Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
Quantitative determination of binding of ISWI to nucleosomes and DNA shows allosteric regulation of DNA binding by nucleotides.
Al-Ani G
,
Briggs K
,
Malik SS
,
Conner M
,
Azuma Y
,
Fischer CJ
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
The regulation of chromatin structure is controlled by a family of molecular motors called chromatin remodelers. The ability of these enzymes to remodel chromatin structure is dependent on their ability to couple ATP binding and hydrolysis into the mechanical work that drives nucleosome repositioning. The necessary first step in determining how these essential enzymes perform this function is to characterize both how they bind nucleosomes and how this interaction is regulated by ATP binding and hydrolysis. With this goal in mind, we monitored the interaction of the chromatin remodeler ISWI with fluorophore-labeled nucleosomes and DNA through associated changes in fluorescence anisotropy of the fluorophore upon binding of ISWI to these substrates. We determined that one ISWI molecule binds to a 20 bp double-stranded DNA substrate with an affinity of 18 ± 2 nM. In contrast, two ISWI molecules can bind to the core nucleosome with short linker DNA with stoichiometric macroscopic equilibrium constants: 1/β1 = 1.3 ± 0.6 nM, and 1/β2 = 13 ± 7 nM(2). Furthermore, to improve our understanding of the mechanism of DNA translocation by ISWI, and hence nucleosome repositioning, we determined the effect of nucleotide analogues on substrate binding by ISWI. While the affinity of ISWI for the nucleosome substrate with short lengths of flanking DNA was not affected by the presence of nucleotides, the affinity of ISWI for the DNA substrate is weakened in the presence of nonhydrolyzable ATP analogues but not by ADP.
Scheme 1. ISWI (P) Binding to DNA (D) and the Nucleotide Analogue (A)β1, βA, β1,A, and βA,1 represent
the stoichiometric macroscopic equilibrium constants.
Scheme 2. ISWI (P) Binding to Nucleosomes (N)β1 and β2 represent the stoichiometric
macroscopic equilibrium constants.
Figure 1. Fluorescence anisotropy measurements (Îr) of binding of ISWI to DNA and nucleosome substrates. (A) A 20 bp
FITC-labeled DNA substrate [(â) 10 and (â) 25 nM] was
titrated with ISWI concentrations ranging from 6 to 183 nM, and changes
in fluorescence anisotropy were monitored. Isotherms were analyzed
using Scheme 1 as described in Experimental Procedures. The solid line represents the fit
of the data to this scheme, which returned a 1/β1 value of 18 ± 2 nM. (B) Electrophoretic mobility shift assay
performed by titrating a nonlabeled 10N5 nucleosome substrate (50
nM) with increasing ISWI concentrations ranging from 12 to 200 nM.
Samples were analyzed using a 5% TBEâacrylamide native gel.
Gels were stained using a DNA staining dye and imaged using a Typhoon
imager. Independent experiments showed that high-molecular weight
smearing is caused by interaction of ISWI with free DNA present (<2%)
in the reconstituted nucleosome sample. (C) Fluorescence anisotropy
measurements of binding of ISWI to doubly labeled Alexa488 (F10N5F)
and singly labeled Alexa488 (F10N5) nucleosomal substrates. Nucleosomes
at 2.5 nM (â and â²) and 10 nM (â and â )
were titrated with increasing concentrations of ISWI ranging from
3 to115 nM. Equilibrium binding isotherms were analyzed using Scheme 2 as described in Experimental Procedures. The solid line represents the fit of the data to this scheme, which
returned a 1/β1 value of 1.3 ± 0.6 nM and a
1/β2 value of 13 ± 7 nM2. (D) Computer
simulations according to Scheme 2 of the fraction
of free nucleosome (N), singly bound nucleosome (PN), and doubly bound
nucleosome (P2N) species present as a function of the concentration
of ISWI. In these simulations, the total nucleosome concentration
was 10 nM, and a 1/β1 value of 1.3 ± 0.6 nM
and a 1/β2 value of 13 ± 7 nM2 were
taken from the analysis of the data in panel C.
Figure 2. Fluorescence
anisotropy measurements (Îr) of equilibrium
binding of ISWI to DNA and nucleosomes in the presence
of nucleotides. (A) Equilibrium binding to a 20 bp FITC-labeled DNA
substrate (25 nM) in the presence of ATP-γ-S. These data were
analyzed using Scheme 1 as described in Experimental Procedures. The solid lines in the
figure represent the fits of the data to this scheme, which returned
the following values: 1/βA = 140 ± 30 μM,
1/βA,1 = 390 ± 70 μM, and 1/β1,A = 42 ± 8 nM. (B) Equilibrium binding to a 20 bp FITC-labeled
DNA substrate (25 nM) in the presence of ADP. The solid line in this
figure represents the fit of equilibrium DNA binding data collected
in the absence of nucleotide (Figure 1A). (C)
Equilibrium binding to an Alexa488-labeled 10N5 nucleosome substrate
in the presence of ATP-γ-S. (D) Equilibrium binding to an Alexa488-labeled
10N5 nucleosome substrate in the presence of ADP. The solid lines
in panels C and D are the fits of the equilibrium nucleosome binding
data collected in the absence of nucleotides (Figure 1C).
Figure 3. ISWI binding to nucleosome
substrate with long flanking DNA. (A)
EMSA performed by titrating a 10N18 nucleosome substrate (50 nM) with
increasing concentrations of ISWI ranging from 12 to 300 nM. Samples
were analyzed using a 5% TBEâacrylamide native gel. Gels were
stained using a DNA staining dye and imaged using a Typhoon imager.
(B) Fluorescence anisotropy measurements (Îr) of equilibrium binding of ISWI to Alexa488-labeled 10N18 nucleosomes
in the presence of 2 mM nucleotides. To more readily determine the
effect of ADP on ISWI binding, two different concentrations [2.5 nM
(â, â², and â) and 10 nM (â and â¼)]
of the 10N18 substrates were used in the associated binding experiments.
The solid line in this panel represents the fit of the equilibrium
nucleosome binding data collected in the absence of nucleotides. (C)
Electrophoretic mobility shift assay performed by titrating a nonlabeled
5N71 nucleosome substrate (50 nM) with increasing concentrations of
ISWI ranging from 12 to 300 nM. Samples were analyzed using a 5% TBEâacrylamide
native gel. Gels were stained using a DNA staining dye and imaged
using a Typhoon imager.
Aalfs,
Functional differences between the human ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling proteins BRG1 and SNF2H.
2001, Pubmed
Aalfs,
Functional differences between the human ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling proteins BRG1 and SNF2H.
2001,
Pubmed
Al-Ani,
ISWI remodels nucleosomes through a random walk.
2014,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Andreeva,
Mechanisms of interactions of the nucleotide cofactor with the RepA protein of plasmid RSF1010. Binding dynamics studied using the fluorescence stopped-flow method.
2009,
Pubmed
Barnett,
WSTF does it all: a multifunctional protein in transcription, repair, and replication.
2011,
Pubmed
Becker,
ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling.
2002,
Pubmed
Blosser,
Dynamics of nucleosome remodelling by individual ACF complexes.
2009,
Pubmed
Bochar,
A family of chromatin remodeling factors related to Williams syndrome transcription factor.
2000,
Pubmed
Bowman,
Mechanisms of ATP-dependent nucleosome sliding.
2010,
Pubmed
Boyer,
Functional delineation of three groups of the ATP-dependent family of chromatin remodeling enzymes.
2000,
Pubmed
Bozhenok,
WSTF-ISWI chromatin remodeling complex targets heterochromatic replication foci.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Brehm,
dMi-2 and ISWI chromatin remodelling factors have distinct nucleosome binding and mobilization properties.
2000,
Pubmed
Brendza,
Autoinhibition of Escherichia coli Rep monomer helicase activity by its 2B subdomain.
2005,
Pubmed
Buning,
Single-pair FRET experiments on nucleosome conformational dynamics.
2010,
Pubmed
Cairns,
Two actin-related proteins are shared functional components of the chromatin-remodeling complexes RSC and SWI/SNF.
1998,
Pubmed
Cairns,
RSC, an essential, abundant chromatin-remodeling complex.
1996,
Pubmed
Chin,
Fluorescence anisotropy assays for analysis of ISWI-DNA and ISWI-nucleosome interactions.
2004,
Pubmed
Clapier,
A critical epitope for substrate recognition by the nucleosome remodeling ATPase ISWI.
2002,
Pubmed
Clapier,
Critical role for the histone H4 N terminus in nucleosome remodeling by ISWI.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Clapier,
The biology of chromatin remodeling complexes.
2009,
Pubmed
Corona,
ISWI is an ATP-dependent nucleosome remodeling factor.
1999,
Pubmed
Corona,
Modulation of ISWI function by site-specific histone acetylation.
2002,
Pubmed
Côté,
Perturbation of nucleosome core structure by the SWI/SNF complex persists after its detachment, enhancing subsequent transcription factor binding.
1998,
Pubmed
Dang,
The Dpb4 subunit of ISW2 is anchored to extranucleosomal DNA.
2007,
Pubmed
Dillingham,
Defining the roles of individual residues in the single-stranded DNA binding site of PcrA helicase.
2001,
Pubmed
Dou,
The DNA binding properties of the Escherichia coli RecQ helicase.
2004,
Pubmed
Dyer,
Reconstitution of nucleosome core particles from recombinant histones and DNA.
2004,
Pubmed
Eisen,
Evolution of the SNF2 family of proteins: subfamilies with distinct sequences and functions.
1995,
Pubmed
Erdel,
Human ISWI chromatin-remodeling complexes sample nucleosomes via transient binding reactions and become immobilized at active sites.
2010,
Pubmed
Ferreira,
Histone modifications influence the action of Snf2 family remodelling enzymes by different mechanisms.
2007,
Pubmed
Fischer,
Mechanism of ATP-dependent translocation of E.coli UvrD monomers along single-stranded DNA.
2004,
Pubmed
Fischer,
Kinetic model for the ATP-dependent translocation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae RSC along double-stranded DNA.
2007,
Pubmed
Fitzgerald,
Reaction cycle of the yeast Isw2 chromatin remodeling complex.
2004,
Pubmed
Flaus,
Mechanisms for ATP-dependent chromatin remodelling.
2001,
Pubmed
Fuino,
Histone deacetylase inhibitor LAQ824 down-regulates Her-2 and sensitizes human breast cancer cells to trastuzumab, taxotere, gemcitabine, and epothilone B.
2003,
Pubmed
Gangaraju,
Conformational changes associated with template commitment in ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling by ISW2.
2009,
Pubmed
Georgel,
Role of histone tails in nucleosome remodeling by Drosophila NURF.
1997,
Pubmed
Grüne,
Crystal structure and functional analysis of a nucleosome recognition module of the remodeling factor ISWI.
2003,
Pubmed
Guschin,
Multiple ISWI ATPase complexes from xenopus laevis. Functional conservation of an ACF/CHRAC homolog.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Hamiche,
Histone tails modulate nucleosome mobility and regulate ATP-dependent nucleosome sliding by NURF.
2001,
Pubmed
Hartlepp,
The histone fold subunits of Drosophila CHRAC facilitate nucleosome sliding through dynamic DNA interactions.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Hauk,
The chromodomains of the Chd1 chromatin remodeler regulate DNA access to the ATPase motor.
2010,
Pubmed
He,
Human ACF1 alters the remodeling strategy of SNF2h.
2006,
Pubmed
Hota,
Nucleosome mobilization by ISW2 requires the concerted action of the ATPase and SLIDE domains.
2013,
Pubmed
Jenuwein,
Translating the histone code.
2001,
Pubmed
Jezewska,
Interactions of Escherichia coli primary replicative helicase DnaB protein with nucleotide cofactors.
1996,
Pubmed
Kadonaga,
Eukaryotic transcription: an interlaced network of transcription factors and chromatin-modifying machines.
1998,
Pubmed
Kagalwala,
Topography of the ISW2-nucleosome complex: insights into nucleosome spacing and chromatin remodeling.
2004,
Pubmed
Khaki,
The macroscopic rate of nucleic acid translocation by hepatitis C virus helicase NS3h is dependent on both sugar and base moieties.
2010,
Pubmed
Korolev,
Comparisons between the structures of HCV and Rep helicases reveal structural similarities between SF1 and SF2 super-families of helicases.
1998,
Pubmed
Längst,
ISWI induces nucleosome sliding on nicked DNA.
2001,
Pubmed
Längst,
Nucleosome movement by CHRAC and ISWI without disruption or trans-displacement of the histone octamer.
1999,
Pubmed
Längst,
Nucleosome mobilization and positioning by ISWI-containing chromatin-remodeling factors.
2001,
Pubmed
LeRoy,
Purification and characterization of a human factor that assembles and remodels chromatin.
2000,
Pubmed
Levin,
ATP binding modulates the nucleic acid affinity of hepatitis C virus helicase.
2003,
Pubmed
Lia,
Direct observation of DNA distortion by the RSC complex.
2006,
Pubmed
Lorch,
Mechanism of chromatin remodeling.
2010,
Pubmed
Lowary,
New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning.
1998,
Pubmed
Lucius,
Allosteric interactions between the nucleotide-binding sites and the ssDNA-binding site in the PriA helicase-ssDNA complex. 3.
2006,
Pubmed
Luger,
Preparation of nucleosome core particle from recombinant histones.
1999,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Luger,
Crystal structure of the nucleosome core particle at 2.8 A resolution.
1997,
Pubmed
Lusser,
Chromatin remodeling by ATP-dependent molecular machines.
2003,
Pubmed
MacCallum,
ISWI remodeling complexes in Xenopus egg extracts: identification as major chromosomal components that are regulated by INCENP-aurora B.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Malik,
Allosteric interactions of DNA and nucleotides with S. cerevisiae RSC.
2011,
Pubmed
McKnight,
Extranucleosomal DNA binding directs nucleosome sliding by Chd1.
2011,
Pubmed
Mueller-Planitz,
The ATPase domain of ISWI is an autonomous nucleosome remodeling machine.
2013,
Pubmed
Patel,
Identification of residues in chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 1 (Chd1) required for coupling ATP hydrolysis to nucleosome sliding.
2011,
Pubmed
Poot,
HuCHRAC, a human ISWI chromatin remodelling complex contains hACF1 and two novel histone-fold proteins.
2000,
Pubmed
Racki,
The chromatin remodeller ACF acts as a dimeric motor to space nucleosomes.
2009,
Pubmed
Rhoades,
Structural features of nucleosomes reorganized by yeast FACT and its HMG box component, Nhp6.
2004,
Pubmed
Richmond,
The structure of DNA in the nucleosome core.
2003,
Pubmed
Ruone,
Multiple Nhp6 molecules are required to recruit Spt16-Pob3 to form yFACT complexes and to reorganize nucleosomes.
2003,
Pubmed
Saha,
Mechanisms for nucleosome movement by ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling complexes.
2006,
Pubmed
Saha,
Chromatin remodeling through directional DNA translocation from an internal nucleosomal site.
2005,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Saha,
Chromatin remodeling by RSC involves ATP-dependent DNA translocation.
2002,
Pubmed
Soultanas,
Uncoupling DNA translocation and helicase activity in PcrA: direct evidence for an active mechanism.
2000,
Pubmed
Thåström,
Sequence motifs and free energies of selected natural and non-natural nucleosome positioning DNA sequences.
1999,
Pubmed
Tsukiyama,
Characterization of the imitation switch subfamily of ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling factors in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.
1999,
Pubmed
Wang,
Heterochromatin protein Sir3 induces contacts between the amino terminus of histone H4 and nucleosomal DNA.
2013,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Whitehouse,
Evidence for DNA translocation by the ISWI chromatin-remodeling enzyme.
2003,
Pubmed
Wong,
DNA-induced dimerization of the Escherichia coli rep helicase. Allosteric effects of single-stranded and duplex DNA.
1992,
Pubmed
Yadon,
SnapShot: Chromatin remodeling: ISWI.
2011,
Pubmed
Yang,
The chromatin-remodeling enzyme ACF is an ATP-dependent DNA length sensor that regulates nucleosome spacing.
2006,
Pubmed
Zhang,
DNA translocation and loop formation mechanism of chromatin remodeling by SWI/SNF and RSC.
2006,
Pubmed
Zofall,
Functional role of extranucleosomal DNA and the entry site of the nucleosome in chromatin remodeling by ISW2.
2004,
Pubmed
Zofall,
Chromatin remodeling by ISW2 and SWI/SNF requires DNA translocation inside the nucleosome.
2006,
Pubmed