Ishihara K et al. (2016), Physical basis of large microtubule aster growth.

XB-ART-52786

Elife 2016 Nov 28;5. doi: 10.7554/eLife.19145.

Show Gene links Show Anatomy links

Physical basis of large microtubule aster growth.

Ishihara K , Korolev KS , Mitchison TJ .

???displayArticle.abstract???
Microtubule asters - radial arrays of microtubules organized by centrosomes - play a fundamental role in the spatial coordination of animal cells. The standard model of aster growth assumes a fixed number of microtubules originating from the centrosomes. However, aster morphology in this model does not scale with cell size, and we recently found evidence for non-centrosomal microtubule nucleation. Here, we combine autocatalytic nucleation and polymerization dynamics to develop a biophysical model of aster growth. Our model predicts that asters expand as traveling waves and recapitulates all major aspects of aster growth. With increasing nucleation rate, the model predicts an explosive transition from stationary to growing asters with a discontinuous jump of the aster velocity to a nonzero value. Experiments in frog egg extract confirm the main theoretical predictions. Our results suggest that asters observed in large fish and amphibian eggs are a meshwork of short, unstable microtubules maintained by autocatalytic nucleation and provide a paradigm for the assembly of robust and evolvable polymer networks.

???displayArticle.pubmedLink??? 27892852
???displayArticle.pmcLink??? PMC5207775
???displayArticle.link??? Elife
???displayArticle.grants??? [+]

Species referenced: Xenopus
Genes referenced: cox7a2l kif2c

???attribute.lit??? ???displayArticles.show???

	Figure 1. A biophysical model for the collective growth of microtubule asters.(A) We propose that asters grow via two microscopic processes: polymerization and nucleation. Individual microtubules follow the standard dynamic instability with a growing state with polymerization rate vg and a shrinking state with depolymerization rate vs. Transitions between the states occur at rates fcâ¢aâ¢t and frâ¢eâ¢s, which model catastrophe and rescue events, respectively. New microtubules are added at a rate r via a nucleation at pre-existing plus ends in the growing state. (B) Individual vs. collective growth of asters. In the standard model of âindividual growthâ, asters increase their radius at rate V=dâ¢Râ¢aâ¢dâ¢iâ¢uâ¢sdâ¢t only via a net polymerization from the centrosome (yellow). Thus, this model predicts that the rate of aster growth equals the mean polymerization rate V=J, the number of microtubules is constant, and their density decreases away from the centrosomes. In the collective growth model, the microtubule density is constant and the number of microtubules increases. Autocatalytic nucleation makes asters grow faster than the net polymerization rate J and can sustain growth even when individual microtubules are unstable J<0.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19145.003
	Figure 2. Our model captures key features of large aster growth.(A) Time evolution of growing plus end density predicted by our model, which we solved via numerical simulations in 1D geometry. In the stationary regime, the microtubule population remained near the centrosome vg=30, vs=40, fcâ¢aâ¢t=3, frâ¢eâ¢s=1, and r=1.0 (left). In contrast, outward expansion of the microtubule population was observed when the nucleation rate was increased to r=2.5, above the critical nucleation rate rc (right). For both simulations, microtubules are in the bounded regime J<0. (B) Experimental measurements confirm that asters expand at a constant rate with time-invariant profiles of the plus end density, as predicted by our model. The plus end densities were estimated as EB1 comet density during aster growth as previously described (Ishihara et al., 2014a).DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19145.005
	Figure 3. Explosive transition from stationary to growing asters and other theoretical predictions.Analytical solution (lines) and numerical simulations (dots) predict that asters either remain stationary or expand at a constant velocity, which increases with the net polymerization rate J (A) and nucleation rate r (B). The transition to a growing state is accompanied by aÂ finite jump in the expansion velocity labeled as Vgâ¢aâ¢p. (A) The behavior in the standard model (r=0) is shown in blue and our model (r=1.5) in red. Note that aster growth commences at J<0 in the presence of nucleation and occurs at a minimal velocity Vgâ¢aâ¢p. Although spatial growth can occur for both J>0 and J<0 the properties of the resulting asters could be very different (see SI). Here, vg=30,vs=30,fcat=3. (B) If J<0, critical nucleation rc is required to commence aster growth. Blue line corresponds to J>0(vg=30,vs=15,fcat=3,fres=3) and red line to J<0(vg=30,vs=15,fcat=3,fres=1). See Materials and methods and SI for the details of the analytical solution and numerical simulations.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19145.006Figure 3âfigure supplement 1. Feedback regulation of catastrophe rate leads to the same explosive transition.(A) Time evolution of growing plus end density similar to the simulations in 1D planar geometry as in Figure 2. This example represents a scenario where the nucleation rate is above the critical nucleation rate (vg=30,vs=40,fcat=3,fres=1,r=2.5) resulting in aster growth. (B) Analytical solution (lines) and numerical simulations (dots) predict aster velocity as a function of nucleation rate similar to Figure 3A. Blue line corresponds to J>0(vg=30,vs=15,fcat=3,fres=3) and red line to J<0(vg=30,vs=15,fcat=3,fres=1).DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19145.007
	Figure 3âfigure supplement 2. Aster growth by polymer-stimulated nucleation leads to the same explosive transition.(A) Time evolution of growing plus end density similar to Figure 2A. Below the critical nucleation rate, asters are stationary (left, vg=30,vs=40,fcat=3,fres=1,p=0.07). Above the critical nucleation rate, asters grow in radius (right, p=0.18) even when microtubules are unstable (J<0). Here, the critical polymer nucleation rate pc=0.0964... as predicted by Equation (A59). (B) Numerical simulations predict aster velocity as a function of J (frâ¢eâ¢s was varied while keeping vg=30,vs=15,fcat=3,p=0.04). (C) Numerical simulations predict aster velocity as a function of polymer-stimulated nucleation rate p (p was varied while keeping vg=30,vs=15,fcat=3,fres=0.3). Dashed vertical lines indicate the predicted critical transitions from Equation (A59).DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19145.008
	Figure 4. Titration of MCAK-Q710 slows then arrests aster growth through a discontinuous transition.(A) Addition of MCAK-Q710 results in smaller interphase asters assembled by Aurora A beads in Xenopus egg extract. Images were obtained 20 min post initiation with the plus end marker EB1-mApple. Dotted lines indicate the approximate outline of asters. (B) Aster velocity decreases with MCAK-Q710 concentration and then abruptly vanishes as predicted by the model. Note a clear gap in the values of the observed velocities and bimodality near the transition, which support the existence of Vgâ¢aâ¢p. Quantification methods are described in methods and Figure 4âfigure supplement 1.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19145.009Figure 4âfigure supplement 1. Aurora A kinase bead asters at different MCAK-Q710 concentrations.(A) Measuring aster growth velocities from time-lapse images of asters visualized with the plus end marker EB1-mApple. A linear region is chosen in the radial outward direction (left). The raw fluorescent intensity profiles (center) are subjected to a low pass filter (right), and the half-max position was manually selected to define the radius of the aster at different time points. Blue to red lines indicate profiles at two minute intervals. (B) At the critical concentration of 320 nM MCAK-Q710, some asters assembled from Aurora A beads showed slow growth (top) while others contained few microtubules which gradually decreased over time (bottom). The latter was scored as zero growth velocity. The reaction was started at time zero by the addition of calcium and beads to the extract. Scale bars 100 Î¼m. (C) Aster growth velocities measured at increasing MCAK-Q710 concentrations. Biological replicate of the same experiment as in Figure 4B.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19145.010
	Figure 4âfigure supplement 2. Pellicle asters at different MCAK-Q710 concentrations.(A) Asters assembled by Tetrahymena pellicles as the nucleating center showed aster growth which was slowed down by MCAK-Q710 (top). At higher MCAK-Q710 concentrations, stationary asters that did not change its radius for over 60 min (bottom). (B) EB1-mApple fluorescence intensity profile of the stationary aster in panel A for time intervals 70â84 min post calcium addition. Such asters were scored as zero velocity. (C) Pellicle aster growth velocities at different MCAK-Q710 concentrations.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19145.011
	Figure 4âfigure supplement 3. Plus end polymerization rate and catastrophe rate do not significantly change with MCAK-Q710 titration.Measurements were made by imaging and tracking EB1 comets in growing interphase asters assembled by Aurora A beads (see MaterialsÂ andÂ methods). (A) Distribution of plus end polymerization rates at different MCAK-Q710 concentrations. (B) Distribution of EB1 comet lifetimes at different MCAK-Q710 concentrations. Inset shows the same data plotted on a semilog scale. (C) Summary of measurements from EB1 tracking analysis. The table shows the number of movies (or asters) and total number of tracks analyzed for each condition. Errors indicate standard error. The catastrophe rate fcâ¢aâ¢t was derived from a linear fit to the semilog plots of the lifetime distributions in the intervals 5â60 s. Its mean and standard error were calculated by bootstrapping.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19145.012
	Figure 5. Phase diagram for aster growth.Aster morphology is determined by the balance of polymerization dynamics and autocatalytic nucleation. Small, stationary asters (V=0), as observed during mitosis, occur at low nucleation r and net depolymerization of individual microtubules (J<0). Net polymerization (J>0) without nucleation (r=0) produces asters that expand at rate V=J with dilution of microtubule density at the periphery and are thus inconsistent with experimental observations. The addition of nucleation to the individual growth regime changes these dynamics only marginally (yellow region); see SI. Alternatively, the transition from stationary to growing asters can be achieved by increasing the nucleation rate, r, while keeping J negative. Above the critical nucleation rate rc starts the regime of collective growth (V as in Equation (4), which is valid for r<fcat) that produces asters composed of relatively short microtubules (red region). The transition from stationary aster to collective growth may be achieved by crossing the curve at any location, but always involves an explosive jump in aster velocity, Vgâ¢aâ¢p. TheÂ reverse transition recapitulates the results of our experimental perturbation of MCAK activity (Figure 4) and mitotic entry (solid arrows). We propose this unified biophysical picture as an explanation for the cell cycle dependent changes of aster morphology in vivo.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.7554/eLife.19145.013

References [+] :

Akhmanova, Microtubule minus-end-targeting proteins. 2015, Pubmed