Wong WF , Chan KS , Michaleski MS , Haesler A , Young EC .

	Figure 1. Simple allosteric reaction scheme for bimodal agonism. Reaction scheme (Chan and Young, 2009) is illustrated by a cell-free inside-out macroscopic patch recording of bimodal CNG channels with cGMP washed into and out from the bath (solid and dashed black bars, respectively). Applying cGMP elicits inward channel current with no desensitization up to 3 mM cGMP, but with 10 mM cGMP, the steady-state macroscopic conductance (white arrow) is smaller than for 3 mM. During wash-in and wash-out of the 10-mM cGMP solution, there are brief intervals with bath cGMP concentration near 3 mM giving rise to “spikes” of maximal conductance. Details of reaction scheme notation: Closed- (C) and open- (O) channel states are equilibrating rapidly compared with agonist wash-in and wash-out. Sizes of black reaction arrows indicate the favored direction of equilibrium. Po increases with cGMP binding of up to m molecules of cGMP (pro action). Binding of the (m+1)th cGMP molecule decreases the steady-state Po (con action) to below the value obtained with m ligands. Experimental details of current trace: The previously characterized channel, X-fA2, incorporates the BD from fCNGA2 channel in a chimera with sequence from other CNG channel types (see Young et al., 2001, and Fig. 2). X-fA2 was expressed as homomers in Xenopus oocytes; patches were held at −40 mV. White arrows mark times where steady-state conductance, g, was measured with cGMP concentrations fixed at their nominal concentrations; for this example, g(10 mM cGMP)/g(3 mM cGMP) = 0.63.
	Figure 2. Extensive BD sequence substitutions preserve con action. (A) Topology of the CNG channel subunit, highlighting the BD region substituted in the X-chimera series of constructs. Alignment compares the substituted BD sequences (bounded by vertical dotted lines) originating from rCNGA4 (in X-rA4) and fCNGA2 (in X-fA2). Invariant non-BD sequences (Young et al., 2001) include bCNGA1 sequence in the C-linker and the extreme C-terminal region, respectively, before and after the BD. Dots in the sequence alignment indicate fCNGA2 residues conserved with rCNGA4; secondary structure elements are marked (α for helices, β for strands) as predicted by comparative modeling (Fig. 4). (B) X-chimera testing substitutions in the C-terminal portion of the BD. Bar represents BD sequence; below the bars, secondary structure elements are marked (letters for helices, numbers for strands, and PB for the PB cassette). Gray background color in bar represents amino acids conserved between fCNGA2 and rCNGA4; black ticks mark unconserved amino acids found in fCNGA2 but not in rCNGA4. Mean g(10 mM cGMP)/g(3 mM cGMP) values (±SD, number of patches in parentheses) include those previously reported for Construct 1 (Young et al., 2001) and for Construct 2 and X-rA4 (Chan and Young, 2009). (C) Examples of current traces for selected constructs during 10-mM cGMP pulses, with g(10 mM cGMP)/g(3 mM cGMP) as marked (based on applications of 3 mM cGMP; not depicted). Horizontal bar, 10 s; vertical bar, 1 nA.
	Figure 3. PB cassette substitution masks con action by raising gating efficacy: refutation of necessity hypothesis. (A) Dose–response relations of Construct 3 activated with cGMP (down-triangles) or cAMP (up-triangles). Points show means and error bars show SD (n ≥ 3 for each point); points are joined by straight lines without fitting. To plot Po values, conductances were normalized to the steady-state conductance measured at 3 mM cGMP (solid down-triangle) in the same patch. Then, Po at 3 mM cGMP was fixed as 0.73 based on Ni2+ potentiation (see Materials and methods). For comparison, gray curves show dose–response relations for Construct 2 activated by cGMP (solid) or cAMP (dashed); these were previously reported on a relative scale without conversion to Po values (Chan and Young, 2009), and new Ni2+ potentiation experiments in this study fix the Po at 3 mM cGMP as 0.18. All measures for both constructs in this plot were collected after completion of spontaneous run-up. (B) Example macroscopic current trace from one patch of Construct 3 before and after completion of run-up, tracking progressive increase in pro-action efficacy and masking of con action. Po scale at right is based on fixing Po = 0.73 for 3 mM cGMP after run-up. Arrows and asterisks, respectively, mark steady-state and spike currents as in Fig. 1. For this example, Psteady/Pspike = 0.80 before run-up and 0.95 after run-up.
	Figure 4. Substitution of N-terminal region of BD abolishes con action: refutation of sufficiency hypothesis. (A) Bars show substitutions in the N-terminal portion of the BD, with mean values of g(30 mM cGMP)/g(3 mM cGMP), including previously reported data for Construct 6 (Young et al., 2001). (B) Dose–response relation of Construct 8 activated with cGMP and cAMP (down-triangles and up-triangles, respectively; n ≥ 4 for all points). Conductances were converted to Po using the methods of Fig. 3, fixing Po = 0.337 at 3 mM cGMP. Black curves are Hill equation fits (see Materials and methods). Fitted parameters (±SE) are: cGMP, K1/2 = 368 ± 26 µM, h = 0.85 ± 0.04, and Pmax = 0.399 ± 0.006; cAMP, K1/2 = 520 ± 220 µM, h = 0.81 ± 0.23, and Pmax = 0.58 ± 0.05. For comparison, gray curves show X-fA2 dose–response data (Young et al., 2001) for cGMP (solid) and cAMP (dashed). (C) Model of the C-linker and BD from X-fA2 (see Results). (Left) Ribbon diagram highlights helix αA and strand β1 (orange) with the three unconserved residues (magenta) whose substitution in Construct 8 abolished con action; numbering follows fCNGA2 sequence (Fig. 1 alignment) with the substituted amino acid from rCNGA4 in parentheses. Hash marks (#) indicate three loops (αB′-αC′, PB cassette, and β4-β5), which were built without template residues. The canonical-binding site (dashed ellipse) uses key ligand contacts with R529 and T530 (green), which are universally conserved in CNG channels. (Right) Electrostatic potential mapped to molecular surface.
	Figure 5. V457E mutation abolishes con action. (A) Bar shows BD of Construct 8. Sequence alignment of the region from helix αA through strand β2 is shown for point mutants, along with their respective mean g(30 mM cGMP)/g(3 mM cGMP) ratios. Dots in alignment indicate residues conserved between fCNGA2 and rCNGA4. Amino acids mutated in each construct are circled. (B) Dose–response relation of X-fA2 V457E activated with cGMP (down-triangles; n ≥ 3 for all points). Conductances were converted to Po using the methods of Fig. 3, fixing Po = 0.359 at 3 mM cGMP. Black curve is a Hill equation fit. Fitted parameters (±SE) are: K1/2 = 350 ± 97 µM, h = 0.78 ± 0.17, and Pmax = 0.45 ± 0.03. For comparison, gray curve shows cGMP dose–response data for X-fA2 (Young et al., 2001) as in Fig. 4 B.
	Figure 6. Neighbor network around position 457 proposed by comparative modeling. All residues in this structural schematic are numbered according to fCNGA2 sequence position. Glutamate is shown in position 457, with black dashed lines indicating its interactions with first neighbors (see Discussion). Parentheses indicate residues that are not identified as first neighbors when valine occupies position 457. Gray dashed lines indicate interactions between first neighbors (black type) and second neighbors (gray type). E458 is capable of forming hydrogen bonds or polar contact with both E457 and K462 (thick dashed lines); other neighbor interactions shown are not polar.

Altenhofen, Control of ligand specificity in cyclic nucleotide-gated channels from rod photoreceptors and olfactory epithelium. 1991, Pubmed, Xenbase

Altenhofen, Control of ligand specificity in cyclic nucleotide-gated channels from rod photoreceptors and olfactory epithelium. 1991, Pubmed , Xenbase
Arias, Molecular mechanisms and binding site locations for noncompetitive antagonists of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. 2006, Pubmed
Arnold, The SWISS-MODEL workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. 2006, Pubmed
Biskup, Relating ligand binding to activation gating in CNGA2 channels. 2007, Pubmed , Xenbase
Bond, Recent developments in constitutive receptor activity and inverse agonism, and their potential for GPCR drug discovery. 2006, Pubmed
Bradley, Nomenclature for ion channel subunits. 2001, Pubmed
Bradley, Heteromeric olfactory cyclic nucleotide-gated channels: a subunit that confers increased sensitivity to cAMP. 1994, Pubmed
Cachelin, Desensitization of the acetylcholine receptor of frog end-plates measured in a Vaseline-gap voltage clamp. 1989, Pubmed
Canaves, Classification and phylogenetic analysis of the cAMP-dependent protein kinase regulatory subunit family. 2002, Pubmed
Chan, Bimodal agonism in heteromeric cyclic nucleotide-gated channels. 2009, Pubmed
Clayton, Structural basis of ligand activation in a cyclic nucleotide regulated potassium channel. 2004, Pubmed
Costa, Antagonists with negative intrinsic activity at delta opioid receptors coupled to GTP-binding proteins. 1989, Pubmed
Craven, Salt bridges and gating in the COOH-terminal region of HCN2 and CNGA1 channels. 2004, Pubmed , Xenbase
Diller, Molecular basis for regulatory subunit diversity in cAMP-dependent protein kinase: crystal structure of the type II beta regulatory subunit. 2001, Pubmed
Flynn, Structure and rearrangements in the carboxy-terminal region of SpIH channels. 2007, Pubmed , Xenbase
Gordon, A histidine residue associated with the gate of the cyclic nucleotide-activated channels in rod photoreceptors. 1995, Pubmed , Xenbase
Goulding, Molecular cloning and single-channel properties of the cyclic nucleotide-gated channel from catfish olfactory neurons. 1992, Pubmed
Goulding, Role of H5 domain in determining pore diameter and ion permeation through cyclic nucleotide-gated channels. 1993, Pubmed , Xenbase
Guex, SWISS-MODEL and the Swiss-PdbViewer: an environment for comparative protein modeling. 1997, Pubmed
Hoshi, Two types of inactivation in Shaker K+ channels: effects of alterations in the carboxy-terminal region. 1991, Pubmed , Xenbase
Karashima, Bimodal action of menthol on the transient receptor potential channel TRPA1. 2007, Pubmed
Kaupp, Primary structure and functional expression from complementary DNA of the rod photoreceptor cyclic GMP-gated channel. 1989, Pubmed , Xenbase
Kaupp, Cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channels. 2002, Pubmed
Kenakin, Efficacy as a vector: the relative prevalence and paucity of inverse agonism. 2004, Pubmed
Kim, Crystal structure of a complex between the catalytic and regulatory (RIalpha) subunits of PKA. 2005, Pubmed
Kramer, Antagonists of cyclic nucleotide-gated channels and molecular mapping of their site of action. 1996, Pubmed
Ledvina, Negative electrostatic surface potential of protein sites specific for anionic ligands. 1996, Pubmed
Li, Functional roles of aromatic residues in the ligand-binding domain of cyclic nucleotide-gated channels. 1999, Pubmed
Liman, A second subunit of the olfactory cyclic nucleotide-gated channel confers high sensitivity to cAMP. 1994, Pubmed , Xenbase
Liu, Constraining ligand-binding site stoichiometry suggests that a cyclic nucleotide-gated channel is composed of two functional dimers. 1998, Pubmed
Matulef, Cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channels. 2003, Pubmed
Mazhab-Jafari, Understanding cAMP-dependent allostery by NMR spectroscopy: comparative analysis of the EPAC1 cAMP-binding domain in its apo and cAMP-bound states. 2007, Pubmed
Molokanova, Modulation of rod photoreceptor cyclic nucleotide-gated channels by tyrosine phosphorylation. 1997, Pubmed , Xenbase
MONOD, ON THE NATURE OF ALLOSTERIC TRANSITIONS: A PLAUSIBLE MODEL. 1965, Pubmed
Mony, Allosteric modulators of NR2B-containing NMDA receptors: molecular mechanisms and therapeutic potential. 2009, Pubmed
Ogden, Ion channel block by acetylcholine, carbachol and suberyldicholine at the frog neuromuscular junction. 1985, Pubmed
Olsen, Fishing for allosteric sites on GABA(A) receptors. 2004, Pubmed
Paoletti, C-Linker of cyclic nucleotide-gated channels controls coupling of ligand binding to channel gating. 1999, Pubmed
Passner, The structure of a CAP-DNA complex having two cAMP molecules bound to each monomer. 1997, Pubmed
Petrey, GRASP2: visualization, surface properties, and electrostatics of macromolecular structures and sequences. 2003, Pubmed
Rehmann, Structure and regulation of the cAMP-binding domains of Epac2. 2003, Pubmed
Rehmann, Structure of Epac2 in complex with a cyclic AMP analogue and RAP1B. 2008, Pubmed
Robert, How AMPA receptor desensitization depends on receptor occupancy. 2003, Pubmed
Ruiz, Single cyclic nucleotide-gated channels locked in different ligand-bound states. 1997, Pubmed , Xenbase
Su, Regulatory subunit of protein kinase A: structure of deletion mutant with cAMP binding domains. 1995, Pubmed
Tibbs, Allosteric activation and tuning of ligand efficacy in cyclic-nucleotide-gated channels. 1997, Pubmed , Xenbase
Tibbs, A state-independent interaction between ligand and a conserved arginine residue in cyclic nucleotide-gated channels reveals a functional polarity of the cyclic nucleotide binding site. 1998, Pubmed , Xenbase
Ulens, Regulation of hyperpolarization-activated HCN channels by cAMP through a gating switch in binding domain symmetry. 2003, Pubmed , Xenbase
Varnum, Molecular mechanism for ligand discrimination of cyclic nucleotide-gated channels. 1995, Pubmed
Varnum, Subunit interactions in the activation of cyclic nucleotide-gated ion channels. 1996, Pubmed
Weber, Structure of a complex of catabolite gene activator protein and cyclic AMP refined at 2.5 A resolution. 1987, Pubmed
Weber, The cAMP-binding domains of the regulatory subunit of cAMP-dependent protein kinase and the catabolite gene activator protein are homologous. 1982, Pubmed
Willard, VADAR: a web server for quantitative evaluation of protein structure quality. 2003, Pubmed
Young, Efficient coupling of ligand binding to channel opening by the binding domain of a modulatory (beta) subunit of the olfactory cyclic nucleotide-gated channel. 2001, Pubmed , Xenbase
Young, Distinct structural determinants of efficacy and sensitivity in the ligand-binding domain of cyclic nucleotide-gated channels. 2004, Pubmed , Xenbase
Zagotta, Structural basis for modulation and agonist specificity of HCN pacemaker channels. 2003, Pubmed