Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
???displayArticle.abstract???
The ability to fully restore damaged or lost organs is present in only a subset of animals. The Xenopus tadpoletail is a complex appendage, containing epidermis, muscle, nerves, spinal cord, and vasculature, which regenerates after amputation. Understanding the mechanisms of tail regeneration may lead to new insights to promote biomedical regeneration in non-regenerative tissues. Although chromatin remodeling is known to be critical for stem cell pluripotency, its role in complex organ regeneration in vivo remains largely uncharacterized. Here we show that histone deacetylase (HDAC) activity is required for the early stages of tail regeneration. HDAC1 is expressed during the 1(st) two days of regeneration. Pharmacological blockade of HDACs using Trichostatin A (TSA) increased histone acetylation levels in the amputated tail. Furthermore, treatment with TSA or another HDAC inhibitor, valproic acid, specifically inhibited regeneration. Over-expression of wild-type Mad3, a transcriptional repressor known to associate in a complex with HDACs via Sin3, inhibited regeneration. Similarly, expression of a Mad3 mutant lacking the Sin3-interacting domain that is required for HDAC binding also blocks regeneration, suggesting that HDAC and Mad3 may act together to regulate regeneration. Inhibition of HDAC function resulted in aberrant expression of Notch1 and BMP2, two genes known to be required for tail regeneration. Our results identify a novel early role for HDAC in appendage regeneration and suggest that modulation of histone acetylation is important in regenerative repair of complex appendages.
???displayArticle.pubmedLink???
22022609
???displayArticle.pmcLink???PMC3194833 ???displayArticle.link???PLoS One ???displayArticle.grants???[+]
Figure 1. HDAC1 and Mad3 are Expressed During Xenopus Tail Regeneration.
(A) RNA in situ hybridization to detect gene expression in tail regenerates at 24, 48 and 72 hpa for HDAC1, (D) Mad3, and (G and H) HDAC6. Probe targets are shown at the left. Black arrowheads indicate presence of RNA whereas open arrowheads indicate absence of expression. Anterior is to the left.
Figure 2. Pharmacological HDAC Blockade using TSA or VPA Inhibits Tail Regeneration.
(A) After st. 40 tail amputation, tadpoles were assayed for tail regeneration at 7 days post amputation (dpa). Yellow arrowheads demarcate amputation site. (B) Control tadpoles (RI = 290, n = 69). 25 nM TSA treatment (RI = 109, n = 69), * denotes p<0.001. (C) Control tadpoles (RI = 283, n = 72). 500 Valproic Acid treatment (RI = 126, n = 53), * denotes p<0.001. (D) Temporal requirement for HDAC activity during regeneration. Percentage of regeneration shows total number of tail regenerates scored as full or good. TSA treatment as follows: Control/untreated (98.6%, RI = 290, n = 69), 0 dpa (10.8%, RI = 105, n = 65), 0 dpa (22.1%, RI = 118, n = 77), and 2 dpa (1.5%, RI = 272, n = 65). * denotes p<0.01 as compared to either Control or 2 dpa treatment.
Figure 3. Over-Expression of Mad3 Inhibits Tail Regeneration.
(A) Schematic showing the structure of Mad3 protein. Green indicates the Sin3-interacting domain (SID) important for the Mad3 interaction with HDACs. The DNA binding domain is represented in blue. Mad3 WT shows the full-length sequence and Mad3-ΔSID showing the construct that lacks the SID domain. (B) Mad3 WT, Mad3-ΔSID and lacZ mRNA were injected into early embryos at the 4 cell stage. Embryos were allowed to develop until st. 40, when tail amputation was performed. Graph showing effects of ectopic expression of Mad3 WT and Mad3-ΔSID on tail regeneration at 7 dpa. Control regenerates (RI = 250, n = 95). Wild-type Mad3 expression (RI = 188, n = 68, p<0.01). Mad3 with SID deletion expression (RI = 159, n = 88, p<0.01). p value denotes comparison to control. Comparison of the 2 ectopic expression experiments yielded p>0.05.
Figure 4. HDAC Inhibition Increases Histone Acetylation During Regeneration.
The acetylation state of tail regenerates were examined at 24 hpa using an anti-acetylated Histone H4 antibody. Yellow arrowheads denote regeneration bud. Top row shows untreated controls. Bottom row shows tadpoles treated with 25 nM TSA after tail amputation. (A, D) Acetylated Histone H4. (B, E) Hoechst DNA stain. (C) merge of A and B. (F) merge of D and E.
Figure 5. HDAC Inhibition Induces Mis-Expression of BMP2 and Notch1 During Regeneration.
Wholemount in situ hybridization of st. 40 24 hpa regeneration buds. DIG-labeled probes specfic to Xenopus BMP2 and Notch1 were used to detect expression during regeneration without (A, A', C, and C') or with (B, B', D, and D') TSA treatment immediately after tail amputation. Wholemount views are shown in (A, B, C, and D) and sagittal sections through the regenerate tail are shown in (A', B', C', and D'). Anterior is to the left. Full arrowheads indicate gene expression. Open arrowheads show lack of expression. (A, A', B, and B') BMP2. (C, C', D, and D') Notch1. Scale bar = 100 .
Tail Regeneration Assay. Individual animals for each specific treatment were scored as follows: Full: complete regeneration. Good: robust regeneration with minor defects (missing fin, curved axis). Weak: poor regeneration (hypomorphic/defective regenerates). None: no regeneration. Shown are representative examples of each regenerate class.
Expression of HDAC1 and Mad3 in Xenopus Tail. RNA in situ hybridization to detect gene expression in st. 40 uncut and amputated tail for (A) HDAC1, (C) Mad3, and (E) β-gal. Probe targets are shown to the left of the panels.
Adams,
H+ pump-dependent changes in membrane voltage are an early mechanism necessary and sufficient to induce Xenopus tail regeneration.
2007, Pubmed,
Xenbase
Adams,
H+ pump-dependent changes in membrane voltage are an early mechanism necessary and sufficient to induce Xenopus tail regeneration.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Adler,
Histone deacetylase inhibitors upregulate Notch-1 and inhibit growth in pheochromocytoma cells.
2008,
Pubmed
Ayer,
Mad: a heterodimeric partner for Max that antagonizes Myc transcriptional activity.
1993,
Pubmed
Beck,
Temporal requirement for bone morphogenetic proteins in regeneration of the tail and limb of Xenopus tadpoles.
2006,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Beck,
Beyond early development: Xenopus as an emerging model for the study of regenerative mechanisms.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Beck,
A developmental pathway controlling outgrowth of the Xenopus tail bud.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Beck,
Molecular pathways needed for regeneration of spinal cord and muscle in a vertebrate.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Bowes,
Xenbase: gene expression and improved integration.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Carneiro,
Histone deacetylase activity is necessary for left-right patterning during vertebrate development.
2011,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Coffman,
Xotch, the Xenopus homolog of Drosophila notch.
1990,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Contreras,
Early requirement of Hyaluronan for tail regeneration in Xenopus tadpoles.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Damjanovski,
Multiple stage-dependent roles for histone deacetylases during amphibian embryogenesis: implications for the involvement of extracellular matrix remodeling.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Dekker,
Histone acetyl transferases as emerging drug targets.
2009,
Pubmed
Dovey,
Histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1), but not HDAC2, controls embryonic stem cell differentiation.
2010,
Pubmed
Eberharter,
Histone acetylation: a switch between repressive and permissive chromatin. Second in review series on chromatin dynamics.
2002,
Pubmed
Feledy,
Inhibitory patterning of the anterior neural plate in Xenopus by homeodomain factors Dlx3 and Msx1.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Fukazawa,
Suppression of the immune response potentiates tadpole tail regeneration during the refractory period.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Glozak,
Histone deacetylases and cancer.
2007,
Pubmed
Haberland,
Epigenetic control of skull morphogenesis by histone deacetylase 8.
2009,
Pubmed
Haberland,
The many roles of histone deacetylases in development and physiology: implications for disease and therapy.
2009,
Pubmed
Hageman,
A DNAJB chaperone subfamily with HDAC-dependent activities suppresses toxic protein aggregation.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Harland,
In situ hybridization: an improved whole-mount method for Xenopus embryos.
1991,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Heinzel,
A complex containing N-CoR, mSin3 and histone deacetylase mediates transcriptional repression.
1997,
Pubmed
Ho,
TGF-beta signaling is required for multiple processes during Xenopus tail regeneration.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Hurlin,
Mnt, a novel Max-interacting protein is coexpressed with Myc in proliferating cells and mediates repression at Myc binding sites.
1997,
Pubmed
Laherty,
Histone deacetylases associated with the mSin3 corepressor mediate mad transcriptional repression.
1997,
Pubmed
Leipe,
Histone deacetylases, acetoin utilization proteins and acetylpolyamine amidohydrolases are members of an ancient protein superfamily.
1997,
Pubmed
Li,
[NF-kappaB modulates activation of the BMP-2 gene by trichostatin A].
2008,
Pubmed
Marks,
Histone deacetylase inhibitors: Potential in cancer therapy.
2009,
Pubmed
Mitsiades,
Transcriptional signature of histone deacetylase inhibition in multiple myeloma: biological and clinical implications.
2004,
Pubmed
Mochii,
Tail regeneration in the Xenopus tadpole.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Montgomery,
Histone deacetylases 1 and 2 redundantly regulate cardiac morphogenesis, growth, and contractility.
2007,
Pubmed
Nightingale,
Cross-talk between histone modifications in response to histone deacetylase inhibitors: MLL4 links histone H3 acetylation and histone H3K4 methylation.
2007,
Pubmed
Nowak,
Phosphorylation of histone H3: a balancing act between chromosome condensation and transcriptional activation.
2004,
Pubmed
Phiel,
Histone deacetylase is a direct target of valproic acid, a potent anticonvulsant, mood stabilizer, and teratogen.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Reid,
Electric currents in Xenopus tadpole tail regeneration.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Riau,
Aberrant DNA methylation of matrix remodeling and cell adhesion related genes in pterygium.
2011,
Pubmed
Shahbazian,
Functions of site-specific histone acetylation and deacetylation.
2007,
Pubmed
Shaw,
Epigenetic reprogramming during wound healing: loss of polycomb-mediated silencing may enable upregulation of repair genes.
2009,
Pubmed
Slack,
Cellular and molecular mechanisms of regeneration in Xenopus.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Sterner,
Acetylation of histones and transcription-related factors.
2000,
Pubmed
Stewart,
A histone demethylase is necessary for regeneration in zebrafish.
2009,
Pubmed
Sugiura,
Xenopus Wnt-5a induces an ectopic larval tail at injured site, suggesting a crucial role for noncanonical Wnt signal in tail regeneration.
2009,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Tseng,
Induction of vertebrate regeneration by a transient sodium current.
2010,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Tseng,
Tail regeneration in Xenopus laevis as a model for understanding tissue repair.
2008,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Wolffe,
Chromatin disruption and modification.
1999,
Pubmed
Xiao,
Notch1 mediates growth suppression of papillary and follicular thyroid cancer cells by histone deacetylase inhibitors.
2009,
Pubmed
Xiong,
Mass spectrometric studies on epigenetic interaction networks in cell differentiation.
2011,
Pubmed
Yakushiji,
Correlation between Shh expression and DNA methylation status of the limb-specific Shh enhancer region during limb regeneration in amphibians.
2007,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Yoshida,
Potent and specific inhibition of mammalian histone deacetylase both in vivo and in vitro by trichostatin A.
1990,
Pubmed