Lee J , Dunphy WG .

GM043974 NIGMS NIH HHS , GM070891 NIGMS NIH HHS , R01 GM043974 NIGMS NIH HHS , R37 GM043974 NIGMS NIH HHS , R01 GM070891 NIGMS NIH HHS

	Figure 1. Binding of TopBP1 to the Rad17/9-1-1 complex is dependent on Ser373 of Rad9. (A) Control IgG (lane 1) and anti-Rad17 antibodies (lane 2) were used for immunoprecipitation of egg extracts. Associated proteins were examined by immunoblotting with indicated antibodies. (B) Recombinant 9-1-1 complexes containing WT His6-Rad9 (r9-1-1-WT, lane 2) or the S373A mutant form of His6-Rad9 (r9-1-1-S373A, lane 3) were incubated in interphase egg extracts. Control buffer was added in lane 1. Nickel agarose beads were incubated in the extracts, retrieved, and immunoblotted for the indicated proteins. (C) Mock-depleted (lane 1) and 9-1-1–depleted extracts supplemented with buffer alone (lane 2), r9-1-1-WT (lane 3), or r9-1-1-S373A (lane 4) were immunoblotted for Hus1 (to monitor the 9-1-1 complex), TopBP1, and Rad17. (D) Mock-depleted extracts (lanes 2 and 3) and 9-1-1–depleted extracts supplemented with buffer alone (lane 4), r9-1-1-WT (lane 5), or r9-1-1-S373A (lane 6) were prepared and incubated for 1 h with anti-FLAG antibody beads in the absence (lane 2) or presence of the FLAG-tagged BRCT I–II fragment of TopBP1 (lanes 3–6). The beads were retrieved, and associated proteins were examined by immunoblotting with indicated antibodies. Anti-Rad9 antibodies detected Rad9 (arrow) as well as the cross-reacting BRCT I–II band (asterisk). Lane 1 depicts 1.5 μl of initial egg extract.
	Figure 2. Rad17 regulates the interaction of 9-1-1 with TopBP1. (A) Mock-depleted (lane 1) and Rad17-depleted extracts supplemented with buffer (lane 2) or recombinant Rad17 (rRad17; lane 3) were immunoblotted for the indicated proteins. (B) The indicated extracts from A were incubated in the absence (lane 2) or presence of the FLAG-tagged BRCT I–II fragment of TopBP1 (lanes 3–5) for 1 h with anti-FLAG antibody beads. The beads were retrieved, and associated proteins were examined by immunoblotting with indicated antibodies. Rad9 (arrow) and the cross-reacting BRCT I–II band (asterisk) are marked. Lane 1 depicts 1.5 μl of initial egg extract.
	Figure 3. Rad17 regulates the chromatin accumulation of 9-1-1 and TopBP1 in an ATP-dependent manner. (A) Various constructs of Rad17 with internal deletions were generated and their binding to BRCT I–II (TopBP1), Hus1 (9-1-1), and RFC40 (RFC) was examined (see Supplemental Figure 1A). Binding of Rad17 to the indicated proteins is indicated as strong (+), weak (±), or negligible (−). (B) Mock-depleted (lane 1) and Rad17-depleted extracts supplemented with buffer alone (lane 2), rRad17-WT (lane 3), rRad17-K138E (lane 4), rRad17-D221Q (lane 5), or rRad17-Δ5 (lane 6) were immunoblotted for Rad17 and TopBP1. (C) The indicated extracts from B were incubated with anti-FLAG antibody beads in the absence (lane 2) or presence of the FLAG-tagged BRCT I–II fragment of TopBP1 (lanes 3–8). The beads were retrieved and immunoblotted for the indicated proteins. Lane 1 depicts 1.5 μl of initial egg extract. Rad9 (arrow) and the cross-reacting BRCT I–II band (asterisk) are marked. (D) The indicated extracts from B were incubated with sperm chromatin in the absence (lane 1) or presence of aphidicolin (lanes 2–7). Aliquots of the extracts were incubated with 35S-Chk1. Nuclear fractions from these incubations were processed for phosphorimaging (top panel). Other aliquots were processed for isolation of chromatin fractions and immunoblotting with indicated antibodies (bottom panels).
	Figure 4. Rad17/9-1-1 complex but not phospho-Ser373 of Rad9 is required for the checkpoint-related accumulation of TopBP1 at stalled replication forks. Mock-depleted extracts (lane 1 and 2) and 9-1-1–depleted extracts supplemented with buffer alone (lane 3), r9-1-1-WT (lane 4), or r9-1-1-S373A (lane 5) were incubated with sperm chromatin in the absence (lane 1) or presence of aphidicolin (lanes 2–5). Chromatin fractions were isolated and immunoblotted with the indicated antibodies.
	Figure 5. Initial binding of the N-terminal half of TopBP1 to chromatin is sufficient for the formation of replication forks. (A) Mock-depleted extracts (lane 1) and TopBP1-depleted extracts supplemented with buffer alone (lane 2) or rTopBP1 (lane 3) were immunoblotted for the indicated proteins. (B) Sperm chromatin was isolated after a 35-min incubation in egg extracts in the presence of 2 μM p27. Next, the p27-treated chromatin was transferred to mock-depleted extracts (lanes 1 and 2) or TopBP1-depleted extracts supplemented with buffer (lane 3) or rTopBP1 (lane 4). Extracts were incubated in the absence (lane 1) or presence of aphidicolin (lanes 2–4). Aliquots of the extracts were incubated with 35S-Chk1. Nuclear fractions from these incubations were processed for phosphorimaging (top panel). Other aliquots were processed for isolation of chromatin fractions and immunoblotting with indicated antibodies (bottom panels). (C) Mock-depleted extracts (lane 1) and TopBP1-depleted extracts supplemented with buffer (lanes 2) or the indicated versions of recombinant TopBP1 (lanes 3–5) were immunoblotted with anti-TopBP1 (top), anti-FLAG (middle), and anti-Hus1 antibodies (bottom). (D) Chromatin fractions from the extracts in C were immunoblotted with anti-TopBP1 antibodies (top panel), anti-FLAG antibodies (second panel from top), and the additional indicated antibodies (bottom panels).
	Figure 6. Summary of Rad17-mediated interaction between 9-1-1 and TopBP1 at stalled replication forks. See text for detailed discussion.

Bloom, Loading clamps for DNA replication and repair. 2009, Pubmed

Bloom, Loading clamps for DNA replication and repair. 2009, Pubmed
Bonilla, Colocalization of sensors is sufficient to activate the DNA damage checkpoint in the absence of damage. 2008, Pubmed
Bowman, Structural analysis of a eukaryotic sliding DNA clamp-clamp loader complex. 2004, Pubmed
Byun, Functional uncoupling of MCM helicase and DNA polymerase activities activates the ATR-dependent checkpoint. 2005, Pubmed , Xenbase
Cai, Reconstitution of human replication factor C from its five subunits in baculovirus-infected insect cells. 1996, Pubmed
Cimprich, ATR: an essential regulator of genome integrity. 2008, Pubmed
Cortez, ATR and ATRIP: partners in checkpoint signaling. 2001, Pubmed
Cuadrado, ATM regulates ATR chromatin loading in response to DNA double-strand breaks. 2006, Pubmed
Delacroix, The Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 (9-1-1) clamp activates checkpoint signaling via TopBP1. 2007, Pubmed
Greer, hRad9 rapidly binds DNA containing double-strand breaks and is required for damage-dependent topoisomerase II beta binding protein 1 focus formation. 2003, Pubmed
Guo, Requirement for Atr in phosphorylation of Chk1 and cell cycle regulation in response to DNA replication blocks and UV-damaged DNA in Xenopus egg extracts. 2000, Pubmed , Xenbase
Hanson, AAA+ proteins: have engine, will work. 2005, Pubmed
Hashimoto, The phosphorylated C-terminal domain of Xenopus Cut5 directly mediates ATR-dependent activation of Chk1. 2006, Pubmed , Xenbase
Hashimoto, Xenopus Cut5 is essential for a CDK-dependent process in the initiation of DNA replication. 2003, Pubmed , Xenbase
Helt, Evidence that DNA damage detection machinery participates in DNA repair. 2005, Pubmed
Huyen, Methylated lysine 79 of histone H3 targets 53BP1 to DNA double-strand breaks. 2004, Pubmed
Indiani, The replication clamp-loading machine at work in the three domains of life. 2006, Pubmed
Jazayeri, ATM- and cell cycle-dependent regulation of ATR in response to DNA double-strand breaks. 2006, Pubmed
Jones, XRad17 is required for the activation of XChk1 but not XCds1 during checkpoint signaling in Xenopus. 2003, Pubmed , Xenbase
Kumagai, Repeated phosphopeptide motifs in Claspin mediate the regulated binding of Chk1. 2003, Pubmed , Xenbase
Kumagai, TopBP1 activates the ATR-ATRIP complex. 2006, Pubmed , Xenbase
Kumagai, How cells activate ATR. 2006, Pubmed
Kumagai, Claspin and the activated form of ATR-ATRIP collaborate in the activation of Chk1. 2004, Pubmed , Xenbase
Lee, Activation and regulation of ATM kinase activity in response to DNA double-strand breaks. 2007, Pubmed
Lee, The Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 checkpoint clamp regulates interaction of TopBP1 with ATR. 2007, Pubmed , Xenbase
Lee, Claspin, a Chk1-regulatory protein, monitors DNA replication on chromatin independently of RPA, ATR, and Rad17. 2003, Pubmed , Xenbase
Lee, Roles of replication fork-interacting and Chk1-activating domains from Claspin in a DNA replication checkpoint response. 2005, Pubmed , Xenbase
Li, Absence of BLM leads to accumulation of chromosomal DNA breaks during both unperturbed and disrupted S phases. 2004, Pubmed , Xenbase
Luciani, Characterization of a novel ATR-dependent, Chk1-independent, intra-S-phase checkpoint that suppresses initiation of replication in Xenopus. 2004, Pubmed , Xenbase
Majka, Requirement for ATP by the DNA damage checkpoint clamp loader. 2004, Pubmed
Majka, The checkpoint clamp activates Mec1 kinase during initiation of the DNA damage checkpoint. 2006, Pubmed
Mäkiniemi, BRCT domain-containing protein TopBP1 functions in DNA replication and damage response. 2001, Pubmed
Masumoto, Dpb11 controls the association between DNA polymerases alpha and epsilon and the autonomously replicating sequence region of budding yeast. 2000, Pubmed
Mordes, TopBP1 activates ATR through ATRIP and a PIKK regulatory domain. 2008, Pubmed
Murray, Cell cycle extracts. 1991, Pubmed
Navadgi-Patil, A tale of two tails: activation of DNA damage checkpoint kinase Mec1/ATR by the 9-1-1 clamp and by Dpb11/TopBP1. 2009, Pubmed
Parrilla-Castellar, Dial 9-1-1 for DNA damage: the Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 (9-1-1) clamp complex. 2004, Pubmed
Parrilla-Castellar, Cut5 is required for the binding of Atr and DNA polymerase alpha to genotoxin-damaged chromatin. 2003, Pubmed , Xenbase
Pellicioli, Signal transduction: how rad53 kinase is activated. 2005, Pubmed
Rupnik, The MRN complex. 2008, Pubmed
Sancar, Molecular mechanisms of mammalian DNA repair and the DNA damage checkpoints. 2004, Pubmed
Schwartz, Rad9 phosphorylation sites couple Rad53 to the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA damage checkpoint. 2002, Pubmed
Shechter, ATR and ATM regulate the timing of DNA replication origin firing. 2004, Pubmed , Xenbase
Shiloh, The ATM-mediated DNA-damage response: taking shape. 2006, Pubmed , Xenbase
Shiotani, Single-stranded DNA orchestrates an ATM-to-ATR switch at DNA breaks. 2009, Pubmed
Stewart, MDC1 is a mediator of the mammalian DNA damage checkpoint. 2003, Pubmed
St Onge, A role for the phosphorylation of hRad9 in checkpoint signaling. 2003, Pubmed
Syljuåsen, Inhibition of human Chk1 causes increased initiation of DNA replication, phosphorylation of ATR targets, and DNA breakage. 2005, Pubmed
Van Hatten, The Xenopus Xmus101 protein is required for the recruitment of Cdc45 to origins of DNA replication. 2002, Pubmed , Xenbase
Wang, BASC, a super complex of BRCA1-associated proteins involved in the recognition and repair of aberrant DNA structures. 2000, Pubmed
Wang, Rad17 phosphorylation is required for claspin recruitment and Chk1 activation in response to replication stress. 2006, Pubmed
Ward, Histone H2AX is phosphorylated in an ATR-dependent manner in response to replicational stress. 2001, Pubmed
Williams, Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 is a keystone complex connecting DNA repair machinery, double-strand break signaling, and the chromatin template. 2007, Pubmed
Wilson, NFBD1/MDC1, 53BP1 and BRCA1 have both redundant and unique roles in the ATM pathway. 2008, Pubmed
Yan, Direct requirement for Xmus101 in ATR-mediated phosphorylation of Claspin bound Chk1 during checkpoint signaling. 2006, Pubmed , Xenbase
Yan, TopBP1 and DNA polymerase-alpha directly recruit the 9-1-1 complex to stalled DNA replication forks. 2009, Pubmed , Xenbase
Yoo, The Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex mediates activation of TopBP1 by ATM. 2009, Pubmed , Xenbase
Yoo, Ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM)-dependent activation of ATR occurs through phosphorylation of TopBP1 by ATM. 2007, Pubmed , Xenbase
Zou, Sensing DNA damage through ATRIP recognition of RPA-ssDNA complexes. 2003, Pubmed