Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
Sci Rep
2013 Jan 01;3:1295. doi: 10.1038/srep01295.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Lipid binding by the Unique and SH3 domains of c-Src suggests a new regulatory mechanism.
Pérez Y
,
Maffei M
,
Igea A
,
Amata I
,
Gairí M
,
Nebreda AR
,
Bernadó P
,
Pons M
.
???displayArticle.abstract??? c-Src is a non-receptor tyrosine kinase involved in numerous signal transduction pathways. The kinase, SH3 and SH2 domains of c-Src are attached to the membrane-anchoring SH4 domain through the flexible Unique domain. Here we show intra- and intermolecular interactions involving the Unique and SH3 domains suggesting the presence of a previously unrecognized additional regulation layer in c-Src. We have characterized lipid binding by the Unique and SH3 domains, their intramolecular interaction and its allosteric modulation by a SH3-binding peptide or by Calcium-loaded calmodulin binding to the Unique domain. We also show reduced lipid binding following phosphorylation at conserved sites of the Unique domain. Finally, we show that injection of full-length c-Src with mutations that abolish lipid binding by the Unique domain causes a strong in vivo phenotype distinct from that of wild-type c-Src in a Xenopus oocyte model system, confirming the functional role of the Unique domain in c-Src regulation.
Figure 1. Lipid binding by the Unique domain of c-Src (a) Overlay of 1H-15N HSQC NMR spectra USrc alone (red) and in the presence of DMPC/DHPC bicelles (blue), and DMPG/DHPC bicelles (grey).(b) Combined 1H-15N lipid-induced chemical shift changes per residue. The color code is the same as in (a). Total lipid concentration was 8% w/v and the ratio of long chain lipids to DHPC (q) was 0.8. (c) Binding of USrc to immobilized lipids, detected by immunoblotting with anti-Strep-tag HRP (TG triglyceride, DAC diacylglyceride, PA phosphatidic acid, PS phosphatidylserine, PE phosphatidylethanolamine, PC phosphatidylcholine, PG phosphatidylglycerol, CL cardiolipin, PtdIns phosphatidylinositol). (d) Schematic representation of the structure and charge of the lipid bicelles used.
Figure 2. Lipid binding by Unique-SH3 (USH3) and isolated SH3 domains.Lipid binding by the USH3 construct (a, b) and the isolated SH3 domain (c,d,e). (a, d)) Combined 1H-15N chemical shift perturbations induced by the presence of 8% w/v of DMPG/DHPC bicelles (q = 0.8). (b,c) Immunoblots showing the lipid binding specificity (see Fig. 1c for the identity of the lipids and to compare with the isolated Unique domain). (e) Residues perturbed in presence of lipids are highlighted in yellow on the SH3 surface (PDB code: 1SHG). The polyproline binding site is located in the opposite side and indicated by the presence of a polyproline ligand.
Figure 3. Interaction between Unique and SH3 domains (a,b) Combined absolute values 1H-15N NMR chemical shift differences between linked and isolated domains.(a) USH3 versus USrc. (b) USH3 versus SH3. (c) Intensity ratios of NH cross-peaks from MTLS-labeled (A59C/USH3 at pH 7.0) between paramagnetic and diamagnetic (DTT reduced) forms. (d) SH3 residues perturbed by interaction with the Unique domain are highlighted in orange. The polyproline binding site is located in the opposite site and indicated by the presence of a polyproline ligand. (e) Cartoon representation of the interaction between SH3 and Unique domains observed by PRE.
Figure 4. Allosteric effect of polyproline peptide binding on the Unique-SH3 interaction.(aâe) Expansion of HSQC spectra showing residues A55 and E150 (acting as control) at molar rations of the Unique-SH3 construct (USH3) to Ac-VSLARRPLPPLP-OH of (a) 0, (b) 0.2, (c) 0.4, (d) 0.7, and (e) 1.0. (f) Expansion of HSQC spectrum of the isolated Unique domain (USrc) containing residue A55. All spectra were recorded at 25°C and 800â MHz. (g) Cartoon representation depicting the fact that he fast equilibrium between the open-close interaction between the Unique and SH3 domains is cancelled by the interaction of a polyproline (PP) peptide with the SH3 domain in spite of the fact that the two binding sites are separated.
Figure 5. Effect of phosphorylation on lipid binding by USrc.Combined 1H-15N NMR shifts induced by DMPG/DHPC bicelles (8% w/v total lipid concentration, q = 0.8) in USrc unphosphorylated (a,b, gray), monophosphorylated at S17 (a, blue), and diphosphorylated at T37 and S75 (b, blue).
Figure 6. Calmodulin binding by the Unique domain of c-Src.Two different expansions of 1H-15N HSQC NMR spectra obtained during the titration of USrc with Ca2+-calmodulin (CaM) are shown in panels a and b. (c) Combined absolute values of 1H-15N chemical shift changes induced by 2-fold excess of Ca2+-calmodulin in USrc residues.
Figure 7. Sequence alignment of the Unique domain of Src.Sequence alignment of the Unique domains of human, mouse, chicken and Xenopus laevis Src is shown.Green boxes highlight residues S17, T37 and S75 that are known to be phosphorylated in vitro. Orange box shows the position of the 6 aminoacids of the ULBR that were mutated in the oocytes maturation experiment (see Fig. 8).
Figure 8. Effect of Src mutants on Xenopus oocyte maturation.The effect of the injection of oocytes with mRNAs encoding wild-type c-Src (green), AAA mutant (blue), EAE mutant (magenta), or water (orange) is compared with that of non-injected oocytes (yellow).(a) Percentage of oocytes that underwent maturation, as determined germinal vesicle breakdown (GVBD), at different times after the addition of progesterone. The inset shows the percentages of morphologically normal oocytes at the end of the experiment, when 100% of the control oocytes treated with progesterone reached GVBD. (b) Oocyte appearance 2 and 4â h after GVBD. About half of the matured oocytes that express AAA or EAE mutants show progressive depigmentation starting 2â h after GVBD. (c) Analysis of the expression levels of wild-type and mutants forms of human c-Src and endogenous Xenopus c-Src. Oocyte lysates were separated by SDS-PAGE and analyzed by immunoblotting with anti-human c-Src (top panel), anti-Xenopus c-Src (middle panel) and anti-MPK1 (bottom panel) as a loading control.
Adachi,
The mapping of the Lyn kinase binding site of the common beta subunit of IL-3/granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor/IL-5 receptor.
1999, Pubmed
Adachi,
The mapping of the Lyn kinase binding site of the common beta subunit of IL-3/granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor/IL-5 receptor.
1999,
Pubmed
Andersson,
Diffusion and dynamics of penetratin in different membrane mimicking media.
2004,
Pubmed
Arbuzova,
MARCKS, membranes, and calmodulin: kinetics of their interaction.
1998,
Pubmed
Barnett,
The peroxisomal membrane protein Pex13p shows a novel mode of SH3 interaction.
2000,
Pubmed
Beltrao,
Comparative genomics and disorder prediction identify biologically relevant SH3 protein interactions.
2005,
Pubmed
Bernadó,
Structural characterization of the active and inactive states of Src kinase in solution by small-angle X-ray scattering.
2008,
Pubmed
Biverståhl,
NMR solution structure and membrane interaction of the N-terminal sequence (1-30) of the bovine prion protein.
2004,
Pubmed
Brown,
Regulation, substrates and functions of src.
1996,
Pubmed
Cantley,
The phosphoinositide 3-kinase pathway.
2002,
Pubmed
Cordier,
Ligand-induced strain in hydrogen bonds of the c-Src SH3 domain detected by NMR.
2000,
Pubmed
Czech,
Dynamics of phosphoinositides in membrane retrieval and insertion.
2003,
Pubmed
Davis,
Homodimerization and heterodimerization of minimal zinc(II)-binding-domain peptides of T-cell proteins CD4, CD8alpha, and Lck.
2009,
Pubmed
Di Paolo,
Phosphoinositides in cell regulation and membrane dynamics.
2006,
Pubmed
Feuerstein,
Transient structure and SH3 interaction sites in an intrinsically disordered fragment of the hepatitis C virus protein NS5A.
2012,
Pubmed
Gingrich,
Unique domain anchoring of Src to synaptic NMDA receptors via the mitochondrial protein NADH dehydrogenase subunit 2.
2004,
Pubmed
Glover,
Structural evaluation of phospholipid bicelles for solution-state studies of membrane-associated biomolecules.
2001,
Pubmed
Heuer,
The helically extended SH3 domain of the T cell adaptor protein ADAP is a novel lipid interaction domain.
2005,
Pubmed
Heuer,
Lipid-binding hSH3 domains in immune cell adapter proteins.
2006,
Pubmed
Hoey,
Chimeric constructs containing the SH4/Unique domains of cYes can restrict the ability of Src(527F) to upregulate heme oxygenase-1 expression efficiently.
2000,
Pubmed
Kami,
Diverse recognition of non-PxxP peptide ligands by the SH3 domains from p67(phox), Grb2 and Pex13p.
2002,
Pubmed
Kaplan,
The src protein contains multiple domains for specific attachment to membranes.
1990,
Pubmed
Kaplan,
The first seven amino acids encoded by the v-src oncogene act as a myristylation signal: lysine 7 is a critical determinant.
1988,
Pubmed
Kato,
Neuron-specific Cdk5 kinase is responsible for mitosis-independent phosphorylation of c-Src at Ser75 in human Y79 retinoblastoma cells.
1999,
Pubmed
Kim,
A zinc clasp structure tethers Lck to T cell coreceptors CD4 and CD8.
2003,
Pubmed
Levinson,
Structural and functional domains of the Rous sarcoma virus transforming protein (pp60src).
1981,
Pubmed
Martin,
The hunting of the Src.
2001,
Pubmed
McLaughlin,
Plasma membrane phosphoinositide organization by protein electrostatics.
2005,
Pubmed
Mulgrew-Nesbitt,
The role of electrostatics in protein-membrane interactions.
2006,
Pubmed
Oikawa,
PtdIns(3,4,5)P3 binding is necessary for WAVE2-induced formation of lamellipodia.
2004,
Pubmed
Parsons,
Src family kinases, key regulators of signal transduction.
2004,
Pubmed
Pellman,
Fine structural mapping of a critical NH2-terminal region of p60src.
1985,
Pubmed
Perdiguero,
Use of Xenopus oocytes and early embryos to study MAPK signaling.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Pérez,
Structural characterization of the natively unfolded N-terminal domain of human c-Src kinase: insights into the role of phosphorylation of the unique domain.
2009,
Pubmed
Rameh,
Phosphatidylinositol (3,4,5)P3 interacts with SH2 domains and modulates PI 3-kinase association with tyrosine-phosphorylated proteins.
1995,
Pubmed
Sigal,
Amino-terminal basic residues of Src mediate membrane binding through electrostatic interaction with acidic phospholipids.
1994,
Pubmed
Summy,
The SH4-Unique-SH3-SH2 domains dictate specificity in signaling that differentiate c-Yes from c-Src.
2003,
Pubmed
Thomas,
Cellular functions regulated by Src family kinases.
1997,
Pubmed
Tokmakov,
Regulation of Src kinase activity during Xenopus oocyte maturation.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Unger,
Biochemical and cytological changes associated with expression of deregulated pp60src in Xenopus oocytes.
1992,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Vold,
Isotropic solutions of phospholipid bicelles: a new membrane mimetic for high-resolution NMR studies of polypeptides.
1997,
Pubmed
Wang,
The role of backbone motions in ligand binding to the c-Src SH3 domain.
2001,
Pubmed
Whiles,
Bicelles in structure-function studies of membrane-associated proteins.
2002,
Pubmed
Xu,
Crystal structures of c-Src reveal features of its autoinhibitory mechanism.
1999,
Pubmed
Yeatman,
A renaissance for SRC.
2004,
Pubmed
Yu,
1H and 15N assignments and secondary structure of the Src SH3 domain.
1993,
Pubmed