are not necessarily required for spindle assembly but can regulate the organization of microtubules into a bipolar array.
Figure 2. Stable microtubule seeds translocate to and accumulate at mitotic poles in the presence and absence of centrosomes. Seeds are red, microtubules are green, and overlap is yellow. (a) Diagram of seed experiment: polarity-marked microtubules polymerized from pure tubulin with a nonhydrolyzable GTP analogue, GMP-CPP, were added to extracts containing spindles. Seeds bound to spindle microtubules and moved poleward, where they accumulated. (b) Seeds accumulate at poles of chromatin bead spindles, DMSO asters, and sperm DNA spindles that contain centrosomes. Bar, 5 μm.
Figure 3. Video analysis of seed movement on DMSO asters. (a) Successive video frames at 20-s intervals showing that individual seeds move poleward. (b) Rates of seed movement over 5-s intervals and distances of individual seeds from the pole over time. (c) Polarity-marked microtubule seeds are oriented with their minus ends directed toward the center of the aster and its focus of microtubule minus ends. Bars: (a) 5 μm; (c) 8 μm.
Figure 4. Disruption of poles by antidynein antibodies. The monoclonal antibody (mAb 70.1) that recognizes the intermediate chain of cytoplasmic dynein was added to extracts containing chromatin bead spindles (A), DMSO asters (B), or sperm DNA spindles (C) with centrosomes. Pole structures were disrupted within 10 min. Bar, 5 μm.
Figure 8. Centrosomes are dominant sites of pole assembly. (a) Sperm half spindle reactions in the presence of control antibodies (A and B) or mAb 70.1 (C and D) were evaluated for microtubule polarity by NuMA immunofluorescence. (b) Quantification of monopolar and bipolar structures under each condition. At least 300 spindles were counted for each condition in two separate experiments. Bar, 5 μm.
Figure 5. Dynein tethers centrosomes to spindle poles. (a) Cytoplasmic dynein is eluted from spindles by addition of mAb 70.1. Immunofluorescent localization of dynein heavy chain to spindle poles disappears within 5 min after mAb 70.1 addition. Microtubules are green, dynein heavy chain is red, and overlap is yellow. (b) Centrosomes are released from sperm DNA spindle poles 3 min after addition of mAb 70.1. Immunofluorescent localization of γ tubulin on sperm centriolar structures that are dissociating from spindle poles. (c) Model of how dynein tethers spindle microtubules to centrosomal microtubules and how this is disrupted by mAb 70.1. Bars, 5 μm.
Figure 6. Microtubules are sorted into antiparallel arrays around chromatin in the absence of pole formation. (a) Immunofluorescent localization of NuMA to the frayed ends of chromatin bead spindles that have formed in the absence of dynein activity. (b and c) Hooking analysis. (b) Quantification of hook handedness in control and poleless spindles. Percentage of right- and left-handed hooks in sections through spindle centers containing chromatin beads, and spindle ends containing microtubule poles (control), or bundles (+ mAb 70.1). (c) Low magnification micrographs (5-μm width) are shown to give an overall impression of microtubule organization seen in sections through spindle ends containing microtubule poles or bundles and through spindle centers containing beads. (d) Higher magnification micrographs (2â2.5-μm width) show hooks on cross sectioned individual microtubules. In the presence of control antibodies, a section through a pole contains right-handed (clockwise) hooks, while a section containing beads contains both right- and left-handed hooks. In the presence of mAb 70.1, a section through a microtubule bundle likely to be at the spindle end is shown that contains almost exclusively left-handed hooks. Note: Hook handedness does not give any information about the polarity of the microtubules in these sections but indicates the degree to which microtubule polarity is uniform. 50â100 microtubules were evaluated in each section, and three sections were evaluated for each condition. Bar, 5 μm.
Figure 7. Centrosomes provide permanent microtubule organizing sites. Sperm DNA and chromatin bead spindles before and 5 or 20 min after incubation on ice to depolymerize microtubules. No microtubules were visible on chromatin beads 5 min after cooling. Bar, 5 μm.
Albertson,
Segregation of holocentric chromosomes at meiosis in the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans.
1993, Pubmed
Albertson,
Segregation of holocentric chromosomes at meiosis in the nematode, Caenorhabditis elegans.
1993,
Pubmed
Bajer,
Functional autonomy of monopolar spindle and evidence for oscillatory movement in mitosis.
1982,
Pubmed
Bajer,
Asters, poles, and transport properties within spindlelike microtubule arrays.
1982,
Pubmed
Bastmeyer,
Immunostaining of spindle components in tipulid spermatocytes using a serum against pericentriolar material.
1986,
Pubmed
Belmont,
Real-time visualization of cell cycle-dependent changes in microtubule dynamics in cytoplasmic extracts.
1990,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Boleti,
Xklp2, a novel Xenopus centrosomal kinesin-like protein required for centrosome separation during mitosis.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Compton,
Mutation of the predicted p34cdc2 phosphorylation sites in NuMA impair the assembly of the mitotic spindle and block mitosis.
1995,
Pubmed
Compton,
NuMA is required for the proper completion of mitosis.
1993,
Pubmed
Debec,
Polar organization of gamma-tubulin in acentriolar mitotic spindles of Drosophila melanogaster cells.
1995,
Pubmed
Echeverri,
Molecular characterization of the 50-kD subunit of dynactin reveals function for the complex in chromosome alignment and spindle organization during mitosis.
1996,
Pubmed
Euteneuer,
Polarity of spindle microtubules in Haemanthus endosperm.
1982,
Pubmed
Euteneuer,
Structural polarity of kinetochore microtubules in PtK1 cells.
1981,
Pubmed
Gaglio,
NuMA is required for the organization of microtubules into aster-like mitotic arrays.
1995,
Pubmed
Gaglio,
Opposing motor activities are required for the organization of the mammalian mitotic spindle pole.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Gard,
Microtubule organization during maturation of Xenopus oocytes: assembly and rotation of the meiotic spindles.
1992,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Heald,
Self-organization of microtubules into bipolar spindles around artificial chromosomes in Xenopus egg extracts.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Heidemann,
Visualization of the structural polarity of microtubules.
1980,
Pubmed
Hyman,
Preparation of marked microtubules for the assay of the polarity of microtubule-based motors by fluorescence.
1991,
Pubmed
Kallajoki,
A 210 kDa nuclear matrix protein is a functional part of the mitotic spindle; a microinjection study using SPN monoclonal antibodies.
1991,
Pubmed
Kallajoki,
Ability to organize microtubules in taxol-treated mitotic PtK2 cells goes with the SPN antigen and not with the centrosome.
1992,
Pubmed
Kallajoki,
Microinjection of a monoclonal antibody against SPN antigen, now identified by peptide sequences as the NuMA protein, induces micronuclei in PtK2 cells.
1993,
Pubmed
Karki,
Affinity chromatography demonstrates a direct binding between cytoplasmic dynein and the dynactin complex.
1995,
Pubmed
Karsenti,
Mitotic spindle morphogenesis in animal cells.
1991,
Pubmed
Kirschner,
Beyond self-assembly: from microtubules to morphogenesis.
1986,
Pubmed
Lajoie-Mazenc,
Recruitment of antigenic gamma-tubulin during mitosis in animal cells: presence of gamma-tubulin in the mitotic spindle.
1994,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Li,
gamma-tubulin is a minus end-specific microtubule binding protein.
1995,
Pubmed
Maekawa,
Identification of a minus end-specific microtubule-associated protein located at the mitotic poles in cultured mammalian cells.
1991,
Pubmed
Mastronarde,
Interpolar spindle microtubules in PTK cells.
1993,
Pubmed
Mazia,
Cooperation of kinetochores and pole in the establishment of monopolar mitotic apparatus.
1981,
Pubmed
Mazia,
Centrosomes and mitotic poles.
1984,
Pubmed
McBeath,
Microtubule detachment from the microtubule-organizing center as a key event in the complete turnover of microtubules in cells.
1990,
Pubmed
McIntosh,
Tubulin hooks as probes for microtubule polarity: an analysis of the method and an evaluation of data on microtubule polarity in the mitotic spindle.
1984,
Pubmed
McKim,
Chromosomal control of meiotic cell division.
1995,
Pubmed
Merdes,
A complex of NuMA and cytoplasmic dynein is essential for mitotic spindle assembly.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Mitchison,
Poleward kinetochore fiber movement occurs during both metaphase and anaphase-A in newt lung cell mitosis.
1992,
Pubmed
Mitchison,
Tubulin flux in the mitotic spindle: where does it come from, where is it going?
1990,
Pubmed
Mitchison,
Microtubule assembly nucleated by isolated centrosomes.
,
Pubmed
Murray,
Real time observation of anaphase in vitro.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Murray,
Cell cycle extracts.
1991,
Pubmed
Nicklas,
Mechanically cut mitotic spindles: clean cuts and stable microtubules.
1989,
Pubmed
Nislow,
A plus-end-directed motor enzyme that moves antiparallel microtubules in vitro localizes to the interzone of mitotic spindles.
1992,
Pubmed
Pfarr,
Cytoplasmic dynein is localized to kinetochores during mitosis.
1990,
Pubmed
Rieder,
Kinetochores are transported poleward along a single astral microtubule during chromosome attachment to the spindle in newt lung cells.
1990,
Pubmed
Sawin,
Microtubule flux in mitosis is independent of chromosomes, centrosomes, and antiparallel microtubules.
1994,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Sawin,
Mitotic spindle assembly by two different pathways in vitro.
1991,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Schroer,
Actin-related protein 1 and cytoplasmic dynein-based motility - what's the connection?
1996,
Pubmed
Schroer,
New insights into the interaction of cytoplasmic dynein with the actin-related protein, Arp1.
1994,
Pubmed
Sluder,
Experimental separation of pronuclei in fertilized sea urchin eggs: chromosomes do not organize a spindle in the absence of centrosomes.
1985,
Pubmed
Stearns,
In vitro reconstitution of centrosome assembly and function: the central role of gamma-tubulin.
1994,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Steffen,
Aster-free spindle poles in insect spermatocytes: evidence for chromosome-induced spindle formation?
1986,
Pubmed
Steuer,
Localization of cytoplasmic dynein to mitotic spindles and kinetochores.
1990,
Pubmed
Telzer,
Decoration of spindle microtubules with Dynein: evidence for uniform polarity.
1981,
Pubmed
Theurkauf,
Meiotic spindle assembly in Drosophila females: behavior of nonexchange chromosomes and the effects of mutations in the nod kinesin-like protein.
1992,
Pubmed
Vaisberg,
Cytoplasmic dynein plays a role in mammalian mitotic spindle formation.
1993,
Pubmed
Vaughan,
Cytoplasmic dynein binds dynactin through a direct interaction between the intermediate chains and p150Glued.
1995,
Pubmed
Verde,
Taxol-induced microtubule asters in mitotic extracts of Xenopus eggs: requirement for phosphorylated factors and cytoplasmic dynein.
1991,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Vernos,
Xklp1, a chromosomal Xenopus kinesin-like protein essential for spindle organization and chromosome positioning.
1995,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Walczak,
Kinesin-related proteins at mitotic spindle poles: function and regulation.
1996,
Pubmed
Waters,
Pathways of spindle assembly.
1997,
Pubmed
White,
Cleavage plane specification in C. elegans: how to divide the spoils.
1996,
Pubmed
Wolf,
Cytology of Lepidoptera. V. The microtubule cytoskeleton in eupyrene spermatocytes of Ephestia kuehniella (Pyralidae), Inachis io (Nymphalidae), and Orgyia antiqua (Lymantriidae).
1991,
Pubmed
Yang,
The nuclear-mitotic apparatus protein is important in the establishment and maintenance of the bipolar mitotic spindle apparatus.
1992,
Pubmed
Zhang,
Chromosomes initiate spindle assembly upon experimental dissolution of the nuclear envelope in grasshopper spermatocytes.
1995,
Pubmed
Zhang,
The impact of chromosomes and centrosomes on spindle assembly as observed in living cells.
1995,
Pubmed