Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
Nat Struct Mol Biol
2008 Aug 01;158:805-10. doi: 10.1038/nsmb.1466.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
The ClC-0 chloride channel is a 'broken' Cl-/H+ antiporter.
Lísal J
,
Maduke M
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Ion channels have historically been viewed as distinct from secondary active transporters. However, the recent discovery that the CLC 'chloride channel' family is made up of both channels and active transporters has led to the hypothesis that the ion-transport mechanisms of these two types of membrane proteins may be similar. Here we use single-channel analysis to demonstrate that ClC-0 channel gating (opening and closing) involves the transmembrane movement of protons. This result indicates that ClC-0 is a 'broken' Cl(-)/H(+) antiporter in which one of the conformational states has become leaky for chloride ions. This finding clarifies the evolutionary relationship between the channels and transporters and conveys that similar mechanisms and analogous protein movements are used by both.
Figure 2. Slow-gate closures recorded from patches with identical chloride gradients and different proton gradients. For each patch, the first five asymmetrical slow-gate closures are shown. For both patches, the chloride concentration was 120 mM (symmetrical) and the membrane voltage was held at â90 mV. In a, a one-pH-unit gradient (pHint 7.5, pHext 8.5) was imposed; in b, a two-pH-unit gradient (pHint 7.0, pHext 9.0) was imposed. The corresponding energies for the chloride and proton electrochemical gradients (ÎGCl and ÎGH) are noted.
Figure 3. The gating asymmetry ratio J+/Jâ as a function of free energy released from chloride transport, ÎGCl, and proton transport, ÎGH. The black solid lines show the maximal expected gating asymmetry for the case in which the gating is powered by chloride transport (a) or proton transport (b). Error bars represent the 95% confidence intervals. In b, the different colors code for different values of pHext (black, 7.5; red, 8.5; blue, 9.5) and the different symbols represents different voltages (circles, â50 mV; squares, â58 mV; triangles, â70 mV; diamonds â90 mV). Thus, the data points represented by the same symbols (but different colors) have the same electrochemical gradients for chloride ions (but different electrochemical gradients for protons).
Figure 4. A possible model for non-equilibrium gating in ClC-0. The diagrams represent ClC-0 dimers with chloride pathways (green) and proton pathways (orange). Both pathways are controlled by the fast gate (dark blue) at the extracellular side. Only the chloride pathway is gated by the slow gate (black) at the intracellular side. The slow gates within individual subunits of the dimer are coupled (gray âspringâ), such that these gates always open and close simultaneously. The number in the corner of each diagram indicates the number of open chloride pores (that is, the conductance level). The red spheres represent protons binding inside the translocation pathway. The proton electrochemical gradient is inward (movement of protons from outside to inside is energetically downhill) and hence J+/Jâ > 1. In this framework, the simple assumption that binding of protons to the intracellular site favors slow-gate opening results in cycling in the J+ direction. Experimentally, this is observed as channels more often entering the inactivated state (left-hand column) from the one-pore open state and returning from inactivation to the two-pore open state. (Note: transitions to the inactivated state directly from the level-1 state (right, middle) cannot be distinguished experimentally from those that occur from the level-0 state (right, below).) The slow gate opens more frequently when the fast gates are open because the protons can enter and bind to the activation site; the slow gate closes more frequently when the fast gates are closed because the protons escape down their electrochemical gradient.
Accardi,
Separate ion pathways in a Cl-/H+ exchanger.
2005, Pubmed
Accardi,
Separate ion pathways in a Cl-/H+ exchanger.
2005,
Pubmed
Accardi,
Fast and slow gating relaxations in the muscle chloride channel CLC-1.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Accardi,
Secondary active transport mediated by a prokaryotic homologue of ClC Cl- channels.
2004,
Pubmed
Aickin,
Intracellular pH regulation by vertebrate muscle.
1986,
Pubmed
Aromataris,
ClC-1 chloride channel: Matching its properties to a role in skeletal muscle.
2006,
Pubmed
Chen,
Structure and function of clc channels.
2005,
Pubmed
Chen,
Side-chain charge effects and conductance determinants in the pore of ClC-0 chloride channels.
2003,
Pubmed
Chen,
Different fast-gate regulation by external Cl(-) and H(+) of the muscle-type ClC chloride channels.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
DeFelice,
Transporters as channels.
2007,
Pubmed
Dutzler,
The ClC family of chloride channels and transporters.
2006,
Pubmed
Dutzler,
Gating the selectivity filter in ClC chloride channels.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Engh,
Cysteine accessibility in ClC-0 supports conservation of the ClC intracellular vestibule.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Estévez,
Conservation of chloride channel structure revealed by an inhibitor binding site in ClC-1.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Hanke,
Single chloride channels from Torpedo electroplax. Activation by protons.
1983,
Pubmed
Jentsch,
Primary structure of Torpedo marmorata chloride channel isolated by expression cloning in Xenopus oocytes.
1990,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Jentsch,
Physiological functions of CLC Cl- channels gleaned from human genetic disease and mouse models.
2005,
Pubmed
Matulef,
The CLC 'chloride channel' family: revelations from prokaryotes.
2007,
Pubmed
Miller,
ClC chloride channels viewed through a transporter lens.
2006,
Pubmed
Miller,
A leak in the EAATs.
2007,
Pubmed
Mindell,
The chloride channel's appendix.
2008,
Pubmed
Nguitragool,
CLC Cl /H+ transporters constrained by covalent cross-linking.
2007,
Pubmed
Picollo,
Chloride/proton antiporter activity of mammalian CLC proteins ClC-4 and ClC-5.
2005,
Pubmed
Puljak,
Emerging roles of chloride channels in human diseases.
2006,
Pubmed
Pusch,
Structural insights into chloride and proton-mediated gating of CLC chloride channels.
2004,
Pubmed
Richard,
Steady-state coupling of ion-channel conformations to a transmembrane ion gradient.
1990,
Pubmed
Saviane,
The muscle chloride channel ClC-1 has a double-barreled appearance that is differentially affected in dominant and recessive myotonia.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Scheel,
Voltage-dependent electrogenic chloride/proton exchange by endosomal CLC proteins.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Sile,
Molecular physiology of renal ClC chloride channels/transporters.
2006,
Pubmed
Traverso,
Proton sensing of CLC-0 mutant E166D.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Zdebik,
Determinants of anion-proton coupling in mammalian endosomal CLC proteins.
2008,
Pubmed