Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
PLoS Biol
2007 Oct 30;511:e284. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050284.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Genetic elucidation of human hyperosmia to isovaleric acid.
Menashe I
,
Abaffy T
,
Hasin Y
,
Goshen S
,
Yahalom V
,
Luetje CW
,
Lancet D
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
The genetic basis of odorant-specific variations in human olfactory thresholds, and in particular of enhanced odorant sensitivity (hyperosmia), remains largely unknown. Olfactory receptor (OR) segregating pseudogenes, displaying both functional and nonfunctional alleles in humans, are excellent candidates to underlie these differences in olfactory sensitivity. To explore this hypothesis, we examined the association between olfactory detection threshold phenotypes of four odorants and segregating pseudogene genotypes of 43 ORs genome-wide. A strong association signal was observed between the single nucleotide polymorphism variants in OR11H7P and sensitivity to the odorant isovaleric acid. This association was largely due to the low frequency of homozygous pseudogenized genotype in individuals with specific hyperosmia to this odorant, implying a possible functional role of OR11H7P in isovaleric acid detection. This predicted receptor-ligand functional relationship was further verified using the Xenopus oocyte expression system, whereby the intact allele of OR11H7P exhibited a response to isovaleric acid. Notably, we also uncovered another mechanism affecting general olfactory acuity that manifested as a significant inter-odorant threshold concordance, resulting in an overrepresentation of individuals who were hyperosmic to several odorants. An involvement of polymorphisms in other downstream transduction genes is one possible explanation for this observation. Thus, human hyperosmia to isovaleric acid is a complex trait, contributed to by both receptor and other mechanisms in the olfactory signaling pathway.
Figure 1. Olfactory Threshold DistributionsHistograms of the measured olfactory thresholds for four odorants: IAA (A), IVA (B), LCA (C), and CIN (D). Odorants are expressed in molar (M) concentrations (in the oil solution) and were tested in 377 genotyped individuals, except CIN, which was tested in a randomly selected subsample of 200 participants. The data are presented for both genders pooled together. A threshold score of one indicates individuals who could not detect the highest possible odorant concentration (10−2 M). Red, yellow, and green, respectively, represent fractions out of the total sample for homozygote disrupted, heterozygote, and homozygote intact OR11H7P genotypes.
Figure 2. Genotype–Phenotype AssociationANOVA p-values for comparison between the olfactory threshold distributions of participants with homozygous disrupted genotypes versus heterozygous and homozygous intact genotypes (1 df), using “gender” and “gender by genotype” as covariates. SPG loci are enumerated as in Table S2. The broken line indicates the statistically significant value of p = 0.05 after Bonferroni correction for 172 tests (four odorants × 43 SPGs). The two strongest p-values for IVA are for the genes marked in Figure 3. Using the individual's average threshold towards the four odorants as an additional covariate did not change the association signal with OR11H7P (open circle in IVA panel). The association signal with OR4Q2P is reduced after adjusting for the OR11H7P effect (solid square in IVA panel).
Figure 3. The Genomic Region Associated with IVA HyperosmiaOR genes are represented by red, green, and yellow triangles indicating pseudogenes, intact genes, and SPGs, respectively. The two SPGs showing the strongest association with IVA sensitivity are marked with single and double asterisks. A linkage disequilibrium plot of SNPs with minor allele frequency ≥ 5% in HapMap CEU [46] is depicted for this genomic region. The pairwise r2 values are indicated on a gray scale, with black = 1 and white = 0. This region contains also the putative OR-specific trans-acting enhancer element (H) [47,48].
Figure 4. OR Responses to IVA(A) Representative current traces from Xenopus oocytes expressing the OR11H7Pi, OR52E4, OR11H4, or OR11H6 receptor (see Materials and Methods) challenged with 15-s applications of 3 mM IVA and 1 mM IBMX.(B) Summary of the 4–12 recordings from oocytes expressing OR11H7Pi, OR52E4, OR8A1, OR12D2, OR11H7P, OR11H4, or OR11H6. Responses were normalized to the 1 mM IBMX response in the same oocyte and are presented as mean ± standard error of the mean. Significant differences from OR52E4, OR8A1, and OR12D2: *, p < 0.05; **, p < 0.01. Significant differences from OR11H7P: †, p < 0.05; ††, p < 0.01.
Figure 5. Excess of General Hyperosmia(A) Histogram of average olfactory thresholds (adjusted for gender). The average threshold values for the four odorants were calculated for the raw data (black bars) and for data generated by 1,000 permutations of the individual odorant thresholds (dotted bars). The significantly broader distribution of the original data as compared to the permutated data (ANOVA, F = 1.83, p = 1.68 × 10−10) indicates an excess of individuals with extreme threshold values, particularly in the hypersensitivity end of the distribution.(B) Combinations of odorant thresholds (adjusted for gender) for the four odorants. Shown are hyperosmia (lowest 10% of thresholds in the entire sample, black), normosmia (middle 80%, gray), and hyposmia (highest 10%, white). Individuals with similar threshold patterns are clustered together. For clarity, only 50 of the total of 123 normosmic individuals are shown. The probability of observing three individuals defined as generally hyperosmic (i.e., having hyperosmia to all four odorants) in this cohort is computed as ∼10−12.
Abaffy,
Functional analysis of a mammalian odorant receptor subfamily.
2006, Pubmed,
Xenbase
Abaffy,
Functional analysis of a mammalian odorant receptor subfamily.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Aloni,
Ancient genomic architecture for mammalian olfactory receptor clusters.
2006,
Pubmed
Amoore,
Measurement of specific anosmia.
1968,
Pubmed
Amoore,
Specific anosmia: a clue to the olfactory code.
1967,
Pubmed
Apter,
Fluctuating olfactory sensitivity and distorted odor perception in allergic rhinitis.
1999,
Pubmed
Bray,
High-throughput multiplex SNP genotyping with MALDI-TOF mass spectrometry: practice, problems and promise.
2001,
Pubmed
Brown,
The distribution of the sensitivity to chemical odors in man.
1968,
Pubmed
Buck,
A novel multigene family may encode odorant receptors: a molecular basis for odor recognition.
1991,
Pubmed
Cain,
Olfactory sensitivity: reliability, generality, and association with aging.
1991,
Pubmed
Fadool,
Kv1.3 channel gene-targeted deletion produces "Super-Smeller Mice" with altered glomeruli, interacting scaffolding proteins, and biophysics.
2004,
Pubmed
Glusman,
The complete human olfactory subgenome.
2001,
Pubmed
Griff,
The genetic basis for specific anosmia to isovaleric acid in the mouse.
1995,
Pubmed
Gross,
A genetic basis for hypersensitivity to "sweaty" odors in humans.
2010,
Pubmed
Gross-Isseroff,
Evidence for genetic determination in human twins of olfactory thresholds for a standard odorant.
1992,
Pubmed
Henkin,
Hyperosmia and depression following exposure to toxic vapors.
1990,
Pubmed
Hummel,
'Sniffin' sticks': olfactory performance assessed by the combined testing of odor identification, odor discrimination and olfactory threshold.
1997,
Pubmed
International HapMap Consortium,
A haplotype map of the human genome.
2005,
Pubmed
Isseroff,
Olfactory sensitivity to androstenone in schizophrenic patients.
1987,
Pubmed
Jafek,
Congenital anosmia.
1990,
Pubmed
Joshi,
Olfactory sensitivity for enantiomers and their racemic mixtures--a comparative study in CD-1 mice and spider monkeys.
2006,
Pubmed
Krautwurst,
Identification of ligands for olfactory receptors by functional expression of a receptor library.
1998,
Pubmed
Lancet,
Olfactory receptors: transduction, diversity, human psychophysics and genome analysis.
1993,
Pubmed
Lanzavecchia,
From TCR engagement to T cell activation: a kinetic view of T cell behavior.
1999,
Pubmed
Laska,
Olfactory sensitivity for aliphatic aldehydes in CD-1 mice.
2006,
Pubmed
Leopold,
Congenital lack of olfactory ability.
1992,
Pubmed
Lison,
A polymorphism of the ability to smell urinary metabolites of asparagus.
,
Pubmed
Lomvardas,
Interchromosomal interactions and olfactory receptor choice.
2006,
Pubmed
Malnic,
Combinatorial receptor codes for odors.
1999,
Pubmed
Menashe,
A probabilistic classifier for olfactory receptor pseudogenes.
2006,
Pubmed
Menashe,
Different noses for different people.
2003,
Pubmed
Novikov,
Specific anosmia to isovaleric acid in laboratory C57BL/6 mice: recessive inheritance.
2002,
Pubmed
Oka,
Odorant receptor map in the mouse olfactory bulb: in vivo sensitivity and specificity of receptor-defined glomeruli.
2006,
Pubmed
Pennacchio,
Genomic strategies to identify mammalian regulatory sequences.
2001,
Pubmed
Ruan,
Ethanol hypersensitivity and olfactory discrimination defect in mice lacking a homolog of Drosophila neuralized.
2001,
Pubmed
Sengupta,
odr-10 encodes a seven transmembrane domain olfactory receptor required for responses to the odorant diacetyl.
1996,
Pubmed
Serizawa,
Negative feedback regulation ensures the one receptor-one olfactory neuron rule in mouse.
2003,
Pubmed
Sherman,
The pyridine scale for clinical measurement of olfactory threshold: a quantitative reevaluation.
1979,
Pubmed
Trask,
Members of the olfactory receptor gene family are contained in large blocks of DNA duplicated polymorphically near the ends of human chromosomes.
1998,
Pubmed
Valle,
Genetics, individuality, and medicine in the 21st century.
2004,
Pubmed
Weischenfeldt,
Messenger RNA surveillance: neutralizing natural nonsense.
2005,
Pubmed
Whissell-Buechy,
Odour-blindness to musk: simple recessive inheritance.
1973,
Pubmed
Wysocki,
Specific anosmia in the laboratory mouse.
1977,
Pubmed
Wysocki,
National Geographic Smell Survey. Effects of age are heterogenous.
1989,
Pubmed
Wysocki,
Ability to smell androstenone is genetically determined.
1984,
Pubmed
Zhang,
The olfactory receptor gene superfamily of the mouse.
2002,
Pubmed
Zibrowski,
Olfactory sensitivity in medical laboratory workers occupationally exposed to organic solvent mixtures.
2006,
Pubmed
Zozulya,
The human olfactory receptor repertoire.
2001,
Pubmed