Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
???displayArticle.abstract???
Neural progenitors self-renew and generate neurons throughout the central nervous system. Here, we uncover an unexpected regional specificity in the properties of neural progenitor cells, revealed by the function of a microRNA--miR-9. miR-9 is expressed in neural progenitors, and its knockdown results in an inhibition of neurogenesis along the anterior-posterior axis. However, the underlying mechanism differs--in the hindbrain, progenitors fail to exit the cell cycle, whereas in the forebrain they undergo apoptosis, counteracting the proliferative effect. Among several targets, we functionally identify hairy1 as a primary target of miR-9, regulated at the mRNA level. hairy1 mediates the effects of miR-9 on proliferation, through Fgf8 signaling in the forebrain and Wnt signaling in the hindbrain, but affects apoptosis only in the forebrain, via the p53 pathway. Our findings show a positional difference in the responsiveness of progenitors to miR-9 depletion, revealing an underlying divergence of their properties.
Figure 1. miR-9 Expression Differs along the AP Axis(A) Whole-mount in situ hybridization for miR-9 expression in X. tropicalis using LNA probe.(B) Expression of miR-9 primary transcripts at stage 30âdorsal view. Dashed line indicates the plane of sectioning in (D). MHB is indicated with an asterisk. Scale bar, 200 μm.(C) Schematic representation of the different regions in the neural tube (red, forebrain; green, midbrain; blue, hindbrain) and transverse sections from the forebrain and hindbrain (red, progenitors; purple, intermediate zone; blue, neurons).(D) In situ hybridization for miR-9 precursors in transverse sections from stage 30 embryos. CNS tissue is outlined with a dashed line. Scale bar, 20 μm.(E) FISH for miR-9a-1 (in red) combined with immunohistochemistry (IHC) for Sox3 (marker for neural progenitors) in stage 30 embryo. CNS tissue is outlined with a dashed line. DNA is stained with DAPI (4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole). Scale bar, 20 μm.
Figure 2. miR-9 Is Required for Neuronal Differentiation(A) Semiquantitative PCR analysis of mature miR-9 levels in stage 30 WT embryos, injected with miR-9-2 precursor or miR-9 MO at one cell stage. The snRNA U2 is used as a loading control.(B) Experimental outline. miR-9 MO was injected in one cell of the two-cell stage embryo, and the injected side was compared to the control at stage 30.(C) In situ hybridization (whole-mount and transverse sections from the forebrain and hindbrain) with markers for differentiated (N-tubulin) and differentiating neurons (NeuroD1). Note the reduced expression of both markers (arrows) in the miR-9 MO-injected side.(D) Immunohistochemistry on sections for the transcription factor Myt1 indicates impaired neuronal differentiation upon miR-9 knockdown. The FITC tag on miR-9 MO was used to identify the injected side; DAPI was used to stain the DNA.(E) The percentage of Myt1-positive cells in miR-9 MO-injected side relative to the control side in the forebrain (n = 6 embryos, p < 0.001) and hindbrain (n = 9 embryos, p < 0.001). Error bars represent SEM. In all images, scale bars represent 20 μm and CNS tissue is outlined with a dashed line.
Figure 3. miR-9 Regulates Progenitor Proliferation in a Region-Specific Manner(A) Immunohistochemistry on sections for Sox3 shows expansion of the progenitor domain in the hindbrain.(B) Area occupied by Sox3-positive cells (progenitor domain) per section in miR-9 MO-injected side expressed relative to the control side in the forebrain (n = 7, p = 0.008) and hindbrain (n = 9, p < 0.001).(C and D) Transverse sections from the forebrain or hindbrain of miR-9 MO-injected embryos analyzed for the mitotic marker pH3 show a hindbrain-specific increase in the number of mitotic cells (n = 11, p < 0.001), but no change in the forebrain (n = 9).(E) pH3-labeling index (pH3+ cells over Sox3+ cells) in the hindbrain (n = 6, p = 0.004).(F and G) Rate of proliferation of the hindbrain progenitors is increased, as determined by BrdU incorporation for 30 min. BrdU-labeling index is calculated as the percentage of BrdU+ and Sox3+ cells over the total population of Sox3+ cells (n = 7, p < 0.001). In all panels, scale bars represent 20 μm, FITC staining shows the MO-injected side, DNA was counterstained with DAPI, CNS tissue is outlined with a dashed line, and error bars represent SEM.
Figure 4. miR-9 Depletion Negatively Affects the Survival of Forebrain Neural Progenitors(A) TUNEL staining shows increased apoptosis upon miR-9 depletion in the forebrain (arrowheads), but not in the hindbrain.(B) Percentage of the TUNEL+ cells in the injected compared to the control side in the forebrain (n = 6, p < 0.001) and in the hindbrain (n = 6). Error bars represent SEM.(C and D) Sox3-positive domain is expanded in miR-9 MO-injected side when apoptosis is prevented (n = 7, p < 0.001). (E and F) The reduced number of differentiating neurons (Myt1+) upon miR-9 depletion is not rescued by caspase inhibitor block of apoptosis (n = 6, p = 0.003). In all images FITC staining shows the MO-injected side; DNA was counterstained with DAPI. Neural tube is outlined with a dashed line. Scale bars, 20 μm. Error bars represent SEM.
Figure 5. miR-9 Regulates the Expression of hairy1 In Vivo(A) Sequence alignment of the predicted miR-9 binding site in HES1 homologs in human, mouse, Xenopus, and zebrafish. Positions that have a single, fully conserved residue are marked with an asterisk. Seed-complementary region is boxed in red.(B) HeLa cells were transfected with WT Xenopus hairy1 (xhairy1_WT), mouse Hes1 (mHes1), or mutant hairy1 (xHairy1_Mut) reporter together with either scrambled (Control) or miR-9 precursors (miR-9). Luciferase expression was normalized and expressed relative to the control levels. Error bars represent SD.(C) Design of target protector morpholino (Hairy1 TP) directed against hairy1 miR-9 binding site. Seed region is boxed in red.(D) Hairy1 TP alleviates the repression of hairy1 luciferase reporter when cotransfected with miR-9 precursors but has no effect on the repression of other miR-9 targets. Error bars represent SD.(E) In situ hybridization for miR-9 (miR-9a-1 transcript) and hairy1 in stage 30 embryos. Shown are whole mounts and transverse sections through the respective brain areas.(F) Double-fluorescent in situ for hairy1 (red) and miR-9a-1 (green) shows mutually exclusive pattern of expression along the AP axis.(G) miR-9 MO and hairy1 TP lead to expansion of the hairy1-positive domain (red arrowheads) along the AP axis, as shown by in situ hybridization.(H) Quantification of the change in hairy1 mRNA expression using qRT-PCR.(I) Hes1 mRNA levels in N1E neuroblastoma cells are downregulated when miR-9 is overexpressed and increased when it is knocked down using LNA inhibitors. In all graphs, data are presented as mean values, and error bars represent SEM.
Figure 6. Hairy1 Target Protector Mimics miR-9 MO Phenotype(A) In situ hybridization (whole-mount and transverse sections from the forebrain and hindbrain) for N-tubulin in hairy1 TP-injected embryos.(B) The number of differentiating neurons (Myt1+ cells) is decreased upon injection of hairy1 TP.(C) Quantification of the Myt1+ cells in the forebrain (n = 7, p < 0.001) and the hindbrain (n = 7, p < 0.001). Myt1+ cells in the injected side were expressed as a percentage of the control side.(D) Hairy1 TP leads to forebrain-specific induction of apoptosis as indicated by TUNEL staining.(E) Quantification of the TUNEL-positive nuclei in the forebrain (n = 7, p < 0.001) and in the hindbrain (n = 5).(F) Immunostaining for pH3 in embryos injected in one side with hairy1 TP.(G) Relative number of pH3+ cells in the hairy1 TP-injected compared to the control side in the forebrain (n = 11) and the hindbrain (n = 9, p < 0.001).(H) In situ hybridization for N-tubulin (purple) in embryos electroporated in one side with hairy1 Î3â²UTR and lacZ DNA as a tracer. Light-blue staining indicates the electroporated area. op, olfactory placodes. Scale bars, 20 μm. In all panels, FITC was used to identify the MO-injected side; DNA was counterstained with DAPI; CNS tissue is outlined with a dashed line; and error bars represent SEM.
Figure 7. Mechanism of miR-9 Function(A) Forebrain sections of miR-9 MO or hairy1 TP-injected embryos analyzed for CyclinD1, p27Xic1, and Fgf8 expression by in situ hybridization.(B) Hindbrain sections of miR-9 MO or hairy1 TP-injected embryos analyzed for CyclinD1, p27Xic1, Wnt1, and Zic1 expression.(C) Representative western blot for endogenous p53 protein levels in forebrain or hindbrain tissue isolated from X. tropicalis embryos injected with control MO, miR-9 MO, or hairy1 TP. Numbers represent the mean from three experiments, 60 embryos each.(D) Real-time PCR analysis for Mdm2 expression, normalized for the ribosomal protein RPL8 (n = 3 experiments, 20 embryos each). Error bars represent SEM.(E) Model for miR-9 function in cell survival and progenitor proliferation.
Aruga,
Zic1 promotes the expansion of dorsal neural progenitors in spinal cord by inhibiting neuronal differentiation.
2002, Pubmed
Aruga,
Zic1 promotes the expansion of dorsal neural progenitors in spinal cord by inhibiting neuronal differentiation.
2002,
Pubmed
Baek,
Persistent and high levels of Hes1 expression regulate boundary formation in the developing central nervous system.
2006,
Pubmed
Bai,
Id sustains Hes1 expression to inhibit precocious neurogenesis by releasing negative autoregulation of Hes1.
2007,
Pubmed
Bellefroid,
X-MyT1, a Xenopus C2HC-type zinc finger protein with a regulatory function in neuronal differentiation.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Bourguignon,
XBF-1, a winged helix transcription factor with dual activity, has a role in positioning neurogenesis in Xenopus competent ectoderm.
1998,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Chalmers,
Oriented cell divisions asymmetrically segregate aPKC and generate cell fate diversity in the early Xenopus embryo.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Choi,
Target protectors reveal dampening and balancing of Nodal agonist and antagonist by miR-430.
2007,
Pubmed
Davis,
Molecular targets of vertebrate segmentation: two mechanisms control segmental expression of Xenopus hairy2 during somite formation.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Delaloy,
MicroRNA-9 coordinates proliferation and migration of human embryonic stem cell-derived neural progenitors.
2010,
Pubmed
Deo,
Detection of mammalian microRNA expression by in situ hybridization with RNA oligonucleotides.
2006,
Pubmed
De Pietri Tonelli,
miRNAs are essential for survival and differentiation of newborn neurons but not for expansion of neural progenitors during early neurogenesis in the mouse embryonic neocortex.
2008,
Pubmed
Elsen,
Zic1 and Zic4 regulate zebrafish roof plate specification and hindbrain ventricle morphogenesis.
2008,
Pubmed
Falk,
Brain area-specific effect of TGF-beta signaling on Wnt-dependent neural stem cell expansion.
2008,
Pubmed
Falk,
Electroporation of cDNA/Morpholinos to targeted areas of embryonic CNS in Xenopus.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Flynt,
Biological principles of microRNA-mediated regulation: shared themes amid diversity.
2008,
Pubmed
Gangaraju,
MicroRNAs: key regulators of stem cells.
2009,
Pubmed
Gaspard,
Mechanisms of neural specification from embryonic stem cells.
2010,
Pubmed
Geling,
bHLH transcription factor Her5 links patterning to regional inhibition of neurogenesis at the midbrain-hindbrain boundary.
2003,
Pubmed
Giraldez,
MicroRNAs regulate brain morphogenesis in zebrafish.
2005,
Pubmed
Götz,
The cell biology of neurogenesis.
2005,
Pubmed
Guo,
Mammalian microRNAs predominantly act to decrease target mRNA levels.
2010,
Pubmed
Haupt,
Mdm2 promotes the rapid degradation of p53.
1997,
Pubmed
Hirata,
Oscillatory expression of the bHLH factor Hes1 regulated by a negative feedback loop.
2002,
Pubmed
Huang,
Identification of p53 regulators by genome-wide functional analysis.
2004,
Pubmed
Ishibashi,
A sonic hedgehog-dependent signaling relay regulates growth of diencephalic and mesencephalic primordia in the early mouse embryo.
2002,
Pubmed
Jessell,
Neuronal specification in the spinal cord: inductive signals and transcriptional codes.
2000,
Pubmed
Jouve,
Notch signalling is required for cyclic expression of the hairy-like gene HES1 in the presomitic mesoderm.
2000,
Pubmed
Kapsimali,
MicroRNAs show a wide diversity of expression profiles in the developing and mature central nervous system.
2007,
Pubmed
Kataoka,
Fgf8 controls regional identity in the developing thalamus.
2008,
Pubmed
Kiecker,
Hedgehog signaling from the ZLI regulates diencephalic regional identity.
2004,
Pubmed
Kosik,
The neuronal microRNA system.
2006,
Pubmed
Krek,
Combinatorial microRNA target predictions.
2005,
Pubmed
Krichevsky,
Specific microRNAs modulate embryonic stem cell-derived neurogenesis.
2006,
Pubmed
Lee,
Neurofibromatosis-1 regulates neuroglial progenitor proliferation and glial differentiation in a brain region-specific manner.
2010,
Pubmed
Lee,
Synchronization of neurogenesis and motor neuron specification by direct coupling of bHLH and homeodomain transcription factors.
2003,
Pubmed
Leucht,
MicroRNA-9 directs late organizer activity of the midbrain-hindbrain boundary.
2008,
Pubmed
Lewis,
Prediction of mammalian microRNA targets.
2003,
Pubmed
Marklund,
Domain-specific control of neurogenesis achieved through patterned regulation of Notch ligand expression.
2010,
Pubmed
Martello,
MicroRNA control of Nodal signalling.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
McLarren,
Association with the nuclear matrix and interaction with Groucho and RUNX proteins regulate the transcription repression activity of the basic helix loop helix factor Hes1.
2001,
Pubmed
Megason,
A mitogen gradient of dorsal midline Wnts organizes growth in the CNS.
2002,
Pubmed
Merzdorf,
The zic1 gene is an activator of Wnt signaling.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Murata,
Hes1 directly controls cell proliferation through the transcriptional repression of p27Kip1.
2005,
Pubmed
Nichane,
Hairy2-Id3 interactions play an essential role in Xenopus neural crest progenitor specification.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Ohtsuka,
Roles of the basic helix-loop-helix genes Hes1 and Hes5 in expansion of neural stem cells of the developing brain.
2001,
Pubmed
Palm,
Brain tumor stem cells.
2010,
Pubmed
Palmeirim,
Avian hairy gene expression identifies a molecular clock linked to vertebrate segmentation and somitogenesis.
1997,
Pubmed
Pena,
miRNA in situ hybridization in formaldehyde and EDC-fixed tissues.
2009,
Pubmed
Plaisance,
MicroRNA-9 controls the expression of Granuphilin/Slp4 and the secretory response of insulin-producing cells.
2006,
Pubmed
Regad,
The neural progenitor-specifying activity of FoxG1 is antagonistically regulated by CKI and FGF.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Sabherwal,
The apicobasal polarity kinase aPKC functions as a nuclear determinant and regulates cell proliferation and fate during Xenopus primary neurogenesis.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Shibata,
MicroRNA-9 modulates Cajal-Retzius cell differentiation by suppressing Foxg1 expression in mouse medial pallium.
2008,
Pubmed
Shimojo,
Oscillations in notch signaling regulate maintenance of neural progenitors.
2008,
Pubmed
Stefani,
Small non-coding RNAs in animal development.
2008,
Pubmed
Storm,
Dose-dependent functions of Fgf8 in regulating telencephalic patterning centers.
2006,
Pubmed
Vize,
Multichannel wholemount fluorescent and fluorescent/chromogenic in situ hybridization in Xenopus embryos.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Walker,
microRNA-24a is required to repress apoptosis in the developing neural retina.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Walker,
Expression of microRNAs during embryonic development of Xenopus tropicalis.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Wienholds,
MicroRNA expression in zebrafish embryonic development.
2005,
Pubmed
Xie,
The role of microRNA in the delayed negative feedback regulation of gene expression.
2007,
Pubmed
Yang,
Notch activation induces apoptosis in neural progenitor cells through a p53-dependent pathway.
2004,
Pubmed
Zhao,
A feedback regulatory loop involving microRNA-9 and nuclear receptor TLX in neural stem cell fate determination.
2009,
Pubmed