Click here to close
Hello! We notice that you are using Internet Explorer, which is not supported by Xenbase and may cause the site to display incorrectly.
We suggest using a current version of Chrome,
FireFox, or Safari.
Front Cell Neurosci
2018 Jan 01;12:45. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2018.00045.
Show Gene links
Show Anatomy links
Musashi and Plasticity of Xenopus and Axolotl Spinal Cord Ependymal Cells.
Chernoff EAG
,
Sato K
,
Salfity HVN
,
Sarria DA
,
Belecky-Adams T
.
???displayArticle.abstract???
The differentiated state of spinal cord ependymal cells in regeneration-competent amphibians varies between a constitutively active state in what is essentially a developing organism, the tadpole of the frog Xenopus laevis, and a quiescent, activatable state in a slowly growing adult salamander Ambystoma mexicanum, the Axolotl. Ependymal cells are epithelial in intact spinal cord of all vertebrates. After transection, body region ependymal epithelium in both Xenopus and the Axolotl disorganizes for regenerative outgrowth (gap replacement). Injury-reactive ependymal cells serve as a stem/progenitor cell population in regeneration and reconstruct the central canal. Expression patterns of mRNA and protein for the stem/progenitor cell-maintenance Notch signaling pathway mRNA-binding protein Musashi (msi) change with life stage and regeneration competence. Msi-1 is missing (immunohistochemistry), or at very low levels (polymerase chain reaction, PCR), in both intact regeneration-competent adult Axolotl cord and intact non-regeneration-competent Xenopus tadpole (Nieuwkoop and Faber stage 62+, NF 62+). The critical correlation for successful regeneration is msi-1 expression/upregulation after injury in the ependymal outgrowth and stump-region ependymal cells. msi-1 and msi-2 isoforms were cloned for the Axolotl as well as previously unknown isoforms of Xenopus msi-2. Intact Xenopus spinal cord ependymal cells show a loss of msi-1 expression between regeneration-competent (NF 50-53) and non-regenerating stages (NF 62+) and in post-metamorphosis froglets, while msi-2 displays a lower molecular weight isoform in non-regenerating cord. In the Axolotl, embryos and juveniles maintain Msi-1 expression in the intact cord. In the adult Axolotl, Msi-1 is absent, but upregulates after injury. Msi-2 levels are more variable among Axolotl life stages: rising between late tailbud embryos and juveniles and decreasing in adult cord. Cultures of regeneration-competent Xenopus tadpole cord and injury-responsive adult Axolotl cord ependymal cells showed an identical growth factor response. Epidermal growth factor (EGF) maintains mesenchymal outgrowth in vitro, the cells are proliferative and maintain msi-1 expression. Non-regeneration competent Xenopus ependymal cells, NF 62+, failed to attach or grow well in EGF+ medium. Ependymal Msi-1 expression in vivo and in vitro is a strong indicator of regeneration competence in the amphibian spinal cord.
FIGURE 1. Cartoon representing ependymal outgrowth from cranial (Left) and caudal (Right) stumps of regenerating Xenopus and Axolotl spinal cord. (A) Regenerating NF 50â53 Xenopus tadpole cord showing gap regeneration with ciliated epithelial ependymal cells in the stump and the bulb-like ependymal outgrowth. (B) Regenerating adult Axolotl gap regeneration with mesenchymal ependymal outgrowth and several layers (bracket) of epithelial ependymal cells in the stump. The glia limitans, the basal lamina of the cord, is represented as a red line adjacent to ependymal endfeet. All other cell types and extracellular matrix were omitted to simplify the representation.
FIGURE 2. Msi-1 alignment, deduced amino acid sequences. A multispecies alignment including both Xenopus and Axolotl is shown. The RNA recognition motifs (RRMs), also known as mRNA-binding domains, are indicated by the boxed areas labeled RRM1 or RRM2. The RRMs are located near the amino terminus of the protein. A 16 amino acid linking region between RRM1 and RRM2 is identical in Xenopus, Axolotl, mouse, and human. Amphibian and mammalian RRM sequences all have greater than 90% homology at the amino acid level, details in the Section âResults.â
FIGURE 3. Msi-2 multispecies alignment, deduced amino acid sequences including Xenopus and Axolotl results. The RNA recognition motifs (RRMs) are indicated by the boxed areas labeled RRM1 or RRM2. Subcloning of Axolotl Msi-2 transcripts showed the presence of a shortened isoform ending with a truncated RRM2 as well as the long and short Xenopus Msi-2 isoforms described in Figure 4. For Xenopus, the original Msi-2 sequence is labeled xrp-1 as originally published. The C-terminal end is not shown for some species.
FIGURE 4. (A) The nucleotide and deduced amino acid sequences are shown for segments of two isoforms of Xenopus Msi-2 detected by RT-PCR. These isoforms were detected using one set of forward and reverse primers. The arrows under the nucleotide sequence show the position of forward (5â²-CTCTATGGAACTGCCAGCCAGGA-3â²) and reverse (5â²-GATGCCCAAGCAAGACTGGGAG-3â²) primers sequences. The longer isoform (A1) yielded a 203 bp band, while the shorter isoform band (A2) had 145 bp. The splicing insert (underlined DNA sequence) in the long isoform (A1) occurred between the greater-than (>>>>>) and the less-than signs (<<<<<). In the shorter isoform (A2), the region underlined in A1 was spliced out and the regions designated between the greater-than the less-than signs, respectively, were directly joined. The bracketed numbers above some amino acids indicate the differing region, and correspond to schematic (A). The asterisks in A1 and A2 show the terminal codons. (B) The schematic for the deduced amino acid sequence region illustrates 100% homology from amino acid 1 to 393, between the longer and shorter band isoforms, with the alternatively spliced region from 394 to 406. The full length amino acid sequence of both isoforms has the same 406 amino acid length. RRM1 and RRM2 indicate, respectively, RNA-recognition motif-1 and -2.
FIGURE 5. Xenopus Msi-1 and Msi-2 semi-quantitative RT-PCR gels show strong expression of Msi-1 in intact, regeneration-competent NF 50 spinal cord (gel column 1), and 5-day regenerating NF 50 spinal cord (Reg. 5D NF 50 spinal cord, gel column 3). Both Msi-1 and Msi-2 were reduced from NF 50 levels in intact NF 62 (non-regeneration-competent) and adult spinal cord (compare gel columns 1, 2). Msi-2 specific primers showed bands representing the two isoforms shown in the Figure 4 alignments (arrowheads). The larger isoform was universally present. The smaller isoform (lower arrowhead) was present only in NF 62 and adult frog (compare gel columns 2, 4). GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) was used as the housekeeping control gene. The No-RT control (âRT) was performed without reverse transcriptase using the GAPDH primers. Each gene is shown in a separate row. All bands in each row are from one original gel. Negative was shown as for image clarity.
FIGURE 6. Axolotl Msi semi-quantitative RT-PCR gel. Msi-1 was strongly expressed in the pre-hatching/late tailbud stage embryo (BD 42â44; column 1), juvenile brain and spinal cord (gel columns 2, 3), but was absent in intact adult spinal cord (column 4). At 3 weeks post-transection in the adult (3 weeks regenerating adult cord) Msi-1was up-regulated (column 5). Msi-2 expression was stronger in the juvenile brain and spinal cord (columns 2, 3) than in the BD 42â44 embryo (column 1). Msi-2 was still expressed in intact adult spinal cord (column 4), and not up-regulated in regenerating adult cord (column 5). GAPDH was used as the internal housekeeping gene loading control, and (âRT) was performed without reverse transcriptase using the GAPDH primers. Each gene is shown in a separate row. All bands in each row are from one original gel (see Supplementary Figure 2) with limb regeneration sample bands excised here. Negative was shown as for image clarity.
FIGURE 7. mRNA tissue distribution of Xenopus Msi-1 in developing and regenerating spinal cord using section in situ hybridization (blue reaction product). (A) Cross section of intact NF 50 spinal cord. Msi-1 was strongly expressed in the ependymal layer. (B) Shh mRNA localization in intact NF 50 spinal cord in the section adjacent to the one shown in âA.â Shh is expressed in the floorplate (arrow). (C) NF 62 spinal cord cross section showed Msi-1 was still expressed in the ependymal layer, but mostly ventrally located and weaker. (D) NF 62+ Shh mRNA is still expressed in the ventralfloorplate, overlapping the Msi-1 expression (arrow). (E) Parasagittal section of NF 52 spinal cord 1-day (1-D) post-transection showed high level of Msi-1 expression throughout the cord, lesion site and caudal stump. (F) Cross section of NF 52 regenerating cord 5-days (5-D) post-transection showed a broad ventral arch of Msi-1 expression in the ependymal outgrowth. The dorsal portion of the notochord is visible below the outgrowth (noto). (G) Cross section of NF 52 regenerating cord 5-days (5-D) post-transection in the section adjacent to the one shown in âFâ. Shh localization is largely in a complementary zone of outgrowth ventral to Msi-1 expression. (Combined Msi-1 and Shh expression shown in Supplementary Figure 6.) The dorsal portion of the notochord is visible below the outgrowth (noto). (H) Cross section of lesion site in NF 52 spinal cord 10-days (10-D) post-transection showed the reconstructed central canal with ependymal Msi-1 expression. (I) NF 52 spinal cord 10-days post-transection (10-D) in the section adjacent to the one in âHâ showed Shh expression restored to floorplate location. Differential interference contrast optics, transmitted light images.
FIGURE 8. Axolotl mRNA (purple) or Msi antibody (red) tissue localization and DAPI nuclear label (blue). (A) Late tailbudembryo (BD 42â44) cross-section in situ hybridization for Msi-1 mRNA showed localization in ependymal region around the central canal and in gray matter. Differential interference contrast image. (B) Antibody localization in late tailbudembryo sections showed Msi-1 protein was present in the same regions as the mRNA shown in âA.â (C) Juvenile cord maintained Msi-1 expression in the ependymal zone, extending dorsally. (D) Intact adult Axolotl cord showed no Msi-1 protein expression, only DAPI-stained nuclei (blue). (E) Parasagittal section of 2 weeks adult regenerative outgrowth showed strong upregulation of ependymal Msi-1expression. (F) In cross section, at higher magnification than in âEâ the mesenchymal nature of the Msi-1-positive 2-week adult regenerated outgrowth is shown. Fluorescence microscope images. All images are dorsal side up.
FIGURE 9. Axolotl Shh semi-quantitative RT-PCR. Intact adult Axolotl cord showed low levels of Shh (gel column 1). Expression was upregulated at 3 weeks regeneration (column 2). Intact late tailbud (BD 42â44) Axolotl embryo cord, juvenile cord and brain all showed high levels of Shh expression (columns 3â5). GAPDH was used as the internal housekeeping gene control, and the No-RT (âRT) was performed without reverse transcriptase using the GAPDH primers. Each gene is shown in a separate row. All bands in each row are from one gel, but limb regeneration results were excised and only CNS results that flanked limb samples are shown (see original rows in Supplementary Figure 3). Negative was shown as for image clarity.
FIGURE 10. Axolotl GFAP antibody labeling (red), with DAPI labeled nuclei (blue). GFAP labeling showed bundles of radial ependymal fibers in sections of the intact juvenile (A) and adult (B) Axolotl spinal cord. Arrow in B indicates the bundle of tanycyte radial fibers extending dorsally. There was also cytoplasmic GFAP content at both stages. In the stump region at 3 weeks of regeneration, GFAP was reduced in the radial processes (C) and was at low levels in the regenerative outgrowth (D). Arrows indicate location of the denticulate ligaments associated with meninges surrounding the regenerative outgrowth (D). The bright red spots are red blood cell autofluorescence. Fluorescence microscope images.
FIGURE 11. Xenopus and Axolotl cell proliferation; PCNA antibody (red) and DAPI nuclear stain (blue) are used throughout. (A) PCNA staining in NF 50 spinal cord. The ependymal layer cells are PCNA-positive. The PCNA labeled region coincides with the region of Msi-1-positive cells shown in Figure 7A. (B) NF 62 spinal cord with PCNA antibody and DAPI staining. Some cells in the ependymal layer are still proliferating, but in a reduced area around the central canal. (C) Parasagittal section shows regenerative outgrowth 7-days (7D) post-transection regenerating NF 50 tadpole spinal cord. The zone of outgrowth and lesion site is indicated within the dashed line. The entire ependymal population contains proliferating cells. (D) Intact juvenile Axolotl (â¼12 cm; less than 6 months old) spinal cord cross section shows extensive ependymal and gray matter PCNA labeling. There is a substantial dorsal extension of labeled ependymal cells. (E) Intact adult Axolotl (â¼25 cm; approximately 2â3 years old) spinal cord cross section shows strong, but reduced PCNA labeling in the ependymal zone. The dorsal plume of PCNA-labeled cells no longer exists and labeling is reduced in the gray matter laterally. (F) Parasagittal section showing PCNA-positive cells in mesenchymal ependymal outgrowth. (Supplementary Figure 8 shows DIC image of the section with the outgrowth and stump region labeling for orientation.) Fluorescence microscope images.
FIGURE 12. Xenopus, Axolotl cell culture in EGF-containing culture medium (+EGF). (AâC) Phase contrast images. (A) Control NF 50 Xenopus ependymal cells in +EGF, 1 day (1D) 6 to 8 large patches of cells adhere to each dish. (B) NF 64 cultures: small, islands of cells, 4â6/dish, exhibit poor attachment and growth even at 8 days (8D) in culture. (C) Control adult Axolotl 2 weeks regenerating ependymal outgrowth explants in EGF at 3 days (3D) culture, patches of cells continue to expand in culture. (D,E) Fluorescent-Phalloidin probes are used to show the organization of F-actin in Xenopus and Axolotl +EGF cultures. (D) Alexa fluor 488-Phalloidin green fluorescence in a +EGF Xenopus ependymal culture shows typical mesenchymal cell F-actin organization, parallel to the long axis. (E) Rhodamine-Phalloidin red fluorescence in a +EGF Axolotl culture shows cell F-actin organization typical of mesenchymal outgrowth. DAPI nuclear stain used in âD,Eâ (blue). (D,E) Fluorescence microscope images.
FIGURE 13. Xenopus and Axolotl Msi-1, proliferation in vitro. (A) NF 50 Xenopus dish in situ hybridization with Msi-1 riboprobe shows Msi-1 expression is maintained in culture. Bright field image (B) Axolotl anti-Msi-1 antibody localization in 2 weeks regenerating mesenchymal ependymal outgrowth. Msi-1 expression is maintained in culture. (C) Labeling with PCNA antibody showed NF 50 Xenopus ependymal cells are proliferative in culture. (D) Labeling with PCNA antibody showed 2 weeks regenerating adult Axolotl mesenchymal ependymal outgrowth is proliferative. (BâD) Fluorescence microscope images. All of the cultures are in EGF-containing medium.
Amamoto,
Adult axolotls can regenerate original neuronal diversity in response to brain injury.
2016, Pubmed
Amamoto,
Adult axolotls can regenerate original neuronal diversity in response to brain injury.
2016,
Pubmed
Androutsellis-Theotokis,
Notch signalling regulates stem cell numbers in vitro and in vivo.
2006,
Pubmed
Barnabé-Heider,
Origin of new glial cells in intact and injured adult spinal cord.
2010,
Pubmed
Barrandon,
Cell migration is essential for sustained growth of keratinocyte colonies: the roles of transforming growth factor-alpha and epidermal growth factor.
1987,
Pubmed
Battelli,
The RNA-binding protein Musashi-1 regulates neural development through the translational repression of p21WAF-1.
2006,
Pubmed
Beattie,
Metamorphosis alters the response to spinal cord transection in Xenopus laevis frogs.
1990,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Beck,
Molecular pathways needed for regeneration of spinal cord and muscle in a vertebrate.
2003,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Becker,
Neuronal regeneration from ependymo-radial glial cells: cook, little pot, cook!
2015,
Pubmed
Bodega,
Ependyma: phylogenetic evolution of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) and vimentin expression in vertebrate spinal cord.
1994,
Pubmed
Butler,
Reconstitution of the spinal cord following ablation in urodele larvae.
1965,
Pubmed
Butler,
Reconstitution of the spinal cord after ablation in adult Triturus.
1967,
Pubmed
Chernoff,
An ependymal cell culture system for the study of spinal cord regeneration.
1998,
Pubmed
Chernoff,
Primary culture of axolotl spinal cord ependymal cells.
1990,
Pubmed
Chernoff,
Urodele spinal cord regeneration and related processes.
2003,
Pubmed
Chernoff,
Matrix metalloproteinase production in regenerating axolotl spinal cord.
2000,
Pubmed
Chernoff,
Spinal cord regeneration: a phenomenon unique to urodeles?
1996,
Pubmed
Chernoff,
Spinal cord regeneration: intrinsic properties and emerging mechanisms.
2002,
Pubmed
Clarke,
Stage-dependent restoration of sensory dorsal columns following spinal cord transection in anuran tadpoles.
1986,
Pubmed
Davis,
Bulbospinal and intraspinal connections in normal and regenerated salamander spinal cord.
1989,
Pubmed
DENT,
Limb regeneration in larvae and metamorphosing individuals of the South African clawed toad.
1962,
Pubmed
DETWILER,
Restitution of the brachial region of the cord following unilateral excision in the embryo.
1947,
Pubmed
Diaz Quiroz,
Spinal cord regeneration: where fish, frogs and salamanders lead the way, can we follow?
2013,
Pubmed
Egar,
The role of ependyma in spinal cord regeneration in the urodele, Triturus.
1972,
Pubmed
Ehm,
RBPJkappa-dependent signaling is essential for long-term maintenance of neural stem cells in the adult hippocampus.
2010,
Pubmed
Faigle,
Signaling mechanisms regulating adult neural stem cells and neurogenesis.
2013,
Pubmed
Fei,
CRISPR-mediated genomic deletion of Sox2 in the axolotl shows a requirement in spinal cord neural stem cell amplification during tail regeneration.
2014,
Pubmed
Ferre,
Quantitative or semi-quantitative PCR: reality versus myth.
1992,
Pubmed
Ferretti,
Changes in spinal cord regenerative ability through phylogenesis and development: lessons to be learnt.
2003,
Pubmed
Forehand,
Anatomical and behavioral recovery from the effects of spinal cord transection: dependence on metamorphosis in anuran larvae.
1982,
Pubmed
Friedl,
Collective cell migration in morphogenesis, regeneration and cancer.
2009,
Pubmed
Gaete,
Spinal cord regeneration in Xenopus tadpoles proceeds through activation of Sox2-positive cells.
2012,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Gargioli,
Cell lineage tracing during Xenopus tail regeneration.
2004,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Gervasi,
Xenopus laevis peripherin (XIF3) is expressed in radial glia and proliferating neural epithelial cells as well as in neurons.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Good,
The human Musashi homolog 1 (MSI1) gene encoding the homologue of Musashi/Nrp-1, a neural RNA-binding protein putatively expressed in CNS stem cells and neural progenitor cells.
1998,
Pubmed
Good,
Three new members of the RNP protein family in Xenopus.
1993,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Henikoff,
Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks.
1992,
Pubmed
Horisawa,
The Musashi family RNA-binding proteins in stem cells.
2010,
Pubmed
Horky,
Fate of endogenous stem/progenitor cells following spinal cord injury.
2006,
Pubmed
Imai,
The neural RNA-binding protein Musashi1 translationally regulates mammalian numb gene expression by interacting with its mRNA.
2001,
Pubmed
Jiménez,
Structure and function of the ependymal barrier and diseases associated with ependyma disruption.
2014,
Pubmed
Kalluri,
The basics of epithelial-mesenchymal transition.
2009,
Pubmed
Kaneko,
Musashi1: an evolutionally conserved marker for CNS progenitor cells including neural stem cells.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Katz,
Musashi proteins are post-transcriptional regulators of the epithelial-luminal cell state.
2014,
Pubmed
Keinath,
Initial characterization of the large genome of the salamander Ambystoma mexicanum using shotgun and laser capture chromosome sequencing.
2015,
Pubmed
Kojima,
Intrathecal administration of epidermal growth factor and fibroblast growth factor 2 promotes ependymal proliferation and functional recovery after spinal cord injury in adult rats.
2002,
Pubmed
Lacroix,
Central canal ependymal cells proliferate extensively in response to traumatic spinal cord injury but not demyelinating lesions.
2014,
Pubmed
Lee-Liu,
Spinal cord regeneration: lessons for mammals from non-mammalian vertebrates.
2013,
Pubmed
Li,
Regenerative Potential of Ependymal Cells for Spinal Cord Injuries Over Time.
2016,
Pubmed
Maier,
Notochord is essential for oligodendrocyte development in Xenopus spinal cord.
1997,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Makanae,
Cooperative inputs of Bmp and Fgf signaling induce tail regeneration in urodele amphibians.
2016,
Pubmed
Martinez-De Luna,
Müller glia reactivity follows retinal injury despite the absence of the glial fibrillary acidic protein gene in Xenopus.
2017,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
McHedlishvili,
A clonal analysis of neural progenitors during axolotl spinal cord regeneration reveals evidence for both spatially restricted and multipotent progenitors.
2007,
Pubmed
Meletis,
Spinal cord injury reveals multilineage differentiation of ependymal cells.
2008,
Pubmed
Mitashov,
[Cellular proliferative potentials of the pigment and ciliated epithelium of the eye in clawed toads normally and during regeneration].
1982,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Monaghan,
Early gene expression during natural spinal cord regeneration in the salamander Ambystoma mexicanum.
2007,
Pubmed
Moore,
The Spinal Ependymal Layer in Health and Disease.
2016,
Pubmed
Mothe,
Proliferation, migration, and differentiation of endogenous ependymal region stem/progenitor cells following minimal spinal cord injury in the adult rat.
2005,
Pubmed
Muñoz,
Regeneration of Xenopus laevis spinal cord requires Sox2/3 expressing cells.
2015,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Nakamura,
Musashi, a neural RNA-binding protein required for Drosophila adult external sensory organ development.
1994,
Pubmed
Nowoshilow,
The axolotl genome and the evolution of key tissue formation regulators.
2018,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
O'Hara,
Reorganization of the ependyma during axolotl spinal cord regeneration: changes in intermediate filament and fibronectin expression.
1992,
Pubmed
O'Hara,
Growth factor modulation of injury-reactive ependymal cell proliferation and migration.
1994,
Pubmed
Panayiotou,
Adult spinal cord ependymal layer: a promising pool of quiescent stem cells to treat spinal cord injury.
2013,
Pubmed
Park,
Caveolin-1 plays important role in EGF-induced migration and proliferation of mouse embryonic stem cells: involvement of PI3K/Akt and ERK.
2009,
Pubmed
Ratti,
A role for the ELAV RNA-binding proteins in neural stem cells: stabilization of Msi1 mRNA.
2006,
Pubmed
Ren,
Ependymal cell contribution to scar formation after spinal cord injury is minimal, local and dependent on direct ependymal injury.
2017,
Pubmed
Richter,
A developmentally regulated, nervous system-specific gene in Xenopus encodes a putative RNA-binding protein.
1990,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Roberts,
Early functional organization of spinal neurons in developing lower vertebrates.
2000,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Rost,
Accelerated cell divisions drive the outgrowth of the regenerating spinal cord in axolotls.
2016,
Pubmed
Sakakibara,
Mouse-Musashi-1, a neural RNA-binding protein highly enriched in the mammalian CNS stem cell.
1996,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Sakakibara,
Rna-binding protein Musashi2: developmentally regulated expression in neural precursor cells and subpopulations of neurons in mammalian CNS.
2001,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Sato,
Chicken keratin-19: cloning of cDNA and analysis of expression in the chicken embryonic gut.
1997,
Pubmed
Savagner,
Leaving the neighborhood: molecular mechanisms involved during epithelial-mesenchymal transition.
2001,
Pubmed
Schnapp,
Hedgehog signaling controls dorsoventral patterning, blastema cell proliferation and cartilage induction during axolotl tail regeneration.
2005,
Pubmed
Smith,
Sal-Site: integrating new and existing ambystomatid salamander research and informational resources.
2005,
Pubmed
Tanaka,
Considering the evolution of regeneration in the central nervous system.
2009,
Pubmed
Tazaki,
Salamander spinal cord regeneration: The ultimate positive control in vertebrate spinal cord regeneration.
2017,
Pubmed
Veldhoen,
Distinctive gene profiles occur at key points during natural metamorphosis in the Xenopus laevis tadpole tail.
2002,
Pubmed
,
Xenbase
Walder,
Up-regulation of neural stem cell markers suggests the occurrence of dedifferentiation in regenerating spinal cord.
2003,
Pubmed
Wells,
Shaping up for shipping out: PLCgamma signaling of morphology changes in EGF-stimulated fibroblast migration.
1999,
Pubmed
Wilson,
The mechanisms of dorsoventral patterning in the vertebrate neural tube.
2005,
Pubmed
Zhang,
FGF-2 Up-regulation and proliferation of neural progenitors in the regenerating amphibian spinal cord in vivo.
2000,
Pubmed
Zukor,
Meningeal cells and glia establish a permissive environment for axon regeneration after spinal cord injury in newts.
2011,
Pubmed