Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
Nat Cell Biol
2016 Dec 01;1812:1357-1366. doi: 10.1038/ncb3436.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
SCAI promotes DNA double-strand break repair in distinct chromosomal contexts.
Hansen RK
,
Mund A
,
Poulsen SL
,
Sandoval M
,
Klement K
,
Tsouroula K
,
Tollenaere MA
,
Räschle M
,
Soria R
,
Offermanns S
,
Worzfeld T
,
Grosse R
,
Brandt DT
,
Rozell B
,
Mann M
,
Cole F
,
Soutoglou E
,
Goodarzi AA
,
Daniel JA
,
Mailand N
,
Bekker-Jensen S
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs) are highly cytotoxic DNA lesions, whose accurate repair by non-homologous end-joining (NHEJ) or homologous recombination (HR) is crucial for genome integrity and is strongly influenced by the local chromatin environment. Here, we identify SCAI (suppressor of cancer cell invasion) as a 53BP1-interacting chromatin-associated protein that promotes the functionality of several DSB repair pathways in mammalian cells. SCAI undergoes prominent enrichment at DSB sites through dual mechanisms involving 53BP1-dependent recruitment to DSB-surrounding chromatin and 53BP1-independent accumulation at resected DSBs. Cells lacking SCAI display reduced DSB repair capacity, hypersensitivity to DSB-inflicting agents and genome instability. We demonstrate that SCAI is a mediator of 53BP1-dependent repair of heterochromatin-associated DSBs, facilitating ATM kinase signalling at DSBs in repressive chromatin environments. Moreover, we establish an important role of SCAI in meiotic recombination, as SCAI deficiency in mice leads to germ cell loss and subfertility associated with impaired retention of the DMC1 recombinase on meiotic chromosomes. Collectively, our findings uncover SCAI as a physiologically important component of both NHEJ- and HR-mediated pathways that potentiates DSB repair efficiency in specific chromatin contexts.
Bekker-Jensen,
Spatial organization of the mammalian genome surveillance machinery in response to DNA strand breaks.
2006, Pubmed
Bekker-Jensen,
Spatial organization of the mammalian genome surveillance machinery in response to DNA strand breaks.
2006,
Pubmed
Bekker-Jensen,
Assembly and function of DNA double-strand break repair foci in mammalian cells.
2010,
Pubmed
Bothmer,
Regulation of DNA end joining, resection, and immunoglobulin class switch recombination by 53BP1.
2011,
Pubmed
Brandt,
SCAI acts as a suppressor of cancer cell invasion through the transcriptional control of beta1-integrin.
2009,
Pubmed
Brandt,
Regulation of myocardin-related transcriptional coactivators through cofactor interactions in differentiation and cancer.
2009,
Pubmed
Broering,
BRCA1 establishes DNA damage signaling and pericentric heterochromatin of the X chromosome in male meiosis.
2014,
Pubmed
Bryant,
Specific killing of BRCA2-deficient tumours with inhibitors of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase.
2005,
Pubmed
Bunting,
End-joining, translocations and cancer.
2013,
Pubmed
Bunting,
53BP1 inhibits homologous recombination in Brca1-deficient cells by blocking resection of DNA breaks.
2010,
Pubmed
Callen,
53BP1 mediates productive and mutagenic DNA repair through distinct phosphoprotein interactions.
2013,
Pubmed
Callén,
ATM prevents the persistence and propagation of chromosome breaks in lymphocytes.
2007,
Pubmed
Chapman,
RIF1 is essential for 53BP1-dependent nonhomologous end joining and suppression of DNA double-strand break resection.
2013,
Pubmed
Ciccia,
The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives.
2010,
Pubmed
Cole,
Homeostatic control of recombination is implemented progressively in mouse meiosis.
2012,
Pubmed
Cowell,
gammaH2AX foci form preferentially in euchromatin after ionising-radiation.
2007,
Pubmed
Cox,
Accurate proteome-wide label-free quantification by delayed normalization and maximal peptide ratio extraction, termed MaxLFQ.
2014,
Pubmed
Daniel,
PTIP promotes chromatin changes critical for immunoglobulin class switch recombination.
2010,
Pubmed
Daniel,
Loss of ATM kinase activity leads to embryonic lethality in mice.
2012,
Pubmed
Di Virgilio,
Rif1 prevents resection of DNA breaks and promotes immunoglobulin class switching.
2013,
Pubmed
Eberl,
A map of general and specialized chromatin readers in mouse tissues generated by label-free interaction proteomics.
2013,
Pubmed
Escribano-Díaz,
A cell cycle-dependent regulatory circuit composed of 53BP1-RIF1 and BRCA1-CtIP controls DNA repair pathway choice.
2013,
Pubmed
EVANS,
AN AIR-DRYING METHOD FOR MEIOTIC PREPARATIONS FROM MAMMALIAN TESTES.
1964,
Pubmed
Farmer,
Targeting the DNA repair defect in BRCA mutant cells as a therapeutic strategy.
2005,
Pubmed
Goodarzi,
KAP-1 phosphorylation regulates CHD3 nucleosome remodeling during the DNA double-strand break response.
2011,
Pubmed
Goodarzi,
ATM signaling facilitates repair of DNA double-strand breaks associated with heterochromatin.
2008,
Pubmed
Gudjonsson,
TRIP12 and UBR5 suppress spreading of chromatin ubiquitylation at damaged chromosomes.
2012,
Pubmed
Gunn,
I-SceI-based assays to examine distinct repair outcomes of mammalian chromosomal double strand breaks.
2012,
Pubmed
Hubner,
Quantitative proteomics combined with BAC TransgeneOmics reveals in vivo protein interactions.
2010,
Pubmed
Hunter,
Meiotic Recombination: The Essence of Heredity.
2015,
Pubmed
Jackson,
The DNA-damage response in human biology and disease.
2009,
Pubmed
Jackson,
The DNA-damage response: new molecular insights and new approaches to cancer therapy.
2009,
Pubmed
Kakarougkas,
Opposing roles for 53BP1 during homologous recombination.
2013,
Pubmed
Kastan,
Cell-cycle checkpoints and cancer.
2004,
Pubmed
Klement,
Opposing ISWI- and CHD-class chromatin remodeling activities orchestrate heterochromatic DNA repair.
2014,
Pubmed
Lemaître,
Double strand break (DSB) repair in heterochromatin and heterochromatin proteins in DSB repair.
2014,
Pubmed
Lukas,
More than just a focus: The chromatin response to DNA damage and its role in genome integrity maintenance.
2011,
Pubmed
Manis,
53BP1 links DNA damage-response pathways to immunoglobulin heavy chain class-switch recombination.
2004,
Pubmed
Mosbech,
The deubiquitylating enzyme USP44 counteracts the DNA double-strand break response mediated by the RNF8 and RNF168 ubiquitin ligases.
2013,
Pubmed
Munoz,
Improved genome editing in human cell lines using the CRISPR method.
2014,
Pubmed
Noon,
53BP1-dependent robust localized KAP-1 phosphorylation is essential for heterochromatic DNA double-strand break repair.
2010,
Pubmed
Räschle,
DNA repair. Proteomics reveals dynamic assembly of repair complexes during bypass of DNA cross-links.
2015,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Schwertman,
Regulation of DNA double-strand break repair by ubiquitin and ubiquitin-like modifiers.
2016,
Pubmed
Seluanov,
Analysis of DNA double-strand break (DSB) repair in mammalian cells.
2010,
Pubmed
Svetlanov,
Mismatch repair proteins, meiosis, and mice: understanding the complexities of mammalian meiosis.
2004,
Pubmed
Toledo,
ATR prohibits replication catastrophe by preventing global exhaustion of RPA.
2013,
Pubmed
Tsouroula,
Temporal and Spatial Uncoupling of DNA Double Strand Break Repair Pathways within Mammalian Heterochromatin.
2016,
Pubmed
Vizcaíno,
2016 update of the PRIDE database and its related tools.
2016,
Pubmed
Ward,
53BP1 is required for class switch recombination.
2004,
Pubmed
Ward,
p53 Binding protein 53BP1 is required for DNA damage responses and tumor suppression in mice.
2003,
Pubmed
Zimmermann,
53BP1 regulates DSB repair using Rif1 to control 5' end resection.
2013,
Pubmed
